Declare arrays with different sizes in a C typedef struct



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I know how to dynamic allocate a new array with malloc.
I wonder if there's a way to avoid that in this situation:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE 128

typedef struct MyBuffer

volatile uint8_t RX[RX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint8_t TX[TX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
volatile uint16_t RX_Tail;
volatile uint16_t TX_Head;
volatile uint16_t TX_Tail;
MyBuffer_t;

typedef struct MyChannel

// other stuff
MyBuffer_t buffer;
MyChannel_t;


then in my code I create several variables like this:



MyChannel_t ch1;
MyChannel_t ch2;
MyChannel_t ch3;


but I would like to set a different sizes of the arrays for each variable. It's ok to select among a small set, i.e.:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 32
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 16

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 128
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 64

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 128


Is there a way to achieve this without using malloc?










share|improve this question






















  • If you would declare the sizes in each source file, then include the typedef, then you can.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:08











  • I would like to set the sizes for each MyChannel_t declared.

    – Mark
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:09











  • You can, if you declare them in different source files as per my suggestion. Otherwise, it is not possible.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:15











  • Sidenote: Your MyBuffer_t should actually be named My2Buffers_t. I would recommend having only single buffer, head and tail in the structure, and then create distinct RX and TX instances that same type.

    – user694733
    Nov 15 '18 at 10:35

















0















I know how to dynamic allocate a new array with malloc.
I wonder if there's a way to avoid that in this situation:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE 128

typedef struct MyBuffer

volatile uint8_t RX[RX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint8_t TX[TX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
volatile uint16_t RX_Tail;
volatile uint16_t TX_Head;
volatile uint16_t TX_Tail;
MyBuffer_t;

typedef struct MyChannel

// other stuff
MyBuffer_t buffer;
MyChannel_t;


then in my code I create several variables like this:



MyChannel_t ch1;
MyChannel_t ch2;
MyChannel_t ch3;


but I would like to set a different sizes of the arrays for each variable. It's ok to select among a small set, i.e.:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 32
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 16

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 128
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 64

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 128


Is there a way to achieve this without using malloc?










share|improve this question






















  • If you would declare the sizes in each source file, then include the typedef, then you can.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:08











  • I would like to set the sizes for each MyChannel_t declared.

    – Mark
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:09











  • You can, if you declare them in different source files as per my suggestion. Otherwise, it is not possible.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:15











  • Sidenote: Your MyBuffer_t should actually be named My2Buffers_t. I would recommend having only single buffer, head and tail in the structure, and then create distinct RX and TX instances that same type.

    – user694733
    Nov 15 '18 at 10:35













0












0








0








I know how to dynamic allocate a new array with malloc.
I wonder if there's a way to avoid that in this situation:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE 128

typedef struct MyBuffer

volatile uint8_t RX[RX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint8_t TX[TX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
volatile uint16_t RX_Tail;
volatile uint16_t TX_Head;
volatile uint16_t TX_Tail;
MyBuffer_t;

typedef struct MyChannel

// other stuff
MyBuffer_t buffer;
MyChannel_t;


then in my code I create several variables like this:



MyChannel_t ch1;
MyChannel_t ch2;
MyChannel_t ch3;


but I would like to set a different sizes of the arrays for each variable. It's ok to select among a small set, i.e.:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 32
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 16

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 128
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 64

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 128


Is there a way to achieve this without using malloc?










share|improve this question














I know how to dynamic allocate a new array with malloc.
I wonder if there's a way to avoid that in this situation:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE 128

typedef struct MyBuffer

volatile uint8_t RX[RX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint8_t TX[TX_BUFFER_SIZE];
volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
volatile uint16_t RX_Tail;
volatile uint16_t TX_Head;
volatile uint16_t TX_Tail;
MyBuffer_t;

typedef struct MyChannel

// other stuff
MyBuffer_t buffer;
MyChannel_t;


then in my code I create several variables like this:



MyChannel_t ch1;
MyChannel_t ch2;
MyChannel_t ch3;


but I would like to set a different sizes of the arrays for each variable. It's ok to select among a small set, i.e.:



#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 32
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S 16

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 128
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_M 64

#define RX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 256
#define TX_BUFFER_SIZE_L 128


Is there a way to achieve this without using malloc?







c arrays struct typedef






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:03









MarkMark

1,13321443




1,13321443












  • If you would declare the sizes in each source file, then include the typedef, then you can.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:08











  • I would like to set the sizes for each MyChannel_t declared.

    – Mark
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:09











  • You can, if you declare them in different source files as per my suggestion. Otherwise, it is not possible.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:15











  • Sidenote: Your MyBuffer_t should actually be named My2Buffers_t. I would recommend having only single buffer, head and tail in the structure, and then create distinct RX and TX instances that same type.

    – user694733
    Nov 15 '18 at 10:35

















  • If you would declare the sizes in each source file, then include the typedef, then you can.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:08











  • I would like to set the sizes for each MyChannel_t declared.

    – Mark
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:09











  • You can, if you declare them in different source files as per my suggestion. Otherwise, it is not possible.

