accessing values inside an inner method through setters and getters in java










0














This seems like an easy problem, yet I am limited by my knowledge in java.



Consider the following code:



public void method1()
Object1 obj = new Object1()
@Override
public void innerMethod(Object response)
setList(response.list);
// Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

;
obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



From what I understand about the execution at runtime, the list should be populated once method1 is run since innerMethod is the first one written.



Please help me understand why the second accessing of getList() returns null and how else can I access the data from innerMethod.



Note as well that I'm using getList() in another class, and there as well it returns null.



EDIT:
Below is the full code for above scenario.



public void callMusicAPI()
Callback<SongList> callback = new Callback<SongListResponse>()
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<SongListResponse> call, Response<SongListResponse> response)
setSongListResult(response.body().getResults());
Log.d(TAG, "Number of Songs received: " + Songs.size()); // This works.

Log.d(TAG, "Actual Response from API Call: " + response.raw() + "" + success + " " + getSongListResult().get(1).getTitle()+getSongListResult().get(1).getRelease_date() ); //This works.


@Override
public void onFailure(Call<SongListResponse> call, Throwable throwable)
Log.e(TAG, throwable.toString());

;
call.enqueue(callback);
if(call.isExecuted())
if (getSongListResult() != null)
Log.d(TAG, "Data received in setter and getter: " + getSongListResult().get(2).getTitle() + getSongListResult().get(2).getRelease_date());
else
Log.e(TAG, "List is super null");






public void setSongListResult(List<Song> songs)
this.songs = songs;


public List<Song> getSongListResult()
return this.songs;



I expect after call.enqueue(callback) the list would be populated however, this is not the case.



Feel free to note if this is a java problem and the setter-getter would work fine on most scenarios, or if this is specific to the response from the api call. If, so do recommend if the question needs to be changed.










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Could you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example? It would make it much easier to work out exactly what's going on.
    – Jon Skeet
    Nov 11 at 17:31










  • It would be easier if you'd post more code. E.g. the getList() method.
    – Ridcully
    Nov 11 at 17:32










  • this seems more of understanding Java's execution at runtime, doesn't the above suffice it?the getList is just a return statement of the List<Objects>
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 17:44










  • @JonSkeet I've updated the question. Request to provide some insight for this. Much appreciated.
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 18:08










  • It remains unclear what the type of call may be, but the method name enqueue() certainly suggests that your expectation is incorrect. Normally, if you "enqueue" something, you are setting it up for action to be performed on it later, often an indeterminate amount of time in the future.
    – John Bollinger
    Nov 11 at 18:15















0














This seems like an easy problem, yet I am limited by my knowledge in java.



Consider the following code:



public void method1()
Object1 obj = new Object1()
@Override
public void innerMethod(Object response)
setList(response.list);
// Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

;
obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



From what I understand about the execution at runtime, the list should be populated once method1 is run since innerMethod is the first one written.



Please help me understand why the second accessing of getList() returns null and how else can I access the data from innerMethod.



Note as well that I'm using getList() in another class, and there as well it returns null.



EDIT:
Below is the full code for above scenario.



public void callMusicAPI()
Callback<SongList> callback = new Callback<SongListResponse>()
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<SongListResponse> call, Response<SongListResponse> response)
setSongListResult(response.body().getResults());
Log.d(TAG, "Number of Songs received: " + Songs.size()); // This works.

Log.d(TAG, "Actual Response from API Call: " + response.raw() + "" + success + " " + getSongListResult().get(1).getTitle()+getSongListResult().get(1).getRelease_date() ); //This works.


@Override
public void onFailure(Call<SongListResponse> call, Throwable throwable)
Log.e(TAG, throwable.toString());

;
call.enqueue(callback);
if(call.isExecuted())
if (getSongListResult() != null)
Log.d(TAG, "Data received in setter and getter: " + getSongListResult().get(2).getTitle() + getSongListResult().get(2).getRelease_date());
else
Log.e(TAG, "List is super null");






public void setSongListResult(List<Song> songs)
this.songs = songs;


public List<Song> getSongListResult()
return this.songs;



I expect after call.enqueue(callback) the list would be populated however, this is not the case.



Feel free to note if this is a java problem and the setter-getter would work fine on most scenarios, or if this is specific to the response from the api call. If, so do recommend if the question needs to be changed.










