Is there a way a more efficient way to write the IF statement









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is the there a more efficient way to write the below IF statement so I only need 2 lines of code or can this be solved with a ternary operator ?



 if(postIds.size()>0) 
PostProperty(postIds);

if(putIds.size()>0)
PutProperty(putIds);










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Is the there a more efficient way to write the below IF statement so I only need 2 lines of code or can this be solved with a ternary operator ?



     if(postIds.size()>0) 
    PostProperty(postIds);

    if(putIds.size()>0)
    PutProperty(putIds);










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Is the there a more efficient way to write the below IF statement so I only need 2 lines of code or can this be solved with a ternary operator ?



       if(postIds.size()>0) 
      PostProperty(postIds);

      if(putIds.size()>0)
      PutProperty(putIds);










      share|improve this question













      Is the there a more efficient way to write the below IF statement so I only need 2 lines of code or can this be solved with a ternary operator ?



       if(postIds.size()>0) 
      PostProperty(postIds);

      if(putIds.size()>0)
      PutProperty(putIds);







      apex list conditional if






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 10 at 10:57









      Thomas

      631213




      631213




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          We use the coding convention that the curly brackets can be skipped if the condition is placed on a single line to make these common cases less cluttered looking. (Such conventions generally cause great debate though.)



          So in your case it would be:



          if (postIds.size() > 0) PostProperty(postIds);
          if (putIds.size() > 0) PutProperty(putIds);


          Your logic has 4 outcomes so a simple ternary if won't work as that only has 2 outcomes; ternary if is really for methods that return a value that is to be assigned to a variable.



          Guards like those could be put inside the methods, particularly if the methods are called from several places. Then the calling code reads more cleanly.



          If by "efficiency" you are thinking about execution speed then don't: making it easy for people to understand what the code is doing is the most important thing most of the time.






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "459"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f238938%2fis-there-a-way-a-more-efficient-way-to-write-the-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            We use the coding convention that the curly brackets can be skipped if the condition is placed on a single line to make these common cases less cluttered looking. (Such conventions generally cause great debate though.)



            So in your case it would be:



            if (postIds.size() > 0) PostProperty(postIds);
            if (putIds.size() > 0) PutProperty(putIds);


            Your logic has 4 outcomes so a simple ternary if won't work as that only has 2 outcomes; ternary if is really for methods that return a value that is to be assigned to a variable.



            Guards like those could be put inside the methods, particularly if the methods are called from several places. Then the calling code reads more cleanly.



            If by "efficiency" you are thinking about execution speed then don't: making it easy for people to understand what the code is doing is the most important thing most of the time.






            share|improve this answer


























              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              We use the coding convention that the curly brackets can be skipped if the condition is placed on a single line to make these common cases less cluttered looking. (Such conventions generally cause great debate though.)



              So in your case it would be:



              if (postIds.size() > 0) PostProperty(postIds);
              if (putIds.size() > 0) PutProperty(putIds);


              Your logic has 4 outcomes so a simple ternary if won't work as that only has 2 outcomes; ternary if is really for methods that return a value that is to be assigned to a variable.



              Guards like those could be put inside the methods, particularly if the methods are called from several places. Then the calling code reads more cleanly.



              If by "efficiency" you are thinking about execution speed then don't: making it easy for people to understand what the code is doing is the most important thing most of the time.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted






                We use the coding convention that the curly brackets can be skipped if the condition is placed on a single line to make these common cases less cluttered looking. (Such conventions generally cause great debate though.)



                So in your case it would be:



                if (postIds.size() > 0) PostProperty(postIds);
                if (putIds.size() > 0) PutProperty(putIds);


                Your logic has 4 outcomes so a simple ternary if won't work as that only has 2 outcomes; ternary if is really for methods that return a value that is to be assigned to a variable.



                Guards like those could be put inside the methods, particularly if the methods are called from several places. Then the calling code reads more cleanly.



                If by "efficiency" you are thinking about execution speed then don't: making it easy for people to understand what the code is doing is the most important thing most of the time.






                share|improve this answer














                We use the coding convention that the curly brackets can be skipped if the condition is placed on a single line to make these common cases less cluttered looking. (Such conventions generally cause great debate though.)



                So in your case it would be:



                if (postIds.size() > 0) PostProperty(postIds);
                if (putIds.size() > 0) PutProperty(putIds);


                Your logic has 4 outcomes so a simple ternary if won't work as that only has 2 outcomes; ternary if is really for methods that return a value that is to be assigned to a variable.



                Guards like those could be put inside the methods, particularly if the methods are called from several places. Then the calling code reads more cleanly.



                If by "efficiency" you are thinking about execution speed then don't: making it easy for people to understand what the code is doing is the most important thing most of the time.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 10 at 11:17

























                answered Nov 10 at 11:05









                Keith C

                93.7k1088199




                93.7k1088199



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f238938%2fis-there-a-way-a-more-efficient-way-to-write-the-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Use pre created SQLite database for Android project in kotlin

                    Darth Vader #20

                    Ondo