Convert spark pipeline to dataframe
The Spark Pipeline framework allows for creation of pipelines of transforms for machine learning or other applications in a reproducible way. However, when creating the dataframes, I want to be able to perform exploratory analysis.
In my case, I have ~100 columns, of which 80 are strings and need to be one hot encoded:
from pyspark.ml.feature import OneHotEncoderEstimator, StringIndexer,VectorAssembler
from pyspark.ml import Pipeline
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegression
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegressionModel
#cols_to_one_hot_encode_2 is a list of columns that need to be one hot encoded
#cols_to_keep_as_is are columns that are **note** one hot encoded
cols_to_one_hot_encode_3=[i+"_hot" for i in cols_to_one_hot_encode_2]
encoder= OneHotEncoderEstimator(inputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_2,
outputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_3,dropLast=False)
#assemble pipeline
vectorAssembler = VectorAssembler().setInputCols(cols_to_keep_as_is+cols_to_one_hot_encode_3).setOutputCol("features")
all_stages=indexers
all_stages.append(encoder)
all_stages.append(vectorAssembler)
transformationPipeline=Pipeline(stages=all_stages)
fittedPipeline=transformationPipeline.fit(df_3)
dataset = fittedPipeline.transform(df_3)
#now pass to logistic regression
selectedcols = ["response_variable","features"] #+df_3.columns
dataset_2= dataset.select(selectedcols)
# Create initial LogisticRegression model
lr = LogisticRegression(labelCol="response_variable", featuresCol="features", maxIter=10,elasticNetParam=1)
# Train model with Training Data
lrModel = lr.fit(dataset_2)
When I look at dataset_2 display(dataset_2)
, it prints:
response_variable features
0 [0,6508,[1,4,53,155,166,186,205,242,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,155,165,185,207,243,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,158,170,185,206,241,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,156,168,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,155,166,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8223,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
Which is totally useless for doing feature exploration.Notice that the one-hot encoder has exploded my features from ~100 columns to 6508.
My question
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
This should be a dataframe that has 6058 features and the corresponding number of rows, such as:
For example, I want something like:
response_variable feature_1_hot_1 feature_1_hot_2 feature_1_hot_3 ... (6505 more columns)
0 1 1 0
etc.
Not a duplicate
Not a duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
That is asking how to do literal string splitting based on a delimiter. The transform done by the pipeline is not a simple string splitting. See Using Spark ML Pipelines just for Transformations
apache-spark pipeline databricks
add a comment |
The Spark Pipeline framework allows for creation of pipelines of transforms for machine learning or other applications in a reproducible way. However, when creating the dataframes, I want to be able to perform exploratory analysis.
In my case, I have ~100 columns, of which 80 are strings and need to be one hot encoded:
from pyspark.ml.feature import OneHotEncoderEstimator, StringIndexer,VectorAssembler
from pyspark.ml import Pipeline
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegression
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegressionModel
#cols_to_one_hot_encode_2 is a list of columns that need to be one hot encoded
#cols_to_keep_as_is are columns that are **note** one hot encoded
cols_to_one_hot_encode_3=[i+"_hot" for i in cols_to_one_hot_encode_2]
encoder= OneHotEncoderEstimator(inputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_2,
outputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_3,dropLast=False)
#assemble pipeline
vectorAssembler = VectorAssembler().setInputCols(cols_to_keep_as_is+cols_to_one_hot_encode_3).setOutputCol("features")
all_stages=indexers
all_stages.append(encoder)
all_stages.append(vectorAssembler)
transformationPipeline=Pipeline(stages=all_stages)
fittedPipeline=transformationPipeline.fit(df_3)
dataset = fittedPipeline.transform(df_3)
#now pass to logistic regression
selectedcols = ["response_variable","features"] #+df_3.columns
dataset_2= dataset.select(selectedcols)
# Create initial LogisticRegression model
lr = LogisticRegression(labelCol="response_variable", featuresCol="features", maxIter=10,elasticNetParam=1)
# Train model with Training Data
lrModel = lr.fit(dataset_2)
When I look at dataset_2 display(dataset_2)
, it prints:
response_variable features
0 [0,6508,[1,4,53,155,166,186,205,242,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,155,165,185,207,243,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,158,170,185,206,241,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,156,168,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,155,166,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8223,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
Which is totally useless for doing feature exploration.Notice that the one-hot encoder has exploded my features from ~100 columns to 6508.
My question
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
This should be a dataframe that has 6058 features and the corresponding number of rows, such as:
For example, I want something like:
response_variable feature_1_hot_1 feature_1_hot_2 feature_1_hot_3 ... (6505 more columns)
0 1 1 0
etc.
