HTML password pattern with minimal requirements
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I've a small problem with a pattern for an input password.
I need the password to have this pattern but I can't find a solution for this problem.
The password must meet the following criteria:
- 8 characters minimal length.
- Begin with a number.
- Finish with an uppercase letter.
Thanks a lot!
html input passwords
add a comment |
I've a small problem with a pattern for an input password.
I need the password to have this pattern but I can't find a solution for this problem.
The password must meet the following criteria:
- 8 characters minimal length.
- Begin with a number.
- Finish with an uppercase letter.
Thanks a lot!
html input passwords
1
[0-9].6,[A-Z]
– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:22
2
As irrational and arbitrary password requirements come, that is pretty irrational and arbitrary.
– JJJ
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
@JJJ These requirements ensure people don't choose too predictable passwords such as "Manuel1988"
– Mr Lister
Nov 15 '18 at 9:48
Complex password rules will usually not lead to more safe passwords, important is only a minimum length. People cannot remember tons of strong passwords, and such rules can interfere with good password schemes. People can get very inventive to bypass such rules, e.g. by using weak passwords like "Password-2018" or in your case "2018PASSWORD". Often you end up with weaker passwords instead of stronger ones. Recently NIST published an official paper, advising against such rules, and against its former recommendations.
– martinstoeckli
Nov 16 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
I've a small problem with a pattern for an input password.
I need the password to have this pattern but I can't find a solution for this problem.
The password must meet the following criteria:
- 8 characters minimal length.
- Begin with a number.
- Finish with an uppercase letter.
Thanks a lot!
html input passwords
I've a small problem with a pattern for an input password.
I need the password to have this pattern but I can't find a solution for this problem.
The password must meet the following criteria:
- 8 characters minimal length.
- Begin with a number.
- Finish with an uppercase letter.
Thanks a lot!
html input passwords
html input passwords
edited Nov 15 '18 at 10:49
Kokogino
7101215
7101215
asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:18
Manuel Jesus FloresManuel Jesus Flores
81
81
1
[0-9].6,[A-Z]
– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:22
2
As irrational and arbitrary password requirements come, that is pretty irrational and arbitrary.
– JJJ
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
@JJJ These requirements ensure people don't choose too predictable passwords such as "Manuel1988"
– Mr Lister
Nov 15 '18 at 9:48
Complex password rules will usually not lead to more safe passwords, important is only a minimum length. People cannot remember tons of strong passwords, and such rules can interfere with good password schemes. People can get very inventive to bypass such rules, e.g. by using weak passwords like "Password-2018" or in your case "2018PASSWORD". Often you end up with weaker passwords instead of stronger ones. Recently NIST published an official paper, advising against such rules, and against its former recommendations.
– martinstoeckli
Nov 16 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
1
[0-9].6,[A-Z]
– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:22
2
As irrational and arbitrary password requirements come, that is pretty irrational and arbitrary.
– JJJ
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
@JJJ These requirements ensure people don't choose too predictable passwords such as "Manuel1988"
– Mr Lister
Nov 15 '18 at 9:48
Complex password rules will usually not lead to more safe passwords, important is only a minimum length. People cannot remember tons of strong passwords, and such rules can interfere with good password schemes. People can get very inventive to bypass such rules, e.g. by using weak passwords like "Password-2018" or in your case "2018PASSWORD". Often you end up with weaker passwords instead of stronger ones. Recently NIST published an official paper, advising against such rules, and against its former recommendations.
– martinstoeckli
Nov 16 '18 at 19:13
1
1
[0-9].6,[A-Z]
– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:22
[0-9].6,[A-Z]
– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:22
2
2
As irrational and arbitrary password requirements come, that is pretty irrational and arbitrary.
– JJJ
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
As irrational and arbitrary password requirements come, that is pretty irrational and arbitrary.
– JJJ
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
@JJJ These requirements ensure people don't choose too predictable passwords such as "Manuel1988"
– Mr Lister
Nov 15 '18 at 9:48
@JJJ These requirements ensure people don't choose too predictable passwords such as "Manuel1988"
– Mr Lister
Nov 15 '18 at 9:48
Complex password rules will usually not lead to more safe passwords, important is only a minimum length. People cannot remember tons of strong passwords, and such rules can interfere with good password schemes. People can get very inventive to bypass such rules, e.g. by using weak passwords like "Password-2018" or in your case "2018PASSWORD". Often you end up with weaker passwords instead of stronger ones. Recently NIST published an official paper, advising against such rules, and against its former recommendations.
