Skip to main content

Unpopular Opinion: Why Thor: The Dark World is a vast improvement on Thor (2011)




























Unpopular Opinion: Why Thor: The Dark World is a vast improvement on Thor (2011)















Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.












Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...












Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.












Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online









Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.












Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy












Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.












Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.












Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2












Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online









Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...












Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.












Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.












Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO












Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked












Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.












Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...












Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.












Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.














Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War













Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...














Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.












Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.












Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.












Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.












Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.















Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read


















































































Wiki



  • Characters

  • Creators

  • Teams

  • Volumes

  • Issues

  • Publishers

  • Locations

  • Concepts

  • Things

  • Story Arcs

  • Movies

  • Series

  • Episodes




  • Characters

  • Creators

  • Teams

  • Volumes

  • Issues

  • Publishers

  • Locations

  • Concepts

  • Things

  • Story Arcs

  • Movies

  • Series

  • Episodes



New Comics



Forums



  • Gen. Discussion

  • Bug Reporting

  • Delete/Combine Pages

  • Artist Show-Off

  • Off-Topic

  • Contests

  • Battles

  • Fan-Fic

  • RPG

  • Comic Book Preview

  • API Developers

  • Editing & Tools

  • Podcast

  • Quests




  • Gen. Discussion

  • Bug Reporting

  • Delete/Combine Pages

  • Artist Show-Off

  • Off-Topic

  • Contests

  • Battles

  • Fan-Fic

  • RPG

  • Comic Book Preview

  • API Developers

  • Editing & Tools

  • Podcast

  • Quests




Community


  • Top Users

  • Activity Feed

  • User Lists

  • Community Promos



  • Top Users

  • Activity Feed

  • User Lists

  • Community Promos




Archives


  • News

  • Reviews

  • Videos

  • Podcasts

  • Previews



  • News

  • Reviews

  • Videos

  • Podcasts

  • Previews
























Unpopular Opinion: Why Thor: The Dark World is a vast improvement on Thor (2011)















Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.












Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...












Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.












Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online









Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.












Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy












Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.












Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.












Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2












Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online









Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...












Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.












Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.












Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO












Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked












Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.












Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...












Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.












Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.














Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War













Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...














Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.












Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.












Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.












Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.












Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.















Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read







































Unpopular Opinion: Why Thor: The Dark World is a vast improvement on Thor (2011)















Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.












Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...












Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.












Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online









Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.












Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy












Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.












Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.












Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2












Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online









Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...












Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.












Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.












Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO












Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked












Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.












Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...












Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.












Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.














Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War













Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...














Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.












Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.












Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.












Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.












Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.















Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read




































Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.












Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...












Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.












Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online









Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.












Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy












Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.












Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.












Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2












Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online









Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...












Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.












Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.












Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO












Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked












Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.












Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...












Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.












Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.














Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War













Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...














Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.












Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.












Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.












Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.












Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.















Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read




























Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.












Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...












Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.












Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online









Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.












Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy












Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.












Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.












Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2












Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online









Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...












Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.












Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.












Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO












Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked












Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.












Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...












Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.












Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.














Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War













Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...














Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.












Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.












Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.












Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.












Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.















Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read


























Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.












Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...












Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.












Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online









Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.












Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy












Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.












Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.












Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2












Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online









Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...












Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.












Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.












Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO












Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked












Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.












Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...












Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.












Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.














Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War













Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...














Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.












Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.












Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.












Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.












Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.















Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read























Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.












Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...












Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.












Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online









Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.












Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy












Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.












Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.












Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2












Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online









Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...












Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.












Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.












Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO












Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked












Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.












Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...












Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.












Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.














Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War













Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...














Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.












Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.












Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.












Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.












Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.















Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read












Avatar image for mrmonster



#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.








Avatar image for mrmonster






#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.








#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.







#1
Posted by

mrmonster
(11484 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




Thor: The Dark World is considered by many to be the worst MCU movie, but if you ask me, it's a huge improvement upon the first Thor movie. Why? Because they at least tried to make use of the creative and fantastic world Thor lives in.


I will never understand why they chose to set the first Thor movie out in a small town in New Mexico. Thor is a character with some of the coolest lore in all of comics, they could have given us a really epic fantasy-adventure movie, but they didn't. To me, this would be like if Black Panther only had a few scenes taking place in Wakanda, or if we barely get to see Atlantis in Aquaman.


At least Thor: The Dark World tried. At least they showed us the fantastic worlds of the nine realms. This is not to say that the movie is great by any means, but at least they tried.


So, as much hate as Thor: The Dark World gets, I am convinced that it is an improvement upon it's predecessor.









Avatar image for asgaard



#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...








Avatar image for asgaard






#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...








#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...







#2
Edited by
Asgaard
(4238 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...









Avatar image for johncena69swag



#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.








Avatar image for johncena69swag






#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.








#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.







#3
Posted by

JohnCena69swag
(3372 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.









Avatar image for amcu



#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online





Avatar image for amcu






#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online





#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.



