Perl's “Switch” grabs a 'case' string inside a HERE document and gets confused?










1















I have a little Perl code, with a HERE document. Inside the HERE document's text, there is embedded the keyword case. This seems to unnerve the Switch statement mightily. Am I crazy?



#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;
use warnings;
use utf8; # Meaning "This lexical scope (i.e. file) contains utf8"

use Switch;

sub printUsage transaction end.
+
HERE



Running this in Perl 5.16 gives:



Bad case statement (invalid case value?) near avo2.pl line 13


i.e. In case of isn't appreciated "here", literally. Some bug? Should I raise this at the Perl bug tracker?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    The general advice is to avoid Switch because, according to its POD... "There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky"

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:01






  • 4





    The POD on CPAN (metacpan.org/pod/Switch#BUGS) even lists this as a known bug: "On perl 5.10.x may cause syntax error if "case" is present inside heredoc.".

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:09






  • 4





    Switch is a source filter, which means it must parse the Perl code that follows itself. An impossible feat, so it doesn't really actually try. You get errors such as the one you describe, and they can be very hard to debug. Avoid Switch.

    – ikegami
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:24
















1















I have a little Perl code, with a HERE document. Inside the HERE document's text, there is embedded the keyword case. This seems to unnerve the Switch statement mightily. Am I crazy?



#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;
use warnings;
use utf8; # Meaning "This lexical scope (i.e. file) contains utf8"

use Switch;

sub printUsage transaction end.
+
HERE



Running this in Perl 5.16 gives:



Bad case statement (invalid case value?) near avo2.pl line 13


i.e. In case of isn't appreciated "here", literally. Some bug? Should I raise this at the Perl bug tracker?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    The general advice is to avoid Switch because, according to its POD... "There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky"

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:01






  • 4





    The POD on CPAN (metacpan.org/pod/Switch#BUGS) even lists this as a known bug: "On perl 5.10.x may cause syntax error if "case" is present inside heredoc.".

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:09






  • 4





    Switch is a source filter, which means it must parse the Perl code that follows itself. An impossible feat, so it doesn't really actually try. You get errors such as the one you describe, and they can be very hard to debug. Avoid Switch.

    – ikegami
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:24














1












1








1








I have a little Perl code, with a HERE document. Inside the HERE document's text, there is embedded the keyword case. This seems to unnerve the Switch statement mightily. Am I crazy?



#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;
use warnings;
use utf8; # Meaning "This lexical scope (i.e. file) contains utf8"

use Switch;

sub printUsage transaction end.
+
HERE



Running this in Perl 5.16 gives:



Bad case statement (invalid case value?) near avo2.pl line 13


i.e. In case of isn't appreciated "here", literally. Some bug? Should I raise this at the Perl bug tracker?










share|improve this question
















I have a little Perl code, with a HERE document. Inside the HERE document's text, there is embedded the keyword case. This seems to unnerve the Switch statement mightily. Am I crazy?



#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;
use warnings;
use utf8; # Meaning "This lexical scope (i.e. file) contains utf8"

use Switch;

sub printUsage transaction end.
+
HERE



Running this in Perl 5.16 gives:



Bad case statement (invalid case value?) near avo2.pl line 13


i.e. In case of isn't appreciated "here", literally. Some bug? Should I raise this at the Perl bug tracker?







perl






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 16:05







David Tonhofer

















asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59









David TonhoferDavid Tonhofer

5,41513431




5,41513431







  • 6





    The general advice is to avoid Switch because, according to its POD... "There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky"

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:01






  • 4





    The POD on CPAN (metacpan.org/pod/Switch#BUGS) even lists this as a known bug: "On perl 5.10.x may cause syntax error if "case" is present inside heredoc.".

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:09






  • 4





    Switch is a source filter, which means it must parse the Perl code that follows itself. An impossible feat, so it doesn't really actually try. You get errors such as the one you describe, and they can be very hard to debug. Avoid Switch.

    – ikegami
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:24













  • 6





    The general advice is to avoid Switch because, according to its POD... "There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky"

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:01






  • 4





    The POD on CPAN (metacpan.org/pod/Switch#BUGS) even lists this as a known bug: "On perl 5.10.x may cause syntax error if "case" is present inside heredoc.".

    – toolic
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:09






  • 4





    Switch is a source filter, which means it must parse the Perl code that follows itself. An impossible feat, so it doesn't really actually try. You get errors such as the one you describe, and they can be very hard to debug. Avoid Switch.

