Have we ever seen a captured ship incorporated permanently in the enemy's fleet?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
The threat of a starship being boarded and captured by enemy forces appears often in Star Trek franchise. On some occasions, such an operation is successful and the enemy gains the control over the starship. Such a starship is of great value for the enemy's intelligence services and would most likely be disassembled and studied by them. However, in situations when the ship's design is already known, or several ships of the same class are captured, there is no need to disassemble every one of them. Such ships can be manned by the enemy and be incorporated in the enemy's fleet.
There have been episodes in which a captured enemy ship is used for covert operations, however these ships do not last for long (like the Dominion's ship used by Starfleet).
Conditions I would like to exclude:
- A captured ship used by an individual and not in actual control of enemy's fleet (like Dukat's Bird-of-Prey).
- A captured ship used in one major operation and not used continuously by the enemy due to its destruction / becoming disabled / not being shown ever again (like Jem'Hadar fighter captured by Starfleet).
Have we ever seen a captured ship incorporated permanently in the enemy's fleet?
star-trek spaceship
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
The threat of a starship being boarded and captured by enemy forces appears often in Star Trek franchise. On some occasions, such an operation is successful and the enemy gains the control over the starship. Such a starship is of great value for the enemy's intelligence services and would most likely be disassembled and studied by them. However, in situations when the ship's design is already known, or several ships of the same class are captured, there is no need to disassemble every one of them. Such ships can be manned by the enemy and be incorporated in the enemy's fleet.
There have been episodes in which a captured enemy ship is used for covert operations, however these ships do not last for long (like the Dominion's ship used by Starfleet).
Conditions I would like to exclude:
- A captured ship used by an individual and not in actual control of enemy's fleet (like Dukat's Bird-of-Prey).
- A captured ship used in one major operation and not used continuously by the enemy due to its destruction / becoming disabled / not being shown ever again (like Jem'Hadar fighter captured by Starfleet).
Have we ever seen a captured ship incorporated permanently in the enemy's fleet?
star-trek spaceship
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
11
It strikes me that a captured ship would be a millstone. Constantly breaking down, hard to maintain, permanently lacking dedicated drydock facilities, in desperate need of hard-to-get spares and hated by the crews. Over time it would simply break as soon as a unique part was unavailable and you'd have to refit it to take your own systems, like O'Brien spent months/years trying to get DS9 to work properly.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:33
9
You mean, like Deep Space 9? :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:34
2
I was also thinking of the Iraqi experience in Gulf I. They left entire batallions of tanks on the battlefield for the want of $1 parts that could have been easily sourced if they hadn't been under embargo.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:35
3
And I was thinking about Earth "sea ships" being boarded and captured by enemy forces, repainted / given a new name and flag, and then used to attack the enemy and their former-sister ships. I AM aware that wooden ships were much simpler and more compatible than starships :) Still, I would like to see Starfleet facing a Galaxy-class starship repainted and manned by Klingons/Romulans, just because they failed to destroy it before it was captured.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:43
1
The more complex a ship or vessel, the more requirement there is to have specialist single-usage parts. My car, for example, can't function without its computer module and those modules are only available from the manufacturer. In a few decades, those parts will be obsolete and the car will be too, even though it might remain in mint condition otherwise. And all for want of a $5 module.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:47
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
The threat of a starship being boarded and captured by enemy forces appears often in Star Trek franchise. On some occasions, such an operation is successful and the enemy gains the control over the starship. Such a starship is of great value for the enemy's intelligence services and would most likely be disassembled and studied by them. However, in situations when the ship's design is already known, or several ships of the same class are captured, there is no need to disassemble every one of them. Such ships can be manned by the enemy and be incorporated in the enemy's fleet.
There have been episodes in which a captured enemy ship is used for covert operations, however these ships do not last for long (like the Dominion's ship used by Starfleet).
Conditions I would like to exclude:
- A captured ship used by an individual and not in actual control of enemy's fleet (like Dukat's Bird-of-Prey).
- A captured ship used in one major operation and not used continuously by the enemy due to its destruction / becoming disabled / not being shown ever again (like Jem'Hadar fighter captured by Starfleet).
