AppSync Resolver Query Table/Secondary Index Without Using Primary Key
From the official AWS documentation it seems that to query for items in dynamodb one needs to provide an equality key expression for the primary key. However, the AppSync doc did not explicitly say this. I am wondering is it possible in the resolver, to query the dynamodb without providing an equality key expression for the primary key of either the index or the table? For example, can I do the following:
primaryKey != anInput
or simply omit the equality expression altogether and use expressions on other attributes instead?
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
add a comment |
From the official AWS documentation it seems that to query for items in dynamodb one needs to provide an equality key expression for the primary key. However, the AppSync doc did not explicitly say this. I am wondering is it possible in the resolver, to query the dynamodb without providing an equality key expression for the primary key of either the index or the table? For example, can I do the following:
primaryKey != anInput
or simply omit the equality expression altogether and use expressions on other attributes instead?
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
add a comment |
From the official AWS documentation it seems that to query for items in dynamodb one needs to provide an equality key expression for the primary key. However, the AppSync doc did not explicitly say this. I am wondering is it possible in the resolver, to query the dynamodb without providing an equality key expression for the primary key of either the index or the table? For example, can I do the following:
primaryKey != anInput
or simply omit the equality expression altogether and use expressions on other attributes instead?
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
From the official AWS documentation it seems that to query for items in dynamodb one needs to provide an equality key expression for the primary key. However, the AppSync doc did not explicitly say this. I am wondering is it possible in the resolver, to query the dynamodb without providing an equality key expression for the primary key of either the index or the table? For example, can I do the following:
primaryKey != anInput
or simply omit the equality expression altogether and use expressions on other attributes instead?
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
asked Nov 14 '18 at 1:41
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
668
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The AppSync doc says:
"The query expression. This field must be specified." In the case of DDB query the DDB doc says: The Query operation finds items based on primary key values. You can query any table or secondary index that has a composite primary key (a partition key and a sort key).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291973%2fappsync-resolver-query-table-secondary-index-without-using-primary-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The AppSync doc says:
"The query expression. This field must be specified." In the case of DDB query the DDB doc says: The Query operation finds items based on primary key values. You can query any table or secondary index that has a composite primary key (a partition key and a sort key).
add a comment |
The AppSync doc says:
"The query expression. This field must be specified." In the case of DDB query the DDB doc says: The Query operation finds items based on primary key values. You can query any table or secondary index that has a composite primary key (a partition key and a sort key).
add a comment |
The AppSync doc says:
"The query expression. This field must be specified." In the case of DDB query the DDB doc says: The Query operation finds items based on primary key values. You can query any table or secondary index that has a composite primary key (a partition key and a sort key).
The AppSync doc says:
"The query expression. This field must be specified." In the case of DDB query the DDB doc says: The Query operation finds items based on primary key values. You can query any table or secondary index that has a composite primary key (a partition key and a sort key).
answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:34
Vasileios LekakisVasileios Lekakis
4,18121015
4,18121015
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291973%2fappsync-resolver-query-table-secondary-index-without-using-primary-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown