Hulk, too strong, too durable with a potent healing factor.

Bump

Bruce tears him apart.

Ironman. His bleeding edge armor is superior to Hulkbuster. I doubt this Hulk is more of a threat than the MCU one

is there anything to suggest that this Hulk is anyway superior to his MCU counterpart?

I would have to revisit the movie to be sure, but out of memory I've always had the impression that 2003 Hulk was stronger and faster than MCU's.

I know this is not big evidence, but here you have mi opinion as "something" to suggest his superiority.

Iron man

I don't have a link to a respect thread but I can confirm that this Hulk is generally regarded as superior to MCU Hulk.

I don't think Tony has much of a chance here.

I would say Hulk. He has a considerable strength advantage for starters and great healing factor. He should be even if not slightly better in terms of speed. He also is pretty great in terms or durability. He tanked getting ragdolled for miles by Absorbing Man who had just absorbed the electricity of an entire city. Later in their fight, he was able to completely overwhelm Absorbing Man with his power who like I said earlier was easily able to absorb an entire city’s worth of electricity.

Bleeding edge iron man seemed superior to mcu hulk, so I would go with him.

@undefined: What with this idea that 2003 Hulk is better then current Hulk? He isnt by feats. 2003 Hulk gets loses.

Iron Man, MCU Hulk >> This version

Hulk wtf iron man is gonna do what to him? He gets bigger and sttonger them angrier he gets and his healing factor plus didny he survive a nuke in the end of the movie