Have we ever seen a captured ship incorporated permanently in the enemy's fleet?
star-trek spaceship
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
The threat of a starship being boarded and captured by enemy forces appears often in Star Trek franchise. On some occasions, such an operation is successful and the enemy gains the control over the starship. Such a starship is of great value for the enemy's intelligence services and would most likely be disassembled and studied by them. However, in situations when the ship's design is already known, or several ships of the same class are captured, there is no need to disassemble every one of them. Such ships can be manned by the enemy and be incorporated in the enemy's fleet.
There have been episodes in which a captured enemy ship is used for covert operations, however these ships do not last for long (like the Dominion's ship used by Starfleet).
Conditions I would like to exclude:
- A captured ship used by an individual and not in actual control of enemy's fleet (like Dukat's Bird-of-Prey).
- A captured ship used in one major operation and not used continuously by the enemy due to its destruction / becoming disabled / not being shown ever again (like Jem'Hadar fighter captured by Starfleet).
Have we ever seen a captured ship incorporated permanently in the enemy's fleet?
star-trek spaceship
star-trek spaceship
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
asked Nov 9 at 11:52
Edmund Dantes
5,06312747
5,06312747
11
It strikes me that a captured ship would be a millstone. Constantly breaking down, hard to maintain, permanently lacking dedicated drydock facilities, in desperate need of hard-to-get spares and hated by the crews. Over time it would simply break as soon as a unique part was unavailable and you'd have to refit it to take your own systems, like O'Brien spent months/years trying to get DS9 to work properly.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:33
9
You mean, like Deep Space 9? :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:34
2
I was also thinking of the Iraqi experience in Gulf I. They left entire batallions of tanks on the battlefield for the want of $1 parts that could have been easily sourced if they hadn't been under embargo.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:35
3
And I was thinking about Earth "sea ships" being boarded and captured by enemy forces, repainted / given a new name and flag, and then used to attack the enemy and their former-sister ships. I AM aware that wooden ships were much simpler and more compatible than starships :) Still, I would like to see Starfleet facing a Galaxy-class starship repainted and manned by Klingons/Romulans, just because they failed to destroy it before it was captured.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:43
1
The more complex a ship or vessel, the more requirement there is to have specialist single-usage parts. My car, for example, can't function without its computer module and those modules are only available from the manufacturer. In a few decades, those parts will be obsolete and the car will be too, even though it might remain in mint condition otherwise. And all for want of a $5 module.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:47
|
show 9 more comments
11
It strikes me that a captured ship would be a millstone. Constantly breaking down, hard to maintain, permanently lacking dedicated drydock facilities, in desperate need of hard-to-get spares and hated by the crews. Over time it would simply break as soon as a unique part was unavailable and you'd have to refit it to take your own systems, like O'Brien spent months/years trying to get DS9 to work properly.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:33
9
You mean, like Deep Space 9? :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:34
2
I was also thinking of the Iraqi experience in Gulf I. They left entire batallions of tanks on the battlefield for the want of $1 parts that could have been easily sourced if they hadn't been under embargo.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:35
3
And I was thinking about Earth "sea ships" being boarded and captured by enemy forces, repainted / given a new name and flag, and then used to attack the enemy and their former-sister ships. I AM aware that wooden ships were much simpler and more compatible than starships :) Still, I would like to see Starfleet facing a Galaxy-class starship repainted and manned by Klingons/Romulans, just because they failed to destroy it before it was captured.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:43
1
The more complex a ship or vessel, the more requirement there is to have specialist single-usage parts. My car, for example, can't function without its computer module and those modules are only available from the manufacturer. In a few decades, those parts will be obsolete and the car will be too, even though it might remain in mint condition otherwise. And all for want of a $5 module.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:47
11
11
It strikes me that a captured ship would be a millstone. Constantly breaking down, hard to maintain, permanently lacking dedicated drydock facilities, in desperate need of hard-to-get spares and hated by the crews. Over time it would simply break as soon as a unique part was unavailable and you'd have to refit it to take your own systems, like O'Brien spent months/years trying to get DS9 to work properly.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:33
