Race condition with Capybara value set










0















I have faced an issue while using .set(#value) to fill the text field in registering form, e.g: the phone number i wanna put in is 506307 then it ended up with 063075.
The work-around i have been made is executing Javascript block like



execute_script("document.querySelector('#selector').value = '#value'")


However, using the same scripts applying for Webmobile based on React.JS, the scripts above just send the text but didn't send the onChange event, which cause another element cannot be selected/clicked -> made the test failed.



I came up with another approach is to use the send_keys #value to trigger the key-pressed event that would make browser think there was a key-pressed event happen for that form, but it ended up with race-condition like set(#value) as i mentioned.



The another work-around is using What is the best way to trigger onchange event in react js , but i tend to use the native Capybara actions before making that tricky Javascript.



So, is there any other way to interact / fill the form field which won't cause that Race condition issue ?



Thanks everybody in advance.










share|improve this question


























    0















    I have faced an issue while using .set(#value) to fill the text field in registering form, e.g: the phone number i wanna put in is 506307 then it ended up with 063075.
    The work-around i have been made is executing Javascript block like



    execute_script("document.querySelector('#selector').value = '#value'")


    However, using the same scripts applying for Webmobile based on React.JS, the scripts above just send the text but didn't send the onChange event, which cause another element cannot be selected/clicked -> made the test failed.



    I came up with another approach is to use the send_keys #value to trigger the key-pressed event that would make browser think there was a key-pressed event happen for that form, but it ended up with race-condition like set(#value) as i mentioned.



    The another work-around is using What is the best way to trigger onchange event in react js , but i tend to use the native Capybara actions before making that tricky Javascript.



    So, is there any other way to interact / fill the form field which won't cause that Race condition issue ?



    Thanks everybody in advance.










    share|improve this question
























      0












      0








      0


      1






      I have faced an issue while using .set(#value) to fill the text field in registering form, e.g: the phone number i wanna put in is 506307 then it ended up with 063075.
      The work-around i have been made is executing Javascript block like



      execute_script("document.querySelector('#selector').value = '#value'")


      However, using the same scripts applying for Webmobile based on React.JS, the scripts above just send the text but didn't send the onChange event, which cause another element cannot be selected/clicked -> made the test failed.



      I came up with another approach is to use the send_keys #value to trigger the key-pressed event that would make browser think there was a key-pressed event happen for that form, but it ended up with race-condition like set(#value) as i mentioned.



      The another work-around is using What is the best way to trigger onchange event in react js , but i tend to use the native Capybara actions before making that tricky Javascript.



      So, is there any other way to interact / fill the form field which won't cause that Race condition issue ?



      Thanks everybody in advance.










      share|improve this question














      I have faced an issue while using .set(#value) to fill the text field in registering form, e.g: the phone number i wanna put in is 506307 then it ended up with 063075.
      The work-around i have been made is executing Javascript block like



      execute_script("document.querySelector('#selector').value = '#value'")


      However, using the same scripts applying for Webmobile based on React.JS, the scripts above just send the text but didn't send the onChange event, which cause another element cannot be selected/clicked -> made the test failed.



      I came up with another approach is to use the send_keys #value to trigger the key-pressed event that would make browser think there was a key-pressed event happen for that form, but it ended up with race-condition like set(#value) as i mentioned.



      The another work-around is using What is the best way to trigger onchange event in react js , but i tend to use the native Capybara actions before making that tricky Javascript.



      So, is there any other way to interact / fill the form field which won't cause that Race condition issue ?



      Thanks everybody in advance.







      ruby selenium capybara






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 13 '18 at 3:23









      Dinh LuongDinh Luong

      31




      31






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Note: Any "solution" suggested that is purely the use of execute_script to run some JS is a terrible idea since it completely bypasses the concept of testing what a user can do and can basically make your test worthless.



          The root cause of the issue here is the JS behavior attached to the input not being able to handle the key events fast enough. The proper fix would be to fix the JS, however if that's not possible there's a few things you can try



          First you can try changing the clear method being used by set



          element.set('506307', clear: :backspace)


          or



          element.set('506307', clear: :none) 


          If that doesn't change anything then try clicking on the input, followed by a short sleep before setting the content



          element.click
          sleep 0.25
          element.set('506307')


          If none of those work around the issue we need to know exactly what JS behavior you have attached to the input and/or what events that JS behavior is listening to.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks a lot. I tried with the first 2 options and the race-condition happened intermittently. Fortunately, the last one seems to solve the race-condition, by clicking and giving a lil bit sleep then the issue seems disappear. This helps me to remove the tricky Javascript above.

            – Dinh Luong
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:17











          • @DinhLuong you’re welcome - if you’re question is answered don’t forget to accept the answer (the check mark) so the question gets marked as answered.

            – Thomas Walpole
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:57










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53273329%2frace-condition-with-capybara-value-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Note: Any "solution" suggested that is purely the use of execute_script to run some JS is a terrible idea since it completely bypasses the concept of testing what a user can do and can basically make your test worthless.



          The root cause of the issue here is the JS behavior attached to the input not being able to handle the key events fast enough. The proper fix would be to fix the JS, however if that's not possible there's a few things you can try



          First you can try changing the clear method being used by set



          element.set('506307', clear: :backspace)


          or



          element.set('506307', clear: :none) 


          If that doesn't change anything then try clicking on the input, followed by a short sleep before setting the content



          element.click
          sleep 0.25
          element.set('506307')


          If none of those work around the issue we need to know exactly what JS behavior you have attached to the input and/or what events that JS behavior is listening to.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks a lot. I tried with the first 2 options and the race-condition happened intermittently. Fortunately, the last one seems to solve the race-condition, by clicking and giving a lil bit sleep then the issue seems disappear. This helps me to remove the tricky Javascript above.

