I've read his run of the JLA, some of of his Batman, his Superman Beyond story with Cosmic Armor Superman and most of his New 52 Superman stories published under Action Comics; I find them all to be quite complicated.

They kind of are, him and Jonathan Hickman do some mind bending stuff.

Depends on which ones, but usually the answer would be yes.

Most often, yes.

You need to have an understanding and knowledge of decades old comic books *cough* Batman R.I.P *cough* to fully appreciate his work at times.

Not really. But my brain isn't filled with plagued live action CBM knowledge.

@life_without_progress: I feel like he leaves a lot of stuff vague, ambiguous and open to interpretation from the reader as to what they are about.

Kinda but he's still 1 of my fav comic writers

Yeah but its rewarding and adds that much more to the story.

Overall i was never really a fan of his works but yes, they are complicated.

He can be, I can understand why people say that but it never really bothered me. Except Batman Inc., now that was one complicated book.

P.S. Why do I remember posting on a thread like this recently?

yeah, 95% of Morrison's work are very mind bending and complicated at times.

Prime examples are: The Invisibles, Doom Patrol, Flex Mentallo, The Filth, Final Crisis & Animal Man.

@killer94: Even JLA got me scratching my head, I enjoyed his run overall but I didn't get all of it.