Why model performs poor after normalization?










0














I'm using fully connected neural network and I am using normalized data such that every single sample values range from 0 to 1. I have used 100 neurons in first layer and 10 in second layer and used almost 50 lack samples during training. I want to classify my data into two classes. But my networks performance is too low, almost 49 percent on training and test data. I tried to increase the performance by changing the values of hyper parameters. But it didn't work. Can some one please tell me what should I do to get higher performance?



x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, nPixels])
W1 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nPixels, nNodes1], stddev=0.01))
b1 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes1]))
y1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(x, W1) + b1)

W2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes1, nNodes2], stddev=0.01))
b2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes2]))
y2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(y1, W2) + b2)

W3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes2, nLabels], stddev=0.01))
b3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nLabels]))
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(y2, W3) + b3)

y_ = tf.placeholder(dtype=tf.float32, shape=[None, 2])

cross_entropy = -1*tf.reduce_sum(y_* tf.log(y), axis=1)
loss = tf.reduce_mean(cross_entropy)

optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01).minimize(loss)
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(y_,axis=1), tf.argmax(y, axis=1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_prediction, "float"))









share|improve this question























  • The title of your question suggests that it was working before you did 'normalization'. Could you be specific on what has changed?
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:33










  • Yes my model was giving 98 percent accuracy without normalization. I have performed normalization on the input data having shape (samples,features). I have normalized the feature of every sample such that in each single sample feature ranges from 0 to one. This is the only change that I have made in input data. After this accuracy suddenly drops. I want to improve performance after normalization
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:49










  • What is the variance of your data?
    – Novak
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:14










  • I didn't check the variance. Should I check it for each sample? Why we nned variance if I normalize each sample from 0 to 1?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17










  • If the performance was 98% anyway, why would you change anything?
    – cheersmate
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17















0














I'm using fully connected neural network and I am using normalized data such that every single sample values range from 0 to 1. I have used 100 neurons in first layer and 10 in second layer and used almost 50 lack samples during training. I want to classify my data into two classes. But my networks performance is too low, almost 49 percent on training and test data. I tried to increase the performance by changing the values of hyper parameters. But it didn't work. Can some one please tell me what should I do to get higher performance?



x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, nPixels])
W1 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nPixels, nNodes1], stddev=0.01))
b1 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes1]))
y1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(x, W1) + b1)

W2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes1, nNodes2], stddev=0.01))
b2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes2]))
y2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(y1, W2) + b2)

W3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes2, nLabels], stddev=0.01))
b3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nLabels]))
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(y2, W3) + b3)

y_ = tf.placeholder(dtype=tf.float32, shape=[None, 2])

cross_entropy = -1*tf.reduce_sum(y_* tf.log(y), axis=1)
loss = tf.reduce_mean(cross_entropy)

optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01).minimize(loss)
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(y_,axis=1), tf.argmax(y, axis=1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_prediction, "float"))









share|improve this question























  • The title of your question suggests that it was working before you did 'normalization'. Could you be specific on what has changed?
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:33










  • Yes my model was giving 98 percent accuracy without normalization. I have performed normalization on the input data having shape (samples,features). I have normalized the feature of every sample such that in each single sample feature ranges from 0 to one. This is the only change that I have made in input data. After this accuracy suddenly drops. I want to improve performance after normalization
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:49










  • What is the variance of your data?
    – Novak
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:14










  • I didn't check the variance. Should I check it for each sample? Why we nned variance if I normalize each sample from 0 to 1?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17










  • If the performance was 98% anyway, why would you change anything?
    – cheersmate
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17













0












0








0







I'm using fully connected neural network and I am using normalized data such that every single sample values range from 0 to 1. I have used 100 neurons in first layer and 10 in second layer and used almost 50 lack samples during training. I want to classify my data into two classes. But my networks performance is too low, almost 49 percent on training and test data. I tried to increase the performance by changing the values of hyper parameters. But it didn't work. Can some one please tell me what should I do to get higher performance?



