Skip to main content

Blade Runner Sequel Discussion Thread


























Blade Runner Sequel Discussion Thread















Avatar image for _gaff_



#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for bruxae



#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!












Avatar image for bruxae



#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.












Avatar image for shadowswordmaster



#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.












Avatar image for rdclip



#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.












Avatar image for jaken7



#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.












Avatar image for fallschirmjager



#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.












Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones



#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided











Avatar image for bruxae



#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.












Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c



#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator









Avatar image for _gaff_



#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for _gaff_



#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link












Avatar image for judasnixon



#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided











Avatar image for chamber-music



#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.












Avatar image for legacy6364



#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!












Avatar image for neghead



#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??












Avatar image for rdclip



#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.












Avatar image for hatemalingsia



#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.












Avatar image for the_commander_



#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read

















































































Wiki



  • Characters

  • Creators

  • Teams

  • Volumes

  • Issues

  • Publishers

  • Locations

  • Concepts

  • Things

  • Story Arcs

  • Movies

  • Series

  • Episodes




  • Characters

  • Creators

  • Teams

  • Volumes

  • Issues

  • Publishers

  • Locations

  • Concepts

  • Things

  • Story Arcs

  • Movies

  • Series

  • Episodes



New Comics



Forums



  • Gen. Discussion

  • Bug Reporting

  • Delete/Combine Pages

  • Artist Show-Off

  • Off-Topic

  • Contests

  • Battles

  • Fan-Fic

  • RPG

  • Comic Book Preview

  • API Developers

  • Editing & Tools

  • Podcast

  • Quests




  • Gen. Discussion

  • Bug Reporting

  • Delete/Combine Pages

  • Artist Show-Off

  • Off-Topic

  • Contests

  • Battles

  • Fan-Fic

  • RPG

  • Comic Book Preview

  • API Developers

  • Editing & Tools

  • Podcast

  • Quests




Community


  • Top Users

  • User Lists

  • Community Promos



  • Top Users

  • User Lists

  • Community Promos




Archives


  • News

  • Reviews

  • Videos

  • Podcasts

  • Previews



  • News

  • Reviews

  • Videos

  • Podcasts

  • Previews


























Blade Runner Sequel Discussion Thread















Avatar image for _gaff_



#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for bruxae



#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!












Avatar image for bruxae



#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.












Avatar image for shadowswordmaster



#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.












Avatar image for rdclip



#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.












Avatar image for jaken7



#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.












Avatar image for fallschirmjager



#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.












Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones



#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided











Avatar image for bruxae



#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.












Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c



#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator









Avatar image for _gaff_



#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for _gaff_



#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link












Avatar image for judasnixon



#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided











Avatar image for chamber-music



#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.












Avatar image for legacy6364



#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!












Avatar image for neghead



#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??












Avatar image for rdclip



#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.












Avatar image for hatemalingsia



#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.












Avatar image for the_commander_



#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read



































Avatar image for _gaff_



#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for bruxae



#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!












Avatar image for bruxae



#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.












Avatar image for shadowswordmaster



#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.












Avatar image for rdclip



#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.












Avatar image for jaken7



#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.












Avatar image for fallschirmjager



#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.












Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones



#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided











Avatar image for bruxae



#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.












Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c



#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator









Avatar image for _gaff_



#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for _gaff_



#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link












Avatar image for judasnixon



#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided











Avatar image for chamber-music



#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.












Avatar image for legacy6364



#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!












Avatar image for neghead



#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??












Avatar image for rdclip



#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.












Avatar image for hatemalingsia



#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.












Avatar image for the_commander_



#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read



























Avatar image for _gaff_



#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for bruxae



#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!












Avatar image for bruxae



#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.












Avatar image for shadowswordmaster



#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.












Avatar image for rdclip



#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.












Avatar image for jaken7



#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.












Avatar image for fallschirmjager



#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.












Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones



#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided











Avatar image for bruxae



#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.












Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c



#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator









Avatar image for _gaff_



#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for _gaff_



#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link












Avatar image for judasnixon



#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided











Avatar image for chamber-music



#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.












Avatar image for legacy6364



#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!












Avatar image for neghead



#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??












Avatar image for rdclip



#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.












Avatar image for hatemalingsia



#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.












Avatar image for the_commander_



#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read

























Avatar image for _gaff_



#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for bruxae



#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!












Avatar image for bruxae



#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.












Avatar image for shadowswordmaster



#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.












Avatar image for rdclip



#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.












Avatar image for jaken7



#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.












Avatar image for fallschirmjager



#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.












Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones



#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided











Avatar image for bruxae



#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.












Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c



#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator









Avatar image for _gaff_



#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for _gaff_



#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link












Avatar image for judasnixon



#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided











Avatar image for chamber-music



#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.












