“Violation: Added non-passive event listener” when no JavaScript present









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













[Violation] Added non-passive event listener to a scroll-blocking 'mousewheel'event. Consider marking event handler as 'passive' to make the page more responsive. See https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5745543795965952




I'm trying to understand this warning.



I've created the simplest of html files:






<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<select name="" id=""></select>
</body>
</html>





Running this in Chrome (Version 61.0.3163.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)), and clicking on the select element shows the above error in the console:



Violation Message



I've done some brief reading of other posts and there's a lot of times this is due to frameworks or after the js code ran preventDefault() on the event.



However, in the above example there is no javascript running, so surely there should be no error? The md doc referenced in the violation text states:




Developers can annotate touch and wheel listeners with passive: true to indicate that they will never invoke preventDefault




There are no touch and wheel listeners in the file above.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    Maybe you have a chrome extension installed that's doing it? I don't see the warning in mine. (61.0.3163.100)
    – zord
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:01







  • 1




    I don't see the warning in mine. ... Thanks @zord, that leads me to believe it must be some sort of local issue. I'll test on some other computers tomorrow.
    – Stu
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:08







  • 1




    @Stu I also don't see that issue. (same version, 61.0.3163.100)
    – Nathan Hinchey
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:09






  • 2




    I'm seeing the same thing... In fact this question came up as relevant when I was typing mine. I'll look at my extensions. Comforting to know that it's not in my code. :)
    – Stijn de Witt
    Jan 23 at 15:14






  • 2




    this comes from chrome core not from an extension. After a new DOM specification for new browsers this is warning.
    – mtizziani
    Apr 20 at 8:46














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













[Violation] Added non-passive event listener to a scroll-blocking 'mousewheel'event. Consider marking event handler as 'passive' to make the page more responsive. See https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5745543795965952




I'm trying to understand this warning.



I've created the simplest of html files:






<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<select name="" id=""></select>
</body>
</html>





Running this in Chrome (Version 61.0.3163.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)), and clicking on the select element shows the above error in the console:



Violation Message



I've done some brief reading of other posts and there's a lot of times this is due to frameworks or after the js code ran preventDefault() on the event.



However, in the above example there is no javascript running, so surely there should be no error? The md doc referenced in the violation text states:




Developers can annotate touch and wheel listeners with passive: true to indicate that they will never invoke preventDefault




There are no touch and wheel listeners in the file above.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    Maybe you have a chrome extension installed that's doing it? I don't see the warning in mine. (61.0.3163.100)
    – zord
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:01







  • 1




    I don't see the warning in mine. ... Thanks @zord, that leads me to believe it must be some sort of local issue. I'll test on some other computers tomorrow.
    – Stu
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:08







  • 1




    @Stu I also don't see that issue. (same version, 61.0.3163.100)
    – Nathan Hinchey
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:09






  • 2




    I'm seeing the same thing... In fact this question came up as relevant when I was typing mine. I'll look at my extensions. Comforting to know that it's not in my code. :)
    – Stijn de Witt
    Jan 23 at 15:14






  • 2




    this comes from chrome core not from an extension. After a new DOM specification for new browsers this is warning.
    – mtizziani
    Apr 20 at 8:46












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1






[Violation] Added non-passive event listener to a scroll-blocking 'mousewheel'event. Consider marking event handler as 'passive' to make the page more responsive. See https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5745543795965952




I'm trying to understand this warning.



I've created the simplest of html files:






<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<select name="" id=""></select>
</body>
</html>





Running this in Chrome (Version 61.0.3163.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)), and clicking on the select element shows the above error in the console:



Violation Message



I've done some brief reading of other posts and there's a lot of times this is due to frameworks or after the js code ran preventDefault() on the event.



However, in the above example there is no javascript running, so surely there should be no error? The md doc referenced in the violation text states:




Developers can annotate touch and wheel listeners with passive: true to indicate that they will never invoke preventDefault




There are no touch and wheel listeners in the file above.










share|improve this question
















[Violation] Added non-passive event listener to a scroll-blocking 'mousewheel'event. Consider marking event handler as 'passive' to make the page more responsive. See https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5745543795965952




I'm trying to understand this warning.



