difference between dune utop and utop









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below



open MParser

let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)

let operators =
[
[
infix (char '*') `Mul;
infix (char '/') `Div;
];
[
infix (char '+') `Add;
infix (char '-') `Sub;
];
]

let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string

let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
let expr s = expression operators term s

let rec calc = function
| `Int i -> i
| `Binop (op, a, b) ->
match op with
| `Add -> calc a + calc b
| `Sub -> calc a - calc b
| `Mul -> calc a * calc b
| `Div -> calc a / calc b


accepted by utop as



val infix :
('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
val operators :
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.operator list list =
[[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val expr :
unit MParser.state ->
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.reply = <fun>
val calc :
([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
int = <fun>


Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :



~$ dune utop lib
ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
(cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
Error: The type of this expression,
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, '_weak1)
operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized


It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?



I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file



Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.



let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =


I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently










share|improve this question



























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below



    open MParser

    let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)

    let operators =
    [
    [
    infix (char '*') `Mul;
    infix (char '/') `Div;
    ];
    [
    infix (char '+') `Add;
    infix (char '-') `Sub;
    ];
    ]

    let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string

    let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
    let expr s = expression operators term s

    let rec calc = function
    | `Int i -> i
    | `Binop (op, a, b) ->
    match op with
    | `Add -> calc a + calc b
    | `Sub -> calc a - calc b
    | `Mul -> calc a * calc b
    | `Div -> calc a / calc b


    accepted by utop as



    val infix :
    ('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
    'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
    val operators :
    (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
    as 'a, unit)
    MParser.operator list list =
    [[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
    [Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
    val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
    val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
    val expr :
    unit MParser.state ->
    (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
    as 'a, unit)
    MParser.reply = <fun>
    val calc :
    ([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
    int = <fun>


    Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :



    ~$ dune utop lib
    ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
    (cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
    File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
    Error: The type of this expression,
    (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
    as 'a, '_weak1)
    operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized


    It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
    I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?



    I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file



    Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.



    let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =


    I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below



      open MParser

      let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)

      let operators =
      [
      [
      infix (char '*') `Mul;
      infix (char '/') `Div;
      ];
      [
      infix (char '+') `Add;
      infix (char '-') `Sub;
      ];
      ]

      let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string

      let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
      let expr s = expression operators term s

      let rec calc = function
      | `Int i -> i
      | `Binop (op, a, b) ->
      match op with
      | `Add -> calc a + calc b
      | `Sub -> calc a - calc b
      | `Mul -> calc a * calc b
      | `Div -> calc a / calc b


      accepted by utop as



      val infix :
      ('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
      'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
      val operators :
      (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
      as 'a, unit)
      MParser.operator list list =
      [[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
      [Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
      val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
      val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
      val expr :
      unit MParser.state ->
      (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
      as 'a, unit)
      MParser.reply = <fun>
      val calc :
      ([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
      int = <fun>


      Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :



      ~$ dune utop lib
      ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
      (cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
      File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
      Error: The type of this expression,
      (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
      as 'a, '_weak1)
      operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized


      It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
      I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?



      I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file



      Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.



      let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =


      I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently










      share|improve this question















      If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below



      open MParser

      let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)

      let operators =
      [
      [
      infix (char '*') `Mul;
      infix (char '/') `Div;
      ];
      [
      infix (char '+') `Add;
      infix (char '-') `Sub;
      ];
      ]

      let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string

      let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
      let expr s = expression operators term s

      let rec calc = function
      | `Int i -> i
      | `Binop (op, a, b) ->
      match op with
      | `Add -> calc a + calc b
      | `Sub -> calc a - calc b
      | `Mul -> calc a * calc b
      | `Div -> calc a / calc b


      accepted by utop as



      val infix :
      ('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
      'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
      val operators :
      (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
      as 'a, unit)
      MParser.operator list list =
      [[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
      [Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
      val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
      val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
      val expr :
      unit MParser.state ->
      (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
      as 'a, unit)
      MParser.reply = <fun>
      val calc :
      ([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
      int = <fun>


      Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :



      ~$ dune utop lib
      ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
      (cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
      File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
      Error: The type of this expression,
      (_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
      as 'a, '_weak1)
      operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized


      It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
      I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?



      I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file



      Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.



      let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =


      I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently







      ocaml variant polymorphic-variants






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 10 at 12:54

























      asked Nov 10 at 12:30









      nicolas

      4,00322559




      4,00322559






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.



          you can get the same result with the mwe :



          let store = ref None


          The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53238966%2fdifference-between-dune-utop-and-utop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.



            you can get the same result with the mwe :



            let store = ref None


            The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.



              you can get the same result with the mwe :



              let store = ref None


              The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.



                you can get the same result with the mwe :



                let store = ref None


                The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref






                share|improve this answer












                You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.



                you can get the same result with the mwe :



                let store = ref None


                The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 11 at 23:03









                Julien

                1327




                1327



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53238966%2fdifference-between-dune-utop-and-utop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Kleinkühnau

                    Makov (Slowakei)

                    Deutsches Schauspielhaus