TCP/IP localhost communcation issue
I am using Qt and QTcpSocket class to develop two console applications communicating each other via socket in localhost on the same machine. This has to be done via socket for backward compatibility.
During the execution, a third application requires a lot of CPU, which usage goes quickly to 100% for some seconds. I can't avoid this behavior. In this situation, the communication gets a delay (i.e. the string sent from the application A is received by the application B many hundreds of ms later).
Obviously, the socket runs in a specific thread and I set the thread's priority to TimeCritical:
QThread::currentThread()->setPriority(QThread::TimeCriticalPriority);
Do you know how to solve this problem?
Thanks
Here you have a brief example of what happens. A simple server and client communicate each other. Every time the server sends a new message, an elapsed timer is started. If the client answers later than 300ms an exception is raised.
Unfortunately, I cannot share with you the third application (the one that requires a lot of CPU, since it's a licensed program). Anyway I suppose that if you are able to saturate for some seconds all the processors, the problem should come out.
qt cpu-usage tcp-ip qtcpsocket thread-priority
add a comment |
I am using Qt and QTcpSocket class to develop two console applications communicating each other via socket in localhost on the same machine. This has to be done via socket for backward compatibility.
During the execution, a third application requires a lot of CPU, which usage goes quickly to 100% for some seconds. I can't avoid this behavior. In this situation, the communication gets a delay (i.e. the string sent from the application A is received by the application B many hundreds of ms later).
Obviously, the socket runs in a specific thread and I set the thread's priority to TimeCritical:
QThread::currentThread()->setPriority(QThread::TimeCriticalPriority);
Do you know how to solve this problem?
Thanks
Here you have a brief example of what happens. A simple server and client communicate each other. Every time the server sends a new message, an elapsed timer is started. If the client answers later than 300ms an exception is raised.
Unfortunately, I cannot share with you the third application (the one that requires a lot of CPU, since it's a licensed program). Anyway I suppose that if you are able to saturate for some seconds all the processors, the problem should come out.
qt cpu-usage tcp-ip qtcpsocket thread-priority
can you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Redanium
Nov 12 '18 at 20:03
which OS do you use? setPriority() is not supported on linux doc.qt.io/archives/qt-4.8/qthread.html#setPriority
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:00
On Linux you may run your program with ‚nice‘, on windows you can set the execution execution rights, if you have an admin account: support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/110853/…
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:06
No, my two applications run in Windows. Editing the post to attach an example.
– Andrea Quattrini
Nov 14 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
I am using Qt and QTcpSocket class to develop two console applications communicating each other via socket in localhost on the same machine. This has to be done via socket for backward compatibility.
During the execution, a third application requires a lot of CPU, which usage goes quickly to 100% for some seconds. I can't avoid this behavior. In this situation, the communication gets a delay (i.e. the string sent from the application A is received by the application B many hundreds of ms later).
Obviously, the socket runs in a specific thread and I set the thread's priority to TimeCritical:
QThread::currentThread()->setPriority(QThread::TimeCriticalPriority);
Do you know how to solve this problem?
Thanks
Here you have a brief example of what happens. A simple server and client communicate each other. Every time the server sends a new message, an elapsed timer is started. If the client answers later than 300ms an exception is raised.
Unfortunately, I cannot share with you the third application (the one that requires a lot of CPU, since it's a licensed program). Anyway I suppose that if you are able to saturate for some seconds all the processors, the problem should come out.
qt cpu-usage tcp-ip qtcpsocket thread-priority
I am using Qt and QTcpSocket class to develop two console applications communicating each other via socket in localhost on the same machine. This has to be done via socket for backward compatibility.
During the execution, a third application requires a lot of CPU, which usage goes quickly to 100% for some seconds. I can't avoid this behavior. In this situation, the communication gets a delay (i.e. the string sent from the application A is received by the application B many hundreds of ms later).
Obviously, the socket runs in a specific thread and I set the thread's priority to TimeCritical:
QThread::currentThread()->setPriority(QThread::TimeCriticalPriority);
Do you know how to solve this problem?
Thanks
Here you have a brief example of what happens. A simple server and client communicate each other. Every time the server sends a new message, an elapsed timer is started. If the client answers later than 300ms an exception is raised.
Unfortunately, I cannot share with you the third application (the one that requires a lot of CPU, since it's a licensed program). Anyway I suppose that if you are able to saturate for some seconds all the processors, the problem should come out.
qt cpu-usage tcp-ip qtcpsocket thread-priority
qt cpu-usage tcp-ip qtcpsocket thread-priority
edited Nov 14 '18 at 8:09
Andrea Quattrini
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:11
Andrea QuattriniAndrea Quattrini
12
12
can you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Redanium
Nov 12 '18 at 20:03
which OS do you use? setPriority() is not supported on linux doc.qt.io/archives/qt-4.8/qthread.html#setPriority
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:00
On Linux you may run your program with ‚nice‘, on windows you can set the execution execution rights, if you have an admin account: support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/110853/…
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:06
No, my two applications run in Windows. Editing the post to attach an example.
– Andrea Quattrini
Nov 14 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
can you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Redanium
Nov 12 '18 at 20:03
which OS do you use? setPriority() is not supported on linux doc.qt.io/archives/qt-4.8/qthread.html#setPriority
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:00
On Linux you may run your program with ‚nice‘, on windows you can set the execution execution rights, if you have an admin account: support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/110853/…
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:06
No, my two applications run in Windows. Editing the post to attach an example.
– Andrea Quattrini
Nov 14 '18 at 7:51
can you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Redanium
Nov 12 '18 at 20:03
can you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Redanium
Nov 12 '18 at 20:03
which OS do you use? setPriority() is not supported on linux doc.qt.io/archives/qt-4.8/qthread.html#setPriority
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:00
which OS do you use? setPriority() is not supported on linux doc.qt.io/archives/qt-4.8/qthread.html#setPriority
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:00
On Linux you may run your program with ‚nice‘, on windows you can set the execution execution rights, if you have an admin account: support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/110853/…
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:06
On Linux you may run your program with ‚nice‘, on windows you can set the execution execution rights, if you have an admin account: support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/110853/…
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:06
No, my two applications run in Windows. Editing the post to attach an example.
– Andrea Quattrini
Nov 14 '18 at 7:51
No, my two applications run in Windows. Editing the post to attach an example.
– Andrea Quattrini
Nov 14 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53266014%2ftcp-ip-localhost-communcation-issue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53266014%2ftcp-ip-localhost-communcation-issue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
can you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Redanium
Nov 12 '18 at 20:03
which OS do you use? setPriority() is not supported on linux doc.qt.io/archives/qt-4.8/qthread.html#setPriority
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:00
On Linux you may run your program with ‚nice‘, on windows you can set the execution execution rights, if you have an admin account: support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/110853/…
– transistor
Nov 12 '18 at 22:06
No, my two applications run in Windows. Editing the post to attach an example.
– Andrea Quattrini
Nov 14 '18 at 7:51