error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type 'std::function&' from an rvalue of type 'main()::'|
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
EDIT: Sorry, I asked this question without a thro understanding of references...
I seem to be getting this error when I run this code...
error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type 'std::function&' from an rvalue of type 'main()::'
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std ;
void printfunction(bool a, function <void()> &b)
if (a == true)
b() ;
int main()
int value = 45 ;
printfunction(true, [value]()cout << "The value is : " << value ;) ;
But, the error disappears when I add a const
before function... like this :
void printfunction(bool a,const function <void()> &b)
The thing is I would like to change the function in the function reference if needed...
Is there any other way to do this? Please let me know if it does indeed exist.
P.S: I am using Code:: Blocks 16.01
Bye,
Samuel
c++ rvalue lvalue lvalue-to-rvalue
add a comment |
EDIT: Sorry, I asked this question without a thro understanding of references...
I seem to be getting this error when I run this code...
error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type 'std::function&' from an rvalue of type 'main()::'
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std ;
void printfunction(bool a, function <void()> &b)
if (a == true)
b() ;
int main()
int value = 45 ;
printfunction(true, [value]()cout << "The value is : " << value ;) ;
But, the error disappears when I add a const
before function... like this :
void printfunction(bool a,const function <void()> &b)
The thing is I would like to change the function in the function reference if needed...
Is there any other way to do this? Please let me know if it does indeed exist.
P.S: I am using Code:: Blocks 16.01
Bye,
Samuel
c++ rvalue lvalue lvalue-to-rvalue
C syntax error, C tag removed
– pmg
Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Why aren't you taking the function by value then?
– Quentin
Nov 15 '18 at 14:20
Something doesn't make sense here. If you change the function, the changes will be lost anyway since the caller creates a temporary function. So if you want to change the function inprintfunction
, you're calling it wrong. Do you wantprintfunction
to get a private copy of the function that it can then modify without affecting its caller?
– David Schwartz
Nov 15 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
EDIT: Sorry, I asked this question without a thro understanding of references...
I seem to be getting this error when I run this code...
error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type 'std::function&' from an rvalue of type 'main()::'
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std ;
void printfunction(bool a, function <void()> &b)
if (a == true)
b() ;
int main()
int value = 45 ;
printfunction(true, [value]()cout << "The value is : " << value ;) ;
But, the error disappears when I add a const
before function... like this :
void printfunction(bool a,const function <void()> &b)
The thing is I would like to change the function in the function reference if needed...
Is there any other way to do this? Please let me know if it does indeed exist.
P.S: I am using Code:: Blocks 16.01
Bye,
Samuel
c++ rvalue lvalue lvalue-to-rvalue
EDIT: Sorry, I asked this question without a thro understanding of references...
I seem to be getting this error when I run this code...
error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type 'std::function&' from an rvalue of type 'main()::'
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std ;
void printfunction(bool a, function <void()> &b)
if (a == true)
b() ;
int main()
int value = 45 ;
printfunction(true, [value]()cout << "The value is : " << value ;) ;
But, the error disappears when I add a const
before function... like this :
void printfunction(bool a,const function <void()> &b)
The thing is I would like to change the function in the function reference if needed...
Is there any other way to do this? Please let me know if it does indeed exist.
P.S: I am using Code:: Blocks 16.01
Bye,
Samuel
c++ rvalue lvalue lvalue-to-rvalue
c++ rvalue lvalue lvalue-to-rvalue
edited Dec 1 '18 at 14:24
Samuel Rasquinha
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:17
Samuel RasquinhaSamuel Rasquinha
2118
2118
C syntax error, C tag removed
– pmg
Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Why aren't you taking the function by value then?
– Quentin
Nov 15 '18 at 14:20
Something doesn't make sense here. If you change the function, the changes will be lost anyway since the caller creates a temporary function. So if you want to change the function inprintfunction
, you're calling it wrong. Do you wantprintfunction
to get a private copy of the function that it can then modify without affecting its caller?
– David Schwartz
Nov 15 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
C syntax error, C tag removed
– pmg
Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Why aren't you taking the function by value then?
– Quentin
Nov 15 '18 at 14:20
Something doesn't make sense here. If you change the function, the changes will be lost anyway since the caller creates a temporary function. So if you want to change the function inprintfunction
, you're calling it wrong. Do you wantprintfunction
to get a private copy of the function that it can then modify without affecting its caller?
– David Schwartz
Nov 15 '18 at 14:37
C syntax error, C tag removed
– pmg
Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
C syntax error, C tag removed
– pmg
Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Why aren't you taking the function by value then?
– Quentin
Nov 15 '18 at 14:20
Why aren't you taking the function by value then?
– Quentin
Nov 15 '18 at 14:20
Something doesn't make sense here. If you change the function, the changes will be lost anyway since the caller creates a temporary function. So if you want to change the function in
printfunction
, you're calling it wrong. Do you want printfunction
to get a private copy of the function that it can then modify without affecting its caller?– David Schwartz
Nov 15 '18 at 14:37
Something doesn't make sense here. If you change the function, the changes will be lost anyway since the caller creates a temporary function. So if you want to change the function in
printfunction
, you're calling it wrong. Do you want printfunction
to get a private copy of the function that it can then modify without affecting its caller?– David Schwartz
Nov 15 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In printfunction
call, lambda expression [value]() ...
argument must be converted to a temporary function<void()>
object first.