            – Dinh Luong
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:17











          • @DinhLuong you’re welcome - if you’re question is answered don’t forget to accept the answer (the check mark) so the question gets marked as answered.

            – Thomas Walpole
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:57















          0














          Note: Any "solution" suggested that is purely the use of execute_script to run some JS is a terrible idea since it completely bypasses the concept of testing what a user can do and can basically make your test worthless.



          The root cause of the issue here is the JS behavior attached to the input not being able to handle the key events fast enough. The proper fix would be to fix the JS, however if that's not possible there's a few things you can try



          First you can try changing the clear method being used by set



          element.set('506307', clear: :backspace)


          or



          element.set('506307', clear: :none) 


          If that doesn't change anything then try clicking on the input, followed by a short sleep before setting the content



          element.click
          sleep 0.25
          element.set('506307')


          If none of those work around the issue we need to know exactly what JS behavior you have attached to the input and/or what events that JS behavior is listening to.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks a lot. I tried with the first 2 options and the race-condition happened intermittently. Fortunately, the last one seems to solve the race-condition, by clicking and giving a lil bit sleep then the issue seems disappear. This helps me to remove the tricky Javascript above.

            – Dinh Luong
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:17











          • @DinhLuong you’re welcome - if you’re question is answered don’t forget to accept the answer (the check mark) so the question gets marked as answered.

            – Thomas Walpole
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:57













          0












          0








          0







          Note: Any "solution" suggested that is purely the use of execute_script to run some JS is a terrible idea since it completely bypasses the concept of testing what a user can do and can basically make your test worthless.



          The root cause of the issue here is the JS behavior attached to the input not being able to handle the key events fast enough. The proper fix would be to fix the JS, however if that's not possible there's a few things you can try



          First you can try changing the clear method being used by set



          element.set('506307', clear: :backspace)


          or



          element.set('506307', clear: :none) 


          If that doesn't change anything then try clicking on the input, followed by a short sleep before setting the content



          element.click
          sleep 0.25
          element.set('506307')


          If none of those work around the issue we need to know exactly what JS behavior you have attached to the input and/or what events that JS behavior is listening to.






          share|improve this answer















          Note: Any "solution" suggested that is purely the use of execute_script to run some JS is a terrible idea since it completely bypasses the concept of testing what a user can do and can basically make your test worthless.



          The root cause of the issue here is the JS behavior attached to the input not being able to handle the key events fast enough. The proper fix would be to fix the JS, however if that's not possible there's a few things you can try



          First you can try changing the clear method being used by set



          element.set('506307', clear: :backspace)


          or



          element.set('506307', clear: :none) 


          If that doesn't change anything then try clicking on the input, followed by a short sleep before setting the content



          element.click
          sleep 0.25
          element.set('506307')


          If none of those work around the issue we need to know exactly what JS behavior you have attached to the input and/or what events that JS behavior is listening to.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 13 '18 at 5:32

























          answered Nov 13 '18 at 5:27









          Thomas WalpoleThomas Walpole

          30.7k32748




          30.7k32748












          • Thanks a lot. I tried with the first 2 options and the race-condition happened intermittently. Fortunately, the last one seems to solve the race-condition, by clicking and giving a lil bit sleep then the issue seems disappear. This helps me to remove the tricky Javascript above.

            – Dinh Luong
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:17











          • @DinhLuong you’re welcome - if you’re question is answered don’t forget to accept the answer (the check mark) so the question gets marked as answered.

            – Thomas Walpole
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:57

















          • Thanks a lot. I tried with the first 2 options and the race-condition happened intermittently. Fortunately, the last one seems to solve the race-condition, by clicking and giving a lil bit sleep then the issue seems disappear. This helps me to remove the tricky Javascript above.

            – Dinh Luong
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:17











          • @DinhLuong you’re welcome - if you’re question is answered don’t forget to accept the answer (the check mark) so the question gets marked as answered.

            – Thomas Walpole
            Nov 15 '18 at 6:57
















          Thanks a lot. I tried with the first 2 options and the race-condition happened intermittently. Fortunately, the last one seems to solve the race-condition, by clicking and giving a lil bit sleep then the issue seems disappear. This helps me to remove the tricky Javascript above.

          – Dinh Luong
          Nov 15 '18 at 6:17





          Thanks a lot. I tried with the first 2 options and the race-condition happened intermittently. Fortunately, the last one seems to solve the race-condition, by clicking and giving a lil bit sleep then the issue seems disappear. This helps me to remove the tricky Javascript above.

          – Dinh Luong
          Nov 15 '18 at 6:17













          @DinhLuong you’re welcome - if you’re question is answered don’t forget to accept the answer (the check mark) so the question gets marked as answered.

          – Thomas Walpole
          Nov 15 '18 at 6:57





          @DinhLuong you’re welcome - if you’re question is answered don’t forget to accept the answer (the check mark) so the question gets marked as answered.

          – Thomas Walpole
          Nov 15 '18 at 6:57

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53273329%2frace-condition-with-capybara-value-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

          Darth Vader #20

          Ondo