x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, nPixels])
W1 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nPixels, nNodes1], stddev=0.01))
b1 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes1]))
y1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(x, W1) + b1)

W2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes1, nNodes2], stddev=0.01))
b2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes2]))
y2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(y1, W2) + b2)

W3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes2, nLabels], stddev=0.01))
b3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nLabels]))
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(y2, W3) + b3)

y_ = tf.placeholder(dtype=tf.float32, shape=[None, 2])

cross_entropy = -1*tf.reduce_sum(y_* tf.log(y), axis=1)
loss = tf.reduce_mean(cross_entropy)

optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01).minimize(loss)
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(y_,axis=1), tf.argmax(y, axis=1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_prediction, "float"))









share|improve this question















I'm using fully connected neural network and I am using normalized data such that every single sample values range from 0 to 1. I have used 100 neurons in first layer and 10 in second layer and used almost 50 lack samples during training. I want to classify my data into two classes. But my networks performance is too low, almost 49 percent on training and test data. I tried to increase the performance by changing the values of hyper parameters. But it didn't work. Can some one please tell me what should I do to get higher performance?



x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, nPixels])
W1 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nPixels, nNodes1], stddev=0.01))
b1 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes1]))
y1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(x, W1) + b1)

W2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes1, nNodes2], stddev=0.01))
b2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nNodes2]))
y2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(y1, W2) + b2)

W3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nNodes2, nLabels], stddev=0.01))
b3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([nLabels]))
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(y2, W3) + b3)

y_ = tf.placeholder(dtype=tf.float32, shape=[None, 2])

cross_entropy = -1*tf.reduce_sum(y_* tf.log(y), axis=1)
loss = tf.reduce_mean(cross_entropy)

optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01).minimize(loss)
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(y_,axis=1), tf.argmax(y, axis=1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_prediction, "float"))






python tensorflow machine-learning neural-network






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 6:51









Milo Lu

1,60311327




1,60311327










asked Nov 12 '18 at 3:41









R.joeR.joe

46




46











  • The title of your question suggests that it was working before you did 'normalization'. Could you be specific on what has changed?
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:33










  • Yes my model was giving 98 percent accuracy without normalization. I have performed normalization on the input data having shape (samples,features). I have normalized the feature of every sample such that in each single sample feature ranges from 0 to one. This is the only change that I have made in input data. After this accuracy suddenly drops. I want to improve performance after normalization
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:49










  • What is the variance of your data?
    – Novak
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:14










  • I didn't check the variance. Should I check it for each sample? Why we nned variance if I normalize each sample from 0 to 1?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17










  • If the performance was 98% anyway, why would you change anything?
    – cheersmate
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17
















  • The title of your question suggests that it was working before you did 'normalization'. Could you be specific on what has changed?
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:33










  • Yes my model was giving 98 percent accuracy without normalization. I have performed normalization on the input data having shape (samples,features). I have normalized the feature of every sample such that in each single sample feature ranges from 0 to one. This is the only change that I have made in input data. After this accuracy suddenly drops. I want to improve performance after normalization
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 7:49










  • What is the variance of your data?
    – Novak
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:14










  • I didn't check the variance. Should I check it for each sample? Why we nned variance if I normalize each sample from 0 to 1?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17










  • If the performance was 98% anyway, why would you change anything?
    – cheersmate
    Nov 12 '18 at 8:17















The title of your question suggests that it was working before you did 'normalization'. Could you be specific on what has changed?
– dedObed
Nov 12 '18 at 7:33




The title of your question suggests that it was working before you did 'normalization'. Could you be specific on what has changed?
– dedObed
Nov 12 '18 at 7:33












Yes my model was giving 98 percent accuracy without normalization. I have performed normalization on the input data having shape (samples,features). I have normalized the feature of every sample such that in each single sample feature ranges from 0 to one. This is the only change that I have made in input data. After this accuracy suddenly drops. I want to improve performance after normalization
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 7:49