It strikes me that a captured ship would be a millstone. Constantly breaking down, hard to maintain, permanently lacking dedicated drydock facilities, in desperate need of hard-to-get spares and hated by the crews. Over time it would simply break as soon as a unique part was unavailable and you'd have to refit it to take your own systems, like O'Brien spent months/years trying to get DS9 to work properly.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:33
9
9
You mean, like Deep Space 9? :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:34
You mean, like Deep Space 9? :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:34
2
2
I was also thinking of the Iraqi experience in Gulf I. They left entire batallions of tanks on the battlefield for the want of $1 parts that could have been easily sourced if they hadn't been under embargo.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:35
I was also thinking of the Iraqi experience in Gulf I. They left entire batallions of tanks on the battlefield for the want of $1 parts that could have been easily sourced if they hadn't been under embargo.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:35
3
3
And I was thinking about Earth "sea ships" being boarded and captured by enemy forces, repainted / given a new name and flag, and then used to attack the enemy and their former-sister ships. I AM aware that wooden ships were much simpler and more compatible than starships :) Still, I would like to see Starfleet facing a Galaxy-class starship repainted and manned by Klingons/Romulans, just because they failed to destroy it before it was captured.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:43
And I was thinking about Earth "sea ships" being boarded and captured by enemy forces, repainted / given a new name and flag, and then used to attack the enemy and their former-sister ships. I AM aware that wooden ships were much simpler and more compatible than starships :) Still, I would like to see Starfleet facing a Galaxy-class starship repainted and manned by Klingons/Romulans, just because they failed to destroy it before it was captured.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:43
1
1
The more complex a ship or vessel, the more requirement there is to have specialist single-usage parts. My car, for example, can't function without its computer module and those modules are only available from the manufacturer. In a few decades, those parts will be obsolete and the car will be too, even though it might remain in mint condition otherwise. And all for want of a $5 module.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:47
The more complex a ship or vessel, the more requirement there is to have specialist single-usage parts. My car, for example, can't function without its computer module and those modules are only available from the manufacturer. In a few decades, those parts will be obsolete and the car will be too, even though it might remain in mint condition otherwise. And all for want of a $5 module.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:47
|
show 9 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
While Terok Nor isn't technically a ship, it is capable of moving around inside the Bajor system under its own steam. It's renamed Deep Space Nine and is used extensively by the Federation and Bajorans.
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
1
Well, it isn't a ship, as you mentioned, but I haven't thought of that at all. Nice one!
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:25
2
If nothing else, it shows that the Federation aren't averse to using non-standard stations (and possibly ships) when the need arises. Much the same is true in TNG: Encounter at Farpoint where they plan to use a pre-built ground station.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:26
1
I have to downvote because DS9, as you pointed, isn't a ship, but also it's legally a Bajoran station not a StarFleet one, it moved only once through the show and nearly tore itself apart in the process, and I'm not convinced about the bunch of Bajoran's sublight raiders/fighters being called a 'fleet'. And, as far as I know, the Bajorans didn't board and capture Terok Nor, more like the Cardassians abandoned it when the retreated from the Bajoran system and the Bajorans moved in afterwards.
– Sava
Nov 9 at 12:39
@Sava - It is, however, incorporated into the Bajoran fleet. It was also (on at least one occasion) captured and used by the Dominion, then re-captured by the Federation.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:39
3
@Sava - They have sufficient ships to form a (relatively in)effective blockade; memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Bajoran_interceptor
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:45
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
25
down vote
The Kazon fleet comprises entirely of vessels taken from their former enslavers, the Trabe
NEELIX: They're Trabe vessels, actually. Everything the Kazon have, they stole from the Trabe. Mabus will tell you all about it over
a sumptuous dinner. The food hasn't been very good where we've been.
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
Interesting find! Although I find it hardly surprising that revolutionaries permanently incorporate the military equipment left behind by the recently overthrown government. ;-) Which makes sense because the new government has access to the same supporting resources (both experience/documentation and maintenance tools) – especially considering your highly praised comment underneath the question.
– David Foerster
Nov 10 at 16:08
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
U.S.S. Defiant, NCC-1764, Constitution class cruiser.
Originally built by:
United Federation of Planets
Captured by:
The Tholian Assembly in TOS S3E09 "The Tholian Web"
Captured by, and incorporated into the fleet of:
The Terran Empire (Mirror Universe) in ENT S4E18 & S4E19 "In a Mirror, Darkly"
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Although it didn't last too long, the Nyrians captured Voyager in Displaced. After all the Voyager crew were replaced, their leader stated "Your vessel will be used to defend Nyrian acquisitions."
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
The question ask for ship that are 'permanently' added to the fleet, not temporarily.
– Sava
yesterday
@Sava - Sure, but the aim seems to have been to include it in their fleet
– Valorum
yesterday
@Sava True, I did overlook that.
– Brandon Dybala
yesterday
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
While Terok Nor isn't technically a ship, it is capable of moving around inside the Bajor system under its own steam. It's renamed Deep Space Nine and is used extensively by the Federation and Bajorans.
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
1
Well, it isn't a ship, as you mentioned, but I haven't thought of that at all. Nice one!
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:25
2
If nothing else, it shows that the Federation aren't averse to using non-standard stations (and possibly ships) when the need arises. Much the same is true in TNG: Encounter at Farpoint where they plan to use a pre-built ground station.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:26
1
I have to downvote because DS9, as you pointed, isn't a ship, but also it's legally a Bajoran station not a StarFleet one, it moved only once through the show and nearly tore itself apart in the process, and I'm not convinced about the bunch of Bajoran's sublight raiders/fighters being called a 'fleet'. And, as far as I know, the Bajorans didn't board and capture Terok Nor, more like the Cardassians abandoned it when the retreated from the Bajoran system and the Bajorans moved in afterwards.
– Sava
Nov 9 at 12:39
@Sava - It is, however, incorporated into the Bajoran fleet. It was also (on at least one occasion) captured and used by the Dominion, then re-captured by the Federation.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:39
3
@Sava - They have sufficient ships to form a (relatively in)effective blockade; memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Bajoran_interceptor
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:45
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
26
down vote
While Terok Nor isn't technically a ship, it is capable of moving around inside the Bajor system under its own steam. It's renamed Deep Space Nine and is used extensively by the Federation and Bajorans.
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
1
Well, it isn't a ship, as you mentioned, but I haven't thought of that at all. Nice one!
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:25
2
If nothing else, it shows that the Federation aren't averse to using non-standard stations (and possibly ships) when the need arises. Much the same is true in TNG: Encounter at Farpoint where they plan to use a pre-built ground station.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:26
1
I have to downvote because DS9, as you pointed, isn't a ship, but also it's legally a Bajoran station not a StarFleet one, it moved only once through the show and nearly tore itself apart in the process, and I'm not convinced about the bunch of Bajoran's sublight raiders/fighters being called a 'fleet'. And, as far as I know, the Bajorans didn't board and capture Terok Nor, more like the Cardassians abandoned it when the retreated from the Bajoran system and the Bajorans moved in afterwards.
– Sava
Nov 9 at 12:39
@Sava - It is, however, incorporated into the Bajoran fleet. It was also (on at least one occasion) captured and used by the Dominion, then re-captured by the Federation.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:39
3
@Sava - They have sufficient ships to form a (relatively in)effective blockade; memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Bajoran_interceptor
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:45
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
26
down vote
up vote
26
down vote
While Terok Nor isn't technically a ship, it is capable of moving around inside the Bajor system under its own steam. It's renamed Deep Space Nine and is used extensively by the Federation and Bajorans.
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
While Terok Nor isn't technically a ship, it is capable of moving around inside the Bajor system under its own steam. It's renamed Deep Space Nine and is used extensively by the Federation and Bajorans.
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
answered Nov 9 at 12:23
Valorum
386k10028073040
386k10028073040
1
Well, it isn't a ship, as you mentioned, but I haven't thought of that at all. Nice one!
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:25
2
If nothing else, it shows that the Federation aren't averse to using non-standard stations (and possibly ships) when the need arises. Much the same is true in TNG: Encounter at Farpoint where they plan to use a pre-built ground station.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:26
1
I have to downvote because DS9, as you pointed, isn't a ship, but also it's legally a Bajoran station not a StarFleet one, it moved only once through the show and nearly tore itself apart in the process, and I'm not convinced about the bunch of Bajoran's sublight raiders/fighters being called a 'fleet'. And, as far as I know, the Bajorans didn't board and capture Terok Nor, more like the Cardassians abandoned it when the retreated from the Bajoran system and the Bajorans moved in afterwards.
