SOQL with character range



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I am trying to get all records whose name starts with "a"
and the second letter is in the range [a-s]



The quires I tried but no luck:



FROM 
Agreement__c
WHERE
Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a[a-s]%'


or



FROM 
Agreement__c
WHERE
Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_[a-s]%'


It is very strange because this works as expected



 FROM 
Agreement__c
WHERE
Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'


but every time I use range even like that no luck ...



Account__r.FirstName LIKE '[a-s]%'









share|improve this question




























    3















    I am trying to get all records whose name starts with "a"
    and the second letter is in the range [a-s]



    The quires I tried but no luck:



    FROM 
    Agreement__c
    WHERE
    Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a[a-s]%'


    or



    FROM 
    Agreement__c
    WHERE
    Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
    AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_[a-s]%'


    It is very strange because this works as expected



     FROM 
    Agreement__c
    WHERE
    Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
    AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'


    but every time I use range even like that no luck ...



    Account__r.FirstName LIKE '[a-s]%'









    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      I am trying to get all records whose name starts with "a"
      and the second letter is in the range [a-s]



      The quires I tried but no luck:



      FROM 
      Agreement__c
      WHERE
      Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a[a-s]%'


      or



      FROM 
      Agreement__c
      WHERE
      Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
      AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_[a-s]%'


      It is very strange because this works as expected



       FROM 
      Agreement__c
      WHERE
      Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
      AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'


      but every time I use range even like that no luck ...



      Account__r.FirstName LIKE '[a-s]%'









      share|improve this question














      I am trying to get all records whose name starts with "a"
      and the second letter is in the range [a-s]



      The quires I tried but no luck:



      FROM 
      Agreement__c
      WHERE
      Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a[a-s]%'


      or



      FROM 
      Agreement__c
      WHERE
      Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
      AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_[a-s]%'


      It is very strange because this works as expected



       FROM 
      Agreement__c
      WHERE
      Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
      AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'


      but every time I use range even like that no luck ...



      Account__r.FirstName LIKE '[a-s]%'






      soql






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 15 '18 at 7:20









      Boris GichevBoris Gichev

      184




      184




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          regex expressions are not supported in SOQL queries.





          It is very strange because this works as expected



          FROM 
          Agreement__c WHERE Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%' AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'



          it works as you expect, because LIKE 'a%' means field starts with a after could be zero or more any chanacters, LIKE '_s%' means query all records where FirstName starts from any exactly one character, second is s and after s zero or more any characters. Combination of two conditions gives your expected result.




          in order to achieve desired result with SOQL, you have to manually include all symbols in condition:



          WHERE 
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
          AND
          (
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_a%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_b%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_c%'
          ..





          share|improve this answer

























          • Yeas that is true and that would work (even if it is the most beautiful code to see) but it is hard to believe that char ranges can not be used here !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:58












          • @BorisGichev yes, it is hard to believe, but this is true. you can read more about LIKE operator

            – Oleksandr Berehovskyi
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:59











          • Yes I read this, but thought that I am missing something. Ok, thank you Olek.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:02






          • 1





            Ahaa you use the reg ex via the fields, because they can use REGEX :). Nice to have that trick in mind. I will go for the first option since I am queering the objects for a document. And it would be faster now. But if I need that again I might consider creating a few filter fields in the objects that I need to query. Thank you for the efforts !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:14






          • 2





            REGEX is only available in Validation Rules and Process Builder? Or did they change that?

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:04


















          4














          You can actually do string comparison using greater than/less than operators.



          SELECT Field__c FROM MyObject__c
          WHERE Name >= 'aa'
          AND Name < 'at'





          share|improve this answer























          • how > and < works, summation of Ascii values?

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:15






          • 2





            It should have the same mechanics as ORDER BY.

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:45












          • This looks good, but first I have to check the char table because the organization uses characters like öäå and that may cause unwanted behavior. Or maybe just make one dedicated filter only for those characters.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 16 '18 at 15:12











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "459"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239441%2fsoql-with-character-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          regex expressions are not supported in SOQL queries.





          It is very strange because this works as expected



          FROM 
          Agreement__c WHERE Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%' AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'



          it works as you expect, because LIKE 'a%' means field starts with a after could be zero or more any chanacters, LIKE '_s%' means query all records where FirstName starts from any exactly one character, second is s and after s zero or more any characters. Combination of two conditions gives your expected result.




          in order to achieve desired result with SOQL, you have to manually include all symbols in condition:



          WHERE 
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
          AND
          (
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_a%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_b%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_c%'
          ..





          share|improve this answer

























          • Yeas that is true and that would work (even if it is the most beautiful code to see) but it is hard to believe that char ranges can not be used here !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:58












          • @BorisGichev yes, it is hard to believe, but this is true. you can read more about LIKE operator

            – Oleksandr Berehovskyi
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:59











          • Yes I read this, but thought that I am missing something. Ok, thank you Olek.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:02






          • 1





            Ahaa you use the reg ex via the fields, because they can use REGEX :). Nice to have that trick in mind. I will go for the first option since I am queering the objects for a document. And it would be faster now. But if I need that again I might consider creating a few filter fields in the objects that I need to query. Thank you for the efforts !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:14






          • 2





            REGEX is only available in Validation Rules and Process Builder? Or did they change that?

