Does it really make sense to talk about the color of gluons?
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
It is my understanding that by enforcing SU(3) gauge invariance on our lagrangian of 3-colored quark fields, we are forced to accept the existence of 8 new massless vector fields, the gluons. The 8 here comes directly from the dimension of SU(3).
That being said I often see discussions about the gluons in terms of linear combinations of $rbar r$, $bbar b$, etc.
This simply cant be the nature of the gluons though can it? Because it seems to imply that the number of colors and the number of gluon fuelds are not independant, while they clearly are.
Certainly gluons are not singlets in color space and so they must have color, but it doesnt make sense to me that this color of the gluons would be some mapping directly from quark color.
Thanks to anyone with the insight and time to share it!
quantum-chromodynamics gauge-invariance strong-force
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
It is my understanding that by enforcing SU(3) gauge invariance on our lagrangian of 3-colored quark fields, we are forced to accept the existence of 8 new massless vector fields, the gluons. The 8 here comes directly from the dimension of SU(3).
That being said I often see discussions about the gluons in terms of linear combinations of $rbar r$, $bbar b$, etc.
This simply cant be the nature of the gluons though can it? Because it seems to imply that the number of colors and the number of gluon fuelds are not independant, while they clearly are.
Certainly gluons are not singlets in color space and so they must have color, but it doesnt make sense to me that this color of the gluons would be some mapping directly from quark color.
Thanks to anyone with the insight and time to share it!
quantum-chromodynamics gauge-invariance strong-force
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
It is my understanding that by enforcing SU(3) gauge invariance on our lagrangian of 3-colored quark fields, we are forced to accept the existence of 8 new massless vector fields, the gluons. The 8 here comes directly from the dimension of SU(3).
That being said I often see discussions about the gluons in terms of linear combinations of $rbar r$, $bbar b$, etc.
This simply cant be the nature of the gluons though can it? Because it seems to imply that the number of colors and the number of gluon fuelds are not independant, while they clearly are.
Certainly gluons are not singlets in color space and so they must have color, but it doesnt make sense to me that this color of the gluons would be some mapping directly from quark color.
Thanks to anyone with the insight and time to share it!
quantum-chromodynamics gauge-invariance strong-force
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
It is my understanding that by enforcing SU(3) gauge invariance on our lagrangian of 3-colored quark fields, we are forced to accept the existence of 8 new massless vector fields, the gluons. The 8 here comes directly from the dimension of SU(3).
That being said I often see discussions about the gluons in terms of linear combinations of $rbar r$, $bbar b$, etc.
This simply cant be the nature of the gluons though can it? Because it seems to imply that the number of colors and the number of gluon fuelds are not independant, while they clearly are.
Certainly gluons are not singlets in color space and so they must have color, but it doesnt make sense to me that this color of the gluons would be some mapping directly from quark color.
Thanks to anyone with the insight and time to share it!
quantum-chromodynamics gauge-invariance strong-force
quantum-chromodynamics gauge-invariance strong-force
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
edited Nov 10 at 18:55
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
asked Nov 10 at 18:03
Craig
829
829
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
The quarks transform according to the fundamental representation $mathbf3$ of SU(3), and the antiquarks according to the conjugate representation $mathbfoverline 3$. The gluons transform according to the adjoint representation $mathbf8$.
The adjoint representation is contained in the product of the fundamental representation and its conjugate:
$$mathbf3otimes mathbfoverline 3 = mathbf8oplus mathbf1$$
Therefore gluons are conventionally labeled using color-anticolor combinations, avoiding the color singlet combination $(roverliner+boverlineb+goverlineg)/sqrt3$.
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
Awesome do you have a any sources/papers/books I could find more about this?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:53
As well; in a universe where we had say, 4 or 5 colors and 8 gluons, how would this work?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:57
1
@Craig, are you familiar with representation theory? A big concept is that the same group can be "represented" with larger or smaller vector spaces. In this case, the quarks have the minimum number of vectors needed to realize SU(3) symmetry, and the gluons have (very loosely) that maximum number of vectors that can have the SU(3) symmetry, one for each dimension. If we had 4 colors, then we would instead want $4otimes bar 4 = 15oplus 1$, and we would have 15 gluon fields for the 4 colors.
– Alex Meiburg
Nov 10 at 19:01
The adjoint reprsentation of SU(n) has dimension $n^2-1$. So if you have 4 colors there need to be 15 gluons and if you have 5 colors there need to be 24 gluons.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 19:05
I’ll let others suggest the best references. But you need to clarify what you main interest is. The mathematics of representation theory? (For example, how do you figure out how an arbitrary product of irreducible representations decomposes into irreducible representations?) The physics of QCD, or the whole Standard Model? The reason why quantum field theory involves group representations? Etc.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 20:25
|
show 7 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440142%2fdoes-it-really-make-sense-to-talk-about-the-color-of-gluons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
The quarks transform according to the fundamental representation $mathbf3$ of SU(3), and the antiquarks according to the conjugate representation $mathbfoverline 3$. The gluons transform according to the adjoint representation $mathbf8$.
The adjoint representation is contained in the product of the fundamental representation and its conjugate:
$$mathbf3otimes mathbfoverline 3 = mathbf8oplus mathbf1$$
Therefore gluons are conventionally labeled using color-anticolor combinations, avoiding the color singlet combination $(roverliner+boverlineb+goverlineg)/sqrt3$.
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
Awesome do you have a any sources/papers/books I could find more about this?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:53
As well; in a universe where we had say, 4 or 5 colors and 8 gluons, how would this work?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:57
1
@Craig, are you familiar with representation theory? A big concept is that the same group can be "represented" with larger or smaller vector spaces. In this case, the quarks have the minimum number of vectors needed to realize SU(3) symmetry, and the gluons have (very loosely) that maximum number of vectors that can have the SU(3) symmetry, one for each dimension. If we had 4 colors, then we would instead want $4otimes bar 4 = 15oplus 1$, and we would have 15 gluon fields for the 4 colors.
– Alex Meiburg
Nov 10 at 19:01
The adjoint reprsentation of SU(n) has dimension $n^2-1$. So if you have 4 colors there need to be 15 gluons and if you have 5 colors there need to be 24 gluons.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 19:05
I’ll let others suggest the best references. But you need to clarify what you main interest is. The mathematics of representation theory? (For example, how do you figure out how an arbitrary product of irreducible representations decomposes into irreducible representations?) The physics of QCD, or the whole Standard Model? The reason why quantum field theory involves group representations? Etc.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 20:25
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
6
down vote
The quarks transform according to the fundamental representation $mathbf3$ of SU(3), and the antiquarks according to the conjugate representation $mathbfoverline 3$. The gluons transform according to the adjoint representation $mathbf8$.
The adjoint representation is contained in the product of the fundamental representation and its conjugate:
$$mathbf3otimes mathbfoverline 3 = mathbf8oplus mathbf1$$
Therefore gluons are conventionally labeled using color-anticolor combinations, avoiding the color singlet combination $(roverliner+boverlineb+goverlineg)/sqrt3$.
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
Awesome do you have a any sources/papers/books I could find more about this?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:53
As well; in a universe where we had say, 4 or 5 colors and 8 gluons, how would this work?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:57
1
@Craig, are you familiar with representation theory? A big concept is that the same group can be "represented" with larger or smaller vector spaces. In this case, the quarks have the minimum number of vectors needed to realize SU(3) symmetry, and the gluons have (very loosely) that maximum number of vectors that can have the SU(3) symmetry, one for each dimension. If we had 4 colors, then we would instead want $4otimes bar 4 = 15oplus 1$, and we would have 15 gluon fields for the 4 colors.
– Alex Meiburg
Nov 10 at 19:01
The adjoint reprsentation of SU(n) has dimension $n^2-1$. So if you have 4 colors there need to be 15 gluons and if you have 5 colors there need to be 24 gluons.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 19:05
I’ll let others suggest the best references. But you need to clarify what you main interest is. The mathematics of representation theory? (For example, how do you figure out how an arbitrary product of irreducible representations decomposes into irreducible representations?) The physics of QCD, or the whole Standard Model? The reason why quantum field theory involves group representations? Etc.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 20:25
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
The quarks transform according to the fundamental representation $mathbf3$ of SU(3), and the antiquarks according to the conjugate representation $mathbfoverline 3$. The gluons transform according to the adjoint representation $mathbf8$.
The adjoint representation is contained in the product of the fundamental representation and its conjugate:
$$mathbf3otimes mathbfoverline 3 = mathbf8oplus mathbf1$$
Therefore gluons are conventionally labeled using color-anticolor combinations, avoiding the color singlet combination $(roverliner+boverlineb+goverlineg)/sqrt3$.
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
The quarks transform according to the fundamental representation $mathbf3$ of SU(3), and the antiquarks according to the conjugate representation $mathbfoverline 3$. The gluons transform according to the adjoint representation $mathbf8$.
The adjoint representation is contained in the product of the fundamental representation and its conjugate:
$$mathbf3otimes mathbfoverline 3 = mathbf8oplus mathbf1$$
Therefore gluons are conventionally labeled using color-anticolor combinations, avoiding the color singlet combination $(roverliner+boverlineb+goverlineg)/sqrt3$.
