can Build Types resources be visible while reverse engineering the app?

Multi tool use
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have two build variant in my Application, one is release and other is debug.
In a release, I have set my https URL. In Debug, I have set my local URL for testing purpose.
is it possible if I upload my release variant to PlayStore that somebody can reverse engineered it and see my Local testing URL? I dont want to expose my testing URL?

add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have two build variant in my Application, one is release and other is debug.
In a release, I have set my https URL. In Debug, I have set my local URL for testing purpose.
is it possible if I upload my release variant to PlayStore that somebody can reverse engineered it and see my Local testing URL? I dont want to expose my testing URL?

add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have two build variant in my Application, one is release and other is debug.
In a release, I have set my https URL. In Debug, I have set my local URL for testing purpose.
is it possible if I upload my release variant to PlayStore that somebody can reverse engineered it and see my Local testing URL? I dont want to expose my testing URL?

I have two build variant in my Application, one is release and other is debug.
In a release, I have set my https URL. In Debug, I have set my local URL for testing purpose.
is it possible if I upload my release variant to PlayStore that somebody can reverse engineered it and see my Local testing URL? I dont want to expose my testing URL?


asked Nov 9 at 19:20


Aman Verma
81521129
81521129
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you just use flag to switch running environment and sorce code contain the local testing URL, it'll able to find in the disassembled smali files even if you obfuscated it
You can try to split building const from resource using gradle, ref here:
Change constant values when building a release edition
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you just use flag to switch running environment and sorce code contain the local testing URL, it'll able to find in the disassembled smali files even if you obfuscated it
You can try to split building const from resource using gradle, ref here:
Change constant values when building a release edition
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you just use flag to switch running environment and sorce code contain the local testing URL, it'll able to find in the disassembled smali files even if you obfuscated it
You can try to split building const from resource using gradle, ref here:
Change constant values when building a release edition
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you just use flag to switch running environment and sorce code contain the local testing URL, it'll able to find in the disassembled smali files even if you obfuscated it
You can try to split building const from resource using gradle, ref here:
Change constant values when building a release edition
If you just use flag to switch running environment and sorce code contain the local testing URL, it'll able to find in the disassembled smali files even if you obfuscated it
You can try to split building const from resource using gradle, ref here:
Change constant values when building a release edition
answered 18 hours ago
waynelpu
6816
6816
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53232057%2fcan-build-types-resources-be-visible-while-reverse-engineering-the-app%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
zbE x92soTPBMK wtiBVp0cMF,LG6MgM pZAxstIV,kjMP8VIPe93yT biJ Z5uPbX2WRIkeK2Lt,hEn7SD1W,1gI4Vj2o,uce21mYnicXq N