    – ikegami
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:24








6




6





The general advice is to avoid Switch because, according to its POD... "There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky"

– toolic
Nov 12 '18 at 14:01





The general advice is to avoid Switch because, according to its POD... "There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky"

– toolic
Nov 12 '18 at 14:01




4




4





The POD on CPAN (metacpan.org/pod/Switch#BUGS) even lists this as a known bug: "On perl 5.10.x may cause syntax error if "case" is present inside heredoc.".

– toolic
Nov 12 '18 at 14:09





The POD on CPAN (metacpan.org/pod/Switch#BUGS) even lists this as a known bug: "On perl 5.10.x may cause syntax error if "case" is present inside heredoc.".

– toolic
Nov 12 '18 at 14:09




4




4





Switch is a source filter, which means it must parse the Perl code that follows itself. An impossible feat, so it doesn't really actually try. You get errors such as the one you describe, and they can be very hard to debug. Avoid Switch.

– ikegami
Nov 12 '18 at 14:24






Switch is a source filter, which means it must parse the Perl code that follows itself. An impossible feat, so it doesn't really actually try. You get errors such as the one you describe, and they can be very hard to debug. Avoid Switch.

– ikegami
Nov 12 '18 at 14:24













1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














Don't use Switch if you can possibly avoid it, it's a source filter and you have found one of the bugs lurking in it's depths. given()/when() would be better, but that has problems and is now marked as experimental. If you want the equivalent of a case statement try



for ($test_this) 
if ( ! /D/ )
say 'is numbers';
last;

if ( $_ eq 'exit' )
say 'exit found';
last;

if (/^pLu/)
say 'Upper case letter';
last;

# Default option
say 'Default';
last;






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    Or use a dispatch table if viable.

    – simbabque
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:33










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53263728%2fperls-switch-grabs-a-case-string-inside-a-here-document-and-gets-confused%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














Don't use Switch if you can possibly avoid it, it's a source filter and you have found one of the bugs lurking in it's depths. given()/when() would be better, but that has problems and is now marked as experimental. If you want the equivalent of a case statement try



for ($test_this) 
if ( ! /D/ )
say 'is numbers';
last;

if ( $_ eq 'exit' )
say 'exit found';
last;

if (/^pLu/)
say 'Upper case letter';
last;

# Default option
say 'Default';
last;






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    Or use a dispatch table if viable.

    – simbabque
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:33















6














Don't use Switch if you can possibly avoid it, it's a source filter and you have found one of the bugs lurking in it's depths. given()/when() would be better, but that has problems and is now marked as experimental. If you want the equivalent of a case statement try



for ($test_this) 
if ( ! /D/ )
say 'is numbers';
last;

if ( $_ eq 'exit' )
say 'exit found';
last;

if (/^pLu/)
say 'Upper case letter';
last;

# Default option
say 'Default';
last;






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    Or use a dispatch table if viable.

    – simbabque
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:33













6












6








6







Don't use Switch if you can possibly avoid it, it's a source filter and you have found one of the bugs lurking in it's depths. given()/when() would be better, but that has problems and is now marked as experimental. If you want the equivalent of a case statement try



for ($test_this) 
if ( ! /D/ )
say 'is numbers';
last;

if ( $_ eq 'exit' )
say 'exit found';
last;

if (/^pLu/)
say 'Upper case letter';
last;

# Default option
say 'Default';
last;






share|improve this answer













Don't use Switch if you can possibly avoid it, it's a source filter and you have found one of the bugs lurking in it's depths. given()/when() would be better, but that has problems and is now marked as experimental. If you want the equivalent of a case statement try



for ($test_this) 
if ( ! /D/ )
say 'is numbers';
last;

if ( $_ eq 'exit' )
say 'exit found';
last;

if (/^pLu/)
say 'Upper case letter';
last;

# Default option
say 'Default';
last;







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:15









JGNIJGNI

1,938615




1,938615







  • 2





    Or use a dispatch table if viable.

    – simbabque
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:33












  • 2





    Or use a dispatch table if viable.

    – simbabque
    Nov 12 '18 at 14:33







2




2





Or use a dispatch table if viable.

– simbabque
Nov 12 '18 at 14:33





Or use a dispatch table if viable.

– simbabque
Nov 12 '18 at 14:33

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53263728%2fperls-switch-grabs-a-case-string-inside-a-here-document-and-gets-confused%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kleinkühnau

Makov (Slowakei)

Deutsches Schauspielhaus