Online




#4
Posted by

Amcu
(13788 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.





Online








Avatar image for subline



#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.








Avatar image for subline






#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.








#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.







#5
Posted by

Subline
(3053 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




One point I have to agree with is the MCU not showing enough of the Nine Realms. I still prefer the first Thor though. Thor: The Dark World is still my least favourite MCU Movie.









Avatar image for green_tea



#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy








Avatar image for green_tea






#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy








#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy







#6
Posted by

Green_Tea
(9904 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio







@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.



better than the winter soldier? oh boy





@johncena69swag said:

Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.





@johncena69swag said:


Dark world gets more hate than it deserves imo. I think its better than the first two cap movies and iron man 3 at least.









Avatar image for huthimamwa



#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.








Avatar image for huthimamwa






#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.








#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.







#7
Posted by

huthimamwa
(2138 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




I loved Thor: The Dark World. Thought it was a huge improvement over the first Thor. I never understood the hate this movie got.









Avatar image for bandedessinee



#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.








Avatar image for bandedessinee






#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.








#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.







#8
Posted by

Bandedessinee
(306 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




I wouldn't say Dark World was a vast improvement over Thor 1 but Malekith and the Dark elves were improvements over Laufie and the frost giants. The frost giants were garbage without the ice box thing while the dark elves had tech to help them take on the Asguardians like the blackhole grenades, blasters etc. The Dark elves flat out attacked Asguard while the frost giants were like rats trying to scurry in.









Avatar image for kbroskywalker2



#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2








Avatar image for kbroskywalker2






#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2








#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2







#9
Posted by

Kbroskywalker2
(128 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




Characters>Cool images



Thor> Thor 2









Avatar image for anthp2000



#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online





Avatar image for anthp2000






#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online





#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.



Online




#10
Edited by
ANTHP2000
(20022 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




Thor had Hawkeye in it, so it's better.


_____________________


In all seriousness, yes the first Thor film is far better than TDW on my book.





Online




Avatar image for amonfire1776



#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...








Avatar image for amonfire1776






#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...








#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio


TDW was pretty good...







#11
Posted by

Amonfire1776
(2437 posts)
- 1 month, 5 days ago
- Show Bio




TDW was pretty good...









Avatar image for mutant1230



#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.








Avatar image for mutant1230






#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.








#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.







#12
Posted by

Mutant1230
(5470 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio







@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.





@asgaard said:


The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...






@asgaard said:



The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...










Avatar image for adamtrmm



#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.








Avatar image for adamtrmm






#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.








#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.







#13
Edited by
adamTRMM
(8031 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio




No. It's just that conveyor flick you watched once and have no reason to even remember.


It was pretty tho.









Avatar image for dirtytree333



#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO








Avatar image for dirtytree333






#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO








#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


both films were subpar IMO







#14
Posted by

DirtyTree333
(4936 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio




both films were subpar IMO









Avatar image for abezethibou



#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked








Avatar image for abezethibou






#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked








#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


the dark world sucked







#15
Posted by

Abezethibou
(840 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio




the dark world sucked









Avatar image for ready_4_madness



#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.








Avatar image for ready_4_madness






#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.








#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


They’re both as bad as each other.







#16
Posted by

Ready_4_Madness
(12745 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio




They’re both as bad as each other.









Avatar image for magian



#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...








Avatar image for magian






#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...








#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...







#17
Edited by
Magian
(149383 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio




I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...









Avatar image for kingofwakanda



#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.








Avatar image for kingofwakanda






#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.








#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio


Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.







#18
Posted by

KingOfWakanda
(1217 posts)
- 1 month, 4 days ago
- Show Bio




Despite the lack of time in Asgard, the first Thor is the better film. Better story, better arc for Thor, the father son dynamic, the sibling rivalry.


TDW was ok, could have been better. Would have preferred Branagh to return to direct.









Avatar image for xmangog__beastx



#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.










Avatar image for xmangog__beastx






#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.










#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.









#19
Posted by

xMangog__Beastx
(2522 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio







@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.







@amcu said:

Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.





@amcu said:


Thor the Dark World is underrated but the first Thor is still better in my book.









Avatar image for bladeoffury



#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War









Avatar image for bladeoffury






#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War









#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


The first Thor > Infinity War








#20
Posted by

BladeOfFury
(2901 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio




The first Thor > Infinity War










Avatar image for mazahs117



#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...










Avatar image for mazahs117






#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...










#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...









#21
Posted by

MAZAHS117
(11225 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio







@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...







@magian said:

I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...