A reference to non-const function<void()>&
only binds to l-values, not temporaries (r-values).
A reference to const, on the other hand, can be bound to temporaries. Which is what you observe.
add a comment |
If you want to modify the std::function
, then you'll need to pass a modifiable (lvalue) parameter:
int main()
int value = 45;
std::function f = [value]() std::cout << "The value is : " << value ;;
printfunction(true, f);
What you were trying to do isn't much different from writing a function that takes a mutable reference to int
(e.g. void foo(int& x)
) and then complaining that you can't call foo(5)
. (The small difference is that the the lambda-expression is converted to a temporary std::function
- but that still can't be bound to a non-const reference).
An alternative would be to change printfunction
to take its argument by value rather than by reference, so that it has its own copy which it may modify. You'll have to consider the needs of the caller to decide whether that's more appropriate.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53321443%2ferror-invalid-initialization-of-non-const-reference-of-type-stdfunctionvoid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In printfunction
call, lambda expression [value]() ...
argument must be converted to a temporary function<void()>
object first.
A reference to non-const function<void()>&
only binds to l-values, not temporaries (r-values).
A reference to const, on the other hand, can be bound to temporaries. Which is what you observe.
add a comment |
In printfunction
call, lambda expression [value]() ...
argument must be converted to a temporary function<void()>
object first.
A reference to non-const function<void()>&
only binds to l-values, not temporaries (r-values).
A reference to const, on the other hand, can be bound to temporaries. Which is what you observe.
add a comment |
In printfunction
call, lambda expression [value]() ...
argument must be converted to a temporary function<void()>
object first.
A reference to non-const function<void()>&
only binds to l-values, not temporaries (r-values).
A reference to const, on the other hand, can be bound to temporaries. Which is what you observe.
In printfunction
call, lambda expression [value]() ...
argument must be converted to a temporary function<void()>
object first.
A reference to non-const function<void()>&
only binds to l-values, not temporaries (r-values).
A reference to const, on the other hand, can be bound to temporaries. Which is what you observe.
edited Nov 15 '18 at 14:33
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:27
Maxim EgorushkinMaxim Egorushkin
90.4k11104193
90.4k11104193
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you want to modify the std::function
, then you'll need to pass a modifiable (lvalue) parameter:
int main()
int value = 45;
std::function f = [value]() std::cout << "The value is : " << value ;;
printfunction(true, f);
What you were trying to do isn't much different from writing a function that takes a mutable reference to int
(e.g. void foo(int& x)
) and then complaining that you can't call foo(5)
. (The small difference is that the the lambda-expression is converted to a temporary std::function
- but that still can't be bound to a non-const reference).
An alternative would be to change printfunction
to take its argument by value rather than by reference, so that it has its own copy which it may modify. You'll have to consider the needs of the caller to decide whether that's more appropriate.
add a comment |
If you want to modify the std::function
, then you'll need to pass a modifiable (lvalue) parameter:
int main()
int value = 45;
std::function f = [value]() std::cout << "The value is : " << value ;;
printfunction(true, f);
What you were trying to do isn't much different from writing a function that takes a mutable reference to int
(e.g. void foo(int& x)
) and then complaining that you can't call foo(5)
. (The small difference is that the the lambda-expression is converted to a temporary std::function
- but that still can't be bound to a non-const reference).
An alternative would be to change printfunction
to take its argument by value rather than by reference, so that it has its own copy which it may modify. You'll have to consider the needs of the caller to decide whether that's more appropriate.
add a comment |
If you want to modify the std::function
, then you'll need to pass a modifiable (lvalue) parameter:
int main()
int value = 45;
std::function f = [value]() std::cout << "The value is : " << value ;;
printfunction(true, f);
What you were trying to do isn't much different from writing a function that takes a mutable reference to int
(e.g. void foo(int& x)
) and then complaining that you can't call foo(5)
. (The small difference is that the the lambda-expression is converted to a temporary std::function
- but that still can't be bound to a non-const reference).
An alternative would be to change printfunction
to take its argument by value rather than by reference, so that it has its own copy which it may modify. You'll have to consider the needs of the caller to decide whether that's more appropriate.
If you want to modify the std::function
, then you'll need to pass a modifiable (lvalue) parameter:
int main()
int value = 45;
std::function f = [value]() std::cout << "The value is : " << value ;;
printfunction(true, f);
What you were trying to do isn't much different from writing a function that takes a mutable reference to int
(e.g. void foo(int& x)
) and then complaining that you can't call foo(5)
. (The small difference is that the the lambda-expression is converted to a temporary std::function
- but that still can't be bound to a non-const reference).
An alternative would be to change printfunction
to take its argument by value rather than by reference, so that it has its own copy which it may modify. You'll have to consider the needs of the caller to decide whether that's more appropriate.
edited Nov 15 '18 at 14:34
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
Toby SpeightToby Speight
17.6k134469
17.6k134469
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53321443%2ferror-invalid-initialization-of-non-const-reference-of-type-stdfunctionvoid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
C syntax error, C tag removed
– pmg
Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Why aren't you taking the function by value then?
– Quentin
Nov 15 '18 at 14:20
Something doesn't make sense here. If you change the function, the changes will be lost anyway since the caller creates a temporary function. So if you want to change the function in
printfunction
, you're calling it wrong. Do you wantprintfunction
to get a private copy of the function that it can then modify without affecting its caller?– David Schwartz
Nov 15 '18 at 14:37