Missing test case for linked list










0














I am writing a function to delete a give number from a linked list in codefights. I am passing 6 out of 7 test cases, however, the 7th is hidden so I am not able to see what it is I am doing wrong. Can anyone see what test case I am missing with this function?



// Definition for singly-linked list:
// template<typename T>
// struct ListNode
// ListNode(const T &v) : value(v), next(nullptr)
// T value;
// ListNode *next;
// ;
#include <stdio.h>
ListNode<int> * removeKFromList(ListNode<int> * l, int k)
ListNode<int> *cur = l;
ListNode<int> *temp = l;
while (cur != NULL)
if (cur->value == k)
if (cur == l)
ListNode<int> *del;
del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
l = l->next;
temp = temp->next;
delete del;
else
ListNode<int> *del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
temp->next = cur;
delete del;

else
temp = cur;
cur = cur->next;


return l;











share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Which programming language is this? Please tag your question appropriately. [c]?
    – user202729
    Nov 11 at 11:17






  • 1




    Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:29










  • I don't know what you're doing wrong, but this code is overly complicated. It could be reduced to auto pp = &l; while (*pp) if ((*pp)->value == k) auto tmp = *pp; *pp = (*pp)->next; delete tmp; else pp = &(*pp)->next; return l;.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:40










  • Code seems alright to me. Only issue I think is whether multiple deletes are needed in single query or not. If not then you are simply wasting the time iterating over the whole linked list
    – Brij Raj Kishore
    Nov 11 at 14:14















0














I am writing a function to delete a give number from a linked list in codefights. I am passing 6 out of 7 test cases, however, the 7th is hidden so I am not able to see what it is I am doing wrong. Can anyone see what test case I am missing with this function?



// Definition for singly-linked list:
// template<typename T>
// struct ListNode
// ListNode(const T &v) : value(v), next(nullptr)
// T value;
// ListNode *next;
// ;
#include <stdio.h>
ListNode<int> * removeKFromList(ListNode<int> * l, int k)
ListNode<int> *cur = l;
ListNode<int> *temp = l;
while (cur != NULL)
if (cur->value == k)
if (cur == l)
ListNode<int> *del;
del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
l = l->next;
temp = temp->next;
delete del;
else
ListNode<int> *del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
temp->next = cur;
delete del;

else
temp = cur;
cur = cur->next;


return l;











share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Which programming language is this? Please tag your question appropriately. [c]?
    – user202729
    Nov 11 at 11:17






  • 1




    Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:29










  • I don't know what you're doing wrong, but this code is overly complicated. It could be reduced to auto pp = &l; while (*pp) if ((*pp)->value == k) auto tmp = *pp; *pp = (*pp)->next; delete tmp; else pp = &(*pp)->next; return l;.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:40










  • Code seems alright to me. Only issue I think is whether multiple deletes are needed in single query or not. If not then you are simply wasting the time iterating over the whole linked list
    – Brij Raj Kishore
    Nov 11 at 14:14













0












0








0







I am writing a function to delete a give number from a linked list in codefights. I am passing 6 out of 7 test cases, however, the 7th is hidden so I am not able to see what it is I am doing wrong. Can anyone see what test case I am missing with this function?



// Definition for singly-linked list:
// template<typename T>
// struct ListNode
// ListNode(const T &v) : value(v), next(nullptr)
// T value;
// ListNode *next;
// ;
#include <stdio.h>
ListNode<int> * removeKFromList(ListNode<int> * l, int k)
ListNode<int> *cur = l;
ListNode<int> *temp = l;
while (cur != NULL)
if (cur->value == k)
if (cur == l)
ListNode<int> *del;
del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
l = l->next;
temp = temp->next;
delete del;
else
ListNode<int> *del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
temp->next = cur;
delete del;

else
temp = cur;
cur = cur->next;


return l;











share|improve this question















I am writing a function to delete a give number from a linked list in codefights. I am passing 6 out of 7 test cases, however, the 7th is hidden so I am not able to see what it is I am doing wrong. Can anyone see what test case I am missing with this function?



// Definition for singly-linked list:
// template<typename T>
// struct ListNode
// ListNode(const T &v) : value(v), next(nullptr)
// T value;
// ListNode *next;
// ;
#include <stdio.h>
ListNode<int> * removeKFromList(ListNode<int> * l, int k)
ListNode<int> *cur = l;
ListNode<int> *temp = l;
while (cur != NULL)
if (cur->value == k)
if (cur == l)
ListNode<int> *del;
del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
l = l->next;
temp = temp->next;
delete del;
else
ListNode<int> *del = cur;
cur = cur->next;
temp->next = cur;
delete del;

else
temp = cur;
cur = cur->next;


return l;








c++ linked-list






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 11 at 13:22









AS Mackay

1,8654816




1,8654816










asked Nov 11 at 11:12









David Hafen

1




1







  • 2




    Which programming language is this? Please tag your question appropriately. [c]?
    – user202729
    Nov 11 at 11:17






  • 1




    Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:29










  • I don't know what you're doing wrong, but this code is overly complicated. It could be reduced to auto pp = &l; while (*pp) if ((*pp)->value == k) auto tmp = *pp; *pp = (*pp)->next; delete tmp; else pp = &(*pp)->next; return l;.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:40










  • Code seems alright to me. Only issue I think is whether multiple deletes are needed in single query or not. If not then you are simply wasting the time iterating over the whole linked list
    – Brij Raj Kishore
    Nov 11 at 14:14












  • 2




    Which programming language is this? Please tag your question appropriately. [c]?
    – user202729
    Nov 11 at 11:17






  • 1




    Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:29










  • I don't know what you're doing wrong, but this code is overly complicated. It could be reduced to auto pp = &l; while (*pp) if ((*pp)->value == k) auto tmp = *pp; *pp = (*pp)->next; delete tmp; else pp = &(*pp)->next; return l;.
    – melpomene
    Nov 11 at 13:40










  • Code seems alright to me. Only issue I think is whether multiple deletes are needed in single query or not. If not then you are simply wasting the time iterating over the whole linked list
    – Brij Raj Kishore
    Nov 11 at 14:14







2




2




Which programming language is this? Please tag your question appropriately. [c]?
– user202729
Nov 11 at 11:17




Which programming language is this? Please tag your question appropriately. [c]?
– user202729
Nov 11 at 11:17




1




1




Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.
– melpomene
Nov 11 at 13:29




Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.
– melpomene
Nov 11 at 13:29












I don't know what you're doing wrong, but this code is overly complicated. It could be reduced to auto pp = &l; while (*pp) if ((*pp)->value == k) auto tmp = *pp; *pp = (*pp)->next; delete tmp; else pp = &(*pp)->next; return l;.
– melpomene
Nov 11 at 13:40




I don't know what you're doing wrong, but this code is overly complicated. It could be reduced to auto pp = &l; while (*pp) if ((*pp)->value == k) auto tmp = *pp; *pp = (*pp)->next; delete tmp; else pp = &(*pp)->next; return l;.
– melpomene
Nov 11 at 13:40












Code seems alright to me. Only issue I think is whether multiple deletes are needed in single query or not. If not then you are simply wasting the time iterating over the whole linked list
– Brij Raj Kishore
Nov 11 at 14:14




Code seems alright to me. Only issue I think is whether multiple deletes are needed in single query or not. If not then you are simply wasting the time iterating over the whole linked list
– Brij Raj Kishore
Nov 11 at 14:14

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248140%2fmissing-test-case-for-linked-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248140%2fmissing-test-case-for-linked-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

Syphilis

Darth Vader #20