Does memsql support Full Outer Join?










4















I wanted to have a full outer join in memsql. Something like



SELECT *
FROM A FULL OUTER JOIN B
ON A.id = B.id


Is it possible ?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    docs.memsql.com/4.0/ref/SELECT

    – Ruchi
    Sep 3 '15 at 5:25















4















I wanted to have a full outer join in memsql. Something like



SELECT *
FROM A FULL OUTER JOIN B
ON A.id = B.id


Is it possible ?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    docs.memsql.com/4.0/ref/SELECT

    – Ruchi
    Sep 3 '15 at 5:25













4












4








4








I wanted to have a full outer join in memsql. Something like



SELECT *
FROM A FULL OUTER JOIN B
ON A.id = B.id


Is it possible ?










share|improve this question
















I wanted to have a full outer join in memsql. Something like



SELECT *
FROM A FULL OUTER JOIN B
ON A.id = B.id


Is it possible ?







outer-join full-outer-join memsql






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 3 '15 at 5:26









Tim Biegeleisen

221k1388141




221k1388141










asked Sep 3 '15 at 5:22









Vivek AdityaVivek Aditya

7911235




7911235







  • 2





    docs.memsql.com/4.0/ref/SELECT

    – Ruchi
    Sep 3 '15 at 5:25












  • 2





    docs.memsql.com/4.0/ref/SELECT

    – Ruchi
    Sep 3 '15 at 5:25







2




2





docs.memsql.com/4.0/ref/SELECT

– Ruchi
Sep 3 '15 at 5:25





docs.memsql.com/4.0/ref/SELECT

– Ruchi
Sep 3 '15 at 5:25












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














It appears that MemSQL does not have a FULL OUTER JOIN syntax. However, you should be able to simulate a full outer join in MemSQL using a combination of LEFT and RIGHT OUTER JOIN operations:



SELECT * FROM A
LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.id = B.id
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM A
RIGHT OUTER JOIN B on A.id = B.id
WHERE ISNULL(A.id)


                                                enter image description here



The first SELECT covers the orange area, namely matching records between A and B along with records in A which do not match to anything in B. The second query obtains only records in B which do not match to anything in A. Using UNION ALL instead of UNION ensures that duplicates are not removed.






share|improve this answer

























  • I would appreciate if you could update the link that is no longer valid. Thanks!

    – Andrey Belykh
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:49










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f32367525%2fdoes-memsql-support-full-outer-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














It appears that MemSQL does not have a FULL OUTER JOIN syntax. However, you should be able to simulate a full outer join in MemSQL using a combination of LEFT and RIGHT OUTER JOIN operations:



SELECT * FROM A
LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.id = B.id
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM A
RIGHT OUTER JOIN B on A.id = B.id
WHERE ISNULL(A.id)


                                                enter image description here



The first SELECT covers the orange area, namely matching records between A and B along with records in A which do not match to anything in B. The second query obtains only records in B which do not match to anything in A. Using UNION ALL instead of UNION ensures that duplicates are not removed.






share|improve this answer

























  • I would appreciate if you could update the link that is no longer valid. Thanks!

    – Andrey Belykh
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:49















4














It appears that MemSQL does not have a FULL OUTER JOIN syntax. However, you should be able to simulate a full outer join in MemSQL using a combination of LEFT and RIGHT OUTER JOIN operations:



SELECT * FROM A
LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.id = B.id
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM A
RIGHT OUTER JOIN B on A.id = B.id
WHERE ISNULL(A.id)


                                                enter image description here



The first SELECT covers the orange area, namely matching records between A and B along with records in A which do not match to anything in B. The second query obtains only records in B which do not match to anything in A. Using UNION ALL instead of UNION ensures that duplicates are not removed.






share|improve this answer

























  • I would appreciate if you could update the link that is no longer valid. Thanks!

    – Andrey Belykh
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:49













4












4








4







It appears that MemSQL does not have a FULL OUTER JOIN syntax. However, you should be able to simulate a full outer join in MemSQL using a combination of LEFT and RIGHT OUTER JOIN operations:



SELECT * FROM A
LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.id = B.id
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM A
RIGHT OUTER JOIN B on A.id = B.id
WHERE ISNULL(A.id)


                                                enter image description here



The first SELECT covers the orange area, namely matching records between A and B along with records in A which do not match to anything in B. The second query obtains only records in B which do not match to anything in A. Using UNION ALL instead of UNION ensures that duplicates are not removed.






share|improve this answer















It appears that MemSQL does not have a FULL OUTER JOIN syntax. However, you should be able to simulate a full outer join in MemSQL using a combination of LEFT and RIGHT OUTER JOIN operations:



SELECT * FROM A
LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.id = B.id
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM A
RIGHT OUTER JOIN B on A.id = B.id
WHERE ISNULL(A.id)


                                                enter image description here



The first SELECT covers the orange area, namely matching records between A and B along with records in A which do not match to anything in B. The second query obtains only records in B which do not match to anything in A. Using UNION ALL instead of UNION ensures that duplicates are not removed.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 12 '18 at 14:55

























answered Sep 3 '15 at 5:39









Tim BiegeleisenTim Biegeleisen

221k1388141




221k1388141












  • I would appreciate if you could update the link that is no longer valid. Thanks!

    – Andrey Belykh
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:49

















  • I would appreciate if you could update the link that is no longer valid. Thanks!

    – Andrey Belykh
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:49
















I would appreciate if you could update the link that is no longer valid. Thanks!

– Andrey Belykh
Nov 12 '18 at 14:49





I would appreciate if you could update the link that is no longer valid. Thanks!

– Andrey Belykh
Nov 12 '18 at 14:49

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f32367525%2fdoes-memsql-support-full-outer-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

Syphilis

Darth Vader #20