Why is __getattribute__ not invoked on an implicit __getitem__-invocation?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








9















While trying to wrap arbitrary objects, I came across a problem with dictionaries and lists. Investigating, I managed to come up with a simple piece of code whose behaviour I simply do not understand. I hope some of you can tell me what is going on:



>>> class Cl(object): # simple class that prints (and suppresses) each attribute lookup
... def __getattribute__(self, name):
... print 'Access:', name
...
>>> i = Cl() # instance of class
>>> i.test # test that __getattribute__ override works
Access: test
>>> i.__getitem__ # test that it works for special functions, too
Access: __getitem__
>>> i['foo'] # but why doesn't this work?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'Cl' object has no attribute '__getitem__'









share|improve this question






























    9















    While trying to wrap arbitrary objects, I came across a problem with dictionaries and lists. Investigating, I managed to come up with a simple piece of code whose behaviour I simply do not understand. I hope some of you can tell me what is going on:



    >>> class Cl(object): # simple class that prints (and suppresses) each attribute lookup
    ... def __getattribute__(self, name):
    ... print 'Access:', name
    ...
    >>> i = Cl() # instance of class
    >>> i.test # test that __getattribute__ override works
    Access: test
    >>> i.__getitem__ # test that it works for special functions, too
    Access: __getitem__
    >>> i['foo'] # but why doesn't this work?
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    TypeError: 'Cl' object has no attribute '__getitem__'









    share|improve this question


























      9












      9








      9


      3






      While trying to wrap arbitrary objects, I came across a problem with dictionaries and lists. Investigating, I managed to come up with a simple piece of code whose behaviour I simply do not understand. I hope some of you can tell me what is going on:



      >>> class Cl(object): # simple class that prints (and suppresses) each attribute lookup
      ... def __getattribute__(self, name):
      ... print 'Access:', name
      ...
      >>> i = Cl() # instance of class
      >>> i.test # test that __getattribute__ override works
      Access: test
      >>> i.__getitem__ # test that it works for special functions, too
      Access: __getitem__
      >>> i['foo'] # but why doesn't this work?
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      TypeError: 'Cl' object has no attribute '__getitem__'









      share|improve this question
















      While trying to wrap arbitrary objects, I came across a problem with dictionaries and lists. Investigating, I managed to come up with a simple piece of code whose behaviour I simply do not understand. I hope some of you can tell me what is going on:



      >>> class Cl(object): # simple class that prints (and suppresses) each attribute lookup
      ... def __getattribute__(self, name):
      ... print 'Access:', name
      ...
      >>> i = Cl() # instance of class
      >>> i.test # test that __getattribute__ override works
      Access: test
      >>> i.__getitem__ # test that it works for special functions, too
      Access: __getitem__
      >>> i['foo'] # but why doesn't this work?
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      TypeError: 'Cl' object has no attribute '__getitem__'






      python magic-methods






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 27 '15 at 13:00









      CommonGuy

      9,503133960




      9,503133960










      asked Jul 6 '12 at 9:59









      holbechholbech

      23627




      23627






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          12














          Magic __methods__() are treated specially: They are internally assigned to "slots" in the type data structure to speed up their look-up, and they are only looked up in these slots. If the slot is empty, you get the error message you got.



          See Special method lookup for new-style classes in the documentation for further details. Excerpt:




          In addition to bypassing any instance attributes in the interest of correctness, implicit special method lookup generally also bypasses the __getattribute__() method even of the object’s metaclass.



          […]



          Bypassing the __getattribute__() machinery in this fashion provides significant scope for speed optimisations within the interpreter, at the cost of some flexibility in the handling of special methods (the special method must be set on the class object itself in order to be consistently invoked by the interpreter).







          share|improve this answer

























          • The link in the answer is not valid any more. Here is a newer one with a version binding: docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#special-lookup.