Yes my model was giving 98 percent accuracy without normalization. I have performed normalization on the input data having shape (samples,features). I have normalized the feature of every sample such that in each single sample feature ranges from 0 to one. This is the only change that I have made in input data. After this accuracy suddenly drops. I want to improve performance after normalization
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 7:49












What is the variance of your data?
– Novak
Nov 12 '18 at 8:14




What is the variance of your data?
– Novak
Nov 12 '18 at 8:14












I didn't check the variance. Should I check it for each sample? Why we nned variance if I normalize each sample from 0 to 1?
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 8:17




I didn't check the variance. Should I check it for each sample? Why we nned variance if I normalize each sample from 0 to 1?
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 8:17












If the performance was 98% anyway, why would you change anything?
– cheersmate
Nov 12 '18 at 8:17




If the performance was 98% anyway, why would you change anything?
– cheersmate
Nov 12 '18 at 8:17












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Your computational model knows nothing about "images", it only sees numbers. So if you trained it with pixels of values from 0-255, it has learned what "light" means, what "dark" means and how do these combine to give you whatever target value you try model.



And what you did by the normalization is that you forced all pixel to be 0-1. So as far as the model cares, they are all black as night. No surprise that it cannot extract anything meaningful.



You need to apply the same input normalization during both training and testing.



And speaking about normalization for NN models, it is better to normalize to zero mean.






share|improve this answer




















  • I have applied this normalization to both training and test set. Suppose my input values in one sample were -4 to +4 so by normalization I shifted them on a different scale 0 to 1. Why should I expect that machine can not extract any information. I even tried to make model complex by adding different layers and provided more data but still there is no improvement in accuracy. I'm bound to implement min max normalization.
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:08










  • But have you trained the model with the normalized values? From reading your comment under the question, I got the idea that you have not.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:09











  • Yes I trained the model with normalized values. Above code that I have mentioned contains two hidden layer. I varied number of neurons ,and also added a large amount of data. But still performance is too low. I was wondering how to improve it
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:16










  • Hey, that changes things, you should have said that ;-) But really, try to normalize them to zero mean, e.g. to <-1; 1> (and check the distribution, there may be outliers screwing the min-max normalization heavily). Also, for such a small network, tanh can be expected to work better than relu. And finally, learning rate tuning typically gives you the most. Try lowering it geometrically. Do changes one by one.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:25










  • if i normalize b/w -1 and 1 is is similar to 0 to 1 means shifting a scale. Why should I expect that in this case network will perform better?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 11:17










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53255677%2fwhy-model-performs-poor-after-normalization%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Your computational model knows nothing about "images", it only sees numbers. So if you trained it with pixels of values from 0-255, it has learned what "light" means, what "dark" means and how do these combine to give you whatever target value you try model.



And what you did by the normalization is that you forced all pixel to be 0-1. So as far as the model cares, they are all black as night. No surprise that it cannot extract anything meaningful.



You need to apply the same input normalization during both training and testing.



And speaking about normalization for NN models, it is better to normalize to zero mean.






share|improve this answer




















  • I have applied this normalization to both training and test set. Suppose my input values in one sample were -4 to +4 so by normalization I shifted them on a different scale 0 to 1. Why should I expect that machine can not extract any information. I even tried to make model complex by adding different layers and provided more data but still there is no improvement in accuracy. I'm bound to implement min max normalization.
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:08










  • But have you trained the model with the normalized values? From reading your comment under the question, I got the idea that you have not.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:09











  • Yes I trained the model with normalized values. Above code that I have mentioned contains two hidden layer. I varied number of neurons ,and also added a large amount of data. But still performance is too low. I was wondering how to improve it
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:16










  • Hey, that changes things, you should have said that ;-) But really, try to normalize them to zero mean, e.g. to <-1; 1> (and check the distribution, there may be outliers screwing the min-max normalization heavily). Also, for such a small network, tanh can be expected to work better than relu. And finally, learning rate tuning typically gives you the most. Try lowering it geometrically. Do changes one by one.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:25










  • if i normalize b/w -1 and 1 is is similar to 0 to 1 means shifting a scale. Why should I expect that in this case network will perform better?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 11:17















1














Your computational model knows nothing about "images", it only sees numbers. So if you trained it with pixels of values from 0-255, it has learned what "light" means, what "dark" means and how do these combine to give you whatever target value you try model.



