Question about story arcs and adaptations
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Question about story arcs and adaptations
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
Wiki
- Characters
- Creators
- Teams
- Volumes
- Issues
- Publishers
- Locations
- Concepts
- Things
- Story Arcs
- Movies
- Series
- Episodes
- Characters
- Creators
- Teams
- Volumes
- Issues
- Publishers
- Locations
- Concepts
- Things
- Story Arcs
- Movies
- Series
- Episodes
Forums
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Community
- Top Users
- Activity Feed
- User Lists
- Community Promos
- Top Users
- Activity Feed
- User Lists
- Community Promos
Archives
- News
- Reviews
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Previews
- News
- Reviews
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Previews
Wiki
Arcs
Characters
Companies
Concepts
Issues
Locations
Movies
People
Teams
Things
Volumes
Series
Episodes
Editorial
Videos
Articles
Reviews
Features
Community
Users
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Question about story arcs and adaptations
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Question about story arcs and adaptations
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
#1
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 25 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
Hello,
I was wondering whether a story arc that is essentially an adaptation such as Robert E. Howard's Conan tale Black Colossus should be specifically linked to one particular publisher's effort (in this case Dark Horse Comics) or if it should be more neutral so it could be added to other publishers like Marvel, Glenat, etc? This would make the story arc more useful to searchers as well as creating less clutter (same story arc for everyone who attempts to adapt it). Thanks.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
#2
Posted by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 14 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: A story arc should be specific for each publisher.
With your Black Colossus example, Dark Horse is credited as the publisher since they published the arc first. Any reprint of that specific arc is noted on the body of the story arc page, even if it is a different press doing the reprint. Any foreign adaptations are also noted, even if they have a different publisher.
Further, if Marvel were to do their own original arc with Conan that was called "Black Colossus" then it would get its own story arc page.
Quick and fast rule: One story arc - even if reprinted by other publishers - gets one story arc page.
Also, comic issues not part of the initial run (like foreign translations) are not credited with the story arc.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
#3
Posted by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 23 days, 13 hours ago
- Show Bio
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
- Renchamp
- Follow
Forum Posts: 7288
Wiki Points: 611031
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 146 Lists: 10
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
#4
Edited by
Renchamp
(7288 posts)
- 23 days, 11 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos: Cool, so the original run should be tagged on its issues with the arc and all other editions should be noted on the story arc page.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
- pikahyper
- Follow
Forum Posts: 18211
Wiki Points: 22865751
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 5 Lists: 386
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
#5
Edited by
pikahyper
(18211 posts)
- 22 days, 7 hours ago
- Show Bio
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
Was Marvel's adaptation of Black Colossus in more then a single issue? adaptation doesn't necessarily equal a story arc, a CV arc page is for a story that goes across multiple issues with a designated title and if I'm remembering correctly most of those old Marvel REH adaptations were single issue so they would not classify as a story arc, with Dark Horse they specifically expanded on adaptations and they became proper arcs. Also with foreign editions they are generally self contained as a single BD or graphic novel and again wouldn't be classified as an arc. Another thing to keep in mind as well is if a story arc is self contained in its own mini-series/maxi-series then it would not get a story arc page since that would be redundant.
@kuonphobos said:
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
@renchamp: OK thanks for the explanation. I'll fix anything that needs fixin'. BTW, Marvel was the first to publish "Black Colossus" and probably all the other REH adaptations both in the 1970s Conan the Barbarian color comic, again as reprints in SSoC and possibly once more in Conan the Savage magazine in the 80s and 90s. Cheers.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
- kuonphobos
- Follow
Forum Posts: 5205
Wiki Points: 80842
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 22
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
#6
Edited by
kuonphobos
(5205 posts)
- 22 days, 1 hour ago
- Show Bio
@pikahyper: Thanks. Only a few of the adaptations in Savage Sword were multi issue but most of the Marvel adaptations as you say were single issue only.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Editing & Tools
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Please Log In to post.
Don't post to forums
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Moderator Hangout
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Spam Museum(Or search for a more specific forum)
(Bring back the main forum list)
Forums
Main boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Popular wiki boards
- X-Men
- Spider-Man
- Dick Grayson
- Batman
- Cyclops
- Dragon Ball Universe
- Superman
- Storm
- Star Wars Universe
- Hulk
Top posters
pikahyper
6025 posts
X35
803 posts
Renchamp
662 posts
Cloudguy
411 posts
wmwadeii
337 posts
Saren
315 posts
BlueEcho
307 posts
fesak
300 posts
njg5595
268 posts
The Poet
266 posts
- Advertise
- Partnerships
- API
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Ad Choice
- Help
- Careers
- Advertise
- Partnerships
- API
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Ad Choice
- Help
- Careers
© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.
Use your keyboard!
- ESC
Use your keyboard!
- ESC
Use your keyboard!
- ESC
Log in to comment
Log in to comment