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Could you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example? It would make it much easier to work out exactly what's going on.
    – Jon Skeet
    Nov 11 at 17:31










  • It would be easier if you'd post more code. E.g. the getList() method.
    – Ridcully
    Nov 11 at 17:32










  • this seems more of understanding Java's execution at runtime, doesn't the above suffice it?the getList is just a return statement of the List<Objects>
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 17:44










  • @JonSkeet I've updated the question. Request to provide some insight for this. Much appreciated.
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 18:08










  • It remains unclear what the type of call may be, but the method name enqueue() certainly suggests that your expectation is incorrect. Normally, if you "enqueue" something, you are setting it up for action to be performed on it later, often an indeterminate amount of time in the future.
    – John Bollinger
    Nov 11 at 18:15













0












0








0







This seems like an easy problem, yet I am limited by my knowledge in java.



Consider the following code:



public void method1()
Object1 obj = new Object1()
@Override
public void innerMethod(Object response)
setList(response.list);
// Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

;
obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



From what I understand about the execution at runtime, the list should be populated once method1 is run since innerMethod is the first one written.



Please help me understand why the second accessing of getList() returns null and how else can I access the data from innerMethod.



Note as well that I'm using getList() in another class, and there as well it returns null.



EDIT:
Below is the full code for above scenario.



public void callMusicAPI()
Callback<SongList> callback = new Callback<SongListResponse>()
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<SongListResponse> call, Response<SongListResponse> response)
setSongListResult(response.body().getResults());
Log.d(TAG, "Number of Songs received: " + Songs.size()); // This works.

Log.d(TAG, "Actual Response from API Call: " + response.raw() + "" + success + " " + getSongListResult().get(1).getTitle()+getSongListResult().get(1).getRelease_date() ); //This works.


@Override
public void onFailure(Call<SongListResponse> call, Throwable throwable)
Log.e(TAG, throwable.toString());

;
call.enqueue(callback);
if(call.isExecuted())
if (getSongListResult() != null)
Log.d(TAG, "Data received in setter and getter: " + getSongListResult().get(2).getTitle() + getSongListResult().get(2).getRelease_date());
else
Log.e(TAG, "List is super null");






public void setSongListResult(List<Song> songs)
this.songs = songs;


public List<Song> getSongListResult()
return this.songs;



I expect after call.enqueue(callback) the list would be populated however, this is not the case.



Feel free to note if this is a java problem and the setter-getter would work fine on most scenarios, or if this is specific to the response from the api call. If, so do recommend if the question needs to be changed.










share|improve this question















This seems like an easy problem, yet I am limited by my knowledge in java.



Consider the following code:



public void method1()
Object1 obj = new Object1()
@Override
public void innerMethod(Object response)
setList(response.list);
// Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

;
obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



From what I understand about the execution at runtime, the list should be populated once method1 is run since innerMethod is the first one written.



Please help me understand why the second accessing of getList() returns null and how else can I access the data from innerMethod.



Note as well that I'm using getList() in another class, and there as well it returns null.



EDIT:
Below is the full code for above scenario.



public void callMusicAPI()
Callback<SongList> callback = new Callback<SongListResponse>()
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<SongListResponse> call, Response<SongListResponse> response)
setSongListResult(response.body().getResults());
Log.d(TAG, "Number of Songs received: " + Songs.size()); // This works.

Log.d(TAG, "Actual Response from API Call: " + response.raw() + "" + success + " " + getSongListResult().get(1).getTitle()+getSongListResult().get(1).getRelease_date() ); //This works.


@Override
public void onFailure(Call<SongListResponse> call, Throwable throwable)
Log.e(TAG, throwable.toString());

;
call.enqueue(callback);
if(call.isExecuted())
if (getSongListResult() != null)
Log.d(TAG, "Data received in setter and getter: " + getSongListResult().get(2).getTitle() + getSongListResult().get(2).getRelease_date());
else
Log.e(TAG, "List is super null");






public void setSongListResult(List<Song> songs)
this.songs = songs;


public List<Song> getSongListResult()
return this.songs;



I expect after call.enqueue(callback) the list would be populated however, this is not the case.



