Restrict a RAW socket to be listened by single process at a time
i am working on RAW sockets, where my applications sends request and take response from same socket. There are multiple processes running on same socket similar to my application. All the processes are running in a while loop as below
while true
do
application1;
application2;
application3;
application4;
my_application;
done
The problem what i am facing is, when any one process sends request on socket the response will be updated by all processes running in loop. Since this is raw socket, how to differentiate the responses for every process. I have tried named binary semaphore, but i observed undefined behavior(like dead lock).
Any tips or suggestions to differentiate response for each process.
linux sockets process
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
add a comment |
i am working on RAW sockets, where my applications sends request and take response from same socket. There are multiple processes running on same socket similar to my application. All the processes are running in a while loop as below
while true
do
application1;
application2;
application3;
application4;
my_application;
done
The problem what i am facing is, when any one process sends request on socket the response will be updated by all processes running in loop. Since this is raw socket, how to differentiate the responses for every process. I have tried named binary semaphore, but i observed undefined behavior(like dead lock).
Any tips or suggestions to differentiate response for each process.
linux sockets process
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
add a comment |
i am working on RAW sockets, where my applications sends request and take response from same socket. There are multiple processes running on same socket similar to my application. All the processes are running in a while loop as below
while true
do
application1;
application2;
application3;
application4;
my_application;
done
The problem what i am facing is, when any one process sends request on socket the response will be updated by all processes running in loop. Since this is raw socket, how to differentiate the responses for every process. I have tried named binary semaphore, but i observed undefined behavior(like dead lock).
Any tips or suggestions to differentiate response for each process.
linux sockets process
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
i am working on RAW sockets, where my applications sends request and take response from same socket. There are multiple processes running on same socket similar to my application. All the processes are running in a while loop as below
while true
do
application1;
application2;
application3;
application4;
my_application;
done
The problem what i am facing is, when any one process sends request on socket the response will be updated by all processes running in loop. Since this is raw socket, how to differentiate the responses for every process. I have tried named binary semaphore, but i observed undefined behavior(like dead lock).
Any tips or suggestions to differentiate response for each process.
linux sockets process
linux sockets process
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
asked Nov 12 '18 at 12:17
Kumar2080Kumar2080
58112
58112
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53262032%2frestrict-a-raw-socket-to-be-listened-by-single-process-at-a-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53262032%2frestrict-a-raw-socket-to-be-listened-by-single-process-at-a-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