Avatar image for legacy6364



#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!












Avatar image for neghead



#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??












Avatar image for rdclip



#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.












Avatar image for hatemalingsia



#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.












Avatar image for the_commander_



#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read






















Avatar image for _gaff_



#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for bruxae



#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!












Avatar image for bruxae



#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.












Avatar image for shadowswordmaster



#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.












Avatar image for rdclip



#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.












Avatar image for jaken7



#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.












Avatar image for fallschirmjager



#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.












Avatar image for _gaff_



#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.












Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones



#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided











Avatar image for bruxae



#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.












Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c



#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator









Avatar image for _gaff_



#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided












Avatar image for _gaff_



#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link












Avatar image for judasnixon



#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided











Avatar image for chamber-music



#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.












Avatar image for legacy6364



#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!












Avatar image for neghead



#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??












Avatar image for rdclip



#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.












Avatar image for hatemalingsia



#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.












Avatar image for the_commander_



#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!










Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read











Avatar image for _gaff_



#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided








Avatar image for _gaff_






#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided








#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided







#1
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




For those who may or may not know, the 1982 cult classic is getting a sequel. Not much is known, but this is what we have been told.


  1. Ridley Scott is directing.

  2. Harrison Ford has been offered to reprise his role.

  3. Original screenwriter Hampton Fancher and Michael Green (Green Lantern) are working on the script.

  4. Katy Perry wants to play Rachael :P

What do you think?


No Caption Provided









Avatar image for bruxae



#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!








Avatar image for bruxae






#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!








#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!







#2
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




I think it would be better to leave the series alone, it's been so long since the original that it's gonna be hard to capture the same essence and not doing so might cheapen the "series". But I am not strongly against the idea like I would be if it was another shitty remake, just unsure and not so positive about this. We do need more Cyberpunk movies though!









Avatar image for bruxae



#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.








Avatar image for bruxae






#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.








#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.







#3
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




Oh and.. Katy Perry definetly has the looks for the part. :P Haven't seen her acting though, but I suspect it's far from good enough.









Avatar image for shadowswordmaster



#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.








Avatar image for shadowswordmaster






#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.








#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.







#4
Edited by
ShadowSwordmaster
(19968 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




This sounds interesting and at least it has the people that made the first one.













Avatar image for rdclip



#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.








Avatar image for rdclip






#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.








#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.







#5
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




No thank you. Do not want.


Blade Runner is my favourite movie of all time. I don't need a 'new, modern' Blade Runner with limitless CG and an 'exciting, new' story. BR is perfect as a stand alone story. Deckard and Rachael got away (for how long is up to your imagination) and the world of BR went on without any more adventures for Rick Deckard.


Ridley Scott has constantly fiddled with the orginal with the different versions. I think everyone remembers the last time the original director of a movie 'did it the right way' with the modern installments in a classic sci-fi series.


Ridley Scott one of the best visual directors around, but it's hard to trust him with story. Prometheus was a beautiful mess. Harrison Ford should retire (yeah i said it). the dude looks so depressed to still be acting; we lost charming rogue Harrison Ford and got grumpy old man Harrison Ford.









Avatar image for _gaff_



#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.








Avatar image for _gaff_






#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.








#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.







#6
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@rdclip: I share your concerns.


I am also worried that Scott wants to establish in story that Deckard is a replicant. He stated this is his position and the Final Cut he made heavily suggested Deckard was. I think that is something the fans should be left to decide and in the process make us question what it is to be human.


I would hate to see the 3 decade old debate come to an end.









Avatar image for jaken7



#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.








Avatar image for jaken7






#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.








#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.







#7
Posted by

JakeN7
(15180 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.









Avatar image for fallschirmjager



#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.








Avatar image for fallschirmjager






#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.








#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.







#8
Edited by
Fallschirmjager
(23432 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




Also doesn't help that Scott has not made a good movie in years.


Also not sure what the motivation is here. I understand how beloved it is now and how much of a classic its considered, but at the time Blade Runner was a bomb. And I don't see how 30 years of time is going to make it make money now.


Its not like cyberpunk is a mainstream genre,.









Avatar image for _gaff_



#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.








Avatar image for _gaff_






#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.








#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.







#9
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio






@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.




Ya, I have always leaned toward the "Deckard is not a replicant" argument. Hopefully Scott will leave it to interpretation.





@jaken7 said:


@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.






@jaken7 said:



@_gaff_: But Deckard IS a replicant. :P


I guess it's not exactly fair for me to say that only because it's the theory I've always subscribed to, and the Final Cut is my favorite version of the film. I actually agree that it should be left open to interpretation.










Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones



#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided







Avatar image for thatguywithheadphones






#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided







#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided






#10
Edited by
thatguywithheadphones
(19859 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided
No Caption ProvidedNo Caption Provided








Avatar image for bruxae



#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.








