Doomsday adapts

Iron Man for sure. He's been tanking high calliber bullets since his earlier suits, and blocking a beam from the power stone, which was able to hurt Thor, puts him above Superman.

Iron Man.

Superman in a mismatch.

Tbh, if we're looking at strictly piercing attack based durability feats then they are both roughly the same since they both have feats of no selling bullets. Superman is obviously far more durable in general though.

@thewatcherking: you do understand that bullets have different ranges right?

@DammeFavour:

Both Clark and Ironman have tanked A10 rounds of GAU-8/A.

Infact Tony did it Ironman 1 when his suit was already badly damaged by Ironmonger.

Here

I don't know saddens me more. That the OP think this was something up for debate or that there actually some that think Iron Man is more durable....

@batman242: the Jabroni OP constantly makes ridiculous one sided threads. Look at his name as well.

About the same based on actual feats but, Superman likely has the better of the two we just haven't seen his limit.

Superman.

I don't know where this recent stuff about piercing durability came from but this is a horrible mismatch in Superman's favor.

Yes

A lot believe iron man's helicarrier feat puts him in the same league

@kalkent: Iron Man was badly hurt by that though. You also have to completely ignore general durability to say that.

Supes.

Even though they have the same feats Supes is obviously more durable

Can this site go back to being good?

Iron Man has no sold bullets on more than one occasion. But I agree in terms of everything else Kal-El is far superior.

MCU is gonna be the new dbz soon lol. All their best feats rely on scaling and Superman fans will always sit on their perch saying “unquantifiable, Superman tanks”

I don't recall saying otherwise.

I read that as "neither of them" have feats no selling bullets for some reason...