            – Alex
            Nov 15 '18 at 17:36











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f11360020%2fwhy-is-getattribute-not-invoked-on-an-implicit-getitem-invocation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          12














          Magic __methods__() are treated specially: They are internally assigned to "slots" in the type data structure to speed up their look-up, and they are only looked up in these slots. If the slot is empty, you get the error message you got.



          See Special method lookup for new-style classes in the documentation for further details. Excerpt:




          In addition to bypassing any instance attributes in the interest of correctness, implicit special method lookup generally also bypasses the __getattribute__() method even of the object’s metaclass.



          […]



          Bypassing the __getattribute__() machinery in this fashion provides significant scope for speed optimisations within the interpreter, at the cost of some flexibility in the handling of special methods (the special method must be set on the class object itself in order to be consistently invoked by the interpreter).







          share|improve this answer

























          • The link in the answer is not valid any more. Here is a newer one with a version binding: docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#special-lookup.

            – Alex
            Nov 15 '18 at 17:36















          12














          Magic __methods__() are treated specially: They are internally assigned to "slots" in the type data structure to speed up their look-up, and they are only looked up in these slots. If the slot is empty, you get the error message you got.



          See Special method lookup for new-style classes in the documentation for further details. Excerpt:




          In addition to bypassing any instance attributes in the interest of correctness, implicit special method lookup generally also bypasses the __getattribute__() method even of the object’s metaclass.



          […]



          Bypassing the __getattribute__() machinery in this fashion provides significant scope for speed optimisations within the interpreter, at the cost of some flexibility in the handling of special methods (the special method must be set on the class object itself in order to be consistently invoked by the interpreter).







          share|improve this answer

























          • The link in the answer is not valid any more. Here is a newer one with a version binding: docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#special-lookup.

            – Alex
            Nov 15 '18 at 17:36













          12












          12








          12







          Magic __methods__() are treated specially: They are internally assigned to "slots" in the type data structure to speed up their look-up, and they are only looked up in these slots. If the slot is empty, you get the error message you got.



          See Special method lookup for new-style classes in the documentation for further details. Excerpt:




          In addition to bypassing any instance attributes in the interest of correctness, implicit special method lookup generally also bypasses the __getattribute__() method even of the object’s metaclass.



          […]



          Bypassing the __getattribute__() machinery in this fashion provides significant scope for speed optimisations within the interpreter, at the cost of some flexibility in the handling of special methods (the special method must be set on the class object itself in order to be consistently invoked by the interpreter).







          share|improve this answer















          Magic __methods__() are treated specially: They are internally assigned to "slots" in the type data structure to speed up their look-up, and they are only looked up in these slots. If the slot is empty, you get the error message you got.



          See Special method lookup for new-style classes in the documentation for further details. Excerpt:




          In addition to bypassing any instance attributes in the interest of correctness, implicit special method lookup generally also bypasses the __getattribute__() method even of the object’s metaclass.



          […]



          Bypassing the __getattribute__() machinery in this fashion provides significant scope for speed optimisations within the interpreter, at the cost of some flexibility in the handling of special methods (the special method must be set on the class object itself in order to be consistently invoked by the interpreter).








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jul 6 '12 at 10:08

























          answered Jul 6 '12 at 10:02









          Sven MarnachSven Marnach

          362k80759703




          362k80759703












          • The link in the answer is not valid any more. Here is a newer one with a version binding: docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#special-lookup.

            – Alex
            Nov 15 '18 at 17:36

















          • The link in the answer is not valid any more. Here is a newer one with a version binding: docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#special-lookup.

            – Alex
            Nov 15 '18 at 17:36
















          The link in the answer is not valid any more. Here is a newer one with a version binding: docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#special-lookup.

          – Alex
          Nov 15 '18 at 17:36





          The link in the answer is not valid any more. Here is a newer one with a version binding: docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#special-lookup.

          – Alex
          Nov 15 '18 at 17:36



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f11360020%2fwhy-is-getattribute-not-invoked-on-an-implicit-getitem-invocation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

          Darth Vader #20

          Ondo