Set ServiceBus trigger behavior parameters separately per trigger
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I am trying to leverage Azure Functions v2 for large integrations solutions, involving many functions that will process service bus messages. My plan was to house all of the functions for a given application domain in the same Function App. I find myself wanting to control the maximum number of concurrent executions of a given function differently depending on the queue/subscription being processed - I may have one Function that is ok to run hundreds or thousands concurrently, and I may have others that I don't want more than one or two. Unless I am missing something, it looks like the host.json controls for ServiceBus trigger behavior are FunctionApp-wide (and really in an integrations project all of those behaviors could need to be tuned differently per trigger). If this is so, are there plans to enable more granular trigger behavior controls?
azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
add a comment |
I am trying to leverage Azure Functions v2 for large integrations solutions, involving many functions that will process service bus messages. My plan was to house all of the functions for a given application domain in the same Function App. I find myself wanting to control the maximum number of concurrent executions of a given function differently depending on the queue/subscription being processed - I may have one Function that is ok to run hundreds or thousands concurrently, and I may have others that I don't want more than one or two. Unless I am missing something, it looks like the host.json controls for ServiceBus trigger behavior are FunctionApp-wide (and really in an integrations project all of those behaviors could need to be tuned differently per trigger). If this is so, are there plans to enable more granular trigger behavior controls?
azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
add a comment |
I am trying to leverage Azure Functions v2 for large integrations solutions, involving many functions that will process service bus messages. My plan was to house all of the functions for a given application domain in the same Function App. I find myself wanting to control the maximum number of concurrent executions of a given function differently depending on the queue/subscription being processed - I may have one Function that is ok to run hundreds or thousands concurrently, and I may have others that I don't want more than one or two. Unless I am missing something, it looks like the host.json controls for ServiceBus trigger behavior are FunctionApp-wide (and really in an integrations project all of those behaviors could need to be tuned differently per trigger). If this is so, are there plans to enable more granular trigger behavior controls?
azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
I am trying to leverage Azure Functions v2 for large integrations solutions, involving many functions that will process service bus messages. My plan was to house all of the functions for a given application domain in the same Function App. I find myself wanting to control the maximum number of concurrent executions of a given function differently depending on the queue/subscription being processed - I may have one Function that is ok to run hundreds or thousands concurrently, and I may have others that I don't want more than one or two. Unless I am missing something, it looks like the host.json controls for ServiceBus trigger behavior are FunctionApp-wide (and really in an integrations project all of those behaviors could need to be tuned differently per trigger). If this is so, are there plans to enable more granular trigger behavior controls?
azure-functions azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:33
BrandonBrandon
885
885
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
We don't have plans to do so. Trigger and binding responsibilities are managed by the Azure Functions Host, which runs the code of one entire Function App.
Our recommendation here is to create multiple Function Apps, that have different host.json configurations. You won't incur more cost, and you can deploy your function apps in the same resource group for easier management.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53320653%2fset-servicebus-trigger-behavior-parameters-separately-per-trigger%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We don't have plans to do so. Trigger and binding responsibilities are managed by the Azure Functions Host, which runs the code of one entire Function App.
Our recommendation here is to create multiple Function Apps, that have different host.json configurations. You won't incur more cost, and you can deploy your function apps in the same resource group for easier management.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
add a comment |
We don't have plans to do so. Trigger and binding responsibilities are managed by the Azure Functions Host, which runs the code of one entire Function App.
Our recommendation here is to create multiple Function Apps, that have different host.json configurations. You won't incur more cost, and you can deploy your function apps in the same resource group for easier management.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
add a comment |
We don't have plans to do so. Trigger and binding responsibilities are managed by the Azure Functions Host, which runs the code of one entire Function App.
Our recommendation here is to create multiple Function Apps, that have different host.json configurations. You won't incur more cost, and you can deploy your function apps in the same resource group for easier management.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
We don't have plans to do so. Trigger and binding responsibilities are managed by the Azure Functions Host, which runs the code of one entire Function App.
Our recommendation here is to create multiple Function Apps, that have different host.json configurations. You won't incur more cost, and you can deploy your function apps in the same resource group for easier management.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:39
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59128
59128
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53320653%2fset-servicebus-trigger-behavior-parameters-separately-per-trigger%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