– martinstoeckli
Nov 16 '18 at 19:13
Complex password rules will usually not lead to more safe passwords, important is only a minimum length. People cannot remember tons of strong passwords, and such rules can interfere with good password schemes. People can get very inventive to bypass such rules, e.g. by using weak passwords like "Password-2018" or in your case "2018PASSWORD". Often you end up with weaker passwords instead of stronger ones. Recently NIST published an official paper, advising against such rules, and against its former recommendations.
– martinstoeckli
Nov 16 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You can use the pattern
attribute of input
:
<input type="password" pattern="[0-9].6,[A-Z]" />
add a comment |
I think you can use regular expression.
For example ^[0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]3,16[A-Z]$
add a comment |
I would prefer to use JavaScript for validations
Edit
I was able to get the regex try this
[0-9].6,[a-zA-Z!@#$%^&*()_+-=;':"|,.<>/?][A-Z]$
try creating your own regexs from here regex101.com
– Nithin P.H
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53316027%2fhtml-password-pattern-with-minimal-requirements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use the pattern
attribute of input
:
<input type="password" pattern="[0-9].6,[A-Z]" />
add a comment |
You can use the pattern
attribute of input
:
<input type="password" pattern="[0-9].6,[A-Z]" />
add a comment |
You can use the pattern
attribute of input
:
<input type="password" pattern="[0-9].6,[A-Z]" />
You can use the pattern
attribute of input
:
<input type="password" pattern="[0-9].6,[A-Z]" />
answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:26
KokoginoKokogino
7101215
7101215
add a comment |
add a comment |
I think you can use regular expression.
For example ^[0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]3,16[A-Z]$
add a comment |
I think you can use regular expression.
For example ^[0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]3,16[A-Z]$
add a comment |
I think you can use regular expression.
For example ^[0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]3,16[A-Z]$
I think you can use regular expression.
For example ^[0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]3,16[A-Z]$
answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:29
DavionninniDavionninni
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
I would prefer to use JavaScript for validations
Edit
I was able to get the regex try this
[0-9].6,[a-zA-Z!@#$%^&*()_+-=;':"|,.<>/?][A-Z]$
try creating your own regexs from here regex101.com
– Nithin P.H
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
I would prefer to use JavaScript for validations
Edit
I was able to get the regex try this
[0-9].6,[a-zA-Z!@#$%^&*()_+-=;':"|,.<>/?][A-Z]$
try creating your own regexs from here regex101.com
– Nithin P.H
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
I would prefer to use JavaScript for validations
Edit
I was able to get the regex try this
[0-9].6,[a-zA-Z!@#$%^&*()_+-=;':"|,.<>/?][A-Z]$
I would prefer to use JavaScript for validations
Edit
I was able to get the regex try this
[0-9].6,[a-zA-Z!@#$%^&*()_+-=;':"|,.<>/?][A-Z]$
edited Nov 15 '18 at 10:26
answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:42
Nithin P.HNithin P.H
141115
141115
try creating your own regexs from here regex101.com
– Nithin P.H
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
try creating your own regexs from here regex101.com
– Nithin P.H
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
try creating your own regexs from here regex101.com
– Nithin P.H
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
try creating your own regexs from here regex101.com
– Nithin P.H
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53316027%2fhtml-password-pattern-with-minimal-requirements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
[0-9].6,[A-Z]
– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:22
2
As irrational and arbitrary password requirements come, that is pretty irrational and arbitrary.
– JJJ
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
@JJJ These requirements ensure people don't choose too predictable passwords such as "Manuel1988"
– Mr Lister
Nov 15 '18 at 9:48
Complex password rules will usually not lead to more safe passwords, important is only a minimum length. People cannot remember tons of strong passwords, and such rules can interfere with good password schemes. People can get very inventive to bypass such rules, e.g. by using weak passwords like "Password-2018" or in your case "2018PASSWORD". Often you end up with weaker passwords instead of stronger ones. Recently NIST published an official paper, advising against such rules, and against its former recommendations.
– martinstoeckli
Nov 16 '18 at 19:13