Time how long a function runs (short duration)

Multi tool use
Multi tool use









0















I'm relatively new to Java programming, and I'm running into an issue calculating the amount of time it takes for a function to run.



First some background - I've got a lot of experience with Python, and I'm trying to recreate the functionality of the Jupyter Notebook/Lab %%timeit function, if you're familiar with that. Here's a pic of it in action (sorry, not enough karma to embed yet):



Snip of Jupyter %%timeit



What it does is run the contents of the cell (in this case a recursive function) either 1k, 10k, or 100k times, and give you the average run time of the function, and the standard deviation.



My first implementation (using the same recursive function) used System.nanoTime():



public static void main(String args) 

long t1, t2, diff;
long times = new long[1000];
int t;
for (int i=0; i< 1000; i++)

t1 = System.nanoTime();
t = triangle(20);
t2 = System.nanoTime();

diff = t2-t1;
System.out.println(diff);
times[i] = diff;


long total = 0;
for (int j=0; j<times.length; j++)
total += times[j];

System.out.println("Mean = " + total/1000.0);



But the mean is wildly thrown off -- for some reason, the first iteration of the function (on many runs) takes upwards of a million nanoseconds:



Pic of initial terminal output



Every iteration after the first dozen or so takes either 395 nanos or 0 -- so there could be a problem there too... not sure what's going on!



Also -- the code of the recursive function I'm timing:



static int triangle(int n) 
if (n == 1)
return n;
else
return n + triangle(n -1);




Initially I had the line n = Math.abs(n) on the first line of the function, but then I removed it because... meh. I'm the only one using this.



I tried a number of different suggestions brought up in this SO post, but they each have their own problems... which I can go into if you need.



Anyway, thank you in advance for your help and expertise!










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    JIT. Warm up. Benchmarking is hard. System clocks don't really do nano second resolution. What platform is this anyway? Which version of Java, which JRE, which operating system, what results do you expect?

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:15











  • Using JDK10 + the JRE that came with it -- running on Windows 10. Is there a better timer to use? I tried the Instant and Duration ones mentioned in that other post, same problem there too. Edit: does the JVM come with its own timer?

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:19












  • Like python's timeit (which you attributed to Jupyter)? No. But there is StopWatch in Apache Commons Lang.

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28











  • I should have said -- does the JVM come with its own internal clock that I can reach out to, if the system clock is a bad way to go about this. I was referring to the Jupyter magic command, which uses the python timeit function, yes.

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:38











  • System.nanoTime is the right method to use. You get nothing preciser. Related: How do I write a correct micro-benchmark in Java?

    – Ole V.V.
    Nov 14 '18 at 7:21
















0















I'm relatively new to Java programming, and I'm running into an issue calculating the amount of time it takes for a function to run.



First some background - I've got a lot of experience with Python, and I'm trying to recreate the functionality of the Jupyter Notebook/Lab %%timeit function, if you're familiar with that. Here's a pic of it in action (sorry, not enough karma to embed yet):



Snip of Jupyter %%timeit



What it does is run the contents of the cell (in this case a recursive function) either 1k, 10k, or 100k times, and give you the average run time of the function, and the standard deviation.



My first implementation (using the same recursive function) used System.nanoTime():



public static void main(String args) 

long t1, t2, diff;
long times = new long[1000];
int t;
for (int i=0; i< 1000; i++)

t1 = System.nanoTime();
t = triangle(20);
t2 = System.nanoTime();

diff = t2-t1;
System.out.println(diff);
times[i] = diff;


long total = 0;
for (int j=0; j<times.length; j++)
total += times[j];

System.out.println("Mean = " + total/1000.0);



But the mean is wildly thrown off -- for some reason, the first iteration of the function (on many runs) takes upwards of a million nanoseconds:



Pic of initial terminal output



Every iteration after the first dozen or so takes either 395 nanos or 0 -- so there could be a problem there too... not sure what's going on!



Also -- the code of the recursive function I'm timing:



static int triangle(int n) 
if (n == 1)
return n;
else
return n + triangle(n -1);




Initially I had the line n = Math.abs(n) on the first line of the function, but then I removed it because... meh. I'm the only one using this.



I tried a number of different suggestions brought up in this SO post, but they each have their own problems... which I can go into if you need.



Anyway, thank you in advance for your help and expertise!