Not a duplicate
Not a duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
That is asking how to do literal string splitting based on a delimiter. The transform done by the pipeline is not a simple string splitting. See Using Spark ML Pipelines just for Transformations
apache-spark pipeline databricks
why the downvote?
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:12
Possible duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
– user10465355
Nov 13 '18 at 22:14
modifed to explain why not duplicate
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
The Spark Pipeline framework allows for creation of pipelines of transforms for machine learning or other applications in a reproducible way. However, when creating the dataframes, I want to be able to perform exploratory analysis.
In my case, I have ~100 columns, of which 80 are strings and need to be one hot encoded:
from pyspark.ml.feature import OneHotEncoderEstimator, StringIndexer,VectorAssembler
from pyspark.ml import Pipeline
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegression
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegressionModel
#cols_to_one_hot_encode_2 is a list of columns that need to be one hot encoded
#cols_to_keep_as_is are columns that are **note** one hot encoded
cols_to_one_hot_encode_3=[i+"_hot" for i in cols_to_one_hot_encode_2]
encoder= OneHotEncoderEstimator(inputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_2,
outputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_3,dropLast=False)
#assemble pipeline
vectorAssembler = VectorAssembler().setInputCols(cols_to_keep_as_is+cols_to_one_hot_encode_3).setOutputCol("features")
all_stages=indexers
all_stages.append(encoder)
all_stages.append(vectorAssembler)
transformationPipeline=Pipeline(stages=all_stages)
fittedPipeline=transformationPipeline.fit(df_3)
dataset = fittedPipeline.transform(df_3)
#now pass to logistic regression
selectedcols = ["response_variable","features"] #+df_3.columns
dataset_2= dataset.select(selectedcols)
# Create initial LogisticRegression model
lr = LogisticRegression(labelCol="response_variable", featuresCol="features", maxIter=10,elasticNetParam=1)
# Train model with Training Data
lrModel = lr.fit(dataset_2)
When I look at dataset_2 display(dataset_2)
, it prints:
response_variable features
0 [0,6508,[1,4,53,155,166,186,205,242,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,155,165,185,207,243,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,158,170,185,206,241,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,156,168,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,155,166,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8223,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
Which is totally useless for doing feature exploration.Notice that the one-hot encoder has exploded my features from ~100 columns to 6508.
My question
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
This should be a dataframe that has 6058 features and the corresponding number of rows, such as:
For example, I want something like:
response_variable feature_1_hot_1 feature_1_hot_2 feature_1_hot_3 ... (6505 more columns)
0 1 1 0
etc.
Not a duplicate
Not a duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
That is asking how to do literal string splitting based on a delimiter. The transform done by the pipeline is not a simple string splitting. See Using Spark ML Pipelines just for Transformations
apache-spark pipeline databricks
The Spark Pipeline framework allows for creation of pipelines of transforms for machine learning or other applications in a reproducible way. However, when creating the dataframes, I want to be able to perform exploratory analysis.
In my case, I have ~100 columns, of which 80 are strings and need to be one hot encoded:
from pyspark.ml.feature import OneHotEncoderEstimator, StringIndexer,VectorAssembler
from pyspark.ml import Pipeline
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegression
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegressionModel
#cols_to_one_hot_encode_2 is a list of columns that need to be one hot encoded
#cols_to_keep_as_is are columns that are **note** one hot encoded
cols_to_one_hot_encode_3=[i+"_hot" for i in cols_to_one_hot_encode_2]
encoder= OneHotEncoderEstimator(inputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_2,
outputCols=cols_to_one_hot_encode_3,dropLast=False)
#assemble pipeline
vectorAssembler = VectorAssembler().setInputCols(cols_to_keep_as_is+cols_to_one_hot_encode_3).setOutputCol("features")
all_stages=indexers
all_stages.append(encoder)
all_stages.append(vectorAssembler)
transformationPipeline=Pipeline(stages=all_stages)
fittedPipeline=transformationPipeline.fit(df_3)
dataset = fittedPipeline.transform(df_3)
#now pass to logistic regression
selectedcols = ["response_variable","features"] #+df_3.columns
dataset_2= dataset.select(selectedcols)
# Create initial LogisticRegression model
lr = LogisticRegression(labelCol="response_variable", featuresCol="features", maxIter=10,elasticNetParam=1)
# Train model with Training Data
lrModel = lr.fit(dataset_2)
When I look at dataset_2 display(dataset_2)
, it prints:
response_variable features
0 [0,6508,[1,4,53,155,166,186,205,242,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,155,165,185,207,243,2104,6225,6498],[8220,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,158,170,185,206,241,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,3,53,156,168,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8222,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
0 [0,6508,[1,2,53,155,166,185,205,240,2104,6225,6498],[8223,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]]
Which is totally useless for doing feature exploration.Notice that the one-hot encoder has exploded my features from ~100 columns to 6508.
