Invulnerable to any physical means until Asgard is being destroyed, yes. That doesn't mean that a character with some hax - a mentalist, a magician, a reality manipulator - doesn't get to have a chance. Yes, she can be beat - she was, in the movie. Just not by the mundane, physical means poor ol' Supes is limited to.

@nucleon:

Don't mind me asking but do you ever double check your posts before actually posting them? Just curious lol.

Exactly; With Mjolnir, Thor carries a piece of equipement that can be more powerful than Superman in itself.

Okay, so,

1. Prove Mjolnir is faster than Superman


2. Prove it is more powerful than Superman


3. I don't see how this is even relevant because we're debating about Hela, Mjolnir has nothing to do with this debate.


4. As you mentioned, Thor "carries" it, it doesn't move on its own and it isn't sentient, the carrier has to have feats to suggest he can actually tag Thor with it.

I tend to agree with your assessment of Hela over Mjolnir. And yet it is, undoubtely, a feat for anyone to pulverize mighty Mjolnir like that. Like I've wrote another poster, there are things that just can't be beat with a fly-by.

Is it a cool feat but it's not enough to hurt Clark since nobody has ever attempted to destroy Mjolnir, we cannot exactly gauge how powerful the feat is and Hela isn't tagging Clark in a million years, while Clark can definitely kill her in a couple of hits.

And, eeerr, I wouldn't bet my last buck on the fact that DCEU Superman resists magic or not. I believe that WW's sword cut Doomsday quite effortlessly to then be revealed as useless against lowly Steppenwolf.

DCEU Superman isn't vulnerable to magic, period. WW's sword isn't magical either, nothing suggests it is and cutting Doomsday doesn't prove anything, Doomsday doesn't have piercing durability feats, Steppenwolf does, false comparison.