Overriding mark for a single test in PyTest
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
There is a test file with a global marker for each stored test:
from pytest import mark
pytestmark = mark.unit
This works as expected and all of the tests from this file as marked as unit. However, I'd like to override the mark for a single test, so that it no longer has the unit marker.
When I use the decorator on the test function that I want to modify, instead of overriding the original marker, it contains both unit and the new integration markers:
@mark.integration
def test_integration():
pass
I've checked the marker decorator sources and it seems that it calls store_mark and has no additional properties that would let me override existing test markers.
Are there any idiomatic solutions to override existing testing marks or should I just store the tests in a separate file?
python unit-testing pytest
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
add a comment |
There is a test file with a global marker for each stored test:
from pytest import mark
pytestmark = mark.unit
This works as expected and all of the tests from this file as marked as unit. However, I'd like to override the mark for a single test, so that it no longer has the unit marker.
When I use the decorator on the test function that I want to modify, instead of overriding the original marker, it contains both unit and the new integration markers:
@mark.integration
def test_integration():
pass
I've checked the marker decorator sources and it seems that it calls store_mark and has no additional properties that would let me override existing test markers.
Are there any idiomatic solutions to override existing testing marks or should I just store the tests in a separate file?
python unit-testing pytest
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
add a comment |
There is a test file with a global marker for each stored test:
from pytest import mark
pytestmark = mark.unit
This works as expected and all of the tests from this file as marked as unit. However, I'd like to override the mark for a single test, so that it no longer has the unit marker.
When I use the decorator on the test function that I want to modify, instead of overriding the original marker, it contains both unit and the new integration markers:
@mark.integration
def test_integration():
pass
I've checked the marker decorator sources and it seems that it calls store_mark and has no additional properties that would let me override existing test markers.
Are there any idiomatic solutions to override existing testing marks or should I just store the tests in a separate file?
python unit-testing pytest
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
There is a test file with a global marker for each stored test:
from pytest import mark
pytestmark = mark.unit
This works as expected and all of the tests from this file as marked as unit. However, I'd like to override the mark for a single test, so that it no longer has the unit marker.
When I use the decorator on the test function that I want to modify, instead of overriding the original marker, it contains both unit and the new integration markers:
@mark.integration
def test_integration():
pass
I've checked the marker decorator sources and it seems that it calls store_mark and has no additional properties that would let me override existing test markers.
Are there any idiomatic solutions to override existing testing marks or should I just store the tests in a separate file?
python unit-testing pytest
python unit-testing pytest
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:28
JustACluelessNewbieJustACluelessNewbie
1,6241226
1,6241226
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I don’t think there is built-in functionality for this. You have a few options:
Implement a plugin that gives you an unmark decorator. Someone has already tried this but I haven’t tested it.
Or Put all of your unit tests in a class and decorate the class with the marker.
import pytest
@pytest.mark.unit
class TestUnits:
def test1(self):
pass
@pytest.mark.integration
def integration_test():
pass
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
Separating the tests was something that I originally did to solve this issue, I just wondered if there's a built-in solution for this. I might experiment withunmarknext time if a similar problem arises. Thanks.
– JustACluelessNewbie
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53321650%2foverriding-mark-for-a-single-test-in-pytest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don’t think there is built-in functionality for this. You have a few options:
Implement a plugin that gives you an unmark decorator. Someone has already tried this but I haven’t tested it.
Or Put all of your unit tests in a class and decorate the class with the marker.
import pytest
@pytest.mark.unit
class TestUnits:
def test1(self):
pass
@pytest.mark.integration
def integration_test():
pass
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
Separating the tests was something that I originally did to solve this issue, I just wondered if there's a built-in solution for this. I might experiment withunmarknext time if a similar problem arises. Thanks.
– JustACluelessNewbie
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14
add a comment |
I don’t think there is built-in functionality for this. You have a few options:
Implement a plugin that gives you an unmark decorator. Someone has already tried this but I haven’t tested it.
Or Put all of your unit tests in a class and decorate the class with the marker.
import pytest
@pytest.mark.unit
class TestUnits:
def test1(self):
pass
@pytest.mark.integration
def integration_test():
pass
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
Separating the tests was something that I originally did to solve this issue, I just wondered if there's a built-in solution for this. I might experiment withunmarknext time if a similar problem arises. Thanks.
– JustACluelessNewbie
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14
add a comment |
I don’t think there is built-in functionality for this. You have a few options:
Implement a plugin that gives you an unmark decorator. Someone has already tried this but I haven’t tested it.
Or Put all of your unit tests in a class and decorate the class with the marker.
import pytest
@pytest.mark.unit
class TestUnits:
def test1(self):
pass
@pytest.mark.integration
def integration_test():
pass
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
I don’t think there is built-in functionality for this. You have a few options:
Implement a plugin that gives you an unmark decorator. Someone has already tried this but I haven’t tested it.
Or Put all of your unit tests in a class and decorate the class with the marker.
import pytest
@pytest.mark.unit
class TestUnits:
def test1(self):
pass
@pytest.mark.integration
def integration_test():
pass
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
edited Nov 20 '18 at 16:51
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:04
soundstripesoundstripe
52038
52038
Separating the tests was something that I originally did to solve this issue, I just wondered if there's a built-in solution for this. I might experiment withunmarknext time if a similar problem arises. Thanks.
– JustACluelessNewbie
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14
add a comment |
Separating the tests was something that I originally did to solve this issue, I just wondered if there's a built-in solution for this. I might experiment withunmarknext time if a similar problem arises. Thanks.
– JustACluelessNewbie
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14
Separating the tests was something that I originally did to solve this issue, I just wondered if there's a built-in solution for this. I might experiment with
unmark next time if a similar problem arises. Thanks.– JustACluelessNewbie
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14
Separating the tests was something that I originally did to solve this issue, I just wondered if there's a built-in solution for this. I might experiment with
unmark next time if a similar problem arises. Thanks.– JustACluelessNewbie
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53321650%2foverriding-mark-for-a-single-test-in-pytest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