@magian said:


I don't think that TDW was actually bad or anything. It was just rather forgettable. Which now that I think of it more, could be even worse...









Avatar image for heatforce



#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.








Avatar image for heatforce






#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.








#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.







#22
Posted by

Heatforce
(4944 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio




I disagree OP, Thor 2 was trash mainly due to Jane and her idiot friends. But I can see your point. Probably the best thing about Thor 2 were the VFX.









Avatar image for samtheg



#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.








Avatar image for samtheg






#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.








#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.







#23
Posted by

SamTheG
(206 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio




Both films are quite underrated, though I still prefer the 1st one.









Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5



#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.








Avatar image for deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5






#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.








#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.







#24
Posted by

deactivated-5b8a0b4aab8d5
(28 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio




It doesn't deserve the hate it gets, but it's still one of the worst MCU films.


It's not a knock against it, it's just a testament to how great the other films are.









Avatar image for cor_tsar



#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.








Avatar image for cor_tsar






#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.








#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.







#25
Posted by

Cor_Tsar
(4980 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio




I never finished the first Thor. The whole Desert thing turned me off. Then I see scenes of him in frost realm and on the rainbow bridge, and I'm like dang this looks dope.









Avatar image for riddlerfan77



#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.











Avatar image for riddlerfan77






#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.











#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio





@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.










#26
Edited by
Riddlerfan77
(4806 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio







@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.








@mutant1230 said:



@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.






@mutant1230 said:




@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...




Pretty much agree with all of this.





@asgaard said:

The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...






The original Thor is a better movie than its sequel, because its structure is better, and there was progression of the main characters, something that barely happened in the Dark World, besides Jane and her crew in the first movie had the purpose to connect Asgard with the rest of the Mcu aka Midgard, in the second movie they were just there almost always hurting the pace of the movie.


And the original Thor had the extra difficulty to introduce a mythological God as a superhero when the Mcu was only relying on Iron Man, the second was after the Avengers where Thor already was accepted as a superhero and the Mcu already was a thing, and still didn't evolve the concept any further, in fact went for a more scientific way that was not the path that audiences really wanted... If the foundation aka the 2011 movie was not better than its sequel, Thor would never achieve the current levels of popularity...










Avatar image for thorthunder98



#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route








Avatar image for thorthunder98






#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route








#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio


I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route







#27
Posted by

Thorthunder98
(6164 posts)
- 1 month, 3 days ago
- Show Bio




I think the main flaw of the first 2 Thor films was their focus on Earth, Thor shouldn't be an Earth based character one of the main appeals of him is that his stories can span the universe and go through space and mythical routes with crazy different characters and villains but the first 2 were very closed off from everywhere except Earth and Asgard. They should've opened us up to the cosmic side of the mcu but it tried to include Jane and co. too much to ground him to Earth. I guess the first film needed to to tie it in with the mcu and the Avengers on Earth and his origin story, but TDW could've easily spanned the nine realms in it's journey and the final battle had no specific need to be on Earth.


If they'd have explored the other realms more and space in general I feel like it could've been a much more interesting film and obviously they would have to make the storyline better but exploring the different realms opens up loads of different story opportunities instead of just Earth. Even when they did go to the other realms it was for so brief it had no impact.


I feel like TDW is underrated but had the potential to be so so much better as did the first Thor and honestly as good as Ragnarok was it also could've been better if it took the traditional Ragnarok route









Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read










Don't post to forums
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Moderator Hangout
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Spam Museum(Or search for a more specific forum)



(Bring back the main forum list)













Forums



Main boards



  • Gen. Discussion


  • Bug Reporting


  • Delete/Combine Pages


  • Artist Show-Off


  • Off-Topic


  • Contests


  • Battles


  • Fan-Fic


  • RPG


  • Comic Book Preview


  • API Developers


  • Editing & Tools


  • Podcast


  • Quests

Popular wiki boards


  • X-Men

  • Spider-Man

  • Wonder Woman

  • Cyclops

  • Dragon Ball Universe

  • Batman

  • Superman

  • Hulk

  • Storm

  • Star Wars Universe





Top posters






  • Kairan1979
    17916 posts





  • RIKR2
    14914 posts





  • Xwraith
    12781 posts





  • the_stegman
    12468 posts





  • waezi2
    11455 posts





  • Guru_Crack
    10232 posts





  • StormShadow_X
    9017 posts





  • Battle_Forum_Junkie
    8453 posts





  • RustyRoy
    8189 posts





  • rogueshadow
    7855 posts


































































Popular posts from this blog

Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

Darth Vader #20

Ondo