Hyperledger Fabric docker-compose CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have some organizations with more than 2 peers. When I was editing the docker-compose-base.yaml, I am not sure how to define CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP. Below is what I did, but the log showed that the peer fails to connect to the gossip peers. What is the correct way to do so? Thank you in advance!
docker-compose-base.yaml
peer0.caseManager.snts.com:
container_name: peer0.caseManager.snts.com
extends:
file: peer-base.yaml
service: peer-base
environment:
- CORE_PEER_ID=peer0.caseManager.snts.com
- CORE_PEER_ADDRESS=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=[peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051]
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_EXTERNALENDPOINT=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_LOCALMSPID=CaseManagerMSP
volumes:
- /var/run/:/host/var/run/
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/msp:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/msp
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/tls:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/tls
- peer0.caseManager.snts.com:/var/hyperledger/production
ports:
- 9051:7051
- 9053:7053
log of "docker-compose -p docker-compose.yaml up"
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 023 Could not connect to peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 024 Could not connect to [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
docker docker-compose hyperledger-fabric hyperledger blockchain
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
add a comment |
I have some organizations with more than 2 peers. When I was editing the docker-compose-base.yaml, I am not sure how to define CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP. Below is what I did, but the log showed that the peer fails to connect to the gossip peers. What is the correct way to do so? Thank you in advance!
docker-compose-base.yaml
peer0.caseManager.snts.com:
container_name: peer0.caseManager.snts.com
extends:
file: peer-base.yaml
service: peer-base
environment:
- CORE_PEER_ID=peer0.caseManager.snts.com
- CORE_PEER_ADDRESS=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=[peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051]
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_EXTERNALENDPOINT=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_LOCALMSPID=CaseManagerMSP
volumes:
- /var/run/:/host/var/run/
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/msp:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/msp
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/tls:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/tls
- peer0.caseManager.snts.com:/var/hyperledger/production
ports:
- 9051:7051
- 9053:7053
log of "docker-compose -p docker-compose.yaml up"
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 023 Could not connect to peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 024 Could not connect to [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
docker docker-compose hyperledger-fabric hyperledger blockchain
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
add a comment |
I have some organizations with more than 2 peers. When I was editing the docker-compose-base.yaml, I am not sure how to define CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP. Below is what I did, but the log showed that the peer fails to connect to the gossip peers. What is the correct way to do so? Thank you in advance!
docker-compose-base.yaml
peer0.caseManager.snts.com:
container_name: peer0.caseManager.snts.com
extends:
file: peer-base.yaml
service: peer-base
environment:
- CORE_PEER_ID=peer0.caseManager.snts.com
- CORE_PEER_ADDRESS=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=[peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051]
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_EXTERNALENDPOINT=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_LOCALMSPID=CaseManagerMSP
volumes:
- /var/run/:/host/var/run/
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/msp:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/msp
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/tls:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/tls
- peer0.caseManager.snts.com:/var/hyperledger/production
ports:
- 9051:7051
- 9053:7053
log of "docker-compose -p docker-compose.yaml up"
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 023 Could not connect to peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 024 Could not connect to [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
docker docker-compose hyperledger-fabric hyperledger blockchain
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
I have some organizations with more than 2 peers. When I was editing the docker-compose-base.yaml, I am not sure how to define CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP. Below is what I did, but the log showed that the peer fails to connect to the gossip peers. What is the correct way to do so? Thank you in advance!
docker-compose-base.yaml
peer0.caseManager.snts.com:
container_name: peer0.caseManager.snts.com
extends:
file: peer-base.yaml
service: peer-base
environment:
- CORE_PEER_ID=peer0.caseManager.snts.com
- CORE_PEER_ADDRESS=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=[peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051]
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_EXTERNALENDPOINT=peer0.caseManager.snts.com:7051
- CORE_PEER_LOCALMSPID=CaseManagerMSP
volumes:
- /var/run/:/host/var/run/
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/msp:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/msp
- ../crypto-config/peerOrganizations/caseManager.snts.com/peers/peer0.caseManager.snts.com/tls:/etc/hyperledger/fabric/tls
- peer0.caseManager.snts.com:/var/hyperledger/production
ports:
- 9051:7051
- 9053:7053
log of "docker-compose -p docker-compose.yaml up"
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 023 Could not connect to peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051] <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
peer0.caseManager.snts.com | 2018-11-15 16:21:18.420 UTC [gossip/discovery] func1 -> WARN 024 Could not connect to [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 [peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 <nil> <nil> : context deadline exceeded
docker docker-compose hyperledger-fabric hyperledger blockchain
docker docker-compose hyperledger-fabric hyperledger blockchain
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:00
lmc1913lmc1913
265
265
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
From a peer's perspective, the Bootstrap peer is another peer from the same Organization, who it can reach out to during bootstrap and get some necessary info to get communication going. (see here)
Your setup looks correct, and its perfectly plausible that your Peer0 started up earlier than Peer1 and Peer2 and was unable to find these during startup, but that's not out of ordinary. Did you end up having any error? If not, this looks like normal operation.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
So can the peers still know each other after bootstrap, like in the normal app operations?