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    JIT. Warm up. Benchmarking is hard. System clocks don't really do nano second resolution. What platform is this anyway? Which version of Java, which JRE, which operating system, what results do you expect?

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:15











  • Using JDK10 + the JRE that came with it -- running on Windows 10. Is there a better timer to use? I tried the Instant and Duration ones mentioned in that other post, same problem there too. Edit: does the JVM come with its own timer?

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:19












  • Like python's timeit (which you attributed to Jupyter)? No. But there is StopWatch in Apache Commons Lang.

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28











  • I should have said -- does the JVM come with its own internal clock that I can reach out to, if the system clock is a bad way to go about this. I was referring to the Jupyter magic command, which uses the python timeit function, yes.

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:38











  • System.nanoTime is the right method to use. You get nothing preciser. Related: How do I write a correct micro-benchmark in Java?

    – Ole V.V.
    Nov 14 '18 at 7:21














0












0








0








I'm relatively new to Java programming, and I'm running into an issue calculating the amount of time it takes for a function to run.



First some background - I've got a lot of experience with Python, and I'm trying to recreate the functionality of the Jupyter Notebook/Lab %%timeit function, if you're familiar with that. Here's a pic of it in action (sorry, not enough karma to embed yet):



Snip of Jupyter %%timeit



What it does is run the contents of the cell (in this case a recursive function) either 1k, 10k, or 100k times, and give you the average run time of the function, and the standard deviation.



My first implementation (using the same recursive function) used System.nanoTime():



public static void main(String args) 

long t1, t2, diff;
long times = new long[1000];
int t;
for (int i=0; i< 1000; i++)

t1 = System.nanoTime();
t = triangle(20);
t2 = System.nanoTime();

diff = t2-t1;
System.out.println(diff);
times[i] = diff;


long total = 0;
for (int j=0; j<times.length; j++)
total += times[j];

System.out.println("Mean = " + total/1000.0);



But the mean is wildly thrown off -- for some reason, the first iteration of the function (on many runs) takes upwards of a million nanoseconds:



Pic of initial terminal output



Every iteration after the first dozen or so takes either 395 nanos or 0 -- so there could be a problem there too... not sure what's going on!



Also -- the code of the recursive function I'm timing:



static int triangle(int n) 
if (n == 1)
return n;
else
return n + triangle(n -1);




Initially I had the line n = Math.abs(n) on the first line of the function, but then I removed it because... meh. I'm the only one using this.



I tried a number of different suggestions brought up in this SO post, but they each have their own problems... which I can go into if you need.



Anyway, thank you in advance for your help and expertise!










share|improve this question
















I'm relatively new to Java programming, and I'm running into an issue calculating the amount of time it takes for a function to run.



First some background - I've got a lot of experience with Python, and I'm trying to recreate the functionality of the Jupyter Notebook/Lab %%timeit function, if you're familiar with that. Here's a pic of it in action (sorry, not enough karma to embed yet):



Snip of Jupyter %%timeit



What it does is run the contents of the cell (in this case a recursive function) either 1k, 10k, or 100k times, and give you the average run time of the function, and the standard deviation.



My first implementation (using the same recursive function) used System.nanoTime():



public static void main(String args) 

long t1, t2, diff;
long times = new long[1000];
int t;
for (int i=0; i< 1000; i++)

t1 = System.nanoTime();
t = triangle(20);
t2 = System.nanoTime();

diff = t2-t1;
System.out.println(diff);
times[i] = diff;


long total = 0;
for (int j=0; j<times.length; j++)
total += times[j];

System.out.println("Mean = " + total/1000.0);



But the mean is wildly thrown off -- for some reason, the first iteration of the function (on many runs) takes upwards of a million nanoseconds:



Pic of initial terminal output



Every iteration after the first dozen or so takes either 395 nanos or 0 -- so there could be a problem there too... not sure what's going on!



Also -- the code of the recursive function I'm timing:



static int triangle(int n) 
if (n == 1)
return n;
else
return n + triangle(n -1);




Initially I had the line n = Math.abs(n) on the first line of the function, but then I removed it because... meh. I'm the only one using this.



I tried a number of different suggestions brought up in this SO post, but they each have their own problems... which I can go into if you need.



Anyway, thank you in advance for your help and expertise!







java time benchmarking nanotime






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 7:20









Ole V.V.

