How to pass “-L” to an awk script?










1















I am trying to write an awk script that accepts -L as an argument.



As an example to show you what I want, here is a simple awk script called awktest:



#!/usr/bin/awk -f 
BEGIN

print ARGV[1]



If I run this from shell:



$./awktest -w


I get as output:



-w


Which is what I expect. It seems to work for anything I put in except -L.



If I run:



$./awktest -L



I get:



awk: option requires an argument --L


When I am expecting ARGV[1] to just contain -L. What is going on here? Why does it fail on this specific case and how can I make it accept -L in ARGV? Thanks










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Only -L? -f, -v, -F, ... pretty much any awk option that requires an argument will show the same results.

    – muru
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:25















1















I am trying to write an awk script that accepts -L as an argument.



As an example to show you what I want, here is a simple awk script called awktest:



#!/usr/bin/awk -f 
BEGIN

print ARGV[1]



If I run this from shell:



$./awktest -w


I get as output:



-w


Which is what I expect. It seems to work for anything I put in except -L.



If I run:



$./awktest -L



I get:



awk: option requires an argument --L


When I am expecting ARGV[1] to just contain -L. What is going on here? Why does it fail on this specific case and how can I make it accept -L in ARGV? Thanks










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Only -L? -f, -v, -F, ... pretty much any awk option that requires an argument will show the same results.

    – muru
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:25













1












1








1


1






I am trying to write an awk script that accepts -L as an argument.



As an example to show you what I want, here is a simple awk script called awktest:



#!/usr/bin/awk -f 
BEGIN

print ARGV[1]



If I run this from shell:



$./awktest -w


I get as output:



-w


Which is what I expect. It seems to work for anything I put in except -L.



If I run:



$./awktest -L



I get:



awk: option requires an argument --L


When I am expecting ARGV[1] to just contain -L. What is going on here? Why does it fail on this specific case and how can I make it accept -L in ARGV? Thanks










share|improve this question
















I am trying to write an awk script that accepts -L as an argument.



As an example to show you what I want, here is a simple awk script called awktest:



#!/usr/bin/awk -f 
BEGIN

print ARGV[1]



If I run this from shell:



$./awktest -w


I get as output:



-w


Which is what I expect. It seems to work for anything I put in except -L.



If I run:



$./awktest -L



I get:



awk: option requires an argument --L


When I am expecting ARGV[1] to just contain -L. What is going on here? Why does it fail on this specific case and how can I make it accept -L in ARGV? Thanks







linux bash shell awk






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 22:20







Kos

















asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:14









KosKos

624321




624321







  • 2





    Only -L? -f, -v, -F, ... pretty much any awk option that requires an argument will show the same results.

    – muru
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:25












  • 2





    Only -L? -f, -v, -F, ... pretty much any awk option that requires an argument will show the same results.

    – muru
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:25







2




2





Only -L? -f, -v, -F, ... pretty much any awk option that requires an argument will show the same results.

– muru
Nov 12 '18 at 23:25





Only -L? -f, -v, -F, ... pretty much any awk option that requires an argument will show the same results.

– muru
Nov 12 '18 at 23:25












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














Wrap your awk script in a shell script:





#!/bin/sh
awk 'BEGIN
print ARGV[1]
' "$@"


Example:



$ ./awktest -L
-L


The problem is that when running a script with a shebang line, the specified program is run with the name of the script and the script's arguments as extra command line arguments. In other words, with your original awktest script, running awktest -L turns into /usr/bin/awk -f /path/to/awktest -L, thus awk treats the -L as an argument to it, and not to the actual script.



If you don't want to use the ./awktest -- -L syntax, you need another layer of indirection to put the script arguments where they need to be.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53270876%2fhow-to-pass-l-to-an-awk-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    Wrap your awk script in a shell script:





    #!/bin/sh
    awk 'BEGIN
    print ARGV[1]
    ' "$@"


    Example:



    $ ./awktest -L
    -L


    The problem is that when running a script with a shebang line, the specified program is run with the name of the script and the script's arguments as extra command line arguments. In other words, with your original awktest script, running awktest -L turns into /usr/bin/awk -f /path/to/awktest -L, thus awk treats the -L as an argument to it, and not to the actual script.



    If you don't want to use the ./awktest -- -L syntax, you need another layer of indirection to put the script arguments where they need to be.






    share|improve this answer



























      4














      Wrap your awk script in a shell script:





      #!/bin/sh
      awk 'BEGIN
      print ARGV[1]
      ' "$@"


      Example:



      $ ./awktest -L
      -L


      The problem is that when running a script with a shebang line, the specified program is run with the name of the script and the script's arguments as extra command line arguments. In other words, with your original awktest script, running awktest -L turns into /usr/bin/awk -f /path/to/awktest -L, thus awk treats the -L as an argument to it, and not to the actual script.



      If you don't want to use the ./awktest -- -L syntax, you need another layer of indirection to put the script arguments where they need to be.






      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4







        Wrap your awk script in a shell script:





        #!/bin/sh
        awk 'BEGIN
        print ARGV[1]
        ' "$@"


        Example:



        $ ./awktest -L
        -L


        The problem is that when running a script with a shebang line, the specified program is run with the name of the script and the script's arguments as extra command line arguments. In other words, with your original awktest script, running awktest -L turns into /usr/bin/awk -f /path/to/awktest -L, thus awk treats the -L as an argument to it, and not to the actual script.



        If you don't want to use the ./awktest -- -L syntax, you need another layer of indirection to put the script arguments where they need to be.






        share|improve this answer













        Wrap your awk script in a shell script:





        #!/bin/sh
        awk 'BEGIN
        print ARGV[1]
        ' "$@"


        Example:



        $ ./awktest -L
        -L


        The problem is that when running a script with a shebang line, the specified program is run with the name of the script and the script's arguments as extra command line arguments. In other words, with your original awktest script, running awktest -L turns into /usr/bin/awk -f /path/to/awktest -L, thus awk treats the -L as an argument to it, and not to the actual script.



        If you don't want to use the ./awktest -- -L syntax, you need another layer of indirection to put the script arguments where they need to be.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:55









        ShawnShawn

        3,7521613




        3,7521613



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53270876%2fhow-to-pass-l-to-an-awk-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Darth Vader #20

            How to how show current date and time by default on contact form 7 in WordPress without taking input from user in datetimepicker

            Ondo