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:03
Btw if I hide the log, it is all running ok
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:17
From what you have shared, yes, they should know each other. It should be visible in the logs too. And as you said there were no errors, I think you can ignore these warning messages, as they most probably have reconciled eventually.
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:43
And if this answer helped you, please consider up-voting it or selecting it as the correct answer. :)
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324477%2fhyperledger-fabric-docker-compose-core-peer-gossip-bootstrap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From a peer's perspective, the Bootstrap peer is another peer from the same Organization, who it can reach out to during bootstrap and get some necessary info to get communication going. (see here)
Your setup looks correct, and its perfectly plausible that your Peer0 started up earlier than Peer1 and Peer2 and was unable to find these during startup, but that's not out of ordinary. Did you end up having any error? If not, this looks like normal operation.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
So can the peers still know each other after bootstrap, like in the normal app operations?
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:03
Btw if I hide the log, it is all running ok
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:17
From what you have shared, yes, they should know each other. It should be visible in the logs too. And as you said there were no errors, I think you can ignore these warning messages, as they most probably have reconciled eventually.
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:43
And if this answer helped you, please consider up-voting it or selecting it as the correct answer. :)
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
From a peer's perspective, the Bootstrap peer is another peer from the same Organization, who it can reach out to during bootstrap and get some necessary info to get communication going. (see here)
Your setup looks correct, and its perfectly plausible that your Peer0 started up earlier than Peer1 and Peer2 and was unable to find these during startup, but that's not out of ordinary. Did you end up having any error? If not, this looks like normal operation.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
So can the peers still know each other after bootstrap, like in the normal app operations?
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:03
Btw if I hide the log, it is all running ok
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:17
From what you have shared, yes, they should know each other. It should be visible in the logs too. And as you said there were no errors, I think you can ignore these warning messages, as they most probably have reconciled eventually.
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:43
And if this answer helped you, please consider up-voting it or selecting it as the correct answer. :)
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
From a peer's perspective, the Bootstrap peer is another peer from the same Organization, who it can reach out to during bootstrap and get some necessary info to get communication going. (see here)
Your setup looks correct, and its perfectly plausible that your Peer0 started up earlier than Peer1 and Peer2 and was unable to find these during startup, but that's not out of ordinary. Did you end up having any error? If not, this looks like normal operation.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
From a peer's perspective, the Bootstrap peer is another peer from the same Organization, who it can reach out to during bootstrap and get some necessary info to get communication going. (see here)
Your setup looks correct, and its perfectly plausible that your Peer0 started up earlier than Peer1 and Peer2 and was unable to find these during startup, but that's not out of ordinary. Did you end up having any error? If not, this looks like normal operation.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
edited Nov 16 '18 at 15:27
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
answered Nov 15 '18 at 20:37
adnan.cadnan.c
508214
508214
So can the peers still know each other after bootstrap, like in the normal app operations?
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:03
Btw if I hide the log, it is all running ok
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:17
From what you have shared, yes, they should know each other. It should be visible in the logs too. And as you said there were no errors, I think you can ignore these warning messages, as they most probably have reconciled eventually.
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:43
And if this answer helped you, please consider up-voting it or selecting it as the correct answer. :)
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
So can the peers still know each other after bootstrap, like in the normal app operations?
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:03
Btw if I hide the log, it is all running ok
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:17
From what you have shared, yes, they should know each other. It should be visible in the logs too. And as you said there were no errors, I think you can ignore these warning messages, as they most probably have reconciled eventually.
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:43
And if this answer helped you, please consider up-voting it or selecting it as the correct answer. :)
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:46
So can the peers still know each other after bootstrap, like in the normal app operations?
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:03
So can the peers still know each other after bootstrap, like in the normal app operations?
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:03
Btw if I hide the log, it is all running ok
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:17
Btw if I hide the log, it is all running ok
– lmc1913
Nov 16 '18 at 1:17
From what you have shared, yes, they should know each other. It should be visible in the logs too. And as you said there were no errors, I think you can ignore these warning messages, as they most probably have reconciled eventually.
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:43
From what you have shared, yes, they should know each other. It should be visible in the logs too. And as you said there were no errors, I think you can ignore these warning messages, as they most probably have reconciled eventually.
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:43
And if this answer helped you, please consider up-voting it or selecting it as the correct answer. :)
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:46
And if this answer helped you, please consider up-voting it or selecting it as the correct answer. :)
– adnan.c
Nov 16 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
add a comment |
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
add a comment |
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
- CORE_PEER_GOSSIP_BOOTSTRAP=peer1.caseManager.snts.com:7051 peer2.caseManager.snts.com:7051
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:53
nekianekia
148
148
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324477%2fhyperledger-fabric-docker-compose-core-peer-gossip-bootstrap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
