difference between dune utop and utop
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below
open MParser
let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)
let operators =
[
[
infix (char '*') `Mul;
infix (char '/') `Div;
];
[
infix (char '+') `Add;
infix (char '-') `Sub;
];
]
let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string
let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
let expr s = expression operators term s
let rec calc = function
| `Int i -> i
| `Binop (op, a, b) ->
match op with
| `Add -> calc a + calc b
| `Sub -> calc a - calc b
| `Mul -> calc a * calc b
| `Div -> calc a / calc b
accepted by utop as
val infix :
('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
val operators :
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.operator list list =
[[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val expr :
unit MParser.state ->
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.reply = <fun>
val calc :
([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
int = <fun>
Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :
~$ dune utop lib
ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
(cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
Error: The type of this expression,
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, '_weak1)
operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized
It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?
I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file
Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.
let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =
I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently
ocaml variant polymorphic-variants
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below
open MParser
let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)
let operators =
[
[
infix (char '*') `Mul;
infix (char '/') `Div;
];
[
infix (char '+') `Add;
infix (char '-') `Sub;
];
]
let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string
let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
let expr s = expression operators term s
let rec calc = function
| `Int i -> i
| `Binop (op, a, b) ->
match op with
| `Add -> calc a + calc b
| `Sub -> calc a - calc b
| `Mul -> calc a * calc b
| `Div -> calc a / calc b
accepted by utop as
val infix :
('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
val operators :
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.operator list list =
[[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val expr :
unit MParser.state ->
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.reply = <fun>
val calc :
([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
int = <fun>
Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :
~$ dune utop lib
ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
(cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
Error: The type of this expression,
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, '_weak1)
operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized
It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?
I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file
Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.
let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =
I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently
ocaml variant polymorphic-variants
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below
open MParser
let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)
let operators =
[
[
infix (char '*') `Mul;
infix (char '/') `Div;
];
[
infix (char '+') `Add;
infix (char '-') `Sub;
];
]
let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string
let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
let expr s = expression operators term s
let rec calc = function
| `Int i -> i
| `Binop (op, a, b) ->
match op with
| `Add -> calc a + calc b
| `Sub -> calc a - calc b
| `Mul -> calc a * calc b
| `Div -> calc a / calc b
accepted by utop as
val infix :
('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
val operators :
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.operator list list =
[[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val expr :
unit MParser.state ->
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.reply = <fun>
val calc :
([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
int = <fun>
Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :
~$ dune utop lib
ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
(cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
Error: The type of this expression,
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, '_weak1)
operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized
It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?
I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file
Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.
let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =
I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently
ocaml variant polymorphic-variants
If I load the following code in utop, after #require "mparser", it is accepted in the top level and give the signature below
open MParser
let infix p op = Infix (p |>> (fun _ a b -> (`Binop (op, a, b))), Assoc_left)
let operators =
[
[
infix (char '*') `Mul;
infix (char '/') `Div;
];
[
infix (char '+') `Add;
infix (char '-') `Sub;
];
]
let decimal = many1_chars digit |>> int_of_string
let term = (decimal |>> fun i -> `Int i)
let expr s = expression operators term s
let rec calc = function
| `Int i -> i
| `Binop (op, a, b) ->
match op with
| `Add -> calc a + calc b
| `Sub -> calc a - calc b
| `Mul -> calc a * calc b
| `Div -> calc a / calc b
accepted by utop as
val infix :
('a, 'b) MParser.t ->
'c -> ([> `Binop of 'c * 'd * 'd ] as 'd, 'b) MParser.operator = <fun>
val operators :
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.operator list list =
[[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)];
[Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left); Infix (<fun>, Assoc_left)]]
val decimal : (int, unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val term : ([> `Int of int ], unit) MParser.t = <fun>
val expr :
unit MParser.state ->
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, unit)
MParser.reply = <fun>
val calc :
([< `Binop of [< `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a) ->
int = <fun>
Now, if I try to load with dune utop a library containing this code as a file/module, I received the following error :
~$ dune utop lib
ocamlc lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmi,cmo,cmt (exit 2)
(cd _build/default && /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -w @a-4-29-40-41-42-44-45-48-58-59-60-40 -strict-sequence -strict-formats -short-paths -keep-locs -g -bin-annot -I lib/.lib.objs -I lib/.lib.objs/.private -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/bytes -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/mparser -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/re/perl -I /Users/nrolland/.opam/system/lib/seq -no-alias-deps -opaque -open Lib -o lib/.lib.objs/lib__VariantExemple.cmo -c -impl lib/variantExemple.ml)
File "lib/variantExemple.ml", line 5, characters 4-13:
Error: The type of this expression,
(_[> `Binop of _[> `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ]
as 'a, '_weak1)
operator list list, contains type variables that cannot be generalized
It looks like there are some type annotation missing.
I am not too familiar with polymorphic variant type and , is there an obvious solution out ?
I was hoping that sticking the signature part given by utop in an interface would work, but it does not seem to be valid in a .mli file
Edit : the simple solution is to add a closed type annotation.
let operators : ([ `Binop of [ `Add | `Div | `Mul | `Sub ] * 'a * 'a | `Int of int ] as 'a, unit) operator list list =
I am not sure if there is a reason for why an interactive session and a dune utop lib one-shot loading should behave differently
ocaml variant polymorphic-variants
ocaml variant polymorphic-variants
edited Nov 10 at 12:54
asked Nov 10 at 12:30
nicolas
4,00322559
4,00322559
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.
you can get the same result with the mwe :
let store = ref None
The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.
you can get the same result with the mwe :
let store = ref None
The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.
you can get the same result with the mwe :
let store = ref None
The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.
you can get the same result with the mwe :
let store = ref None
The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref
You have _ in front of your types, which suggest your type is weakly polymorphic, and the compiler refuse to let such things live in a compiled object.
you can get the same result with the mwe :
let store = ref None
The toplevel is ok with that as it can be resolved to a monomorphic type later if you evaluate something like store:= Some1, which "monomorphise" the type from _a option ref to int option ref
answered Nov 11 at 23:03
Julien
1327
1327
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53238966%2fdifference-between-dune-utop-and-utop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown