Suggest requirements/standards to be officially and only worthy to be called a "Music Legend"
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Suggest requirements/standards to be officially and only worthy to be called a "Music Legend"
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
Wiki
- Characters
- Creators
- Teams
- Volumes
- Issues
- Publishers
- Locations
- Concepts
- Things
- Story Arcs
- Movies
- Series
- Episodes
- Characters
- Creators
- Teams
- Volumes
- Issues
- Publishers
- Locations
- Concepts
- Things
- Story Arcs
- Movies
- Series
- Episodes
Forums
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Community
- Top Users
- Activity Feed
- User Lists
- Community Promos
- Top Users
- Activity Feed
- User Lists
- Community Promos
Archives
- News
- Reviews
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Previews
- News
- Reviews
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Previews
Wiki
Arcs
Characters
Companies
Concepts
Issues
Locations
Movies
People
Teams
Things
Volumes
Series
Episodes
Editorial
Videos
Articles
Reviews
Features
Community
Users
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Suggest requirements/standards to be officially and only worthy to be called a "Music Legend"
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Suggest requirements/standards to be officially and only worthy to be called a "Music Legend"
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Please Log In to post.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
#1
Posted by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
I'm (I'm a Filipino) a huge fan of music that's why i know a lot of songs, I listen to almost any genre of music, sing, dance, write songs, read articles about music artists, update myself on music charts, etc.
And every now and then, a lot of people use the word "legend" on a lot of music artists.
Now I have a problem with this because:
1. Music awards don't seem to have requirements/standards when giving their highest/special awards to selected music artist/artists. They usually say "impact/influence/contribution to music industry" They don't even tell us if the highest/special awards scope is within the country only or is it a worldwide scope. Most probably country-wise only and if that is the case then they should add "in america / the usa" like "legend award of America" or something similar to that concept.
Let me give examples...
Grammys "Grammy Legend Award" recipients list:
1990 Andrew Lloyd Webber
1990 Liza Minnelli
1990 Smokey Robinson
1990 Willie Nelson
1991 Aretha Franklin
1991 Billy Joel
1991 Johnny Cash
1991 Quincy Jones
1992 Barbra Streisand
1993 Michael Jackson
1994 Curtis Mayfield
1994 Frank Sinatra
1998 Luciano Pavarotti
1999 Elton John
2003 Bee Gees
I don't even know most of them. And most of them aren't even in best-selling artists in America.
The Grammy also have "Salute To Industry Icons" award, a special awards given to only 5 music artists so far and the recipients ( Clive Davis, L. A. Reid, Lucian Grange, Jay-Z and Janet Jackson ) of it doesn't give us a clear reason why they have obtained the award.
Here's another example. BillBoard Music Awards
Check the link and go to the special awards page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
Especially on the Artist Achievement Award, Millenium Award and Icon Award. Check the recipients of each and it doesn't seem right, even if these special awards scope is only America.
World Music Awards Legend Award: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Music_Award
I actually like this particular awards more than the others because they base their decisions usually in a worldwide scope. But I don't agree with all of the recipients getting the legend award and I also think they have given the award a lot.
2. There are people who tend to use the word "legend" especially when a music artist dies. They emphasize the term to the music artist. For example in Prince's case when somebody said "the last living greatest performer" which Justin Bieber got a backlash for disagreeing. Justin Bieber was right though because, if it meant last living legend, we still have a living Madonna, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, a member of The Beatles, etc, who have sold way more records, succeeded more on concerts/tours and have more songs that charted better than Prince.
3. There are people who overrate music artists, calling them legends when I don't think they are. This is the case of Aretha Franklin. List on different sites would put her on top (or ranks better than other music artists who have achieved more and worldwide-wise) of the list for greatest voices, best /greatest female singers (rollingstones.com), etc. First and foremost, Aretha is I could say "unknown" in Asia. Second, since she's unknown in Asia then that means she really didn't have a song that became a hit worldwide. Third is, even if we're talking about music charts in America or record sales in America, she's not even of the best-selling artists of America.
4. Lastly, as time goes by, past singers eventually die and new singers sprout so the word "legend" is becoming a common word. And the term legend loses it's special and extraordinary meaning.
So I hope y'all getting my point and why we need requirements/standards to keep the "legend" title given only to those who are worthy to be called legends as well as to limit its usage, which means, only a few can really obtain the "legend" title.
If you have suggestions, please do answer the following cases first.
A. If a duo or group will be worthy of being called legends, can each member be worthy of being called a music legend too? - raising this up because each member didn't obtain extraordinary achievements individually, but as a group. Also, some members quit, new members come.
B. Should we have separate requirements/standards for different generations? -Raising this up because previous generations support music artists through buying physical albums and singles while the newer generation are more into buying digital albums and singles as well as streaming on streaming music services and watching videos on like YouTube.
C. Should music artist/artists know how to play instruments and/or write songs to worthy of being called a "music legend" - i am including this because there are people who dislike and do not appreciate music artists for not writing their own beat/music/songs.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
- jhazzroucher
- Follow
Forum Posts: 22891
Wiki Points: 395
Followed by: 0
Reviews: 0 Lists: 9
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
#2
Edited by
jhazzroucher
(22891 posts)
- 28 days, 8 hours ago
- Show Bio
A. For duos, trios or groups, individual member should not be called a music legend because they individually cannot stand on their own. They are known as a group, not as individuals. Aside from that, some members of a certain group leave the group, some would add a new member/s so a member can't be called a music legend. We can just say, as an example: Paul Mccartney is part of the music legend/legendary music group, The Beatles. You can't say: Music legend Paul McCartney will attend the Grammys show this year.
B. There must be a separate requirement/s/standards for different generations and for this case, i have come up with 2 separate requirements/standards, one for earlier decades until the 90s and two for music artists from 200s til present.
C. Being able to play instruments or writing your own music should not be a requirement. It's a plus factor but not a requirement. My point, some writers can't make their songs popular because they just don't have it. While other music artists who don't write music has their way of making one songs click to a lot of people. They could be better at dealing with other people in the music industry that's or they just have better concepts thats why somebody else's music works well with them.
I'm tired. Ill update my post for my suggestions prolly tomorrow.
- Comic Vine
- Forums
- Off-Topic
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Jump to Top
Jump to Last Read
Browse Boards
- Gen. Discussion
- Bug Reporting
- Delete/Combine Pages
- Artist Show-Off
- Off-Topic
- Contests
- Battles
- Fan-Fic
- RPG
- Comic Book Preview
- API Developers
- Editing & Tools
- Podcast
- Quests
Please Log In to post.
Don't post to forums
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Moderator Hangout
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Spam Museum(Or search for a more specific forum)
(Bring back the main forum list)
Forums
Main boards
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Popular wiki boards
- X-Men
- Spider-Man
- Dick Grayson
- Batman
- Wonder Woman
- Teen Titans
- Cyclops
- Superman
- Hulk
- Storm
Top posters

Rouflex
31884 posts

PowerHerc
27706 posts

Dragonborn_CT
24996 posts

Pharoh_Atem
24449 posts

King Saturn
23358 posts

Xwraith
20483 posts

Straight-Fire
20348 posts

Deadite
19243 posts

Wolverine008
18486 posts

MonsterStomp
16057 posts








- Advertise
- Partnerships
- API
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Ad Choice
- Help
- Careers
- Advertise
- Partnerships
- API
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Ad Choice
- Help
- Careers
© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.
Use your keyboard!
- ESC
Use your keyboard!
- ESC
Use your keyboard!
- ESC
Log in to comment

Clash Royale CLAN TAG
Log in to comment