Feel free to note if this is a java problem and the setter-getter would work fine on most scenarios, or if this is specific to the response from the api call. If, so do recommend if the question needs to be changed.







java






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 11 at 18:07

























asked Nov 11 at 17:27









BrainAmplifier1820

12




12







  • 2




    Could you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example? It would make it much easier to work out exactly what's going on.
    – Jon Skeet
    Nov 11 at 17:31










  • It would be easier if you'd post more code. E.g. the getList() method.
    – Ridcully
    Nov 11 at 17:32










  • this seems more of understanding Java's execution at runtime, doesn't the above suffice it?the getList is just a return statement of the List<Objects>
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 17:44










  • @JonSkeet I've updated the question. Request to provide some insight for this. Much appreciated.
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 18:08










  • It remains unclear what the type of call may be, but the method name enqueue() certainly suggests that your expectation is incorrect. Normally, if you "enqueue" something, you are setting it up for action to be performed on it later, often an indeterminate amount of time in the future.
    – John Bollinger
    Nov 11 at 18:15












  • 2




    Could you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example? It would make it much easier to work out exactly what's going on.
    – Jon Skeet
    Nov 11 at 17:31










  • It would be easier if you'd post more code. E.g. the getList() method.
    – Ridcully
    Nov 11 at 17:32










  • this seems more of understanding Java's execution at runtime, doesn't the above suffice it?the getList is just a return statement of the List<Objects>
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 17:44










  • @JonSkeet I've updated the question. Request to provide some insight for this. Much appreciated.
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 18:08










  • It remains unclear what the type of call may be, but the method name enqueue() certainly suggests that your expectation is incorrect. Normally, if you "enqueue" something, you are setting it up for action to be performed on it later, often an indeterminate amount of time in the future.
    – John Bollinger
    Nov 11 at 18:15







2




2




Could you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example? It would make it much easier to work out exactly what's going on.
– Jon Skeet
Nov 11 at 17:31




Could you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example? It would make it much easier to work out exactly what's going on.
– Jon Skeet
Nov 11 at 17:31












It would be easier if you'd post more code. E.g. the getList() method.
– Ridcully
Nov 11 at 17:32




It would be easier if you'd post more code. E.g. the getList() method.
– Ridcully
Nov 11 at 17:32












this seems more of understanding Java's execution at runtime, doesn't the above suffice it?the getList is just a return statement of the List<Objects>
– BrainAmplifier1820
Nov 11 at 17:44




this seems more of understanding Java's execution at runtime, doesn't the above suffice it?the getList is just a return statement of the List<Objects>
– BrainAmplifier1820
Nov 11 at 17:44












@JonSkeet I've updated the question. Request to provide some insight for this. Much appreciated.
– BrainAmplifier1820
Nov 11 at 18:08




@JonSkeet I've updated the question. Request to provide some insight for this. Much appreciated.
– BrainAmplifier1820
Nov 11 at 18:08












It remains unclear what the type of call may be, but the method name enqueue() certainly suggests that your expectation is incorrect. Normally, if you "enqueue" something, you are setting it up for action to be performed on it later, often an indeterminate amount of time in the future.
– John Bollinger
Nov 11 at 18:15




It remains unclear what the type of call may be, but the method name enqueue() certainly suggests that your expectation is incorrect. Normally, if you "enqueue" something, you are setting it up for action to be performed on it later, often an indeterminate amount of time in the future.
– John Bollinger
Nov 11 at 18:15












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Actually, I would much rather write a comment, but since I don't have enough reputation to do that, I'll write my input as an answer. I hope that I can be of help.



It looks to me as if there is a problem with scope. If you remove all code that is "out of reach" for the second getList() it looks like this



public void method1()
Object1 obj = new Object1()
obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



There seems to be nothing for getList() to get, so maybe that's the reason for your problem.






share|improve this answer




















  • Hi, I posted the full code for the scenario. It's important to capture the data inside the innerMethod as that's where it can only be accessed, which is why I thought of using setters and getters.
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 18:13


















0














public void method1()
Object1 obj = new Object1()
@Override
public void innerMethod(Object response)
setList(response.list);
// Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

;
obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
System.out.println(obj.getList().get(0).getName()); // <-- ***********



I think you're calling getList() from the wrong object. If you don't specify the object to call the method from it's assuming this.list(), in which case you're getting uninitialized data members.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53251317%2faccessing-values-inside-an-inner-method-through-setters-and-getters-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Actually, I would much rather write a comment, but since I don't have enough reputation to do that, I'll write my input as an answer. I hope that I can be of help.



    It looks to me as if there is a problem with scope. If you remove all code that is "out of reach" for the second getList() it looks like this



    public void method1()
    Object1 obj = new Object1()
    obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
    System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



    There seems to be nothing for getList() to get, so maybe that's the reason for your problem.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Hi, I posted the full code for the scenario. It's important to capture the data inside the innerMethod as that's where it can only be accessed, which is why I thought of using setters and getters.
      – BrainAmplifier1820
      Nov 11 at 18:13















    0














    Actually, I would much rather write a comment, but since I don't have enough reputation to do that, I'll write my input as an answer. I hope that I can be of help.



