Java collection set for user defined types with unique key strings
I was wondering is there a collection that I can use for a class Weapon where it's like a hash_set of Weapon objects, but I want to use a name field in my weapon class and make it so that no two Weapons with the same name can exist in the set. I want to compare inputs with strings of my Weapon set to see if it already exists, and if it does, don't put it in the set, but I don't want to search the entire map every single time. Also, it wouldn't be case sensitive.
java hash set
add a comment |
I was wondering is there a collection that I can use for a class Weapon where it's like a hash_set of Weapon objects, but I want to use a name field in my weapon class and make it so that no two Weapons with the same name can exist in the set. I want to compare inputs with strings of my Weapon set to see if it already exists, and if it does, don't put it in the set, but I don't want to search the entire map every single time. Also, it wouldn't be case sensitive.
java hash set
1
Use aHashSet
and override theequals()
method so that the two objects will be considered equal if thename
property is the same
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:19
1
@GBlodgett don't forget also to override hashCode().
– Gene
Nov 15 '18 at 3:29
"Searching the entire map" organized by weapon's name is an O(1) operation -- it's very fast even for thousands of weapons. If you have a dozen of weapons or so, you could use an array list and search it linearly; it would be pretty fast as well.
– dasblinkenlight
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
@Gene Yes that too
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
add a comment |
I was wondering is there a collection that I can use for a class Weapon where it's like a hash_set of Weapon objects, but I want to use a name field in my weapon class and make it so that no two Weapons with the same name can exist in the set. I want to compare inputs with strings of my Weapon set to see if it already exists, and if it does, don't put it in the set, but I don't want to search the entire map every single time. Also, it wouldn't be case sensitive.
java hash set
I was wondering is there a collection that I can use for a class Weapon where it's like a hash_set of Weapon objects, but I want to use a name field in my weapon class and make it so that no two Weapons with the same name can exist in the set. I want to compare inputs with strings of my Weapon set to see if it already exists, and if it does, don't put it in the set, but I don't want to search the entire map every single time. Also, it wouldn't be case sensitive.
java hash set
java hash set
asked Nov 15 '18 at 3:18
Shinji-sanShinji-san
474615
474615
1
Use aHashSet
and override theequals()
method so that the two objects will be considered equal if thename
property is the same
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:19
1
@GBlodgett don't forget also to override hashCode().
– Gene
Nov 15 '18 at 3:29
"Searching the entire map" organized by weapon's name is an O(1) operation -- it's very fast even for thousands of weapons. If you have a dozen of weapons or so, you could use an array list and search it linearly; it would be pretty fast as well.
– dasblinkenlight
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
@Gene Yes that too
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
add a comment |
1
Use aHashSet
and override theequals()
method so that the two objects will be considered equal if thename
property is the same
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:19
1
@GBlodgett don't forget also to override hashCode().
– Gene
Nov 15 '18 at 3:29
"Searching the entire map" organized by weapon's name is an O(1) operation -- it's very fast even for thousands of weapons. If you have a dozen of weapons or so, you could use an array list and search it linearly; it would be pretty fast as well.
– dasblinkenlight
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
@Gene Yes that too
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
1
1
Use a
HashSet
and override the equals()
method so that the two objects will be considered equal if the name
property is the same– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:19
Use a
HashSet
and override the equals()
method so that the two objects will be considered equal if the name
property is the same– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:19
1
1
@GBlodgett don't forget also to override hashCode().
– Gene
Nov 15 '18 at 3:29
@GBlodgett don't forget also to override hashCode().
– Gene
Nov 15 '18 at 3:29
"Searching the entire map" organized by weapon's name is an O(1) operation -- it's very fast even for thousands of weapons. If you have a dozen of weapons or so, you could use an array list and search it linearly; it would be pretty fast as well.
– dasblinkenlight
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
"Searching the entire map" organized by weapon's name is an O(1) operation -- it's very fast even for thousands of weapons. If you have a dozen of weapons or so, you could use an array list and search it linearly; it would be pretty fast as well.
– dasblinkenlight
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
@Gene Yes that too
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
@Gene Yes that too
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In your equals()
, check only the name
field for equality.
public class Weapon
private String name;
// ... other fields
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
Weapon weapon = (Weapon) o;
return name.equalsIgnoreCase(weapon.name); //case-insensitive
@Override
public int hashCode()
return name.toLowerCase().hashCode();
And then use your HashSet like so:-
public static void main(String args)
Set<Weapon> weapons = new HashSet<>();
Weapon w1 = new Weapon();
// TODO set the name of the weapon or pass it in constructor
if (weapons.add(w1))
System.out.println("Weapon added");
else
System.out.println("Weapon with same name already exists");
add a comment |
We have to override equals() and hashcode() methods to return the same interger for name.
Below is the equals() and hashcode () contract:
See JavaDoc of java.lang.Object
In hashCode() it says:
If two objects are equal according to the equals(Object) method, then calling the hashCode method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
If you only override equals() and not hashCode() your class violates this contract.