– Sava
Nov 9 at 12:39
@Sava - It is, however, incorporated into the Bajoran fleet. It was also (on at least one occasion) captured and used by the Dominion, then re-captured by the Federation.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:39
3
@Sava - They have sufficient ships to form a (relatively in)effective blockade; memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Bajoran_interceptor
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:45
|
show 4 more comments
1
Well, it isn't a ship, as you mentioned, but I haven't thought of that at all. Nice one!
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:25
2
If nothing else, it shows that the Federation aren't averse to using non-standard stations (and possibly ships) when the need arises. Much the same is true in TNG: Encounter at Farpoint where they plan to use a pre-built ground station.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:26
1
I have to downvote because DS9, as you pointed, isn't a ship, but also it's legally a Bajoran station not a StarFleet one, it moved only once through the show and nearly tore itself apart in the process, and I'm not convinced about the bunch of Bajoran's sublight raiders/fighters being called a 'fleet'. And, as far as I know, the Bajorans didn't board and capture Terok Nor, more like the Cardassians abandoned it when the retreated from the Bajoran system and the Bajorans moved in afterwards.
– Sava
Nov 9 at 12:39
@Sava - It is, however, incorporated into the Bajoran fleet. It was also (on at least one occasion) captured and used by the Dominion, then re-captured by the Federation.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:39
3
@Sava - They have sufficient ships to form a (relatively in)effective blockade; memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Bajoran_interceptor
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:45
1
1
Well, it isn't a ship, as you mentioned, but I haven't thought of that at all. Nice one!
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:25
Well, it isn't a ship, as you mentioned, but I haven't thought of that at all. Nice one!
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:25
2
2
If nothing else, it shows that the Federation aren't averse to using non-standard stations (and possibly ships) when the need arises. Much the same is true in TNG: Encounter at Farpoint where they plan to use a pre-built ground station.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:26
If nothing else, it shows that the Federation aren't averse to using non-standard stations (and possibly ships) when the need arises. Much the same is true in TNG: Encounter at Farpoint where they plan to use a pre-built ground station.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:26
1
1
I have to downvote because DS9, as you pointed, isn't a ship, but also it's legally a Bajoran station not a StarFleet one, it moved only once through the show and nearly tore itself apart in the process, and I'm not convinced about the bunch of Bajoran's sublight raiders/fighters being called a 'fleet'. And, as far as I know, the Bajorans didn't board and capture Terok Nor, more like the Cardassians abandoned it when the retreated from the Bajoran system and the Bajorans moved in afterwards.
– Sava
Nov 9 at 12:39
I have to downvote because DS9, as you pointed, isn't a ship, but also it's legally a Bajoran station not a StarFleet one, it moved only once through the show and nearly tore itself apart in the process, and I'm not convinced about the bunch of Bajoran's sublight raiders/fighters being called a 'fleet'. And, as far as I know, the Bajorans didn't board and capture Terok Nor, more like the Cardassians abandoned it when the retreated from the Bajoran system and the Bajorans moved in afterwards.
– Sava
Nov 9 at 12:39
@Sava - It is, however, incorporated into the Bajoran fleet. It was also (on at least one occasion) captured and used by the Dominion, then re-captured by the Federation.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:39
@Sava - It is, however, incorporated into the Bajoran fleet. It was also (on at least one occasion) captured and used by the Dominion, then re-captured by the Federation.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:39
3
3
@Sava - They have sufficient ships to form a (relatively in)effective blockade; memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Bajoran_interceptor
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:45
@Sava - They have sufficient ships to form a (relatively in)effective blockade; memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Bajoran_interceptor
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:45
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
25
down vote
The Kazon fleet comprises entirely of vessels taken from their former enslavers, the Trabe
NEELIX: They're Trabe vessels, actually. Everything the Kazon have, they stole from the Trabe. Mabus will tell you all about it over
a sumptuous dinner. The food hasn't been very good where we've been.