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
edited Nov 11 at 20:17
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
answered Nov 10 at 18:49
G. Smith
3,623917
3,623917
Awesome do you have a any sources/papers/books I could find more about this?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:53
As well; in a universe where we had say, 4 or 5 colors and 8 gluons, how would this work?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:57
1
@Craig, are you familiar with representation theory? A big concept is that the same group can be "represented" with larger or smaller vector spaces. In this case, the quarks have the minimum number of vectors needed to realize SU(3) symmetry, and the gluons have (very loosely) that maximum number of vectors that can have the SU(3) symmetry, one for each dimension. If we had 4 colors, then we would instead want $4otimes bar 4 = 15oplus 1$, and we would have 15 gluon fields for the 4 colors.
– Alex Meiburg
Nov 10 at 19:01
The adjoint reprsentation of SU(n) has dimension $n^2-1$. So if you have 4 colors there need to be 15 gluons and if you have 5 colors there need to be 24 gluons.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 19:05
I’ll let others suggest the best references. But you need to clarify what you main interest is. The mathematics of representation theory? (For example, how do you figure out how an arbitrary product of irreducible representations decomposes into irreducible representations?) The physics of QCD, or the whole Standard Model? The reason why quantum field theory involves group representations? Etc.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 20:25
|
show 7 more comments
Awesome do you have a any sources/papers/books I could find more about this?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:53
As well; in a universe where we had say, 4 or 5 colors and 8 gluons, how would this work?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:57
1
@Craig, are you familiar with representation theory? A big concept is that the same group can be "represented" with larger or smaller vector spaces. In this case, the quarks have the minimum number of vectors needed to realize SU(3) symmetry, and the gluons have (very loosely) that maximum number of vectors that can have the SU(3) symmetry, one for each dimension. If we had 4 colors, then we would instead want $4otimes bar 4 = 15oplus 1$, and we would have 15 gluon fields for the 4 colors.
– Alex Meiburg
Nov 10 at 19:01
The adjoint reprsentation of SU(n) has dimension $n^2-1$. So if you have 4 colors there need to be 15 gluons and if you have 5 colors there need to be 24 gluons.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 19:05
I’ll let others suggest the best references. But you need to clarify what you main interest is. The mathematics of representation theory? (For example, how do you figure out how an arbitrary product of irreducible representations decomposes into irreducible representations?) The physics of QCD, or the whole Standard Model? The reason why quantum field theory involves group representations? Etc.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 20:25
Awesome do you have a any sources/papers/books I could find more about this?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:53
Awesome do you have a any sources/papers/books I could find more about this?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:53
As well; in a universe where we had say, 4 or 5 colors and 8 gluons, how would this work?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:57
As well; in a universe where we had say, 4 or 5 colors and 8 gluons, how would this work?
– Craig
Nov 10 at 18:57
1
1
@Craig, are you familiar with representation theory? A big concept is that the same group can be "represented" with larger or smaller vector spaces. In this case, the quarks have the minimum number of vectors needed to realize SU(3) symmetry, and the gluons have (very loosely) that maximum number of vectors that can have the SU(3) symmetry, one for each dimension. If we had 4 colors, then we would instead want $4otimes bar 4 = 15oplus 1$, and we would have 15 gluon fields for the 4 colors.
– Alex Meiburg
Nov 10 at 19:01
@Craig, are you familiar with representation theory? A big concept is that the same group can be "represented" with larger or smaller vector spaces. In this case, the quarks have the minimum number of vectors needed to realize SU(3) symmetry, and the gluons have (very loosely) that maximum number of vectors that can have the SU(3) symmetry, one for each dimension. If we had 4 colors, then we would instead want $4otimes bar 4 = 15oplus 1$, and we would have 15 gluon fields for the 4 colors.
– Alex Meiburg
Nov 10 at 19:01
The adjoint reprsentation of SU(n) has dimension $n^2-1$. So if you have 4 colors there need to be 15 gluons and if you have 5 colors there need to be 24 gluons.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 19:05
The adjoint reprsentation of SU(n) has dimension $n^2-1$. So if you have 4 colors there need to be 15 gluons and if you have 5 colors there need to be 24 gluons.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 19:05
I’ll let others suggest the best references. But you need to clarify what you main interest is. The mathematics of representation theory? (For example, how do you figure out how an arbitrary product of irreducible representations decomposes into irreducible representations?) The physics of QCD, or the whole Standard Model? The reason why quantum field theory involves group representations? Etc.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 20:25
I’ll let others suggest the best references. But you need to clarify what you main interest is. The mathematics of representation theory? (For example, how do you figure out how an arbitrary product of irreducible representations decomposes into irreducible representations?) The physics of QCD, or the whole Standard Model? The reason why quantum field theory involves group representations? Etc.
– G. Smith
Nov 10 at 20:25
|
show 7 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440142%2fdoes-it-really-make-sense-to-talk-about-the-color-of-gluons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
