basically Composite Michael from any source (Christianity, Judaism, Islam, comics, books, etc.) vs Composite Sorcerer from all fiction (comics/manga, books, tv shows, movies, etc.)

michael stomps.

Composite Sorcerer have beings like the Umineko Witches, which includes Featherine. The best thing composite Michael can hope for is a stalemate, but seeing as DC's Michael is probably the strongest Michael, I don't think CM could stalemate.

This thread is a dillemma because Michael the Archangel is a divine being, arguably with magicky stuff and supernatural stuff. You would think that Michael falls under being a Sorcerer for being such a thing so this thread is a circular one.

Unless you've read through every iteration of a sorcerer throughout all of fiction, this probably isn't a realistic battle.

I only know of christian and DC Michael, but these should stomp alone. Mostly because christian Michael is directly channeling and representing power and the very person of Jahweh, who is completely omnipotent, limitless, outerversal character. By comickbook standards, he'd be the writer, you cant go any higher then that. The best sorcerer can hope for is a stalemate, if someone can find a sorcerer in fiction who has truely unlimited, outerversal power source.

Once upon a time there was a Michael the Archangel who was Omnipotent. The End.

Once upon a time there was a Sorcerer who was Omnipotent. The End.

Once upon a time there was a Michael the Archangel who was also a Sorcerer, who was Omnipotent. The End.

I created three short stories with an Omnipotent Michael and Omnipotent Sorcerer and one that identifies the two. Compositing either side of the OP's battle demands that because mty two new short stories be included in the composite battle. All fiction that can be used is equally as valid, and so are the stories I just made up for the purpose of this thread.

So stalemate Omnipotent Michael = Omnipotent Sorcerer.

See what's wrong with composite stories like these?

@sungsam: since I am the sole arbiter of this thread, I hereby reject your contribution to fiction, so it doesn't apply here.

that is all.

You said Composite Fiction, then you reject my contribution to fiction? Do you know how stupid and hypocritical your thread looks?

@sungsam: lol dude you are no writer (unless you can prove otherwise) also those were not fictional stories or any litersture you've written there, just a couple of provocative lines for the sake of themselves. Sorry but the decision to reject your contribution to fiction seems justified and rational imo.

Sometimes I feel like this entire forum needs a vetting for stupidity.

in all fiction

basically Composite Michael from any source (Christianity, Judaism, Islam, comics, books, etc.)

He said any source, ANY SOURCE, in ALL fiction. Not everything in fiction by its varying definitions necessitates to a story or a literature, in case you did not realize that. Fiction includes imagination. Fiction means beliefs and fabrications, just as I fabricated these fictional imaginations.

In addition, this thread literally violates FORUM RULES in Creation.

Do Not Use Religious Figures

Be respectful to the various faiths that we have here, regardless of whatever personal beliefs you have. This includes, but is not limited to, religious figures from: Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.

An exception would be fictional representations, such as Lucifer Morningstar from DC / Vertigo. But don’t use parody versions (like the Super Best Friends from South Park).

In general, using figures from ancient mythology is fine, such as Greek / Roman, Norse, Egyptian, etc.

Op attempted to include versions of Michael in actual direct religions above fictional representations, which forum goes against. You people are the ones unjustified in argument, not me. Unless just the OP, assuming you and gray1999 are not puppet accounts of each other of course.