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
Interesting find! Although I find it hardly surprising that revolutionaries permanently incorporate the military equipment left behind by the recently overthrown government. ;-) Which makes sense because the new government has access to the same supporting resources (both experience/documentation and maintenance tools) – especially considering your highly praised comment underneath the question.
– David Foerster
Nov 10 at 16:08
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
The Kazon fleet comprises entirely of vessels taken from their former enslavers, the Trabe
NEELIX: They're Trabe vessels, actually. Everything the Kazon have, they stole from the Trabe. Mabus will tell you all about it over
a sumptuous dinner. The food hasn't been very good where we've been.
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
Interesting find! Although I find it hardly surprising that revolutionaries permanently incorporate the military equipment left behind by the recently overthrown government. ;-) Which makes sense because the new government has access to the same supporting resources (both experience/documentation and maintenance tools) – especially considering your highly praised comment underneath the question.
– David Foerster
Nov 10 at 16:08
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
up vote
25
down vote
The Kazon fleet comprises entirely of vessels taken from their former enslavers, the Trabe
NEELIX: They're Trabe vessels, actually. Everything the Kazon have, they stole from the Trabe. Mabus will tell you all about it over
a sumptuous dinner. The food hasn't been very good where we've been.
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
The Kazon fleet comprises entirely of vessels taken from their former enslavers, the Trabe
NEELIX: They're Trabe vessels, actually. Everything the Kazon have, they stole from the Trabe. Mabus will tell you all about it over
a sumptuous dinner. The food hasn't been very good where we've been.
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
answered Nov 9 at 12:43
Valorum
386k10028073040
386k10028073040
Interesting find! Although I find it hardly surprising that revolutionaries permanently incorporate the military equipment left behind by the recently overthrown government. ;-) Which makes sense because the new government has access to the same supporting resources (both experience/documentation and maintenance tools) – especially considering your highly praised comment underneath the question.
– David Foerster
Nov 10 at 16:08
add a comment |
Interesting find! Although I find it hardly surprising that revolutionaries permanently incorporate the military equipment left behind by the recently overthrown government. ;-) Which makes sense because the new government has access to the same supporting resources (both experience/documentation and maintenance tools) – especially considering your highly praised comment underneath the question.
– David Foerster
Nov 10 at 16:08
Interesting find! Although I find it hardly surprising that revolutionaries permanently incorporate the military equipment left behind by the recently overthrown government. ;-) Which makes sense because the new government has access to the same supporting resources (both experience/documentation and maintenance tools) – especially considering your highly praised comment underneath the question.
– David Foerster
Nov 10 at 16:08
Interesting find! Although I find it hardly surprising that revolutionaries permanently incorporate the military equipment left behind by the recently overthrown government. ;-) Which makes sense because the new government has access to the same supporting resources (both experience/documentation and maintenance tools) – especially considering your highly praised comment underneath the question.
– David Foerster
Nov 10 at 16:08
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
U.S.S. Defiant, NCC-1764, Constitution class cruiser.
Originally built by:
United Federation of Planets
Captured by:
The Tholian Assembly in TOS S3E09 "The Tholian Web"
Captured by, and incorporated into the fleet of:
The Terran Empire (Mirror Universe) in ENT S4E18 & S4E19 "In a Mirror, Darkly"
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
U.S.S. Defiant, NCC-1764, Constitution class cruiser.
Originally built by:
United Federation of Planets
Captured by:
The Tholian Assembly in TOS S3E09 "The Tholian Web"
Captured by, and incorporated into the fleet of:
The Terran Empire (Mirror Universe) in ENT S4E18 & S4E19 "In a Mirror, Darkly"
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
up vote
23
down vote
U.S.S. Defiant, NCC-1764, Constitution class cruiser.
Originally built by:
United Federation of Planets
Captured by:
The Tholian Assembly in TOS S3E09 "The Tholian Web"
Captured by, and incorporated into the fleet of:
The Terran Empire (Mirror Universe) in ENT S4E18 & S4E19 "In a Mirror, Darkly"
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
U.S.S. Defiant, NCC-1764, Constitution class cruiser.
