Forwarding instantiation of generic interface to other generic interface
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have a generic interface IApiService responsible for making GET calls to other server. I have three requirements:
- some usages have to be cached
- some usages never should be cached
- some usages don't care about caching and should have default setting that can be easily changed
My idea was to introduce the following hierachy:
public interface IApiService<T> where T : class
Task<T> GetAsync(IRequestParameters requestParameters);
public interface ICachedApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
public interface IDirectApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
For case 1 I use ICachedApiService, for case 2 I use IDirectApiService and for case 3 I use IApiService.
I use .NET Core default dependency injection framework. And here's my configuration for ICachedApiService:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(ICachedApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>);
For IDirectApiService it's different and I have to use lambda method for each generic type
serviceCollection.AddScoped<IDirectApiService<ProductDTO>>(serviceProvider => new
DirectApiService<ProductDTO> (
ProductsEndpoint // and other type specific data
));
The question is how can I configure IApiService to use either IDirectApiService or ICachedApiService?
For ICachedApiService it's easy:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>));
For IDirectApiService I would prefer not to repeat the configuration for each concrete type as this is error prone and needs more changes if I want to switch to cached version. Is this possible with any dependency injection framework? Is there a way to somehow get the generic parameter that is missing in getService?
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), x => x.GetService<???>());
c# dependency-injection .net-core asp.net-core-2.0
add a comment |
I have a generic interface IApiService responsible for making GET calls to other server. I have three requirements:
- some usages have to be cached
- some usages never should be cached
- some usages don't care about caching and should have default setting that can be easily changed
My idea was to introduce the following hierachy:
public interface IApiService<T> where T : class
Task<T> GetAsync(IRequestParameters requestParameters);
public interface ICachedApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
public interface IDirectApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
For case 1 I use ICachedApiService, for case 2 I use IDirectApiService and for case 3 I use IApiService.
I use .NET Core default dependency injection framework. And here's my configuration for ICachedApiService:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(ICachedApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>);
For IDirectApiService it's different and I have to use lambda method for each generic type
serviceCollection.AddScoped<IDirectApiService<ProductDTO>>(serviceProvider => new
DirectApiService<ProductDTO> (
ProductsEndpoint // and other type specific data
));
The question is how can I configure IApiService to use either IDirectApiService or ICachedApiService?
For ICachedApiService it's easy:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>));
For IDirectApiService I would prefer not to repeat the configuration for each concrete type as this is error prone and needs more changes if I want to switch to cached version. Is this possible with any dependency injection framework? Is there a way to somehow get the generic parameter that is missing in getService?
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), x => x.GetService<???>());
c# dependency-injection .net-core asp.net-core-2.0
Point 3 sounds like it's not cached / the same as point 2, you cannot program 'not caring' into a DI framework. This sounds like you will need some kind of service factory class that creates aDirectApiService
based on the generic type
– matt_lethargic
Nov 15 '18 at 15:06
add a comment |
I have a generic interface IApiService responsible for making GET calls to other server. I have three requirements:
- some usages have to be cached
- some usages never should be cached
- some usages don't care about caching and should have default setting that can be easily changed
My idea was to introduce the following hierachy:
public interface IApiService<T> where T : class
Task<T> GetAsync(IRequestParameters requestParameters);
public interface ICachedApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
public interface IDirectApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
For case 1 I use ICachedApiService, for case 2 I use IDirectApiService and for case 3 I use IApiService.
I use .NET Core default dependency injection framework. And here's my configuration for ICachedApiService:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(ICachedApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>);
For IDirectApiService it's different and I have to use lambda method for each generic type
serviceCollection.AddScoped<IDirectApiService<ProductDTO>>(serviceProvider => new
DirectApiService<ProductDTO> (
ProductsEndpoint // and other type specific data
));
The question is how can I configure IApiService to use either IDirectApiService or ICachedApiService?
For ICachedApiService it's easy:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>));
For IDirectApiService I would prefer not to repeat the configuration for each concrete type as this is error prone and needs more changes if I want to switch to cached version. Is this possible with any dependency injection framework? Is there a way to somehow get the generic parameter that is missing in getService?
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), x => x.GetService<???>());
c# dependency-injection .net-core asp.net-core-2.0
I have a generic interface IApiService responsible for making GET calls to other server. I have three requirements:
- some usages have to be cached
- some usages never should be cached
- some usages don't care about caching and should have default setting that can be easily changed
My idea was to introduce the following hierachy:
public interface IApiService<T> where T : class
Task<T> GetAsync(IRequestParameters requestParameters);
public interface ICachedApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
public interface IDirectApiService<T> : IApiService<T> where T : class
For case 1 I use ICachedApiService, for case 2 I use IDirectApiService and for case 3 I use IApiService.
I use .NET Core default dependency injection framework. And here's my configuration for ICachedApiService:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(ICachedApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>);
For IDirectApiService it's different and I have to use lambda method for each generic type
serviceCollection.AddScoped<IDirectApiService<ProductDTO>>(serviceProvider => new
DirectApiService<ProductDTO> (
ProductsEndpoint // and other type specific data
));
The question is how can I configure IApiService to use either IDirectApiService or ICachedApiService?
For ICachedApiService it's easy:
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), typeof(CachedApiService<>));
For IDirectApiService I would prefer not to repeat the configuration for each concrete type as this is error prone and needs more changes if I want to switch to cached version. Is this possible with any dependency injection framework? Is there a way to somehow get the generic parameter that is missing in getService?
serviceCollection.AddScoped(typeof(IApiService<>), x => x.GetService<???>());
c# dependency-injection .net-core asp.net-core-2.0
c# dependency-injection .net-core asp.net-core-2.0
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:15
Ryszard SikoraRyszard Sikora
285
285
Point 3 sounds like it's not cached / the same as point 2, you cannot program 'not caring' into a DI framework. This sounds like you will need some kind of service factory class that creates aDirectApiService
based on the generic type
– matt_lethargic
Nov 15 '18 at 15:06
add a comment |
Point 3 sounds like it's not cached / the same as point 2, you cannot program 'not caring' into a DI framework. This sounds like you will need some kind of service factory class that creates aDirectApiService
based on the generic type
– matt_lethargic
Nov 15 '18 at 15:06
Point 3 sounds like it's not cached / the same as point 2, you cannot program 'not caring' into a DI framework. This sounds like you will need some kind of service factory class that creates a
DirectApiService
based on the generic type– matt_lethargic
Nov 15 '18 at 15:06
Point 3 sounds like it's not cached / the same as point 2, you cannot program 'not caring' into a DI framework. This sounds like you will need some kind of service factory class that creates a
DirectApiService
based on the generic type– matt_lethargic
Nov 15 '18 at 15:06
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53321401%2fforwarding-instantiation-of-generic-interface-to-other-generic-interface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53321401%2fforwarding-instantiation-of-generic-interface-to-other-generic-interface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Point 3 sounds like it's not cached / the same as point 2, you cannot program 'not caring' into a DI framework. This sounds like you will need some kind of service factory class that creates a
DirectApiService
based on the generic type– matt_lethargic
Nov 15 '18 at 15:06