29.6k63653




29.6k63653










asked Nov 14 '18 at 1:06









LukeLuke

12




12







  • 1





    JIT. Warm up. Benchmarking is hard. System clocks don't really do nano second resolution. What platform is this anyway? Which version of Java, which JRE, which operating system, what results do you expect?

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:15











  • Using JDK10 + the JRE that came with it -- running on Windows 10. Is there a better timer to use? I tried the Instant and Duration ones mentioned in that other post, same problem there too. Edit: does the JVM come with its own timer?

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:19












  • Like python's timeit (which you attributed to Jupyter)? No. But there is StopWatch in Apache Commons Lang.

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28











  • I should have said -- does the JVM come with its own internal clock that I can reach out to, if the system clock is a bad way to go about this. I was referring to the Jupyter magic command, which uses the python timeit function, yes.

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:38











  • System.nanoTime is the right method to use. You get nothing preciser. Related: How do I write a correct micro-benchmark in Java?

    – Ole V.V.
    Nov 14 '18 at 7:21













  • 1





    JIT. Warm up. Benchmarking is hard. System clocks don't really do nano second resolution. What platform is this anyway? Which version of Java, which JRE, which operating system, what results do you expect?

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:15











  • Using JDK10 + the JRE that came with it -- running on Windows 10. Is there a better timer to use? I tried the Instant and Duration ones mentioned in that other post, same problem there too. Edit: does the JVM come with its own timer?

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:19












  • Like python's timeit (which you attributed to Jupyter)? No. But there is StopWatch in Apache Commons Lang.

    – Elliott Frisch
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28











  • I should have said -- does the JVM come with its own internal clock that I can reach out to, if the system clock is a bad way to go about this. I was referring to the Jupyter magic command, which uses the python timeit function, yes.

    – Luke
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:38











  • System.nanoTime is the right method to use. You get nothing preciser. Related: How do I write a correct micro-benchmark in Java?

    – Ole V.V.
    Nov 14 '18 at 7:21








1




1





JIT. Warm up. Benchmarking is hard. System clocks don't really do nano second resolution. What platform is this anyway? Which version of Java, which JRE, which operating system, what results do you expect?

– Elliott Frisch
Nov 14 '18 at 1:15





JIT. Warm up. Benchmarking is hard. System clocks don't really do nano second resolution. What platform is this anyway? Which version of Java, which JRE, which operating system, what results do you expect?

– Elliott Frisch
Nov 14 '18 at 1:15













Using JDK10 + the JRE that came with it -- running on Windows 10. Is there a better timer to use? I tried the Instant and Duration ones mentioned in that other post, same problem there too. Edit: does the JVM come with its own timer?

– Luke
Nov 14 '18 at 1:19






Using JDK10 + the JRE that came with it -- running on Windows 10. Is there a better timer to use? I tried the Instant and Duration ones mentioned in that other post, same problem there too. Edit: does the JVM come with its own timer?

– Luke
Nov 14 '18 at 1:19














Like python's timeit (which you attributed to Jupyter)? No. But there is StopWatch in Apache Commons Lang.

– Elliott Frisch
Nov 14 '18 at 1:28





Like python's timeit (which you attributed to Jupyter)? No. But there is StopWatch in Apache Commons Lang.

– Elliott Frisch
Nov 14 '18 at 1:28













I should have said -- does the JVM come with its own internal clock that I can reach out to, if the system clock is a bad way to go about this. I was referring to the Jupyter magic command, which uses the python timeit function, yes.

– Luke
Nov 14 '18 at 1:38





I should have said -- does the JVM come with its own internal clock that I can reach out to, if the system clock is a bad way to go about this. I was referring to the Jupyter magic command, which uses the python timeit function, yes.

– Luke
Nov 14 '18 at 1:38













System.nanoTime is the right method to use. You get nothing preciser. Related: How do I write a correct micro-benchmark in Java?

– Ole V.V.
Nov 14 '18 at 7:21






System.nanoTime is the right method to use. You get nothing preciser. Related: How do I write a correct micro-benchmark in Java?

– Ole V.V.
Nov 14 '18 at 7:21













0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291741%2ftime-how-long-a-function-runs-short-duration%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291741%2ftime-how-long-a-function-runs-short-duration%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







hxC,fsKv4gHqkLH2NJgxkV,bQv33WJ0 Kufo
rZQd,aOHQ Gz,jqSBo,vYA TrBUQ,LcjMFb 4hgcjvx lyOAgIh95TWn

Popular posts from this blog

Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

Ruanda

Ondo