Overflow/carry flag in MIPS
I have searched a bit and didn't find anything that properly explained this.
In MIPS you have add
and addu
to do additions. The main difference is that addu
doesn't generate an overflow exceptions.
Let's say we have this binary (I'm using four bits although MIPS is 32 for simplification):
0111
If we add 1
it becomes 1000
.
With the add
instruction there is an overflow and no carry, since a positive 7 became a negative 1 (assuming two's complement in MIPS). This generates an overflow exception too.
With the addu
there is no overflow and no carry, since everything went as expected.
Now let's say you have this binary:
1111
If we add 1
it becomes 0000
.
With the add
instruction there should be no overflow since a negative 1 became a 0. What about the carry out flag, does it change to 1?
And what happens with the addu
instruction? Is it considered overflow, since 15 became 0? I know that there is no overflow exception, but what happens to the overflow flag? Does it get set to 1? What about the carry flag?
overflow mips carryflag
add a comment |
I have searched a bit and didn't find anything that properly explained this.
In MIPS you have add
and addu
to do additions. The main difference is that addu
doesn't generate an overflow exceptions.
Let's say we have this binary (I'm using four bits although MIPS is 32 for simplification):
0111
If we add 1
it becomes 1000
.
With the add
instruction there is an overflow and no carry, since a positive 7 became a negative 1 (assuming two's complement in MIPS). This generates an overflow exception too.
With the addu
there is no overflow and no carry, since everything went as expected.
Now let's say you have this binary:
1111
If we add 1
it becomes 0000
.
With the add
instruction there should be no overflow since a negative 1 became a 0. What about the carry out flag, does it change to 1?
And what happens with the addu
instruction? Is it considered overflow, since 15 became 0? I know that there is no overflow exception, but what happens to the overflow flag? Does it get set to 1? What about the carry flag?
overflow mips carryflag
1
Which carry flag are you referring to? There's no status register in the MIPS architecture.
– Michael
Nov 12 '18 at 11:18
@Michael oh I thought there was. My bad.
– Myntekt
Nov 13 '18 at 12:18
add a comment |
I have searched a bit and didn't find anything that properly explained this.
In MIPS you have add
and addu
to do additions. The main difference is that addu
doesn't generate an overflow exceptions.
Let's say we have this binary (I'm using four bits although MIPS is 32 for simplification):
0111
If we add 1
it becomes 1000
.
With the add
instruction there is an overflow and no carry, since a positive 7 became a negative 1 (assuming two's complement in MIPS). This generates an overflow exception too.
With the addu
there is no overflow and no carry, since everything went as expected.
Now let's say you have this binary:
1111
If we add 1
it becomes 0000
.
With the add
instruction there should be no overflow since a negative 1 became a 0. What about the carry out flag, does it change to 1?
And what happens with the addu
instruction? Is it considered overflow, since 15 became 0? I know that there is no overflow exception, but what happens to the overflow flag? Does it get set to 1? What about the carry flag?
overflow mips carryflag
I have searched a bit and didn't find anything that properly explained this.
In MIPS you have add
and addu
to do additions. The main difference is that addu
doesn't generate an overflow exceptions.
Let's say we have this binary (I'm using four bits although MIPS is 32 for simplification):
0111
If we add 1
it becomes 1000
.
With the add
instruction there is an overflow and no carry, since a positive 7 became a negative 1 (assuming two's complement in MIPS). This generates an overflow exception too.
With the addu
there is no overflow and no carry, since everything went as expected.
Now let's say you have this binary:
1111
If we add 1
it becomes 0000
.
With the add
instruction there should be no overflow since a negative 1 became a 0. What about the carry out flag, does it change to 1?
And what happens with the addu
instruction? Is it considered overflow, since 15 became 0? I know that there is no overflow exception, but what happens to the overflow flag? Does it get set to 1? What about the carry flag?
overflow mips carryflag
overflow mips carryflag
asked Nov 11 '18 at 19:12
Myntekt
1411111
1411111
1
Which carry flag are you referring to? There's no status register in the MIPS architecture.
– Michael
Nov 12 '18 at 11:18
@Michael oh I thought there was. My bad.
– Myntekt
Nov 13 '18 at 12:18
add a comment |
1
Which carry flag are you referring to? There's no status register in the MIPS architecture.
– Michael
Nov 12 '18 at 11:18
@Michael oh I thought there was. My bad.
– Myntekt
Nov 13 '18 at 12:18
1
1
Which carry flag are you referring to? There's no status register in the MIPS architecture.
– Michael
Nov 12 '18 at 11:18
Which carry flag are you referring to? There's no status register in the MIPS architecture.
– Michael
Nov 12 '18 at 11:18
@Michael oh I thought there was. My bad.
– Myntekt
Nov 13 '18 at 12:18
@Michael oh I thought there was. My bad.
– Myntekt
Nov 13 '18 at 12:18
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is no carryout flag in MIPS architecture.
Overflow exception in the case of addition happens when the sign of the result is different form the expected sign which can happen:
- When you add two positive numbers and you get a negative number as a result
- When you add two negative numbers and you get a positive number as a result
So yes, in you hypothetical 4 bit MIPS 0111+1 results in an overflow, with the corresponding flag being activated.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252235%2foverflow-carry-flag-in-mips%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no carryout flag in MIPS architecture.
Overflow exception in the case of addition happens when the sign of the result is different form the expected sign which can happen:
- When you add two positive numbers and you get a negative number as a result
- When you add two negative numbers and you get a positive number as a result
So yes, in you hypothetical 4 bit MIPS 0111+1 results in an overflow, with the corresponding flag being activated.
add a comment |
There is no carryout flag in MIPS architecture.
Overflow exception in the case of addition happens when the sign of the result is different form the expected sign which can happen:
- When you add two positive numbers and you get a negative number as a result
- When you add two negative numbers and you get a positive number as a result
So yes, in you hypothetical 4 bit MIPS 0111+1 results in an overflow, with the corresponding flag being activated.
add a comment |
There is no carryout flag in MIPS architecture.
Overflow exception in the case of addition happens when the sign of the result is different form the expected sign which can happen:
- When you add two positive numbers and you get a negative number as a result
- When you add two negative numbers and you get a positive number as a result
So yes, in you hypothetical 4 bit MIPS 0111+1 results in an overflow, with the corresponding flag being activated.
There is no carryout flag in MIPS architecture.
Overflow exception in the case of addition happens when the sign of the result is different form the expected sign which can happen:
- When you add two positive numbers and you get a negative number as a result
- When you add two negative numbers and you get a positive number as a result
So yes, in you hypothetical 4 bit MIPS 0111+1 results in an overflow, with the corresponding flag being activated.
edited Nov 19 '18 at 0:37
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:06
fasiume
236
236
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252235%2foverflow-carry-flag-in-mips%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Which carry flag are you referring to? There's no status register in the MIPS architecture.
– Michael
Nov 12 '18 at 11:18
@Michael oh I thought there was. My bad.
– Myntekt
Nov 13 '18 at 12:18