gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
Wiki
Characters
Creators
Teams
Volumes
Issues
Publishers
Locations
Concepts
Things
Story Arcs
Movies
Series
Episodes
Characters
Creators
Teams
Volumes
Issues
Publishers
Locations
Concepts
Things
Story Arcs
Movies
Series
Episodes
New Comics
Forums
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Community
Top Users
Activity Feed
User Lists
Community Promos
Top Users
Activity Feed
User Lists
Community Promos
Archives
News
Reviews
Videos
Podcasts
Previews
News
Reviews
Videos
Podcasts
Previews
All Wiki Arcs Characters Companies Concepts Issues Locations Movies People Teams Things Volumes Series Episodes Editorial Videos Articles Reviews Features Community Users
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Comic Vine Weekly Podcast 7-11-16
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Comic Vine Weekly Podcast 7-11-16
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
gmanfromheck
Follow
Forum Posts: 42523
Wiki Points: 259236
Followed by: 192969
Reviews: 472 Lists: 2
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
Posted by
gmanfromheck (42523 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
0:00:00 / 0:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
Avatar_of_Green
Follow
Forum Posts: 3212
Wiki Points: 241
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
#1 Posted by
Avatar_of_Green (3212 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Finally!!!!!
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
#2 Posted by
NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
#3 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
#4 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
Having two different version of a character is fine, but 4 or 6 all in the same place.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Marvel is fine with it; we've got two Caps at the same time, Ms. Marvel and Captain Marvel, Two Spiderman (Spidermen?), Two Thors, I am waiting for them to re-do the Fantastic Four so they look like the Burger King Kids Club
@nightfang3 said:
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Mantle characters are fine we just need the previous mantle holders to die and retire or well end up with 4 different Flash's and 6 different Batmen all in their 20s.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
#5 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
NightFang3
Follow
Forum Posts: 12342
Wiki Points: 316981
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 3
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
#6 Edited by NightFang3 (12342 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
casper4690
Follow
Forum Posts: 704
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
#7 Edited by casper4690 (704 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Great podcast! Always look forward to this , especially when you both talk about the rebirth titles . I'm enjoying almost all the titles out right now , with the exception of JL . I was surprised to hear that Green arrow isn't your type of book, Matt. It's definitely my favorite one right now . I am liking the current batman as well. Tom King has yet to disappoint and his writing is always engaging . I didn't mind batman's interaction with Grundy lol I just thought damn , only batman can pull something off like that xD
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
#8 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Here's a second vote for Quantum and Woody. Definitely over the top and funny.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
#9 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
#10 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
Not all fans :P
I jumped off Marvel a while ago and haven't been back since. Honestly it was the new Old Man Logan which did it for me, I loved the original and was so happy for a sequel series and then they add the time travel garbage and I was out. I wanted to see Old Man Logan with baby Hulk forming a new Avengers but instead we get that terrible story.
I went to Valiant after that and haven't bought a Marvel comic since. I do check back every now and then though.
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
One man's "lazier, and easier" is another man's "selling comics and making money"..... I'm sure a lot of the writers would rather make brand new non-legacy characters, but Marvel know what sells. The reason why Marvel does all those things we hate is because people buy them... Their best selling comics are events, and new number ones. Everyone complains about those, but someone's buying all those comics...... Don't hate the company when it's the fans fault......
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
#11 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
judasnixon
Follow
Forum Posts: 12660
Wiki Points: 699
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 4
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
#12 Posted by
judasnixon (12660 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
#13 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
Maybe, I can't speak for all fans on that point but I do feel that Image and Valiant, being younger and more individual creator driven have advantages. However, I do slightly disagree in someway, I loved the Walking Dead comic but really disliked the show with the portrayal of certain characters and how they were written, especially Andrea.
