Strange behavior of underset

up vote
9
down vote

favorite

Why aren't the arrows put under the equal sign if they are less than .7em or .3cm?

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

add a comment |

up vote
9
down vote

favorite

Why aren't the arrows put under the equal sign if they are less than .7em or .3cm?

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

add a comment |

up vote
9
down vote

favorite

Why aren't the arrows put under the equal sign if they are less than .7em or .3cm?

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

Why aren't the arrows put under the equal sign if they are less than .7em or .3cm?

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

tikz-pgf math-mode stacking-symbols

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

asked Nov 9 at 16:51

CarLaTeX

27.2k445118

add a comment |

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

up vote
6
down vote

accepted

Adding baseline fixes it, I believe.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikz[baseline]draw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Don't know why, but here is a fix. I put the underset arrows inside of an hbox...

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

Alternately, giving a hat tip to marmot, I could force bigswarrow onto the baseline by way of stackengine:

usepackagestackengine
newcommandbigswarrow[1]abovebaseline[0pt]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);

Then, I wouldn't need the hboxes.

edited Nov 9 at 17:06

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

Though the math mode inside the hbox isn't really necessary, is't it?
– campa
Nov 9 at 16:58

1

@campa Thanks. Fixed.
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 9 at 17:00

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);

);

draft saved

draft discarded

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459163%2fstrange-behavior-of-underset%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

up vote
6
down vote

accepted

Adding baseline fixes it, I believe.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikz[baseline]draw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

add a comment |

up vote
6
down vote

accepted

Adding baseline fixes it, I believe.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikz[baseline]draw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

add a comment |

up vote
6
down vote

accepted

Adding baseline fixes it, I believe.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikz[baseline]draw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

Adding baseline fixes it, I believe.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikz[baseline]draw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersetbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

answered Nov 9 at 16:59

marmot

75.4k485159

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Don't know why, but here is a fix. I put the underset arrows inside of an hbox...

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

Alternately, giving a hat tip to marmot, I could force bigswarrow onto the baseline by way of stackengine:

usepackagestackengine
newcommandbigswarrow[1]abovebaseline[0pt]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);

Then, I wouldn't need the hboxes.

edited Nov 9 at 17:06

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

Though the math mode inside the hbox isn't really necessary, is't it?
– campa
Nov 9 at 16:58

1

@campa Thanks. Fixed.
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 9 at 17:00

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Don't know why, but here is a fix. I put the underset arrows inside of an hbox...

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

Alternately, giving a hat tip to marmot, I could force bigswarrow onto the baseline by way of stackengine:

usepackagestackengine
newcommandbigswarrow[1]abovebaseline[0pt]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);

Then, I wouldn't need the hboxes.

edited Nov 9 at 17:06

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

Though the math mode inside the hbox isn't really necessary, is't it?
– campa
Nov 9 at 16:58

1

@campa Thanks. Fixed.
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 9 at 17:00

add a comment |

up vote
5
down vote

Don't know why, but here is a fix. I put the underset arrows inside of an hbox...

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

Alternately, giving a hat tip to marmot, I could force bigswarrow onto the baseline by way of stackengine:

usepackagestackengine
newcommandbigswarrow[1]abovebaseline[0pt]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);

Then, I wouldn't need the hboxes.

edited Nov 9 at 17:06

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

Don't know why, but here is a fix. I put the underset arrows inside of an hbox...

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
newcommandbigswarrow[1]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);
begindocument
foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid em

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid em=$

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
bigswarrowwid

foreach wid in .1,.2,...,1
$undersethboxbigswarrowwid=$
enddocument

enter image description here

Alternately, giving a hat tip to marmot, I could force bigswarrow onto the baseline by way of stackengine:

usepackagestackengine
newcommandbigswarrow[1]abovebaseline[0pt]tikzdraw[->](#1,3ex)--(0,0);

Then, I wouldn't need the hboxes.

edited Nov 9 at 17:06

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

edited Nov 9 at 17:06

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

answered Nov 9 at 16:55

Steven B. Segletes

151k9189397

Though the math mode inside the hbox isn't really necessary, is't it?
– campa
Nov 9 at 16:58

1

@campa Thanks. Fixed.
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 9 at 17:00

add a comment |

Though the math mode inside the hbox isn't really necessary, is't it?
– campa
Nov 9 at 16:58

1

@campa Thanks. Fixed.
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 9 at 17:00

Though the math mode inside the hbox isn't really necessary, is't it?
– campa
Nov 9 at 16:58

@campa Thanks. Fixed.
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 9 at 17:00

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

draft saved

draft discarded

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Pfthb