How to merge JsonIgnoreProperties with superclass?
I have two classes:
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="foo", allowGetters = true)
public class Parent
String foo;
String bar;
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="alice", allowGetters = true)
public class Child extends Parent
String alice;
String bob;
This results in a class Child
where the attribute foo
is not ignored (for setting). So I assume JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
overrides JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
.
But I need a way to merge JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
and JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
. How to do this? TIA!
java json jackson
add a comment |
I have two classes:
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="foo", allowGetters = true)
public class Parent
String foo;
String bar;
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="alice", allowGetters = true)
public class Child extends Parent
String alice;
String bob;
This results in a class Child
where the attribute foo
is not ignored (for setting). So I assume JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
overrides JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
.
But I need a way to merge JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
and JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
. How to do this? TIA!
java json jackson
You can set ignoreUnknown = true which will ignore any or specify multiple using value = "alice", "foo" on parent
– karen
Nov 9 at 12:21
@karen I do not want to ignore unknown, because I want to avoid setting some (existing) properties by the caller of a REST API.
– t777
Nov 9 at 12:22
add a comment |
I have two classes:
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="foo", allowGetters = true)
public class Parent
String foo;
String bar;
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="alice", allowGetters = true)
public class Child extends Parent
String alice;
String bob;
This results in a class Child
where the attribute foo
is not ignored (for setting). So I assume JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
overrides JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
.
But I need a way to merge JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
and JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
. How to do this? TIA!
java json jackson
I have two classes:
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="foo", allowGetters = true)
public class Parent
String foo;
String bar;
@JsonIgnoreProperties(values="alice", allowGetters = true)
public class Child extends Parent
String alice;
String bob;
This results in a class Child
where the attribute foo
is not ignored (for setting). So I assume JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
overrides JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
.
But I need a way to merge JsonIgnoreProperties
of Child
and JsonIgnoreProperties
of Parent
. How to do this? TIA!
java json jackson
java json jackson
asked Nov 9 at 12:14
t777
1,19352540
1,19352540
You can set ignoreUnknown = true which will ignore any or specify multiple using value = "alice", "foo" on parent
– karen
Nov 9 at 12:21
@karen I do not want to ignore unknown, because I want to avoid setting some (existing) properties by the caller of a REST API.
– t777
Nov 9 at 12:22
add a comment |
You can set ignoreUnknown = true which will ignore any or specify multiple using value = "alice", "foo" on parent
– karen
Nov 9 at 12:21
@karen I do not want to ignore unknown, because I want to avoid setting some (existing) properties by the caller of a REST API.
– t777
Nov 9 at 12:22
You can set ignoreUnknown = true which will ignore any or specify multiple using value = "alice", "foo" on parent
– karen
Nov 9 at 12:21
You can set ignoreUnknown = true which will ignore any or specify multiple using value = "alice", "foo" on parent
– karen
Nov 9 at 12:21
@karen I do not want to ignore unknown, because I want to avoid setting some (existing) properties by the caller of a REST API.
– t777
Nov 9 at 12:22
@karen I do not want to ignore unknown, because I want to avoid setting some (existing) properties by the caller of a REST API.
– t777
Nov 9 at 12:22
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Since you've redefined the annotation in Child class it overrides the one defined in Parent.
I know 2 Ways you could solve this, both of which are not straight forward.
- In the Child class, instead of using
@JsonIgnoreProperties
make use of@JsonIgnore
on the Getters of the Properties you would like to Ignore. This will make sure you're not overriding the Parent Annotation. - If you still want to make use of
@JsonIgnoreProperties
, then Add a Custom JsonFilter and handle the annotations parsing manually in Runtime (Reflections) by looking if any of the hierarchical parent classes has a JsonIgnoreProperties then skip the assignment.
Thanks. Regarding the second point: Is it sufficient to use a customJsonFilter
or do I need a customer deserializer?
– t777
Nov 9 at 20:19
@t777 Just a Custom JsonFilter should be enough.
– Bandi Kishore
Nov 11 at 12:58
add a comment |
I solved the problem with a custom BeanDeserializerModifier
.
see here: Jackson Dynamic filtering of properties during deserialization
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53225542%2fhow-to-merge-jsonignoreproperties-with-superclass%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Since you've redefined the annotation in Child class it overrides the one defined in Parent.
I know 2 Ways you could solve this, both of which are not straight forward.
- In the Child class, instead of using
@JsonIgnoreProperties
make use of@JsonIgnore
on the Getters of the Properties you would like to Ignore. This will make sure you're not overriding the Parent Annotation. - If you still want to make use of
@JsonIgnoreProperties
, then Add a Custom JsonFilter and handle the annotations parsing manually in Runtime (Reflections) by looking if any of the hierarchical parent classes has a JsonIgnoreProperties then skip the assignment.
Thanks. Regarding the second point: Is it sufficient to use a customJsonFilter
or do I need a customer deserializer?
– t777
Nov 9 at 20:19
@t777 Just a Custom JsonFilter should be enough.
– Bandi Kishore
Nov 11 at 12:58
add a comment |
Since you've redefined the annotation in Child class it overrides the one defined in Parent.
I know 2 Ways you could solve this, both of which are not straight forward.
- In the Child class, instead of using
@JsonIgnoreProperties
make use of@JsonIgnore
on the Getters of the Properties you would like to Ignore. This will make sure you're not overriding the Parent Annotation. - If you still want to make use of
@JsonIgnoreProperties
, then Add a Custom JsonFilter and handle the annotations parsing manually in Runtime (Reflections) by looking if any of the hierarchical parent classes has a JsonIgnoreProperties then skip the assignment.
Thanks. Regarding the second point: Is it sufficient to use a customJsonFilter
or do I need a customer deserializer?
– t777
Nov 9 at 20:19
@t777 Just a Custom JsonFilter should be enough.
– Bandi Kishore
Nov 11 at 12:58
add a comment |
Since you've redefined the annotation in Child class it overrides the one defined in Parent.
I know 2 Ways you could solve this, both of which are not straight forward.
- In the Child class, instead of using
@JsonIgnoreProperties
make use of@JsonIgnore
on the Getters of the Properties you would like to Ignore. This will make sure you're not overriding the Parent Annotation. - If you still want to make use of
@JsonIgnoreProperties
, then Add a Custom JsonFilter and handle the annotations parsing manually in Runtime (Reflections) by looking if any of the hierarchical parent classes has a JsonIgnoreProperties then skip the assignment.
Since you've redefined the annotation in Child class it overrides the one defined in Parent.
I know 2 Ways you could solve this, both of which are not straight forward.
- In the Child class, instead of using
@JsonIgnoreProperties
make use of@JsonIgnore
on the Getters of the Properties you would like to Ignore. This will make sure you're not overriding the Parent Annotation. - If you still want to make use of
@JsonIgnoreProperties
, then Add a Custom JsonFilter and handle the annotations parsing manually in Runtime (Reflections) by looking if any of the hierarchical parent classes has a JsonIgnoreProperties then skip the assignment.
answered Nov 9 at 12:54
Bandi Kishore
3,3341830
3,3341830
Thanks. Regarding the second point: Is it sufficient to use a customJsonFilter
or do I need a customer deserializer?
– t777
Nov 9 at 20:19
@t777 Just a Custom JsonFilter should be enough.
– Bandi Kishore
Nov 11 at 12:58
add a comment |
Thanks. Regarding the second point: Is it sufficient to use a customJsonFilter
or do I need a customer deserializer?
– t777
Nov 9 at 20:19
@t777 Just a Custom JsonFilter should be enough.
– Bandi Kishore
Nov 11 at 12:58
Thanks. Regarding the second point: Is it sufficient to use a custom
JsonFilter
or do I need a customer deserializer?– t777
Nov 9 at 20:19
Thanks. Regarding the second point: Is it sufficient to use a custom
JsonFilter
or do I need a customer deserializer?– t777
Nov 9 at 20:19
@t777 Just a Custom JsonFilter should be enough.
– Bandi Kishore
Nov 11 at 12:58
@t777 Just a Custom JsonFilter should be enough.
– Bandi Kishore
Nov 11 at 12:58
add a comment |
I solved the problem with a custom BeanDeserializerModifier
.
see here: Jackson Dynamic filtering of properties during deserialization
add a comment |
I solved the problem with a custom BeanDeserializerModifier
.
see here: Jackson Dynamic filtering of properties during deserialization
add a comment |
I solved the problem with a custom BeanDeserializerModifier
.
see here: Jackson Dynamic filtering of properties during deserialization
I solved the problem with a custom BeanDeserializerModifier
.
see here: Jackson Dynamic filtering of properties during deserialization
answered Nov 11 at 15:39
t777
1,19352540
1,19352540
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53225542%2fhow-to-merge-jsonignoreproperties-with-superclass%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You can set ignoreUnknown = true which will ignore any or specify multiple using value = "alice", "foo" on parent
– karen
Nov 9 at 12:21
@karen I do not want to ignore unknown, because I want to avoid setting some (existing) properties by the caller of a REST API.
– t777
Nov 9 at 12:22