And what you did by the normalization is that you forced all pixel to be 0-1. So as far as the model cares, they are all black as night. No surprise that it cannot extract anything meaningful.



You need to apply the same input normalization during both training and testing.



And speaking about normalization for NN models, it is better to normalize to zero mean.






share|improve this answer




















  • I have applied this normalization to both training and test set. Suppose my input values in one sample were -4 to +4 so by normalization I shifted them on a different scale 0 to 1. Why should I expect that machine can not extract any information. I even tried to make model complex by adding different layers and provided more data but still there is no improvement in accuracy. I'm bound to implement min max normalization.
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:08










  • But have you trained the model with the normalized values? From reading your comment under the question, I got the idea that you have not.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:09











  • Yes I trained the model with normalized values. Above code that I have mentioned contains two hidden layer. I varied number of neurons ,and also added a large amount of data. But still performance is too low. I was wondering how to improve it
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:16










  • Hey, that changes things, you should have said that ;-) But really, try to normalize them to zero mean, e.g. to <-1; 1> (and check the distribution, there may be outliers screwing the min-max normalization heavily). Also, for such a small network, tanh can be expected to work better than relu. And finally, learning rate tuning typically gives you the most. Try lowering it geometrically. Do changes one by one.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:25










  • if i normalize b/w -1 and 1 is is similar to 0 to 1 means shifting a scale. Why should I expect that in this case network will perform better?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 11:17













1












1








1






Your computational model knows nothing about "images", it only sees numbers. So if you trained it with pixels of values from 0-255, it has learned what "light" means, what "dark" means and how do these combine to give you whatever target value you try model.



And what you did by the normalization is that you forced all pixel to be 0-1. So as far as the model cares, they are all black as night. No surprise that it cannot extract anything meaningful.



You need to apply the same input normalization during both training and testing.



And speaking about normalization for NN models, it is better to normalize to zero mean.






share|improve this answer












Your computational model knows nothing about "images", it only sees numbers. So if you trained it with pixels of values from 0-255, it has learned what "light" means, what "dark" means and how do these combine to give you whatever target value you try model.



And what you did by the normalization is that you forced all pixel to be 0-1. So as far as the model cares, they are all black as night. No surprise that it cannot extract anything meaningful.



You need to apply the same input normalization during both training and testing.



And speaking about normalization for NN models, it is better to normalize to zero mean.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 12 '18 at 8:45









dedObeddedObed

419110




419110











  • I have applied this normalization to both training and test set. Suppose my input values in one sample were -4 to +4 so by normalization I shifted them on a different scale 0 to 1. Why should I expect that machine can not extract any information. I even tried to make model complex by adding different layers and provided more data but still there is no improvement in accuracy. I'm bound to implement min max normalization.
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:08










  • But have you trained the model with the normalized values? From reading your comment under the question, I got the idea that you have not.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:09











  • Yes I trained the model with normalized values. Above code that I have mentioned contains two hidden layer. I varied number of neurons ,and also added a large amount of data. But still performance is too low. I was wondering how to improve it
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:16










  • Hey, that changes things, you should have said that ;-) But really, try to normalize them to zero mean, e.g. to <-1; 1> (and check the distribution, there may be outliers screwing the min-max normalization heavily). Also, for such a small network, tanh can be expected to work better than relu. And finally, learning rate tuning typically gives you the most. Try lowering it geometrically. Do changes one by one.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:25










