Skip to main content

How durable is the most durable material that can exist in our universe?




























How durable is the most durable material that can exist in our universe?















Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?












Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense












Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online









Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.












Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online









Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.














Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online









Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.












Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online









Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online









Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density












Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.












Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.












Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha












Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.












Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!












Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.












Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online







Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read


















































































Wiki



  • Characters

  • Creators

  • Teams

  • Volumes

  • Issues

  • Publishers

  • Locations

  • Concepts

  • Things

  • Story Arcs

  • Movies

  • Series

  • Episodes




  • Characters

  • Creators

  • Teams

  • Volumes

  • Issues

  • Publishers

  • Locations

  • Concepts

  • Things

  • Story Arcs

  • Movies

  • Series

  • Episodes



New Comics



Forums



  • Gen. Discussion

  • Bug Reporting

  • Delete/Combine Pages

  • Artist Show-Off

  • Off-Topic

  • Contests

  • Battles

  • Fan-Fic

  • RPG

  • Comic Book Preview

  • API Developers

  • Editing & Tools

  • Podcast

  • Quests




  • Gen. Discussion

  • Bug Reporting

  • Delete/Combine Pages

  • Artist Show-Off

  • Off-Topic

  • Contests

  • Battles

  • Fan-Fic

  • RPG

  • Comic Book Preview

  • API Developers

  • Editing & Tools

  • Podcast

  • Quests




Community


  • Top Users

  • Activity Feed

  • User Lists

  • Community Promos



  • Top Users

  • Activity Feed

  • User Lists

  • Community Promos




Archives


  • News

  • Reviews

  • Videos

  • Podcasts

  • Previews



  • News

  • Reviews

  • Videos

  • Podcasts

  • Previews
























How durable is the most durable material that can exist in our universe?















Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?












Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense












Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online









Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.












Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online









Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.














Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online









Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.












Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online









Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online









Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density












Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.












Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.












Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha












Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.












Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!












Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.












Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online







Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read







































How durable is the most durable material that can exist in our universe?















Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?












Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense












Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online









Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.












Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online









Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.














Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online









Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.












Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online









Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online









Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density












Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.












Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.












Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha












Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.












Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!












Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.












Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online







Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read




































Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?












Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense












Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online









Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.












Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online









Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.














Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online









Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.












Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online









Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online









Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density












Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.












Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.












Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha












Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.












Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!












Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.












Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online







Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read




























Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?












Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense












Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online









Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.












Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online









Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.














Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online









Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.












Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online









Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online









Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density












Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.












Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.












Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha












Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.












Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!












Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.












Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online







Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read


























Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?












Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense












Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online









Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.












Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online









Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.














Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online









Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.












Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online









Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online









Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density












Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.












Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.












Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha












Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.












Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!












Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.












Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online







Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read























Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?












Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense












Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online









Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.












Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online









Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.














Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online









Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.












Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online









Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online









Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density












Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.












Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.












Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha












Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.












Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!












Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.












Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online







Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read












Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?








Avatar image for hulkuberstomp






#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?








#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio


What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?







#1
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 14 days, 2 hours ago
- Show Bio




What is a theoretical limit of material's durability in our universe? For example Adamantium,is it physically possible for it to exist?









Avatar image for giliad_



#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense








Avatar image for giliad_






#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense








#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio


I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense







#2
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 14 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio




I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense









Avatar image for spareheadone



#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online





Avatar image for spareheadone






#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online





#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


The thing inside a black hole



Online




#3
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




The thing inside a black hole





Online




Avatar image for plotweapon16255



#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.









Avatar image for plotweapon16255






#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.









#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.








#4
Edited by
plotweapon16255
(5005 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio






@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.





@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole




The thing inside a black hole













Avatar image for mimisalome



#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.








Avatar image for mimisalome






#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.








#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.







#5
Edited by
mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




Material conformation exist base on its equilibrium with their local environment and "durability" is a very loose term that could be applied to various physical properties (resistance from permanent physical deformation, flexibility/elasticity, resistance to chemical reaction, resistance to temperature changes).



In the most practical sense, strength of material is a function of electron proton bonding/charge bonding between atoms and molecules.


And stronger bonds could be attributed to the strength of the bonds, the number of bonds, and the topographical orientation of the bonds in the lattice.









Avatar image for lan_fan



#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online





Avatar image for lan_fan






#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online





#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very durable.



Online




#6
Posted by

Lan_Fan
(6248 posts)
- 13 days, 23 hours ago
- Show Bio




Very durable.





Online




Avatar image for mimisalome



#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.










Avatar image for mimisalome






#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.










#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio





@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.









#7
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 22 hours ago
- Show Bio







@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.



So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,



but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process




However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.







@plotweapon16255 said:



@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.






@plotweapon16255 said:




@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.





@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole




The thing inside a black hole









Avatar image for spareheadone



#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online





Avatar image for spareheadone






#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online





#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



Online




#8
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 20 hours ago
- Show Bio




The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.





Online




Avatar image for heroup2112



#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.








Avatar image for heroup2112






#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.








#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.







#9
Posted by

HeroUp2112
(16927 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio







@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.



lol Entirely too true. Especially since the drool of small children is universally known to secret a destructive enzyme that can break down the molecular structure of ANYTHING over time.





@spareheadone said:

The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.





@spareheadone said:


The material used to create a child's doll or teddy. Those things seem to survive catastrophic events of every kind; eliciting pathos in every aftermath.









Avatar image for spareheadone



#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online





Avatar image for spareheadone






#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online





#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.



Online




#10
Posted by

SpareHeadOne
(3794 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio




@heroup2112:


A weapon that Baby Face could utilise more often.





