Can I use Quartz Scheduler 1.8.6 using the latest Spring Batch?
I have a requirement to use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with a recent version of Spring Batch. There are legacy batch jobs that use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 but currently not Spring Batch.
I was able to get a simple Spring Batch job scheduled and running using Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with the latest Spring Batch v4.1.0 but had to add a dependency in my pom.xml to use an old version of spring-context-support v3.2.18.RELEASE. The spring-context-support provides the bridge to Quartz and v3.2.18.RELEASE was the latest version that will schedule and run a simple job in my test code.
- Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
- Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
- Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
spring spring-batch quartz-scheduler
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
add a comment |
I have a requirement to use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with a recent version of Spring Batch. There are legacy batch jobs that use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 but currently not Spring Batch.
I was able to get a simple Spring Batch job scheduled and running using Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with the latest Spring Batch v4.1.0 but had to add a dependency in my pom.xml to use an old version of spring-context-support v3.2.18.RELEASE. The spring-context-support provides the bridge to Quartz and v3.2.18.RELEASE was the latest version that will schedule and run a simple job in my test code.
- Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
- Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
- Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
spring spring-batch quartz-scheduler
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
add a comment |
I have a requirement to use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with a recent version of Spring Batch. There are legacy batch jobs that use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 but currently not Spring Batch.
I was able to get a simple Spring Batch job scheduled and running using Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with the latest Spring Batch v4.1.0 but had to add a dependency in my pom.xml to use an old version of spring-context-support v3.2.18.RELEASE. The spring-context-support provides the bridge to Quartz and v3.2.18.RELEASE was the latest version that will schedule and run a simple job in my test code.
- Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
- Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
- Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
spring spring-batch quartz-scheduler
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
I have a requirement to use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with a recent version of Spring Batch. There are legacy batch jobs that use Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 but currently not Spring Batch.
I was able to get a simple Spring Batch job scheduled and running using Quartz Scheduler v1.8.6 with the latest Spring Batch v4.1.0 but had to add a dependency in my pom.xml to use an old version of spring-context-support v3.2.18.RELEASE. The spring-context-support provides the bridge to Quartz and v3.2.18.RELEASE was the latest version that will schedule and run a simple job in my test code.
- Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
- Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
- Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
spring spring-batch quartz-scheduler
spring spring-batch quartz-scheduler
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:13
JohnJohn
31
31
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
You can check the version of quartz in the build.gradle file of the Spring Batch version you use. For Spring batch 4.1.0, you can use quartz 2.3.0.
If you use Spring Boot, you can check start.spring.io/actuator/info to get information about spring project versions that are known to work best together when imported via Spring Boot. For example, if you generate a project with start.spring.io using Spring Boot version 2.1.0 and add spring-boot-starter-batch and spring-boot-starter-quartz starters, you will get Spring Batch 4.1.0 and Quartz 2.3.0 in your classpath.
Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
Not incorrect (as long as it works for you) but not recommended.
- If you do use Spring Boot, you will get the latest
spring-contextversion (5.1.2 in the example given above). - If you do not use Spring Boot, you can still import the maven BOM provided by Spring Boot and let it import the versions for you. This is better than managing the versions manually.
Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
I don't recommend this. You can stick with v4.1.0 as you managed to get it working as you mentioned. Spring v4.x requires Java 8, so as long as the quartz version you use runs on Java 8, it will be able to schedule Spring Batch jobs.
Hope this helps.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53303331%2fcan-i-use-quartz-scheduler-1-8-6-using-the-latest-spring-batch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
You can check the version of quartz in the build.gradle file of the Spring Batch version you use. For Spring batch 4.1.0, you can use quartz 2.3.0.
If you use Spring Boot, you can check start.spring.io/actuator/info to get information about spring project versions that are known to work best together when imported via Spring Boot. For example, if you generate a project with start.spring.io using Spring Boot version 2.1.0 and add spring-boot-starter-batch and spring-boot-starter-quartz starters, you will get Spring Batch 4.1.0 and Quartz 2.3.0 in your classpath.
Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
Not incorrect (as long as it works for you) but not recommended.