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:04















          4














          regex expressions are not supported in SOQL queries.





          It is very strange because this works as expected



          FROM 
          Agreement__c WHERE Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%' AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'



          it works as you expect, because LIKE 'a%' means field starts with a after could be zero or more any chanacters, LIKE '_s%' means query all records where FirstName starts from any exactly one character, second is s and after s zero or more any characters. Combination of two conditions gives your expected result.




          in order to achieve desired result with SOQL, you have to manually include all symbols in condition:



          WHERE 
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
          AND
          (
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_a%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_b%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_c%'
          ..





          share|improve this answer

























          • Yeas that is true and that would work (even if it is the most beautiful code to see) but it is hard to believe that char ranges can not be used here !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:58












          • @BorisGichev yes, it is hard to believe, but this is true. you can read more about LIKE operator

            – Oleksandr Berehovskyi
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:59











          • Yes I read this, but thought that I am missing something. Ok, thank you Olek.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:02






          • 1





            Ahaa you use the reg ex via the fields, because they can use REGEX :). Nice to have that trick in mind. I will go for the first option since I am queering the objects for a document. And it would be faster now. But if I need that again I might consider creating a few filter fields in the objects that I need to query. Thank you for the efforts !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:14






          • 2





            REGEX is only available in Validation Rules and Process Builder? Or did they change that?

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:04













          4












          4








          4







          regex expressions are not supported in SOQL queries.





          It is very strange because this works as expected



          FROM 
          Agreement__c WHERE Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%' AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'



          it works as you expect, because LIKE 'a%' means field starts with a after could be zero or more any chanacters, LIKE '_s%' means query all records where FirstName starts from any exactly one character, second is s and after s zero or more any characters. Combination of two conditions gives your expected result.




          in order to achieve desired result with SOQL, you have to manually include all symbols in condition:



          WHERE 
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
          AND
          (
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_a%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_b%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_c%'
          ..





          share|improve this answer















          regex expressions are not supported in SOQL queries.





          It is very strange because this works as expected



          FROM 
          Agreement__c WHERE Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%' AND Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_s%'



          it works as you expect, because LIKE 'a%' means field starts with a after could be zero or more any chanacters, LIKE '_s%' means query all records where FirstName starts from any exactly one character, second is s and after s zero or more any characters. Combination of two conditions gives your expected result.




          in order to achieve desired result with SOQL, you have to manually include all symbols in condition:



          WHERE 
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE 'a%'
          AND
          (
          Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_a%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_b%'
          OR Account__r.FirstName LIKE '_c%'
          ..






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 15 '18 at 14:06

























          answered Nov 15 '18 at 7:31









          Oleksandr BerehovskyiOleksandr Berehovskyi

          10.3k32339




          10.3k32339












          • Yeas that is true and that would work (even if it is the most beautiful code to see) but it is hard to believe that char ranges can not be used here !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:58












          • @BorisGichev yes, it is hard to believe, but this is true. you can read more about LIKE operator

            – Oleksandr Berehovskyi
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:59











          • Yes I read this, but thought that I am missing something. Ok, thank you Olek.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:02






          • 1





            Ahaa you use the reg ex via the fields, because they can use REGEX :). Nice to have that trick in mind. I will go for the first option since I am queering the objects for a document. And it would be faster now. But if I need that again I might consider creating a few filter fields in the objects that I need to query. Thank you for the efforts !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:14






          • 2





            REGEX is only available in Validation Rules and Process Builder? Or did they change that?

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:04

















          • Yeas that is true and that would work (even if it is the most beautiful code to see) but it is hard to believe that char ranges can not be used here !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:58












          • @BorisGichev yes, it is hard to believe, but this is true. you can read more about LIKE operator

            – Oleksandr Berehovskyi
            Nov 15 '18 at 7:59











          • Yes I read this, but thought that I am missing something. Ok, thank you Olek.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:02






          • 1





            Ahaa you use the reg ex via the fields, because they can use REGEX :). Nice to have that trick in mind. I will go for the first option since I am queering the objects for a document. And it would be faster now. But if I need that again I might consider creating a few filter fields in the objects that I need to query. Thank you for the efforts !