Originally built by:
United Federation of Planets
Captured by:
The Tholian Assembly in TOS S3E09 "The Tholian Web"
Captured by, and incorporated into the fleet of:
The Terran Empire (Mirror Universe) in ENT S4E18 & S4E19 "In a Mirror, Darkly"
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
answered Nov 9 at 14:52
Chronocidal
4735
4735
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Although it didn't last too long, the Nyrians captured Voyager in Displaced. After all the Voyager crew were replaced, their leader stated "Your vessel will be used to defend Nyrian acquisitions."
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
The question ask for ship that are 'permanently' added to the fleet, not temporarily.
– Sava
yesterday
@Sava - Sure, but the aim seems to have been to include it in their fleet
– Valorum
yesterday
@Sava True, I did overlook that.
– Brandon Dybala
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Although it didn't last too long, the Nyrians captured Voyager in Displaced. After all the Voyager crew were replaced, their leader stated "Your vessel will be used to defend Nyrian acquisitions."
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
The question ask for ship that are 'permanently' added to the fleet, not temporarily.
– Sava
yesterday
@Sava - Sure, but the aim seems to have been to include it in their fleet
– Valorum
yesterday
@Sava True, I did overlook that.
– Brandon Dybala
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Although it didn't last too long, the Nyrians captured Voyager in Displaced. After all the Voyager crew were replaced, their leader stated "Your vessel will be used to defend Nyrian acquisitions."
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
Although it didn't last too long, the Nyrians captured Voyager in Displaced. After all the Voyager crew were replaced, their leader stated "Your vessel will be used to defend Nyrian acquisitions."
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
answered yesterday
Brandon Dybala
1757
1757
The question ask for ship that are 'permanently' added to the fleet, not temporarily.
– Sava
yesterday
@Sava - Sure, but the aim seems to have been to include it in their fleet
– Valorum
yesterday
@Sava True, I did overlook that.
– Brandon Dybala
yesterday
add a comment |
The question ask for ship that are 'permanently' added to the fleet, not temporarily.
– Sava
yesterday
@Sava - Sure, but the aim seems to have been to include it in their fleet
– Valorum
yesterday
@Sava True, I did overlook that.
– Brandon Dybala
yesterday
The question ask for ship that are 'permanently' added to the fleet, not temporarily.
– Sava
yesterday
The question ask for ship that are 'permanently' added to the fleet, not temporarily.
– Sava
yesterday
@Sava - Sure, but the aim seems to have been to include it in their fleet
– Valorum
yesterday
@Sava - Sure, but the aim seems to have been to include it in their fleet
– Valorum
yesterday
@Sava True, I did overlook that.
– Brandon Dybala
yesterday
@Sava True, I did overlook that.
– Brandon Dybala
yesterday
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198218%2fhave-we-ever-seen-a-captured-ship-incorporated-permanently-in-the-enemys-fleet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
11
It strikes me that a captured ship would be a millstone. Constantly breaking down, hard to maintain, permanently lacking dedicated drydock facilities, in desperate need of hard-to-get spares and hated by the crews. Over time it would simply break as soon as a unique part was unavailable and you'd have to refit it to take your own systems, like O'Brien spent months/years trying to get DS9 to work properly.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:33
9
You mean, like Deep Space 9? :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:34
2
I was also thinking of the Iraqi experience in Gulf I. They left entire batallions of tanks on the battlefield for the want of $1 parts that could have been easily sourced if they hadn't been under embargo.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:35
3
And I was thinking about Earth "sea ships" being boarded and captured by enemy forces, repainted / given a new name and flag, and then used to attack the enemy and their former-sister ships. I AM aware that wooden ships were much simpler and more compatible than starships :) Still, I would like to see Starfleet facing a Galaxy-class starship repainted and manned by Klingons/Romulans, just because they failed to destroy it before it was captured.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 9 at 12:43
1
The more complex a ship or vessel, the more requirement there is to have specialist single-usage parts. My car, for example, can't function without its computer module and those modules are only available from the manufacturer. In a few decades, those parts will be obsolete and the car will be too, even though it might remain in mint condition otherwise. And all for want of a $5 module.
– Valorum
Nov 9 at 12:47