    It looks to me as if there is a problem with scope. If you remove all code that is "out of reach" for the second getList() it looks like this



    public void method1()
    Object1 obj = new Object1()
    obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
    System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



    There seems to be nothing for getList() to get, so maybe that's the reason for your problem.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Hi, I posted the full code for the scenario. It's important to capture the data inside the innerMethod as that's where it can only be accessed, which is why I thought of using setters and getters.
      – BrainAmplifier1820
      Nov 11 at 18:13













    0












    0








    0






    Actually, I would much rather write a comment, but since I don't have enough reputation to do that, I'll write my input as an answer. I hope that I can be of help.



    It looks to me as if there is a problem with scope. If you remove all code that is "out of reach" for the second getList() it looks like this



    public void method1()
    Object1 obj = new Object1()
    obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
    System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



    There seems to be nothing for getList() to get, so maybe that's the reason for your problem.






    share|improve this answer












    Actually, I would much rather write a comment, but since I don't have enough reputation to do that, I'll write my input as an answer. I hope that I can be of help.



    It looks to me as if there is a problem with scope. If you remove all code that is "out of reach" for the second getList() it looks like this



    public void method1()
    Object1 obj = new Object1()
    obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
    System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This returns null for the getList().



    There seems to be nothing for getList() to get, so maybe that's the reason for your problem.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 11 at 18:03









    OingoBoingo

    158




    158











    • Hi, I posted the full code for the scenario. It's important to capture the data inside the innerMethod as that's where it can only be accessed, which is why I thought of using setters and getters.
      – BrainAmplifier1820
      Nov 11 at 18:13
















    • Hi, I posted the full code for the scenario. It's important to capture the data inside the innerMethod as that's where it can only be accessed, which is why I thought of using setters and getters.
      – BrainAmplifier1820
      Nov 11 at 18:13















    Hi, I posted the full code for the scenario. It's important to capture the data inside the innerMethod as that's where it can only be accessed, which is why I thought of using setters and getters.
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 18:13




    Hi, I posted the full code for the scenario. It's important to capture the data inside the innerMethod as that's where it can only be accessed, which is why I thought of using setters and getters.
    – BrainAmplifier1820
    Nov 11 at 18:13













    0














    public void method1()
    Object1 obj = new Object1()
    @Override
    public void innerMethod(Object response)
    setList(response.list);
    // Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
    System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

    ;
    obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
    System.out.println(obj.getList().get(0).getName()); // <-- ***********



    I think you're calling getList() from the wrong object. If you don't specify the object to call the method from it's assuming this.list(), in which case you're getting uninitialized data members.






    share|improve this answer

























      0














      public void method1()
      Object1 obj = new Object1()
      @Override
      public void innerMethod(Object response)
      setList(response.list);
      // Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
      System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

      ;
      obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
      System.out.println(obj.getList().get(0).getName()); // <-- ***********



      I think you're calling getList() from the wrong object. If you don't specify the object to call the method from it's assuming this.list(), in which case you're getting uninitialized data members.






      share|improve this answer























        0












        0








        0






        public void method1()
        Object1 obj = new Object1()
        @Override
        public void innerMethod(Object response)
        setList(response.list);
        // Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
        System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

        ;
        obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
        System.out.println(obj.getList().get(0).getName()); // <-- ***********



        I think you're calling getList() from the wrong object. If you don't specify the object to call the method from it's assuming this.list(), in which case you're getting uninitialized data members.






        share|improve this answer












        public void method1()
        Object1 obj = new Object1()
        @Override
        public void innerMethod(Object response)
        setList(response.list);
        // Displaying the result of the getter is for sample purposes
        System.out.println(getList().get(0).getName()); // This works and prints out the name of the first item.

        ;
        obj.execute(); // Suppose execute method is pre-defined and just means it'll execute the `innerMethod`.
        System.out.println(obj.getList().get(0).getName()); // <-- ***********



        I think you're calling getList() from the wrong object. If you don't specify the object to call the method from it's assuming this.list(), in which case you're getting uninitialized data members.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 11 at 18:18









        Travis

        11




        11



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53251317%2faccessing-values-inside-an-inner-method-through-setters-and-getters-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

            Syphilis

            Darth Vader #20