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:14






          • 2





            REGEX is only available in Validation Rules and Process Builder? Or did they change that?

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:04
















          Yeas that is true and that would work (even if it is the most beautiful code to see) but it is hard to believe that char ranges can not be used here !

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 15 '18 at 7:58






          Yeas that is true and that would work (even if it is the most beautiful code to see) but it is hard to believe that char ranges can not be used here !

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 15 '18 at 7:58














          @BorisGichev yes, it is hard to believe, but this is true. you can read more about LIKE operator

          – Oleksandr Berehovskyi
          Nov 15 '18 at 7:59





          @BorisGichev yes, it is hard to believe, but this is true. you can read more about LIKE operator

          – Oleksandr Berehovskyi
          Nov 15 '18 at 7:59













          Yes I read this, but thought that I am missing something. Ok, thank you Olek.

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:02





          Yes I read this, but thought that I am missing something. Ok, thank you Olek.

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:02




          1




          1





          Ahaa you use the reg ex via the fields, because they can use REGEX :). Nice to have that trick in mind. I will go for the first option since I am queering the objects for a document. And it would be faster now. But if I need that again I might consider creating a few filter fields in the objects that I need to query. Thank you for the efforts !

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:14





          Ahaa you use the reg ex via the fields, because they can use REGEX :). Nice to have that trick in mind. I will go for the first option since I am queering the objects for a document. And it would be faster now. But if I need that again I might consider creating a few filter fields in the objects that I need to query. Thank you for the efforts !

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:14




          2




          2





          REGEX is only available in Validation Rules and Process Builder? Or did they change that?

          – Adrian Larson
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:04





          REGEX is only available in Validation Rules and Process Builder? Or did they change that?

          – Adrian Larson
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:04













          4














          You can actually do string comparison using greater than/less than operators.



          SELECT Field__c FROM MyObject__c
          WHERE Name >= 'aa'
          AND Name < 'at'





          share|improve this answer























          • how > and < works, summation of Ascii values?

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:15






          • 2





            It should have the same mechanics as ORDER BY.

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:45












          • This looks good, but first I have to check the char table because the organization uses characters like öäå and that may cause unwanted behavior. Or maybe just make one dedicated filter only for those characters.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 16 '18 at 15:12















          4














          You can actually do string comparison using greater than/less than operators.



          SELECT Field__c FROM MyObject__c
          WHERE Name >= 'aa'
          AND Name < 'at'





          share|improve this answer























          • how > and < works, summation of Ascii values?

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:15






          • 2





            It should have the same mechanics as ORDER BY.

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:45












          • This looks good, but first I have to check the char table because the organization uses characters like öäå and that may cause unwanted behavior. Or maybe just make one dedicated filter only for those characters.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 16 '18 at 15:12













          4












          4








          4







          You can actually do string comparison using greater than/less than operators.



          SELECT Field__c FROM MyObject__c
          WHERE Name >= 'aa'
          AND Name < 'at'





          share|improve this answer













          You can actually do string comparison using greater than/less than operators.



          SELECT Field__c FROM MyObject__c
          WHERE Name >= 'aa'
          AND Name < 'at'






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:01









          Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

          110k19119252




          110k19119252












          • how > and < works, summation of Ascii values?

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:15






          • 2





            It should have the same mechanics as ORDER BY.

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:45












          • This looks good, but first I have to check the char table because the organization uses characters like öäå and that may cause unwanted behavior. Or maybe just make one dedicated filter only for those characters.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 16 '18 at 15:12

















          • how > and < works, summation of Ascii values?

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:15






          • 2





            It should have the same mechanics as ORDER BY.

            – Adrian Larson
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:45












          • This looks good, but first I have to check the char table because the organization uses characters like öäå and that may cause unwanted behavior. Or maybe just make one dedicated filter only for those characters.

            – Boris Gichev
            Nov 16 '18 at 15:12
















          how > and < works, summation of Ascii values?

          – Pranay Jaiswal
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:15





          how > and < works, summation of Ascii values?

          – Pranay Jaiswal
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:15




          2




          2





          It should have the same mechanics as ORDER BY.

          – Adrian Larson
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:45






          It should have the same mechanics as ORDER BY.

          – Adrian Larson
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:45














          This looks good, but first I have to check the char table because the organization uses characters like öäå and that may cause unwanted behavior. Or maybe just make one dedicated filter only for those characters.

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 16 '18 at 15:12





          This looks good, but first I have to check the char table because the organization uses characters like öäå and that may cause unwanted behavior. Or maybe just make one dedicated filter only for those characters.

          – Boris Gichev
          Nov 16 '18 at 15:12

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239441%2fsoql-with-character-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

          Darth Vader #20

          Ondo