I've created the simplest of html files:






<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<select name="" id=""></select>
</body>
</html>





Running this in Chrome (Version 61.0.3163.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)), and clicking on the select element shows the above error in the console:



Violation Message



I've done some brief reading of other posts and there's a lot of times this is due to frameworks or after the js code ran preventDefault() on the event.



However, in the above example there is no javascript running, so surely there should be no error? The md doc referenced in the violation text states:




Developers can annotate touch and wheel listeners with passive: true to indicate that they will never invoke preventDefault




There are no touch and wheel listeners in the file above.






<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<select name="" id=""></select>
</body>
</html>





<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<select name="" id=""></select>
</body>
</html>






javascript google-chrome passive-event-listeners






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 11 at 0:07









Kevin Reid

14.9k45276




14.9k45276










asked Oct 12 '17 at 19:56









Stu

3,8751539




3,8751539







  • 1




    Maybe you have a chrome extension installed that's doing it? I don't see the warning in mine. (61.0.3163.100)
    – zord
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:01







  • 1




    I don't see the warning in mine. ... Thanks @zord, that leads me to believe it must be some sort of local issue. I'll test on some other computers tomorrow.
    – Stu
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:08







  • 1




    @Stu I also don't see that issue. (same version, 61.0.3163.100)
    – Nathan Hinchey
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:09






  • 2




    I'm seeing the same thing... In fact this question came up as relevant when I was typing mine. I'll look at my extensions. Comforting to know that it's not in my code. :)
    – Stijn de Witt
    Jan 23 at 15:14






  • 2




    this comes from chrome core not from an extension. After a new DOM specification for new browsers this is warning.
    – mtizziani
    Apr 20 at 8:46












  • 1




    Maybe you have a chrome extension installed that's doing it? I don't see the warning in mine. (61.0.3163.100)
    – zord
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:01







  • 1




    I don't see the warning in mine. ... Thanks @zord, that leads me to believe it must be some sort of local issue. I'll test on some other computers tomorrow.
    – Stu
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:08







  • 1




    @Stu I also don't see that issue. (same version, 61.0.3163.100)
    – Nathan Hinchey
    Oct 12 '17 at 20:09






  • 2




    I'm seeing the same thing... In fact this question came up as relevant when I was typing mine. I'll look at my extensions. Comforting to know that it's not in my code. :)
    – Stijn de Witt
    Jan 23 at 15:14






  • 2




    this comes from chrome core not from an extension. After a new DOM specification for new browsers this is warning.
    – mtizziani
    Apr 20 at 8:46







1




1




Maybe you have a chrome extension installed that's doing it? I don't see the warning in mine. (61.0.3163.100)
– zord
Oct 12 '17 at 20:01





Maybe you have a chrome extension installed that's doing it? I don't see the warning in mine. (61.0.3163.100)
– zord
Oct 12 '17 at 20:01





1




1




I don't see the warning in mine. ... Thanks @zord, that leads me to believe it must be some sort of local issue. I'll test on some other computers tomorrow.
– Stu
Oct 12 '17 at 20:08





I don't see the warning in mine. ... Thanks @zord, that leads me to believe it must be some sort of local issue. I'll test on some other computers tomorrow.
– Stu
Oct 12 '17 at 20:08





1




1




@Stu I also don't see that issue. (same version, 61.0.3163.100)
– Nathan Hinchey
Oct 12 '17 at 20:09




@Stu I also don't see that issue. (same version, 61.0.3163.100)
– Nathan Hinchey
Oct 12 '17 at 20:09




2




2




I'm seeing the same thing... In fact this question came up as relevant when I was typing mine. I'll look at my extensions. Comforting to know that it's not in my code. :)
– Stijn de Witt
Jan 23 at 15:14




I'm seeing the same thing... In fact this question came up as relevant when I was typing mine. I'll look at my extensions. Comforting to know that it's not in my code. :)
– Stijn de Witt
Jan 23 at 15:14




2




2




this comes from chrome core not from an extension. After a new DOM specification for new browsers this is warning.
– mtizziani
Apr 20 at 8:46




this comes from chrome core not from an extension. After a new DOM specification for new browsers this is warning.
– mtizziani
Apr 20 at 8:46

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f46717866%2fviolation-added-non-passive-event-listener-when-no-javascript-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f46717866%2fviolation-added-non-passive-event-listener-when-no-javascript-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

Darth Vader #20

Ondo