Finding all asp.net elements with specific suffix using jquery










1















Is it possible to find all asp.net elements with a suffix _val, if so what is the syntax? (I must use the .ClientID and cant use Static Client ID)



I know we can typically use



$('div[id$="_val"]')


And I know how to select individual elements



$(document).ready(function () 
var myDomElement = document.getElementById("panel_validate_field")
$(myDomElement).find("#<%=txt_Surname_val.ClientID%>").change(function()
// do my validation check
);
);


However the former does not work with the asp.net controls, I assume this has something to do with the unique client id. Is there any way I can combine these two methods ? I would like to avoid having to iterate through all my panels elements as not all of them require the validation re-correction.










share|improve this question
























  • if you want to target multiple elements, why not just use a class?

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:03












  • why not just give all fields you want to target the same class (as well as the others that style it) - you aren't limited to using just one class per element. Also, classes don't necessarily have to apply a style - they can be used just so that js can target them (which can improve performance as they are more efficient than attribute selectors)

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06












  • I'm not even sure how to select via class when there are multiple classes.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:10












  • same way you do when there is one class - jsfiddle.net/amvc5h0z

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:12












  • doesn't seem to work I'm using $(myDomElement).find(".val").on('change keyup paste',function() but its not finding anything, as I assume its not finding the unique client id ? I can't use client mode static.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:15
















1















Is it possible to find all asp.net elements with a suffix _val, if so what is the syntax? (I must use the .ClientID and cant use Static Client ID)



I know we can typically use



$('div[id$="_val"]')


And I know how to select individual elements



$(document).ready(function () 
var myDomElement = document.getElementById("panel_validate_field")
$(myDomElement).find("#<%=txt_Surname_val.ClientID%>").change(function()
// do my validation check
);
);


However the former does not work with the asp.net controls, I assume this has something to do with the unique client id. Is there any way I can combine these two methods ? I would like to avoid having to iterate through all my panels elements as not all of them require the validation re-correction.










share|improve this question
























  • if you want to target multiple elements, why not just use a class?

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:03












  • why not just give all fields you want to target the same class (as well as the others that style it) - you aren't limited to using just one class per element. Also, classes don't necessarily have to apply a style - they can be used just so that js can target them (which can improve performance as they are more efficient than attribute selectors)

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06












  • I'm not even sure how to select via class when there are multiple classes.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:10












  • same way you do when there is one class - jsfiddle.net/amvc5h0z

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:12












  • doesn't seem to work I'm using $(myDomElement).find(".val").on('change keyup paste',function() but its not finding anything, as I assume its not finding the unique client id ? I can't use client mode static.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:15














1












1








1








Is it possible to find all asp.net elements with a suffix _val, if so what is the syntax? (I must use the .ClientID and cant use Static Client ID)



I know we can typically use



$('div[id$="_val"]')


And I know how to select individual elements



$(document).ready(function () 
var myDomElement = document.getElementById("panel_validate_field")
$(myDomElement).find("#<%=txt_Surname_val.ClientID%>").change(function()
// do my validation check
);
);


However the former does not work with the asp.net controls, I assume this has something to do with the unique client id. Is there any way I can combine these two methods ? I would like to avoid having to iterate through all my panels elements as not all of them require the validation re-correction.










share|improve this question
















Is it possible to find all asp.net elements with a suffix _val, if so what is the syntax? (I must use the .ClientID and cant use Static Client ID)



I know we can typically use



$('div[id$="_val"]')


And I know how to select individual elements



$(document).ready(function () 
var myDomElement = document.getElementById("panel_validate_field")
$(myDomElement).find("#<%=txt_Surname_val.ClientID%>").change(function()
// do my validation check
);
);


However the former does not work with the asp.net controls, I assume this has something to do with the unique client id. Is there any way I can combine these two methods ? I would like to avoid having to iterate through all my panels elements as not all of them require the validation re-correction.







jquery asp.net






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 10:18







RyanN1220

















asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:51









RyanN1220RyanN1220

788




788












  • if you want to target multiple elements, why not just use a class?

