LINQ To Entities - M to M selection returns more columns than needed










0















I have the following situation which, works fine:



IQueryable<Experiment> experiments1 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Projects.Any(p => p.Id == project.Id));
IQueryable<Experiment> experiments2 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Tools.Any(m => m.Project.Id == project.Id));
var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date
).ToList();


Checking with SQL Profiles, this translates in 1 SQL query which correctly extract Id, Name and Date from the union.



The problem arises when I perform a join with a many-to-many connected table:



var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
e.Types.Select(t => t.Name)
// or also just e.Types
).ToList();


The generated SQL query for some reasons not only return the "needed" columns but returns all the columns in the Experiment table + the additional specified columns (i.e. types' names).



This result in a pretty big loss in performances.



Btw, in the code I later need to perform:



experimentsList.Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
Types = string.Join(", ", e.Types)
)


So I need the faster way to have in memory Id, Name, Date + a list of types.



Thanks!










share|improve this question
























  • Removing linq-to-sql: that is a different LINQ provider to EF and will only confuse things.

    – Richard
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:13











  • Why are you using Any and not join? I expect you want Join.

    – Hogan
    Nov 12 '18 at 15:00















0















I have the following situation which, works fine:



IQueryable<Experiment> experiments1 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Projects.Any(p => p.Id == project.Id));
IQueryable<Experiment> experiments2 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Tools.Any(m => m.Project.Id == project.Id));
var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date
).ToList();


Checking with SQL Profiles, this translates in 1 SQL query which correctly extract Id, Name and Date from the union.



The problem arises when I perform a join with a many-to-many connected table:



var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
e.Types.Select(t => t.Name)
// or also just e.Types
).ToList();


The generated SQL query for some reasons not only return the "needed" columns but returns all the columns in the Experiment table + the additional specified columns (i.e. types' names).



This result in a pretty big loss in performances.



Btw, in the code I later need to perform:



experimentsList.Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
Types = string.Join(", ", e.Types)
)


So I need the faster way to have in memory Id, Name, Date + a list of types.



Thanks!










share|improve this question
























  • Removing linq-to-sql: that is a different LINQ provider to EF and will only confuse things.

    – Richard
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:13











  • Why are you using Any and not join? I expect you want Join.

    – Hogan
    Nov 12 '18 at 15:00













0












0








0








I have the following situation which, works fine:



IQueryable<Experiment> experiments1 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Projects.Any(p => p.Id == project.Id));
IQueryable<Experiment> experiments2 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Tools.Any(m => m.Project.Id == project.Id));
var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date
).ToList();


Checking with SQL Profiles, this translates in 1 SQL query which correctly extract Id, Name and Date from the union.



The problem arises when I perform a join with a many-to-many connected table:



var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
e.Types.Select(t => t.Name)
// or also just e.Types
).ToList();


The generated SQL query for some reasons not only return the "needed" columns but returns all the columns in the Experiment table + the additional specified columns (i.e. types' names).



This result in a pretty big loss in performances.



Btw, in the code I later need to perform:



experimentsList.Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
Types = string.Join(", ", e.Types)
)


So I need the faster way to have in memory Id, Name, Date + a list of types.



Thanks!










share|improve this question
















I have the following situation which, works fine:



IQueryable<Experiment> experiments1 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Projects.Any(p => p.Id == project.Id));
IQueryable<Experiment> experiments2 = _db.Experiments.Where(e => e.Tools.Any(m => m.Project.Id == project.Id));
var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date
).ToList();


Checking with SQL Profiles, this translates in 1 SQL query which correctly extract Id, Name and Date from the union.



The problem arises when I perform a join with a many-to-many connected table:



var experimentsList = experiments1.Union(experiments2).OrderBy(e => e.Date).Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
e.Types.Select(t => t.Name)
// or also just e.Types
).ToList();


The generated SQL query for some reasons not only return the "needed" columns but returns all the columns in the Experiment table + the additional specified columns (i.e. types' names).



This result in a pretty big loss in performances.



Btw, in the code I later need to perform:



experimentsList.Select(e => new

e.Id,
e.Name,
e.Date,
Types = string.Join(", ", e.Types)
)


So I need the faster way to have in memory Id, Name, Date + a list of types.



Thanks!







c# linq linq-to-entities






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 14:17







Guido Lo Spacy

















asked Nov 12 '18 at 14:10









Guido Lo SpacyGuido Lo Spacy

111115




111115












  • Removing linq-to-sql: that is a different LINQ provider to EF and will only confuse things.

    – Richard
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:13











  • Why are you using Any and not join? I expect you want Join.

    – Hogan
    Nov 12 '18 at 15:00

















  • Removing linq-to-sql: that is a different LINQ provider to EF and will only confuse things.

    – Richard
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:13











  • Why are you using Any and not join? I expect you want Join.

    – Hogan
    Nov 12 '18 at 15:00
















Removing linq-to-sql: that is a different LINQ provider to EF and will only confuse things.

– Richard
Nov 12 '18 at 14:13





Removing linq-to-sql: that is a different LINQ provider to EF and will only confuse things.

– Richard
Nov 12 '18 at 14:13













Why are you using Any and not join? I expect you want Join.

– Hogan
Nov 12 '18 at 15:00





Why are you using Any and not join? I expect you want Join.

– Hogan
Nov 12 '18 at 15:00












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Can you try this? Coloum names may need to be changed



var result = from exp in _db.Experiments
join t in _db.Types on exp.TypeID = t.Id
select new

exp.Id,
exp.Name,
exp.Date,
t.Name
).ToList();





share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53263926%2flinq-to-entities-m-to-m-selection-returns-more-columns-than-needed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Can you try this? Coloum names may need to be changed



    var result = from exp in _db.Experiments
    join t in _db.Types on exp.TypeID = t.Id
    select new

    exp.Id,
    exp.Name,
    exp.Date,
    t.Name
    ).ToList();





    share|improve this answer



























      0














      Can you try this? Coloum names may need to be changed



      var result = from exp in _db.Experiments
      join t in _db.Types on exp.TypeID = t.Id
      select new

      exp.Id,
      exp.Name,
      exp.Date,
      t.Name
      ).ToList();





      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        Can you try this? Coloum names may need to be changed



        var result = from exp in _db.Experiments
        join t in _db.Types on exp.TypeID = t.Id
        select new

        exp.Id,
        exp.Name,
        exp.Date,
        t.Name
        ).ToList();





        share|improve this answer













        Can you try this? Coloum names may need to be changed



        var result = from exp in _db.Experiments
        join t in _db.Types on exp.TypeID = t.Id
        select new

        exp.Id,
        exp.Name,
        exp.Date,
        t.Name
        ).ToList();






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:21









        R2D2R2D2

        1,09511118




        1,09511118



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53263926%2flinq-to-entities-m-to-m-selection-returns-more-columns-than-needed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

            Syphilis

            Darth Vader #20