Avatar image for bruxae






#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.








#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.







#11
Posted by

Bruxae
(18147 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.









Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c



#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator





Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c






#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator





#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio


At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?



Moderator




#12
Posted by

deactivated-5c901e667a76c
(36557 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio




At least it's not a remake.


But Katy Perry? Really?





Moderator




Avatar image for _gaff_



#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided








Avatar image for _gaff_






#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided








#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided







#13
Edited by
_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 9 months ago
- Show Bio







@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.



Ya, I would fell better if the move focused on new characters in the same universe. Lets pretend Soldiernever happened. That is why them asking Ford to return worried me. That being said, I would love to see Gaff make a cameo or something.


No Caption Provided





@bruxae said:

How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.





@bruxae said:


How would people feel if they made a movie in the same setting, only different characters and a new title? I feel like this would be the better option, obviously they would earn less money without riding the BR name, but I don't think it would piss off many fans.









Avatar image for _gaff_



#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link








Avatar image for _gaff_






#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link








#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link







#14
Posted by

_Gaff_
(5106 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio




Well Scott said the script is finished. And that Ford will have "a part of" it. Link









Avatar image for judasnixon



#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided







Avatar image for judasnixon






#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided







#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio


No Caption Provided






#15
Posted by

judasnixon
(12663 posts)
- 4 years, 7 months ago
- Show Bio




No Caption Provided








Avatar image for chamber-music



#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.








Avatar image for chamber-music






#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.








#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.







#16
Posted by

chamber-music
(26 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio




I hope Gosling s playing a replicant.









Avatar image for legacy6364



#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!








Avatar image for legacy6364






#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!








#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!







#17
Edited by
LEGACY6364
(7441 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio




Katy Perry?


F*** you Hollywood!









Avatar image for neghead



#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??








Avatar image for neghead






#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??








#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??







#18
Edited by
Neghead
(1273 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio




Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??









Avatar image for rdclip



#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.








Avatar image for rdclip






#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.








#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.







#19
Posted by

RDClip
(2792 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio







@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??



The same thing every nostalgia-based reboot/decades-later sequels wants. To make a crapload of money on name recognition alone.


Please Ridley, don't do this! You can mess around with the alien series as much as you want, that series has been broken since Alien 3. Hell, make a sequel to Robin Hood, I promise to see that movie 5 times, in 3d, on IMAX; just don't ruin Balde Runner. Blade Runner is one of the rare gems in sci-fi film history that hasn't been ruined by terrible sequels/prequels.





@neghead said:

Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??





@neghead said:


Bleh. No Phillip K. Dicking around. Some movies don't need a sequel. The original told the story it needed to tell. I don't give a damn about the logistics. What does this sequel want to accomplish??









Avatar image for hatemalingsia



#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.








Avatar image for hatemalingsia






#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.








#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio


Ok.







#20
Posted by

hatemalingsia
(15494 posts)
- 3 years, 11 months ago
- Show Bio




Ok.









Avatar image for the_commander_



#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!








Avatar image for the_commander_






#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!








#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio


Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!







#21
Posted by

The_Commander_
(218 posts)
- 6 months, 15 days ago
- Show Bio




Hey, the movie came out already. Bump time!









Jump to Top

Jump to Last Read










Don't post to forums
Gen. Discussion
Bug Reporting
Delete/Combine Pages
Artist Show-Off
Off-Topic
Contests
Battles
Fan-Fic
RPG
Moderator Hangout
Comic Book Preview
API Developers
Editing & Tools
Podcast
Quests
Spam Museum(Or search for a more specific forum)



(Bring back the main forum list)













Forums



Main boards



  • Gen. Discussion


  • Bug Reporting


  • Delete/Combine Pages


  • Artist Show-Off


  • Off-Topic


  • Contests


  • Battles


  • Fan-Fic


  • RPG


  • Comic Book Preview


  • API Developers


  • Editing & Tools


  • Podcast


  • Quests

Popular wiki boards


  • Marvel Cinematic Universe

  • X-Men

  • Spider-Man

  • DC Extended Universe

  • Dragon Ball Universe

  • Hulk

  • Batman

  • Thanos

  • Superman

  • Thor







Top posters






  • Rouflex
    31884 posts





  • PowerHerc
    27706 posts





  • Dragonborn_CT
    25009 posts





  • Pharoh_Atem
    24520 posts





  • King Saturn
    23676 posts





  • Straight-Fire
    20482 posts





  • Helloman
    19898 posts





  • Deadite
    19243 posts





  • Wolverine008
    18486 posts





  • MonsterStomp
    16155 posts




































































Popular posts from this blog

Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

Darth Vader #20

Ondo