    – Paul Ogilvie
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:15











  • Sidenote: Your MyBuffer_t should actually be named My2Buffers_t. I would recommend having only single buffer, head and tail in the structure, and then create distinct RX and TX instances that same type.

    – user694733
    Nov 15 '18 at 10:35
















If you would declare the sizes in each source file, then include the typedef, then you can.

– Paul Ogilvie
Nov 15 '18 at 9:08





If you would declare the sizes in each source file, then include the typedef, then you can.

– Paul Ogilvie
Nov 15 '18 at 9:08













I would like to set the sizes for each MyChannel_t declared.

– Mark
Nov 15 '18 at 9:09





I would like to set the sizes for each MyChannel_t declared.

– Mark
Nov 15 '18 at 9:09













You can, if you declare them in different source files as per my suggestion. Otherwise, it is not possible.

– Paul Ogilvie
Nov 15 '18 at 9:15





You can, if you declare them in different source files as per my suggestion. Otherwise, it is not possible.

– Paul Ogilvie
Nov 15 '18 at 9:15













Sidenote: Your MyBuffer_t should actually be named My2Buffers_t. I would recommend having only single buffer, head and tail in the structure, and then create distinct RX and TX instances that same type.

– user694733
Nov 15 '18 at 10:35





Sidenote: Your MyBuffer_t should actually be named My2Buffers_t. I would recommend having only single buffer, head and tail in the structure, and then create distinct RX and TX instances that same type.

– user694733
Nov 15 '18 at 10:35












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Declare your buffers as pointers:



typedef struct MyBuffer 
{
volatile uint8_t * RX;
volatile uint8_t * TX;
size_t rxSize;
size_t txSize;
volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
...


And then use separate static allocation for the buffers, and use them to initialize your object.



volatile uint8_t ch1_rx_buffer[RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
volatile uint8_t ch1_tx_buffer[TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
MyChannel_t ch1 =
.buffer =
ch1_rx_buffer,
ch1_tx_buffer,
sizeof ch1_rx_buffer,
sizeof ch1_tx_buffer,
...







share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315755%2fdeclare-arrays-with-different-sizes-in-a-c-typedef-struct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Declare your buffers as pointers:



    typedef struct MyBuffer 
    {
    volatile uint8_t * RX;
    volatile uint8_t * TX;
    size_t rxSize;
    size_t txSize;
    volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
    ...


    And then use separate static allocation for the buffers, and use them to initialize your object.



    volatile uint8_t ch1_rx_buffer[RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
    volatile uint8_t ch1_tx_buffer[TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
    MyChannel_t ch1 =
    .buffer =
    ch1_rx_buffer,
    ch1_tx_buffer,
    sizeof ch1_rx_buffer,
    sizeof ch1_tx_buffer,
    ...







    share|improve this answer





























      2














      Declare your buffers as pointers:



      typedef struct MyBuffer 
      {
      volatile uint8_t * RX;
      volatile uint8_t * TX;
      size_t rxSize;
      size_t txSize;
      volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
      ...


      And then use separate static allocation for the buffers, and use them to initialize your object.



      volatile uint8_t ch1_rx_buffer[RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
      volatile uint8_t ch1_tx_buffer[TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
      MyChannel_t ch1 =
      .buffer =
      ch1_rx_buffer,
      ch1_tx_buffer,
      sizeof ch1_rx_buffer,
      sizeof ch1_tx_buffer,
      ...







      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2







        Declare your buffers as pointers:



        typedef struct MyBuffer 
        {
        volatile uint8_t * RX;
        volatile uint8_t * TX;
        size_t rxSize;
        size_t txSize;
        volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
        ...


        And then use separate static allocation for the buffers, and use them to initialize your object.



        volatile uint8_t ch1_rx_buffer[RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
        volatile uint8_t ch1_tx_buffer[TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
        MyChannel_t ch1 =
        .buffer =
        ch1_rx_buffer,
        ch1_tx_buffer,
        sizeof ch1_rx_buffer,
        sizeof ch1_tx_buffer,
        ...







        share|improve this answer















        Declare your buffers as pointers:



        typedef struct MyBuffer 
        {
        volatile uint8_t * RX;
        volatile uint8_t * TX;
        size_t rxSize;
        size_t txSize;
        volatile uint16_t RX_Head;
        ...


        And then use separate static allocation for the buffers, and use them to initialize your object.



        volatile uint8_t ch1_rx_buffer[RX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
        volatile uint8_t ch1_tx_buffer[TX_BUFFER_SIZE_S];
        MyChannel_t ch1 =
        .buffer =
        ch1_rx_buffer,
        ch1_tx_buffer,
        sizeof ch1_rx_buffer,
        sizeof ch1_tx_buffer,
        ...








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 15 '18 at 9:16

























        answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:11









        user694733user694733

        11.2k13152




        11.2k13152





























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315755%2fdeclare-arrays-with-different-sizes-in-a-c-typedef-struct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

            Darth Vader #20

            Ondo