This is also said in the JavaDoc of the equals() method:
Note that it is generally necessary to override the hashCode method whenever this method is overridden, so as to maintain the general contract for the hashCode method, which states that equal objects must have equal hash codes.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53311904%2fjava-collection-set-for-user-defined-types-with-unique-key-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In your equals()
, check only the name
field for equality.
public class Weapon
private String name;
// ... other fields
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
Weapon weapon = (Weapon) o;
return name.equalsIgnoreCase(weapon.name); //case-insensitive
@Override
public int hashCode()
return name.toLowerCase().hashCode();
And then use your HashSet like so:-
public static void main(String args)
Set<Weapon> weapons = new HashSet<>();
Weapon w1 = new Weapon();
// TODO set the name of the weapon or pass it in constructor
if (weapons.add(w1))
System.out.println("Weapon added");
else
System.out.println("Weapon with same name already exists");
add a comment |
In your equals()
, check only the name
field for equality.
public class Weapon
private String name;
// ... other fields
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
Weapon weapon = (Weapon) o;
return name.equalsIgnoreCase(weapon.name); //case-insensitive
@Override
public int hashCode()
return name.toLowerCase().hashCode();
And then use your HashSet like so:-
public static void main(String args)
Set<Weapon> weapons = new HashSet<>();
Weapon w1 = new Weapon();
// TODO set the name of the weapon or pass it in constructor
if (weapons.add(w1))
System.out.println("Weapon added");
else
System.out.println("Weapon with same name already exists");
add a comment |
In your equals()
, check only the name
field for equality.
public class Weapon
private String name;
// ... other fields
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
Weapon weapon = (Weapon) o;
return name.equalsIgnoreCase(weapon.name); //case-insensitive
@Override
public int hashCode()
return name.toLowerCase().hashCode();
And then use your HashSet like so:-
public static void main(String args)
Set<Weapon> weapons = new HashSet<>();
Weapon w1 = new Weapon();
// TODO set the name of the weapon or pass it in constructor
if (weapons.add(w1))
System.out.println("Weapon added");
else
System.out.println("Weapon with same name already exists");
In your equals()
, check only the name
field for equality.
public class Weapon
private String name;
// ... other fields
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
Weapon weapon = (Weapon) o;
return name.equalsIgnoreCase(weapon.name); //case-insensitive
@Override
public int hashCode()
return name.toLowerCase().hashCode();
And then use your HashSet like so:-
public static void main(String args)
Set<Weapon> weapons = new HashSet<>();
Weapon w1 = new Weapon();
// TODO set the name of the weapon or pass it in constructor
if (weapons.add(w1))
System.out.println("Weapon added");
else
System.out.println("Weapon with same name already exists");
edited Nov 15 '18 at 3:53
answered Nov 15 '18 at 3:28
KartikKartik
4,45731537
4,45731537
add a comment |
add a comment |
We have to override equals() and hashcode() methods to return the same interger for name.
Below is the equals() and hashcode () contract:
See JavaDoc of java.lang.Object
In hashCode() it says:
If two objects are equal according to the equals(Object) method, then calling the hashCode method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
If you only override equals() and not hashCode() your class violates this contract.
This is also said in the JavaDoc of the equals() method:
Note that it is generally necessary to override the hashCode method whenever this method is overridden, so as to maintain the general contract for the hashCode method, which states that equal objects must have equal hash codes.
add a comment |
We have to override equals() and hashcode() methods to return the same interger for name.
Below is the equals() and hashcode () contract:
See JavaDoc of java.lang.Object
In hashCode() it says:
If two objects are equal according to the equals(Object) method, then calling the hashCode method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
If you only override equals() and not hashCode() your class violates this contract.
This is also said in the JavaDoc of the equals() method:
Note that it is generally necessary to override the hashCode method whenever this method is overridden, so as to maintain the general contract for the hashCode method, which states that equal objects must have equal hash codes.
add a comment |
We have to override equals() and hashcode() methods to return the same interger for name.
Below is the equals() and hashcode () contract:
See JavaDoc of java.lang.Object
In hashCode() it says:
If two objects are equal according to the equals(Object) method, then calling the hashCode method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
If you only override equals() and not hashCode() your class violates this contract.
This is also said in the JavaDoc of the equals() method:
Note that it is generally necessary to override the hashCode method whenever this method is overridden, so as to maintain the general contract for the hashCode method, which states that equal objects must have equal hash codes.
We have to override equals() and hashcode() methods to return the same interger for name.
Below is the equals() and hashcode () contract:
See JavaDoc of java.lang.Object
In hashCode() it says:
If two objects are equal according to the equals(Object) method, then calling the hashCode method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
If you only override equals() and not hashCode() your class violates this contract.
This is also said in the JavaDoc of the equals() method:
Note that it is generally necessary to override the hashCode method whenever this method is overridden, so as to maintain the general contract for the hashCode method, which states that equal objects must have equal hash codes.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 4:00
Karthik PKarthik P
336
336
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53311904%2fjava-collection-set-for-user-defined-types-with-unique-key-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Use a
HashSet
and override theequals()
method so that the two objects will be considered equal if thename
property is the same– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:19
1
@GBlodgett don't forget also to override hashCode().
– Gene
Nov 15 '18 at 3:29
"Searching the entire map" organized by weapon's name is an O(1) operation -- it's very fast even for thousands of weapons. If you have a dozen of weapons or so, you could use an array list and search it linearly; it would be pretty fast as well.
– dasblinkenlight
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30
@Gene Yes that too
– GBlodgett
Nov 15 '18 at 3:30