Why typescript throws an error for two array of object types but doesn't on shape of both?









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have two simple types of data:



type IData = 
percent: string;
exchange: string;
;

type IRow =
price: number;
exchange: string;
;


I'm not following why typescript throws errors here if I use them both:



const sumSame = (
assets: IData | IRow,
sumBy: string,
sumWhat: string
) =>
const mapWithUniqCoins = assets.reduce((accMap, el: IData ;


But it doesn't throw errors when I combine two types into one shape:



type Shape = IData | IRow;


Why it happened?
https://codesandbox.io/s/16vzvqqv3 (Check Errors.ts and NoErrors.ts)










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I have two simple types of data:



    type IData = 
    percent: string;
    exchange: string;
    ;

    type IRow =
    price: number;
    exchange: string;
    ;


    I'm not following why typescript throws errors here if I use them both:



    const sumSame = (
    assets: IData | IRow,
    sumBy: string,
    sumWhat: string
    ) =>
    const mapWithUniqCoins = assets.reduce((accMap, el: IData ;


    But it doesn't throw errors when I combine two types into one shape:



    type Shape = IData | IRow;


    Why it happened?
    https://codesandbox.io/s/16vzvqqv3 (Check Errors.ts and NoErrors.ts)










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I have two simple types of data:



      type IData = 
      percent: string;
      exchange: string;
      ;

      type IRow =
      price: number;
      exchange: string;
      ;


      I'm not following why typescript throws errors here if I use them both:



      const sumSame = (
      assets: IData | IRow,
      sumBy: string,
      sumWhat: string
      ) =>
      const mapWithUniqCoins = assets.reduce((accMap, el: IData ;


      But it doesn't throw errors when I combine two types into one shape:



      type Shape = IData | IRow;


      Why it happened?
      https://codesandbox.io/s/16vzvqqv3 (Check Errors.ts and NoErrors.ts)










      share|improve this question













      I have two simple types of data:



      type IData = 
      percent: string;
      exchange: string;
      ;

      type IRow =
      price: number;
      exchange: string;
      ;


      I'm not following why typescript throws errors here if I use them both:



      const sumSame = (
      assets: IData | IRow,
      sumBy: string,
      sumWhat: string
      ) =>
      const mapWithUniqCoins = assets.reduce((accMap, el: IData ;


      But it doesn't throw errors when I combine two types into one shape:



      type Shape = IData | IRow;


      Why it happened?
      https://codesandbox.io/s/16vzvqqv3 (Check Errors.ts and NoErrors.ts)







      javascript arrays typescript javascript-objects






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 10 at 17:16









      Avernikoz

      998




      998






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          When assets are declared as a union of arrays



          assets: IData | IRow


          assets.reduce() has different declarations in each array type: for IData array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IData element, for IRow array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IRow element.



          The error message - "Cannot invoke an expression whose type lacks a call signature" - is basically telling that the compiles is not smart enough to recognize that it could be possible to call reduce() for the union type, even when it receives appropriate callback type.



          There is open issue for this:




          This is currently by design because we don't synthesize an
          intersectional call signature when getting the members of a union type
          -- only call signatures which are identical appear on the unioned type







          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53241452%2fwhy-typescript-throws-an-error-for-two-array-of-object-types-but-doesnt-on-shap%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            When assets are declared as a union of arrays



            assets: IData | IRow


            assets.reduce() has different declarations in each array type: for IData array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IData element, for IRow array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IRow element.



            The error message - "Cannot invoke an expression whose type lacks a call signature" - is basically telling that the compiles is not smart enough to recognize that it could be possible to call reduce() for the union type, even when it receives appropriate callback type.



            There is open issue for this:




            This is currently by design because we don't synthesize an
            intersectional call signature when getting the members of a union type
            -- only call signatures which are identical appear on the unioned type







            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              When assets are declared as a union of arrays



              assets: IData | IRow


              assets.reduce() has different declarations in each array type: for IData array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IData element, for IRow array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IRow element.



              The error message - "Cannot invoke an expression whose type lacks a call signature" - is basically telling that the compiles is not smart enough to recognize that it could be possible to call reduce() for the union type, even when it receives appropriate callback type.



              There is open issue for this:




              This is currently by design because we don't synthesize an
              intersectional call signature when getting the members of a union type
              -- only call signatures which are identical appear on the unioned type







              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                When assets are declared as a union of arrays



                assets: IData | IRow


                assets.reduce() has different declarations in each array type: for IData array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IData element, for IRow array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IRow element.



                The error message - "Cannot invoke an expression whose type lacks a call signature" - is basically telling that the compiles is not smart enough to recognize that it could be possible to call reduce() for the union type, even when it receives appropriate callback type.



                There is open issue for this:




                This is currently by design because we don't synthesize an
                intersectional call signature when getting the members of a union type
                -- only call signatures which are identical appear on the unioned type







                share|improve this answer












                When assets are declared as a union of arrays



                assets: IData | IRow


                assets.reduce() has different declarations in each array type: for IData array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IData element, for IRow array, reduce() takes a callback that receives IRow element.



                The error message - "Cannot invoke an expression whose type lacks a call signature" - is basically telling that the compiles is not smart enough to recognize that it could be possible to call reduce() for the union type, even when it receives appropriate callback type.



                There is open issue for this:




                This is currently by design because we don't synthesize an
                intersectional call signature when getting the members of a union type
                -- only call signatures which are identical appear on the unioned type








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 10 at 20:37









                artem

                13.5k12738




                13.5k12738



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53241452%2fwhy-typescript-throws-an-error-for-two-array-of-object-types-but-doesnt-on-shap%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

                    Syphilis

                    Darth Vader #20