Online




Avatar image for jagernutt



#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online





Avatar image for jagernutt






#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online





#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio


Me



Online




#11
Posted by

jagernutt
(13223 posts)
- 13 days, 16 hours ago
- Show Bio




Me





Online




Avatar image for hulkuberstomp



#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density








Avatar image for hulkuberstomp






#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density








#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density







#12
Posted by

hulkuberstomp
(1791 posts)
- 13 days, 15 hours ago
- Show Bio




@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density









Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime



#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.








Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime






#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.








#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio


Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.







#13
Posted by

DarkPsychicLord_Prime
(2744 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio




Whatever the hell the Nokia 3310 is made from.









Avatar image for mimisalome



#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.








Avatar image for mimisalome






#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.








#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.







#14
Posted by

mimisalome
(4736 posts)
- 13 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio







@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density



Not in our current level of scientific understanding.


I can't tell if it's actually feasible, but we have some really weird scientific concepts in Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics.


Would it be possible for us to engineer new types of particles, and as a consequence create new kinds of highly improbable elements, and materials?


only time will tell.





@hulkuberstomp said:

@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density





@hulkuberstomp said:


@mimisalome: and how realistic is adamantium?Is it possible for it to exist?I mean a material with immense durability and low density









Avatar image for giliad_



#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha








Avatar image for giliad_






#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha








#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha







#15
Posted by

GIliad_
(6477 posts)
- 13 days, 6 hours ago
- Show Bio







@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.




Oh god, I've done me lifesworth of physics already haha f*** strong/weak an whatever else interaction an just let me have me moment haha





@mimisalome said:



@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.






@mimisalome said:




@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.




While this is most definitely true if you consider durability in the more traditional terms of EM forces.


Removing a single piece of the neutron star from the entire structure would require tremendous amount of energy (for black holes that would be infinite amount of energy).


Basically you'll be substituting the force of gravity as the dominant force that binds the entire material together.


So its kinda true that they are one of the strongest most durable material in existence (in theory) if you consider them as an entire structure,


but if you decide to make a key out of a piece of a black hole/neutron star and somehow manage to bring it to earth instantaneous, the local condition on the earth surface would make the black hole/neutron key vaporize releasing a huge amount of energy in the process


However if 2nd law of thermodynamics (Entropy law) and Hawking Radiation theory are correct (and if dark energy is actually real), it would suggest that even these structures are not permanent.





@plotweapon16255 said:


@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.







@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole



Lol,definitely not.


they most unstable material in the universe.


their atomic force itself will rip itself apart if they taken out of it's gravity.





@giliad_ said:

I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




I'm gonna guess like a neutron star is durable af because it's so dense




@spareheadone said:

The thing inside a black hole




The thing inside a black hole









Avatar image for anna_karenina



#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.








Avatar image for anna_karenina






#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.








#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.







#16
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 13 days, 5 hours ago
- Show Bio




It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.









Avatar image for crash_



#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online





Avatar image for crash_






#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online





#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd



Online




#17
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 11 days, 43 minutes ago
- Show Bio







@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.



Kachi Katchin. he he xd





@anna_karenina said:

It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.





@anna_karenina said:


It is durable enough to break the legendary Zeta Sword.





Online




Avatar image for anna_karenina



#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!








Avatar image for anna_karenina






#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!








#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: Precisely!







#18
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@crash_: Precisely!









Avatar image for crash_



#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online





Avatar image for crash_






#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online





#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP



Online




#19
Posted by

crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio







@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!



Do I get a cookie now? xP





@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: Precisely!





@anna_karenina said:


@crash_: Precisely!





Online




Avatar image for anna_karenina



#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.








Avatar image for anna_karenina






#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.








#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.







#20
Posted by

Anna_Karenina
(4275 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.









Avatar image for crash_



#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online





Avatar image for crash_






#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online





#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋



Online




#21
Edited by
crash_
(10365 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio






@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.




😋




@anna_karenina said:

@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.






@crash_: 🍪 ☕


Here you are.






Online




Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online





Avatar image for xmangog__beastx






#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online





#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio


Very.



Online




#22
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(985 posts)
- 10 days, 12 hours ago
- Show Bio




Very.





Online




Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read










Don't post to forums
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Moderator Hangout
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Spam Museum(Or search for a more specific forum)



(Bring back the main forum list)













Forums



Main boards



  • Gen. Discussion


  • Bug Reporting


  • Delete/Combine Pages


  • Artist Show-Off


  • Off-Topic


  • Contests


  • Battles


  • Fan-Fic


  • RPG


  • Comic Book Preview


  • API Developers


  • Editing & Tools


  • Podcast


  • Quests

Popular wiki boards


  • X-Men

  • Dragon Ball Universe

  • Spider-Man

  • Wonder Woman

  • Batman

  • Storm

  • Superman

  • Hulk

  • Star Wars Universe

  • Thor





Top posters






  • Rouflex
    31884 posts





  • PowerHerc
    27706 posts





  • Dragonborn_CT
    24994 posts





  • Pharoh_Atem
    24407 posts





  • King Saturn
    23257 posts





  • Xwraith
    20457 posts





  • Straight-Fire
    20326 posts





  • Deadite
    19243 posts





  • Wolverine008
    18486 posts





  • MonsterStomp
    16043 posts


































































Popular posts from this blog

How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

Syphilis

Darth Vader #20