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
@judasnixon said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I feel that Image and Valiant are a different type of beast too Marvel and DC. I read mostly Image, because I follow the creative teams I like. I feel like a lot of Marvel and DC fans go to their comics not for their talent, but for their characters. Guess that's why people gets so mad when a writer writes something they don't like about Batman....You never hear outrage when so and so dies in Saga.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
kendigs
Follow
Forum Posts: 55
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 0
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
#14 Posted by
kendigs (55 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
I may have missed you mention them but,
EMPRESS!~ and RENATO JONES THE ONE% have been awesome!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
#16 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
#17 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
@nightfang3 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@doc-holiday said:
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
That true and at this point the fans are more to blame for the mantle passing than the companies are.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
@nightfang3: Well technically there are multiple Captain Marvels, multiple Captain Americas, sometimes they just make the previous guy use his original name rather than his super name.
What they said in the podcast is true though, it's hard to make brand new characters so they just mantle pass, it's lazier and easier.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
#18 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
Doc-Holiday
Follow
Forum Posts: 3849
Wiki Points: 15701
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 3 Lists: 4
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
#19 Posted by
Doc-Holiday (3849 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
I'd agree if they didn't continue to push characters like Sam Wilson Cap who gets mediocre sales
@d9000 said:
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
I can understand why you'd see it that way but personally I see it differently.
Valiant and Image aren't under the same type of financial pressure as Marvel or DC. The bigger the company is the more money it requires in order to function. They don't have the "luxury" to take creative risks at this point. They simply have to do what will definitely make money, end of story. At this point in their lifespan their direction and focus is dictated by market trends and consumer habits, not artistic integrity and fan service.That being said they still have talented people working on their books so you do end up with some great stuff here and there.
Instead of writing them off altogether I find it easier to simply look at them as a different animal than Valiant. And I've always put Image into it's own box because if I'm not mistaken they have a very different business structure.
@doc-holiday said:
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
It's 50/50, it is up to the fans to like the new characters they make but it is up to Marvel to intrigue them enough to want to buy them. Image and Valiant do it, they have new characters all the time; Invincible took the world by storm (in a way), it is great.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
#20 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
Everything is a complete IF statement since we're both speculating. That's the fun of speculation, no one is wrong because you can't know if you're right.
But anyway, you've already done the right thing. Drop what you don't like and find what you do like. But I guarantee if decades from now Valiant becomes the same juggernaut that Marvel is we'll all be having the same discussions about them.
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
@doc-holiday said:
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
That is a lot of "if" and there is the flaw these characters may not be born of out creativity but rather marketable needs and therefore lack the appeal that other characters have. It is hard to sell new characters, even mantle passes regardless of ethnicity or gender because people are used to characters as they are. It's why Image, Valiant and others have the advantage of being smaller and being able to make characters of great variety with less chance of upsetting readers because only a few characters are expected to be a certain way and even then, some are minorities, like Spawn. No one seems to remember that the poster-boy for all of Image is also one of the most famous black super heroes ever, largely because Image rarely makes it an issue, except in like issue #5 where Spawn learns he can transform and accidentally makes himself a white guy :P
Some characters have been met with a lot of push-back because the thought of replacing a classic character bothers readers (and that is readers of all types, I've seen numerous comments from non-white readers saying they would prefer new characters over the diversi-swaps).
I see your point of course, that Marvel is hoping for the long term and even has the benefit of the fact that if the characters fail they can reprise the originals but it comes off even lazier than before when you realize all this.
@d9000 said:
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Well I'd say that mediocre sales for Marvel are still higher than most publishers would get for a high selling book.
But beyond that I feel like they have a long term plan when it comes to racial diversity that supersedes anything else. I believe they're looking to prove that they have the most appealing/most diverse roster of characters and will grab the attention of A) parents who prefer that their kids look at a more diverse comic book and B) young minorities who will feel like they're being represented properly. In this way Marvel assures itself future success as these impressionable kids grow older and maybe they loved seeing Sam Wilson as Captain America so they follow Marvel for the rest of their lives.
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
Kgphil01
Follow
Forum Posts: 57
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 2 Lists: 0
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
#21 Posted by
Kgphil01 (57 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@d9000: awesome thanks for the recommendations!! Will have to check those out! I ended up picking up the first volume of deadly class & hack slash I know there not funny but they seemed to be the crazy kind of stories I'm looking for!
