AspectJ programmatic Pointcut and Around advice
I have the following portion of code within an @Aspect annotated class:
@Pointcut("@within(org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional) || @within(org.springframework.stereotype.Controller) || @within(org.granite.messaging.service.annotations.RemoteDestination)")
public void serviceMethod()
@Around("serviceMethod()")
public Object aroundServiceInvocation(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable
// my code goes here
I have to build a framework where I can add programatically various annotations (like Transactional and Controller were added above in the Pointcut) and ensure all are processed by the same advice method (in my case, the method "aroundServiceInvocation").
This framework will be used by various projects, therefore I was hoping I could do something like a method (which will be called by a subproject) that receives such an annotation class and basically adds another "|| within(newAnnotationClass)" to the @Pointcut's value (which by default will have the @within Annotations above).
Thank you for your answers!
java spring frameworks aspectj spring-annotations
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
add a comment |
I have the following portion of code within an @Aspect annotated class:
@Pointcut("@within(org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional) || @within(org.springframework.stereotype.Controller) || @within(org.granite.messaging.service.annotations.RemoteDestination)")
public void serviceMethod()
@Around("serviceMethod()")
public Object aroundServiceInvocation(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable
// my code goes here
I have to build a framework where I can add programatically various annotations (like Transactional and Controller were added above in the Pointcut) and ensure all are processed by the same advice method (in my case, the method "aroundServiceInvocation").
This framework will be used by various projects, therefore I was hoping I could do something like a method (which will be called by a subproject) that receives such an annotation class and basically adds another "|| within(newAnnotationClass)" to the @Pointcut's value (which by default will have the @within Annotations above).
Thank you for your answers!
java spring frameworks aspectj spring-annotations
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
Why would you want to do that? There are other ways to make applications, conditions, aspects dynamic. I recommend to change the application design in order to achieve what you want instead of contriving a solution based on AOP abuse.
– kriegaex
Dec 10 '18 at 8:00
add a comment |
I have the following portion of code within an @Aspect annotated class:
@Pointcut("@within(org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional) || @within(org.springframework.stereotype.Controller) || @within(org.granite.messaging.service.annotations.RemoteDestination)")
public void serviceMethod()
@Around("serviceMethod()")
public Object aroundServiceInvocation(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable
// my code goes here
I have to build a framework where I can add programatically various annotations (like Transactional and Controller were added above in the Pointcut) and ensure all are processed by the same advice method (in my case, the method "aroundServiceInvocation").
This framework will be used by various projects, therefore I was hoping I could do something like a method (which will be called by a subproject) that receives such an annotation class and basically adds another "|| within(newAnnotationClass)" to the @Pointcut's value (which by default will have the @within Annotations above).
Thank you for your answers!
java spring frameworks aspectj spring-annotations
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
I have the following portion of code within an @Aspect annotated class:
@Pointcut("@within(org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional) || @within(org.springframework.stereotype.Controller) || @within(org.granite.messaging.service.annotations.RemoteDestination)")
public void serviceMethod()
@Around("serviceMethod()")
public Object aroundServiceInvocation(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable
// my code goes here
I have to build a framework where I can add programatically various annotations (like Transactional and Controller were added above in the Pointcut) and ensure all are processed by the same advice method (in my case, the method "aroundServiceInvocation").
This framework will be used by various projects, therefore I was hoping I could do something like a method (which will be called by a subproject) that receives such an annotation class and basically adds another "|| within(newAnnotationClass)" to the @Pointcut's value (which by default will have the @within Annotations above).
Thank you for your answers!
java spring frameworks aspectj spring-annotations
java spring frameworks aspectj spring-annotations
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
asked Nov 12 '18 at 10:42
EmanuelEmanuel
8161810
8161810
Why would you want to do that? There are other ways to make applications, conditions, aspects dynamic. I recommend to change the application design in order to achieve what you want instead of contriving a solution based on AOP abuse.
– kriegaex
Dec 10 '18 at 8:00
add a comment |
Why would you want to do that? There are other ways to make applications, conditions, aspects dynamic. I recommend to change the application design in order to achieve what you want instead of contriving a solution based on AOP abuse.
– kriegaex
Dec 10 '18 at 8:00
Why would you want to do that? There are other ways to make applications, conditions, aspects dynamic. I recommend to change the application design in order to achieve what you want instead of contriving a solution based on AOP abuse.
– kriegaex
Dec 10 '18 at 8:00
Why would you want to do that? There are other ways to make applications, conditions, aspects dynamic. I recommend to change the application design in order to achieve what you want instead of contriving a solution based on AOP abuse.
– kriegaex
Dec 10 '18 at 8:00
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53260455%2faspectj-programmatic-pointcut-and-around-advice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53260455%2faspectj-programmatic-pointcut-and-around-advice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why would you want to do that? There are other ways to make applications, conditions, aspects dynamic. I recommend to change the application design in order to achieve what you want instead of contriving a solution based on AOP abuse.
– kriegaex
Dec 10 '18 at 8:00