My question
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
This should be a dataframe that has 6058 features and the corresponding number of rows, such as:
For example, I want something like:
response_variable feature_1_hot_1 feature_1_hot_2 feature_1_hot_3 ... (6505 more columns)
0 1 1 0
etc.
Not a duplicate
Not a duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
That is asking how to do literal string splitting based on a delimiter. The transform done by the pipeline is not a simple string splitting. See Using Spark ML Pipelines just for Transformations
apache-spark pipeline databricks
apache-spark pipeline databricks
edited Nov 13 '18 at 22:18
Josh
asked Nov 13 '18 at 22:10
JoshJosh
878
878
why the downvote?
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:12
Possible duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
– user10465355
Nov 13 '18 at 22:14
modifed to explain why not duplicate
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
why the downvote?
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:12
Possible duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
– user10465355
Nov 13 '18 at 22:14
modifed to explain why not duplicate
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:19
why the downvote?
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:12
why the downvote?
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:12
Possible duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
– user10465355
Nov 13 '18 at 22:14
Possible duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
– user10465355
Nov 13 '18 at 22:14
modifed to explain why not duplicate
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:19
modifed to explain why not duplicate
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
There is no such hidden structure. Spark ML Pipelines
are build around VectorUDT
columns and metadata to enrich the structure. There is no intermediate structure that holds expanded columns, and if there where, it wouldn't scale (Spark doesn't handle wide and dense data that would be generated here, and query planner chokes when number of columns gets into tens of thousands) given the current implementation.
Splitting the columns and analyzing the metadata is your best and only option.
So there is no method to create such a dataframe? I find that very hard to believe.
– Josh
Nov 14 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53290258%2fconvert-spark-pipeline-to-dataframe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
There is no such hidden structure. Spark ML Pipelines
are build around VectorUDT
columns and metadata to enrich the structure. There is no intermediate structure that holds expanded columns, and if there where, it wouldn't scale (Spark doesn't handle wide and dense data that would be generated here, and query planner chokes when number of columns gets into tens of thousands) given the current implementation.
Splitting the columns and analyzing the metadata is your best and only option.
So there is no method to create such a dataframe? I find that very hard to believe.
– Josh
Nov 14 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
There is no such hidden structure. Spark ML Pipelines
are build around VectorUDT
columns and metadata to enrich the structure. There is no intermediate structure that holds expanded columns, and if there where, it wouldn't scale (Spark doesn't handle wide and dense data that would be generated here, and query planner chokes when number of columns gets into tens of thousands) given the current implementation.
Splitting the columns and analyzing the metadata is your best and only option.
So there is no method to create such a dataframe? I find that very hard to believe.
– Josh
Nov 14 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
There is no such hidden structure. Spark ML Pipelines
are build around VectorUDT
columns and metadata to enrich the structure. There is no intermediate structure that holds expanded columns, and if there where, it wouldn't scale (Spark doesn't handle wide and dense data that would be generated here, and query planner chokes when number of columns gets into tens of thousands) given the current implementation.
Splitting the columns and analyzing the metadata is your best and only option.
How do I look at the dataframe that iscreated under the hood by the pipeline?
There is no such hidden structure. Spark ML Pipelines
are build around VectorUDT
columns and metadata to enrich the structure. There is no intermediate structure that holds expanded columns, and if there where, it wouldn't scale (Spark doesn't handle wide and dense data that would be generated here, and query planner chokes when number of columns gets into tens of thousands) given the current implementation.
Splitting the columns and analyzing the metadata is your best and only option.
answered Nov 14 '18 at 9:50
user10651176
So there is no method to create such a dataframe? I find that very hard to believe.
– Josh
Nov 14 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
So there is no method to create such a dataframe? I find that very hard to believe.
– Josh
Nov 14 '18 at 14:55
So there is no method to create such a dataframe? I find that very hard to believe.
– Josh
Nov 14 '18 at 14:55
So there is no method to create such a dataframe? I find that very hard to believe.
– Josh
Nov 14 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53290258%2fconvert-spark-pipeline-to-dataframe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
why the downvote?
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:12
Possible duplicate of How to split Vector into columns - using PySpark
– user10465355
Nov 13 '18 at 22:14
modifed to explain why not duplicate
– Josh
Nov 13 '18 at 22:19