different result with scipy integrate.tplquad










1














With Matematica this integral gives me 3. wolfram alpha
With integrate.tplquad I get -3.

This is Matematica code.



Integrate[1-x, (0,2),(0,3-1.5*x),(0,6-3*x -2*y)] 


I can't see what I am doing wrong with ntegrate.tplquad



f = lambda x,y,z: 1-x 

x1, x2 = 0,2

y1, y2 = lambda x : 0 , lambda x:3-1.5*x

z1, z2 = lambda x,y:0, lambda x,y: 6 -3*x -2*y

print(integrate.tplquad(f,x1,x2, y1, y2, z1, z2)[0])
-3.0









share|improve this question























  • @kabanus, I will update with the code. But there is is link to wolfram on the first line.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:29















1














With Matematica this integral gives me 3. wolfram alpha
With integrate.tplquad I get -3.

This is Matematica code.



Integrate[1-x, (0,2),(0,3-1.5*x),(0,6-3*x -2*y)] 


I can't see what I am doing wrong with ntegrate.tplquad



f = lambda x,y,z: 1-x 

x1, x2 = 0,2

y1, y2 = lambda x : 0 , lambda x:3-1.5*x

z1, z2 = lambda x,y:0, lambda x,y: 6 -3*x -2*y

print(integrate.tplquad(f,x1,x2, y1, y2, z1, z2)[0])
-3.0









share|improve this question























  • @kabanus, I will update with the code. But there is is link to wolfram on the first line.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:29













1












1








1







With Matematica this integral gives me 3. wolfram alpha
With integrate.tplquad I get -3.

This is Matematica code.



Integrate[1-x, (0,2),(0,3-1.5*x),(0,6-3*x -2*y)] 


I can't see what I am doing wrong with ntegrate.tplquad



f = lambda x,y,z: 1-x 

x1, x2 = 0,2

y1, y2 = lambda x : 0 , lambda x:3-1.5*x

z1, z2 = lambda x,y:0, lambda x,y: 6 -3*x -2*y

print(integrate.tplquad(f,x1,x2, y1, y2, z1, z2)[0])
-3.0









share|improve this question















With Matematica this integral gives me 3. wolfram alpha
With integrate.tplquad I get -3.

This is Matematica code.



Integrate[1-x, (0,2),(0,3-1.5*x),(0,6-3*x -2*y)] 


I can't see what I am doing wrong with ntegrate.tplquad



f = lambda x,y,z: 1-x 

x1, x2 = 0,2

y1, y2 = lambda x : 0 , lambda x:3-1.5*x

z1, z2 = lambda x,y:0, lambda x,y: 6 -3*x -2*y

print(integrate.tplquad(f,x1,x2, y1, y2, z1, z2)[0])
-3.0






python scipy wolfram-mathematica






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 8 at 21:34









kabanus

11.2k31337




11.2k31337










asked Oct 8 at 21:16









LetzerWille

3,4162918




3,4162918











  • @kabanus, I will update with the code. But there is is link to wolfram on the first line.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:29
















  • @kabanus, I will update with the code. But there is is link to wolfram on the first line.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:29















@kabanus, I will update with the code. But there is is link to wolfram on the first line.
– LetzerWille
Oct 8 at 21:29




@kabanus, I will update with the code. But there is is link to wolfram on the first line.
– LetzerWille
Oct 8 at 21:29












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














Double-check the tplquad docstring; you'll see that the signature of the function f is f(z, y, x). So it looks like your integrand should be:



 f = lambda x, y, z: 1 - z





share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    I actually thought it more natural to change the signature rather than the function. Weird how these things are.
    – kabanus
    Oct 8 at 21:34










  • This one is really counter intuitive. Thank you.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:49










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52710223%2fdifferent-result-with-scipy-integrate-tplquad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Double-check the tplquad docstring; you'll see that the signature of the function f is f(z, y, x). So it looks like your integrand should be:



 f = lambda x, y, z: 1 - z





share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    I actually thought it more natural to change the signature rather than the function. Weird how these things are.
    – kabanus
    Oct 8 at 21:34










  • This one is really counter intuitive. Thank you.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:49















3














Double-check the tplquad docstring; you'll see that the signature of the function f is f(z, y, x). So it looks like your integrand should be:



 f = lambda x, y, z: 1 - z





share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    I actually thought it more natural to change the signature rather than the function. Weird how these things are.
    – kabanus
    Oct 8 at 21:34










  • This one is really counter intuitive. Thank you.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:49













3












3








3






Double-check the tplquad docstring; you'll see that the signature of the function f is f(z, y, x). So it looks like your integrand should be:



 f = lambda x, y, z: 1 - z





share|improve this answer












Double-check the tplquad docstring; you'll see that the signature of the function f is f(z, y, x). So it looks like your integrand should be:



 f = lambda x, y, z: 1 - z






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Oct 8 at 21:30









Warren Weckesser

67.8k795130




67.8k795130







  • 1




    I actually thought it more natural to change the signature rather than the function. Weird how these things are.
    – kabanus
    Oct 8 at 21:34










  • This one is really counter intuitive. Thank you.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:49












  • 1




    I actually thought it more natural to change the signature rather than the function. Weird how these things are.
    – kabanus
    Oct 8 at 21:34










  • This one is really counter intuitive. Thank you.
    – LetzerWille
    Oct 8 at 21:49







1




1




I actually thought it more natural to change the signature rather than the function. Weird how these things are.
– kabanus
Oct 8 at 21:34




I actually thought it more natural to change the signature rather than the function. Weird how these things are.
– kabanus
Oct 8 at 21:34












This one is really counter intuitive. Thank you.
– LetzerWille
Oct 8 at 21:49




This one is really counter intuitive. Thank you.
– LetzerWille
Oct 8 at 21:49

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52710223%2fdifferent-result-with-scipy-integrate-tplquad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

Darth Vader #20

Ondo