Check if digits in a number can be rearranged to form a fibonacci number










3















This question is asked in a programming contest. I couldn't find any way other than generating all permutations. But the number of digits is upto 15 and no of permutations (15!) is very large. Is there any other way?



I know that if (5*N^2 + 4) or (5*N^2 - 4) is a perfect square, n is fibonacci.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    As an aside, assuming you work in base-10, there are far fewer than 15! permutations of any 15-digit number.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06











  • Yes. 15! divided the product of the factorial of the no of repeating numbers.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:07















3















This question is asked in a programming contest. I couldn't find any way other than generating all permutations. But the number of digits is upto 15 and no of permutations (15!) is very large. Is there any other way?



I know that if (5*N^2 + 4) or (5*N^2 - 4) is a perfect square, n is fibonacci.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    As an aside, assuming you work in base-10, there are far fewer than 15! permutations of any 15-digit number.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06











  • Yes. 15! divided the product of the factorial of the no of repeating numbers.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:07













3












3








3








This question is asked in a programming contest. I couldn't find any way other than generating all permutations. But the number of digits is upto 15 and no of permutations (15!) is very large. Is there any other way?



I know that if (5*N^2 + 4) or (5*N^2 - 4) is a perfect square, n is fibonacci.










share|improve this question
















This question is asked in a programming contest. I couldn't find any way other than generating all permutations. But the number of digits is upto 15 and no of permutations (15!) is very large. Is there any other way?



I know that if (5*N^2 + 4) or (5*N^2 - 4) is a perfect square, n is fibonacci.







string algorithm fibonacci






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 10:29









Deduplicator

34.6k64889




34.6k64889










asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:44









duplex143duplex143

162113




162113







  • 1





    As an aside, assuming you work in base-10, there are far fewer than 15! permutations of any 15-digit number.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06











  • Yes. 15! divided the product of the factorial of the no of repeating numbers.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:07












  • 1





    As an aside, assuming you work in base-10, there are far fewer than 15! permutations of any 15-digit number.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06











  • Yes. 15! divided the product of the factorial of the no of repeating numbers.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:07







1




1





As an aside, assuming you work in base-10, there are far fewer than 15! permutations of any 15-digit number.

– Deduplicator
Nov 14 '18 at 10:06





As an aside, assuming you work in base-10, there are far fewer than 15! permutations of any 15-digit number.

– Deduplicator
Nov 14 '18 at 10:06













Yes. 15! divided the product of the factorial of the no of repeating numbers.

– duplex143
Nov 14 '18 at 10:07





Yes. 15! divided the product of the factorial of the no of repeating numbers.

– duplex143
Nov 14 '18 at 10:07












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














You don't need to generate all permutations. Generate the fibonacci numbers of desired length (which will be less than 74 numbers, because 73rd fib. number is the highest with 15 digits) and then just check for those few whether they can be "constructed" from digits in the given number.






share|improve this answer























  • I didn't know that Fibonacci sequence increases so drastically. Exponential growth I think. Thanks.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01







  • 1





    Yes, inverting the direction can make for a surprising jump in efficiency.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:04






  • 1





    Upvoted. As a note, the fibonacci numbers grow at a rate of phi (~= 1.618). Since phi**5 > 10, there can never be more than 5 Fibonacci numbers with the same digit length (except for digit length 1).

    – Paul Hankin
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:02










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53297138%2fcheck-if-digits-in-a-number-can-be-rearranged-to-form-a-fibonacci-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You don't need to generate all permutations. Generate the fibonacci numbers of desired length (which will be less than 74 numbers, because 73rd fib. number is the highest with 15 digits) and then just check for those few whether they can be "constructed" from digits in the given number.






share|improve this answer























  • I didn't know that Fibonacci sequence increases so drastically. Exponential growth I think. Thanks.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01







  • 1





    Yes, inverting the direction can make for a surprising jump in efficiency.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:04






  • 1





    Upvoted. As a note, the fibonacci numbers grow at a rate of phi (~= 1.618). Since phi**5 > 10, there can never be more than 5 Fibonacci numbers with the same digit length (except for digit length 1).

    – Paul Hankin
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:02















4














You don't need to generate all permutations. Generate the fibonacci numbers of desired length (which will be less than 74 numbers, because 73rd fib. number is the highest with 15 digits) and then just check for those few whether they can be "constructed" from digits in the given number.






share|improve this answer























  • I didn't know that Fibonacci sequence increases so drastically. Exponential growth I think. Thanks.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01







  • 1





    Yes, inverting the direction can make for a surprising jump in efficiency.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:04






  • 1





    Upvoted. As a note, the fibonacci numbers grow at a rate of phi (~= 1.618). Since phi**5 > 10, there can never be more than 5 Fibonacci numbers with the same digit length (except for digit length 1).

    – Paul Hankin
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:02













4












4








4







You don't need to generate all permutations. Generate the fibonacci numbers of desired length (which will be less than 74 numbers, because 73rd fib. number is the highest with 15 digits) and then just check for those few whether they can be "constructed" from digits in the given number.






share|improve this answer













You don't need to generate all permutations. Generate the fibonacci numbers of desired length (which will be less than 74 numbers, because 73rd fib. number is the highest with 15 digits) and then just check for those few whether they can be "constructed" from digits in the given number.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 9:55









Martin HeraleckýMartin Heralecký

3,15421134




3,15421134












  • I didn't know that Fibonacci sequence increases so drastically. Exponential growth I think. Thanks.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01







  • 1





    Yes, inverting the direction can make for a surprising jump in efficiency.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:04






  • 1





    Upvoted. As a note, the fibonacci numbers grow at a rate of phi (~= 1.618). Since phi**5 > 10, there can never be more than 5 Fibonacci numbers with the same digit length (except for digit length 1).

    – Paul Hankin
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:02

















  • I didn't know that Fibonacci sequence increases so drastically. Exponential growth I think. Thanks.

    – duplex143
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01







  • 1





    Yes, inverting the direction can make for a surprising jump in efficiency.

    – Deduplicator
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:04






  • 1





    Upvoted. As a note, the fibonacci numbers grow at a rate of phi (~= 1.618). Since phi**5 > 10, there can never be more than 5 Fibonacci numbers with the same digit length (except for digit length 1).

    – Paul Hankin
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:02
















I didn't know that Fibonacci sequence increases so drastically. Exponential growth I think. Thanks.

– duplex143
Nov 14 '18 at 10:01






I didn't know that Fibonacci sequence increases so drastically. Exponential growth I think. Thanks.

– duplex143
Nov 14 '18 at 10:01





1




1





Yes, inverting the direction can make for a surprising jump in efficiency.

– Deduplicator
Nov 14 '18 at 10:04





Yes, inverting the direction can make for a surprising jump in efficiency.

– Deduplicator
Nov 14 '18 at 10:04




1




1





Upvoted. As a note, the fibonacci numbers grow at a rate of phi (~= 1.618). Since phi**5 > 10, there can never be more than 5 Fibonacci numbers with the same digit length (except for digit length 1).

– Paul Hankin
Nov 14 '18 at 14:02





Upvoted. As a note, the fibonacci numbers grow at a rate of phi (~= 1.618). Since phi**5 > 10, there can never be more than 5 Fibonacci numbers with the same digit length (except for digit length 1).

– Paul Hankin
Nov 14 '18 at 14:02



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53297138%2fcheck-if-digits-in-a-number-can-be-rearranged-to-form-a-fibonacci-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

Syphilis

Darth Vader #20