  • if i normalize b/w -1 and 1 is is similar to 0 to 1 means shifting a scale. Why should I expect that in this case network will perform better?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 11:17
















  • I have applied this normalization to both training and test set. Suppose my input values in one sample were -4 to +4 so by normalization I shifted them on a different scale 0 to 1. Why should I expect that machine can not extract any information. I even tried to make model complex by adding different layers and provided more data but still there is no improvement in accuracy. I'm bound to implement min max normalization.
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:08










  • But have you trained the model with the normalized values? From reading your comment under the question, I got the idea that you have not.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:09











  • Yes I trained the model with normalized values. Above code that I have mentioned contains two hidden layer. I varied number of neurons ,and also added a large amount of data. But still performance is too low. I was wondering how to improve it
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:16










  • Hey, that changes things, you should have said that ;-) But really, try to normalize them to zero mean, e.g. to <-1; 1> (and check the distribution, there may be outliers screwing the min-max normalization heavily). Also, for such a small network, tanh can be expected to work better than relu. And finally, learning rate tuning typically gives you the most. Try lowering it geometrically. Do changes one by one.
    – dedObed
    Nov 12 '18 at 10:25










  • if i normalize b/w -1 and 1 is is similar to 0 to 1 means shifting a scale. Why should I expect that in this case network will perform better?
    – R.joe
    Nov 12 '18 at 11:17















I have applied this normalization to both training and test set. Suppose my input values in one sample were -4 to +4 so by normalization I shifted them on a different scale 0 to 1. Why should I expect that machine can not extract any information. I even tried to make model complex by adding different layers and provided more data but still there is no improvement in accuracy. I'm bound to implement min max normalization.
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 10:08




I have applied this normalization to both training and test set. Suppose my input values in one sample were -4 to +4 so by normalization I shifted them on a different scale 0 to 1. Why should I expect that machine can not extract any information. I even tried to make model complex by adding different layers and provided more data but still there is no improvement in accuracy. I'm bound to implement min max normalization.
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 10:08












But have you trained the model with the normalized values? From reading your comment under the question, I got the idea that you have not.
– dedObed
Nov 12 '18 at 10:09





But have you trained the model with the normalized values? From reading your comment under the question, I got the idea that you have not.
– dedObed
Nov 12 '18 at 10:09













Yes I trained the model with normalized values. Above code that I have mentioned contains two hidden layer. I varied number of neurons ,and also added a large amount of data. But still performance is too low. I was wondering how to improve it
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 10:16




Yes I trained the model with normalized values. Above code that I have mentioned contains two hidden layer. I varied number of neurons ,and also added a large amount of data. But still performance is too low. I was wondering how to improve it
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 10:16












Hey, that changes things, you should have said that ;-) But really, try to normalize them to zero mean, e.g. to <-1; 1> (and check the distribution, there may be outliers screwing the min-max normalization heavily). Also, for such a small network, tanh can be expected to work better than relu. And finally, learning rate tuning typically gives you the most. Try lowering it geometrically. Do changes one by one.
– dedObed
Nov 12 '18 at 10:25




Hey, that changes things, you should have said that ;-) But really, try to normalize them to zero mean, e.g. to <-1; 1> (and check the distribution, there may be outliers screwing the min-max normalization heavily). Also, for such a small network, tanh can be expected to work better than relu. And finally, learning rate tuning typically gives you the most. Try lowering it geometrically. Do changes one by one.
– dedObed
Nov 12 '18 at 10:25












if i normalize b/w -1 and 1 is is similar to 0 to 1 means shifting a scale. Why should I expect that in this case network will perform better?
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 11:17




if i normalize b/w -1 and 1 is is similar to 0 to 1 means shifting a scale. Why should I expect that in this case network will perform better?
– R.joe
Nov 12 '18 at 11:17

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53255677%2fwhy-model-performs-poor-after-normalization%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

Darth Vader #20

Ondo