- If you do use Spring Boot, you will get the latest
spring-contextversion (5.1.2 in the example given above). - If you do not use Spring Boot, you can still import the maven BOM provided by Spring Boot and let it import the versions for you. This is better than managing the versions manually.
Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
I don't recommend this. You can stick with v4.1.0 as you managed to get it working as you mentioned. Spring v4.x requires Java 8, so as long as the quartz version you use runs on Java 8, it will be able to schedule Spring Batch jobs.
Hope this helps.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
add a comment |
Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
You can check the version of quartz in the build.gradle file of the Spring Batch version you use. For Spring batch 4.1.0, you can use quartz 2.3.0.
If you use Spring Boot, you can check start.spring.io/actuator/info to get information about spring project versions that are known to work best together when imported via Spring Boot. For example, if you generate a project with start.spring.io using Spring Boot version 2.1.0 and add spring-boot-starter-batch and spring-boot-starter-quartz starters, you will get Spring Batch 4.1.0 and Quartz 2.3.0 in your classpath.
Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
Not incorrect (as long as it works for you) but not recommended.
- If you do use Spring Boot, you will get the latest
spring-contextversion (5.1.2 in the example given above). - If you do not use Spring Boot, you can still import the maven BOM provided by Spring Boot and let it import the versions for you. This is better than managing the versions manually.
Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
I don't recommend this. You can stick with v4.1.0 as you managed to get it working as you mentioned. Spring v4.x requires Java 8, so as long as the quartz version you use runs on Java 8, it will be able to schedule Spring Batch jobs.
Hope this helps.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
add a comment |
Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
You can check the version of quartz in the build.gradle file of the Spring Batch version you use. For Spring batch 4.1.0, you can use quartz 2.3.0.
If you use Spring Boot, you can check start.spring.io/actuator/info to get information about spring project versions that are known to work best together when imported via Spring Boot. For example, if you generate a project with start.spring.io using Spring Boot version 2.1.0 and add spring-boot-starter-batch and spring-boot-starter-quartz starters, you will get Spring Batch 4.1.0 and Quartz 2.3.0 in your classpath.
Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
Not incorrect (as long as it works for you) but not recommended.
- If you do use Spring Boot, you will get the latest
spring-contextversion (5.1.2 in the example given above). - If you do not use Spring Boot, you can still import the maven BOM provided by Spring Boot and let it import the versions for you. This is better than managing the versions manually.
Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
I don't recommend this. You can stick with v4.1.0 as you managed to get it working as you mentioned. Spring v4.x requires Java 8, so as long as the quartz version you use runs on Java 8, it will be able to schedule Spring Batch jobs.
Hope this helps.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
Is there documentation somewhere that lists compatible versions of Spring Batch and Quartz Scheduler?
You can check the version of quartz in the build.gradle file of the Spring Batch version you use. For Spring batch 4.1.0, you can use quartz 2.3.0.
If you use Spring Boot, you can check start.spring.io/actuator/info to get information about spring project versions that are known to work best together when imported via Spring Boot. For example, if you generate a project with start.spring.io using Spring Boot version 2.1.0 and add spring-boot-starter-batch and spring-boot-starter-quartz starters, you will get Spring Batch 4.1.0 and Quartz 2.3.0 in your classpath.
Is using an old spring-context-support in this way a completely incorrect approach?
Not incorrect (as long as it works for you) but not recommended.
- If you do use Spring Boot, you will get the latest
spring-contextversion (5.1.2 in the example given above). - If you do not use Spring Boot, you can still import the maven BOM provided by Spring Boot and let it import the versions for you. This is better than managing the versions manually.
Should I use an older version of Spring Batch? I would prefer not to have to do this because the latest Spring Batch seems to have a ton of great features.
I don't recommend this. You can stick with v4.1.0 as you managed to get it working as you mentioned. Spring v4.x requires Java 8, so as long as the quartz version you use runs on Java 8, it will be able to schedule Spring Batch jobs.
Hope this helps.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:18
Mahmoud Ben HassineMahmoud Ben Hassine
5,2501717
5,2501717
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53303331%2fcan-i-use-quartz-scheduler-1-8-6-using-the-latest-spring-batch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
