Change column values in pandas based on condition
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
df:
A
0 219
1 590
2 272
3 945
4 175
5 930
6 662
7 472
8 251
9 130
I am trying to create a new column quantile based on which quantile the value falls in, for example:
if value > 1st quantile : value = 1
if value > 2nd quantile : value = 2
if value > 3rd quantile : value = 3
if value > 4th quantile : value = 4
Code:
f_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.25)
s_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.5)
t_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.75)
fo_q = df['A'] .quantile (1)
index = 0
for i in range(len(test_df)):
value = df.at[index,"A"]
if value > 0 and value <= f_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 1
elif value > f_q and value <= s_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 2
elif value > s_q and value <= t_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 3
elif value > t_q and value <= fo_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 4
index += 1
The code works fine. But I would like to know if there is a more efficient pandas way of doing this. Any suggestions are helpful.
python pandas
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
df:
A
0 219
1 590
2 272
3 945
4 175
5 930
6 662
7 472
8 251
9 130
I am trying to create a new column quantile based on which quantile the value falls in, for example:
if value > 1st quantile : value = 1
if value > 2nd quantile : value = 2
if value > 3rd quantile : value = 3
if value > 4th quantile : value = 4
Code:
f_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.25)
s_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.5)
t_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.75)
fo_q = df['A'] .quantile (1)
index = 0
for i in range(len(test_df)):
value = df.at[index,"A"]
if value > 0 and value <= f_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 1
elif value > f_q and value <= s_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 2
elif value > s_q and value <= t_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 3
elif value > t_q and value <= fo_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 4
index += 1
The code works fine. But I would like to know if there is a more efficient pandas way of doing this. Any suggestions are helpful.
python pandas
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
df:
A
0 219
1 590
2 272
3 945
4 175
5 930
6 662
7 472
8 251
9 130
I am trying to create a new column quantile based on which quantile the value falls in, for example:
if value > 1st quantile : value = 1
if value > 2nd quantile : value = 2
if value > 3rd quantile : value = 3
if value > 4th quantile : value = 4
Code:
f_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.25)
s_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.5)
t_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.75)
fo_q = df['A'] .quantile (1)
index = 0
for i in range(len(test_df)):
value = df.at[index,"A"]
if value > 0 and value <= f_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 1
elif value > f_q and value <= s_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 2
elif value > s_q and value <= t_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 3
elif value > t_q and value <= fo_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 4
index += 1
The code works fine. But I would like to know if there is a more efficient pandas way of doing this. Any suggestions are helpful.
python pandas
df:
A
0 219
1 590
2 272
3 945
4 175
5 930
6 662
7 472
8 251
9 130
I am trying to create a new column quantile based on which quantile the value falls in, for example:
if value > 1st quantile : value = 1
if value > 2nd quantile : value = 2
if value > 3rd quantile : value = 3
if value > 4th quantile : value = 4
Code:
f_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.25)
s_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.5)
t_q = df['A'] .quantile (0.75)
fo_q = df['A'] .quantile (1)
index = 0
for i in range(len(test_df)):
value = df.at[index,"A"]
if value > 0 and value <= f_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 1
elif value > f_q and value <= s_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 2
elif value > s_q and value <= t_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 3
elif value > t_q and value <= fo_q:
df.at[index,"A"] = 4
index += 1
The code works fine. But I would like to know if there is a more efficient pandas way of doing this. Any suggestions are helpful.
python pandas
python pandas
edited Nov 10 at 3:38
coldspeed
111k17101170
111k17101170
asked Nov 10 at 3:13
vikky
6231128
6231128
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, using pd.qcut
:
>>> pd.qcut(df.A, 4).cat.codes + 1
0 1
1 3
2 2
3 4
4 1
5 4
6 4
7 3
8 2
9 1
dtype: int8
(Gives me exactly the same result your code does.)
You could also call np.unique
on the qcut
result:
>>> np.unique(pd.qcut(df.A, 4), return_inverse=True)[1] + 1
array([1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1])
Or, using pd.factorize
(note the slight difference in the output):
>>> pd.factorize(pd.qcut(df.A, 4))[0] + 1
array([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 4, 2, 3, 1])
1
wow!! thanks for the suggestion. This is great.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:20
@vikky Added more options, if needed.