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:03












  • why not just give all fields you want to target the same class (as well as the others that style it) - you aren't limited to using just one class per element. Also, classes don't necessarily have to apply a style - they can be used just so that js can target them (which can improve performance as they are more efficient than attribute selectors)

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06












  • I'm not even sure how to select via class when there are multiple classes.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:10












  • same way you do when there is one class - jsfiddle.net/amvc5h0z

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:12












  • doesn't seem to work I'm using $(myDomElement).find(".val").on('change keyup paste',function() but its not finding anything, as I assume its not finding the unique client id ? I can't use client mode static.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:15


















  • if you want to target multiple elements, why not just use a class?

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:03












  • why not just give all fields you want to target the same class (as well as the others that style it) - you aren't limited to using just one class per element. Also, classes don't necessarily have to apply a style - they can be used just so that js can target them (which can improve performance as they are more efficient than attribute selectors)

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:06












  • I'm not even sure how to select via class when there are multiple classes.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:10












  • same way you do when there is one class - jsfiddle.net/amvc5h0z

    – Pete
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:12












  • doesn't seem to work I'm using $(myDomElement).find(".val").on('change keyup paste',function() but its not finding anything, as I assume its not finding the unique client id ? I can't use client mode static.

    – RyanN1220
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:15

















if you want to target multiple elements, why not just use a class?

– Pete
Nov 14 '18 at 10:03






if you want to target multiple elements, why not just use a class?

– Pete
Nov 14 '18 at 10:03














why not just give all fields you want to target the same class (as well as the others that style it) - you aren't limited to using just one class per element. Also, classes don't necessarily have to apply a style - they can be used just so that js can target them (which can improve performance as they are more efficient than attribute selectors)

– Pete
Nov 14 '18 at 10:06






why not just give all fields you want to target the same class (as well as the others that style it) - you aren't limited to using just one class per element. Also, classes don't necessarily have to apply a style - they can be used just so that js can target them (which can improve performance as they are more efficient than attribute selectors)

– Pete
Nov 14 '18 at 10:06














I'm not even sure how to select via class when there are multiple classes.

– RyanN1220
Nov 14 '18 at 10:10






I'm not even sure how to select via class when there are multiple classes.

– RyanN1220
Nov 14 '18 at 10:10














same way you do when there is one class - jsfiddle.net/amvc5h0z

– Pete
Nov 14 '18 at 10:12






same way you do when there is one class - jsfiddle.net/amvc5h0z

– Pete
Nov 14 '18 at 10:12














doesn't seem to work I'm using $(myDomElement).find(".val").on('change keyup paste',function() but its not finding anything, as I assume its not finding the unique client id ? I can't use client mode static.

– RyanN1220
Nov 14 '18 at 10:15






doesn't seem to work I'm using $(myDomElement).find(".val").on('change keyup paste',function() but its not finding anything, as I assume its not finding the unique client id ? I can't use client mode static.

– RyanN1220
Nov 14 '18 at 10:15













1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Ok silly blunder of mine, the correct form is simply (overcomplicating in my head)



$(myDomElement).find('[id$=_val]')





share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53297278%2ffinding-all-asp-net-elements-with-specific-suffix-using-jquery%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Ok silly blunder of mine, the correct form is simply (overcomplicating in my head)



    $(myDomElement).find('[id$=_val]')





    share|improve this answer



























      0














      Ok silly blunder of mine, the correct form is simply (overcomplicating in my head)



      $(myDomElement).find('[id$=_val]')





      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        Ok silly blunder of mine, the correct form is simply (overcomplicating in my head)



        $(myDomElement).find('[id$=_val]')





        share|improve this answer













        Ok silly blunder of mine, the correct form is simply (overcomplicating in my head)



        $(myDomElement).find('[id$=_val]')






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 14 '18 at 10:32









        RyanN1220RyanN1220

        788




        788





























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53297278%2ffinding-all-asp-net-elements-with-specific-suffix-using-jquery%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

            Darth Vader #20

            Ondo