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
D9000
Follow
Forum Posts: 1637
Wiki Points: 300
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 6 Lists: 1
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
#22 Posted by
D9000 (1637 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
@kgphil01: Nice! Now I'm jealous :p
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
JLFan15
Follow
Forum Posts: 20
Wiki Points: 0
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 1 Lists: 0
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
#23 Posted by
JLFan15 (20 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago - Show Bio
Ahh I've been wanting a ComicVine / Kinda Funny crossover for ages!
Comic Vine
Forums
Podcast
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Browse Boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Please Log In to post.
Don't post to forums Gen. Discussion Bug Reporting Delete/Combine Pages Artist Show-Off Off-Topic Contests Battles Fan-Fic RPG Moderator Hangout Comic Book Preview API Developers Editing & Tools Podcast Quests Spam Museum(Or search for a more specific forum)
0 I am trying to use an already existing sqLite database in my android app. I have verified that it is loaded into the project in the assets folder and I can browse it in DB browser when I open it directly from the project. This is the schema for the table I am trying to query CREATE TABLE "ACTIVITY_LIST_TBL" ( `_ID` INTEGER NOT NULL, `ACT_NAME` VARCHAR NOT NULL, `ACT_CODE` VARCHAR, `IS_ACTIVE` INTEGER DEFAULT -1, PRIMARY KEY(`_ID`) ) Below is the activity that creates the sqlite helper and then on a button click I execute a query on the ACTIVITY_LIST_TBL. When the query is executed this exception is thrown: android.database.sqlite.SQLiteException: no such table: ACTIVITY_LIST_TBL (code 1 SQLITE_ERROR): , while compiling: SELECT * FROM ACTIVITY_LIST_TBL class CalendarActivity : AppCompatActivity() { private var cursor:Cursor? = null override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState:Bundle?) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState) setContentView(R.layout.calendar_activity
Wiki Characters Creators Teams Volumes Issues Publishers Locations Concepts Things Story Arcs Movies Series Episodes New Comics Forums Gen. Discussion Bug Reporting Delete/Combine Pages Artist Show-Off Off-Topic Contests Battles Fan-Fic RPG Comic Book Preview API Developers Editing & Tools Podcast Quests Community Top Users Activity Feed User Lists Community Promos Archives News Reviews Videos Podcasts Previews Login / Sign Up All Wiki Arcs Characters Companies Concepts Issues Locations Movies People Teams Things Volumes Series Episodes Editorial Videos Articles Reviews Features Community Users Wiki Characters Creators Teams Volumes Issues Publishers Locations Concepts Things Story Arcs Movies Series Episodes New Comics Forums Gen. Discussion Bug Reporting Delete/Combine Pages Artist Show-Off Off-Topic Contests Battles Fan-Fic RPG Comic Book Preview API Developers Editing & Tools Podcast Quests Com
Der Titel dieses Artikels ist mehrdeutig. Zu weiteren Bedeutungen siehe Ondo (Begriffsklärung). Ondo Basisdaten Hauptstadt: Akure gegründet: 3. Februar 1976 Gouverneur: Rotimi Akeredolu ISO 3166-2: NG-ON Fläche Fläche: 15.500 km² Rang in Nigeria: 25 Bevölkerung Einwohner: 4.671.700 (2016) Bevölkerungsdichte: 320 Einw./km² (2016) Rang in Nigeria: 18 Lage von Ondo in Nigeria Ondo ist ein Bundesstaat des westafrikanischen Landes Nigeria mit der Hauptstadt Akure, die mit 420.623 Einwohnern (2005) auch die größte Stadt des Bundesstaates ist. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Geografie 2 Geschichte 2.1 Liste der Gouverneure und Administratoren 3 Verwaltung 4 Wirtschaft Geografie | Der Bundesstaat liegt im Südwesten des Landes und grenzt im Norden an den Bundesstaat Ekiti, im Nordwesten an den Bundesstaat Osun, im Nordosten an den Bundesstaat Kogi, im Süden an den Atlantik, im Südosten an den Bundesstaat Delta, im Westen an den Bundesstaat Ogun und im Osten an den Bundesstaat Edo. Geschichte | Der
Log in to comment