– coldspeed
Nov 10 at 3:25
cool Thanks. i will compare the performances of the options and will post that for future readers.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, using pd.qcut
:
>>> pd.qcut(df.A, 4).cat.codes + 1
0 1
1 3
2 2
3 4
4 1
5 4
6 4
7 3
8 2
9 1
dtype: int8
(Gives me exactly the same result your code does.)
You could also call np.unique
on the qcut
result:
>>> np.unique(pd.qcut(df.A, 4), return_inverse=True)[1] + 1
array([1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1])
Or, using pd.factorize
(note the slight difference in the output):
>>> pd.factorize(pd.qcut(df.A, 4))[0] + 1
array([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 4, 2, 3, 1])
1
wow!! thanks for the suggestion. This is great.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:20
@vikky Added more options, if needed.
– coldspeed
Nov 10 at 3:25
cool Thanks. i will compare the performances of the options and will post that for future readers.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, using pd.qcut
:
>>> pd.qcut(df.A, 4).cat.codes + 1
0 1
1 3
2 2
3 4
4 1
5 4
6 4
7 3
8 2
9 1
dtype: int8
(Gives me exactly the same result your code does.)
You could also call np.unique
on the qcut
result:
>>> np.unique(pd.qcut(df.A, 4), return_inverse=True)[1] + 1
array([1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1])
Or, using pd.factorize
(note the slight difference in the output):
>>> pd.factorize(pd.qcut(df.A, 4))[0] + 1
array([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 4, 2, 3, 1])
1
wow!! thanks for the suggestion. This is great.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:20
@vikky Added more options, if needed.
– coldspeed
Nov 10 at 3:25
cool Thanks. i will compare the performances of the options and will post that for future readers.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, using pd.qcut
:
>>> pd.qcut(df.A, 4).cat.codes + 1
0 1
1 3
2 2
3 4
4 1
5 4
6 4
7 3
8 2
9 1
dtype: int8
(Gives me exactly the same result your code does.)
You could also call np.unique
on the qcut
result:
>>> np.unique(pd.qcut(df.A, 4), return_inverse=True)[1] + 1
array([1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1])
Or, using pd.factorize
(note the slight difference in the output):
>>> pd.factorize(pd.qcut(df.A, 4))[0] + 1
array([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 4, 2, 3, 1])
Yes, using pd.qcut
:
>>> pd.qcut(df.A, 4).cat.codes + 1
0 1
1 3
2 2
3 4
4 1
5 4
6 4
7 3
8 2
9 1
dtype: int8
(Gives me exactly the same result your code does.)
You could also call np.unique
on the qcut
result:
>>> np.unique(pd.qcut(df.A, 4), return_inverse=True)[1] + 1
array([1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1])
Or, using pd.factorize
(note the slight difference in the output):
>>> pd.factorize(pd.qcut(df.A, 4))[0] + 1
array([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 4, 2, 3, 1])
edited Nov 10 at 3:24
answered Nov 10 at 3:19
coldspeed
111k17101170
111k17101170
1
wow!! thanks for the suggestion. This is great.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:20
@vikky Added more options, if needed.
– coldspeed
Nov 10 at 3:25
cool Thanks. i will compare the performances of the options and will post that for future readers.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
1
wow!! thanks for the suggestion. This is great.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:20
@vikky Added more options, if needed.
– coldspeed
Nov 10 at 3:25
cool Thanks. i will compare the performances of the options and will post that for future readers.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:30
1
1
wow!! thanks for the suggestion. This is great.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:20
wow!! thanks for the suggestion. This is great.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:20
@vikky Added more options, if needed.
– coldspeed
Nov 10 at 3:25
@vikky Added more options, if needed.
– coldspeed
Nov 10 at 3:25
cool Thanks. i will compare the performances of the options and will post that for future readers.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:30
cool Thanks. i will compare the performances of the options and will post that for future readers.
– vikky
Nov 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53235718%2fchange-column-values-in-pandas-based-on-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown